Skip to content

Assessment of Asthma Control Level in Primary Care Setting in Malaysia

A Prospective Observational Multi Center Study to Assess the Level of Asthma Control at Government Health Clinics (Klinik Kesihatan) in Malaysia.

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03804632
Acronym
ASCOPE
Enrollment
1011
Registered
2019-01-15
Start date
2017-10-23
Completion date
2018-06-06
Last updated
2019-05-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Asthma Control Level

Brief summary

A prospective observational multi center study to assess the level of asthma control at Primary Care Setting; government health clinics (Klinik Kesihatan) in Malaysia. The specific objective of the study is to assess, in real-life clinical practice in Malaysia, the level of asthma control and the potential risk factors for uncontrolled disease in asthma patients treated at government health clinics.

Detailed description

Despite the availability of GINA global guideline on asthma management which is widely referred by health care providers in Malaysia, the control of asthma is still a critical challenge. According to National Health and Morbidity Survey 2011, the prevalence of asthma in Malaysia is at 6.3%. Based on self-rated health status, 5.5% of patients were reported to be in good health whereas 9.9% reported poor health status although medications such as inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and long-acting beta agonists (LABA) are widely available for effective asthma management. There is limited data to assess the level of asthma control at the Primary Care Setting in Malaysia which includes current clinical manifestation and future risk of exacerbation. Given the lack of data on Asthma control level, the awareness on the current disease control level will assist to properly characterise the patients based on GINA control level thus leading to appropriate diagnosis and treatment. The specific objective of the study is to assess, in real-life clinical practice in Malaysia, the level of GINA-defined asthma control and the potential risk factors for uncontrolled disease in asthma patients.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

AstraZeneca
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Malaysians who have been diagnosed with Asthma by a physician verified by an investigator and seen at government health clinic (Klinik Kesihatan) from October - December 2017 * Be at least 18 years of age

Exclusion criteria

* Clinical features suggesting emphysema or chronic bronchitis and other chronic lung diagnosis * Pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Level of GINA-defined asthma controlup to 8 monthsGINA-defined asthma control: According to clinical characteristics that include daytime symptoms, limitations of activity, nocturnal symptoms/awakening, need for reliever/rescue treatment. Patient's are classified as controlled, partially controlled or uncontrolled.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Types of medication prescribed for asthma controlup to 8 monthsPharmacological management used for asthma control
Asthma control levelup to 8 monthsAsthma control is evaluated by patients' self-completion of the Asthma Control Test (ACT). The ACT is a reliable, valid tool that helps physicians identify patients with uncontrolled asthma in a clinical setting. The questionnaire assesses the frequency of asthma symptoms and patients' own perception of asthma control during the previous 4 weeks. Based on the sum of scores, complete asthma control (25 points), well-controlled asthma (20-24 points) or no asthma control (≤19 points) is revealed.
Adherence level in patients with inhalersup to 8 monthsAdherence level measured by Malaysia Medication Adherence Scale (MALMAS) The first item of the MALMAS has five responses: (1) All the time, (2) Often, (3) Sometimes, (4) Rarely and (5) Never. The remaining seven items have a dichotomous response of Yes or No. The responses in the MALMAS were scored based on the MMAS-8 where the total score ranged from 0 to 8. Both instruments categorized medication adherence based on the total scores obtained: low adherence (total score\<6), medium adherence (6 to \< 8) and high adherence (total score = 8)

Countries

Malaysia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026