Skip to content

Resource Availability Following Critical Illness

Perception of Quality of Life and Resource Availability After Surviving Critical Illness

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03800628
Enrollment
30
Registered
2019-01-11
Start date
2018-12-07
Completion date
2019-08-30
Last updated
2019-01-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Quality of Life

Keywords

survivor, QOL, resources

Brief summary

The purpose of this qualitative study is to explore the vital issues in recovery of QOL from the perspective of survivors of critical illness and understand these patients' views on rehabilitative services in the United States (U.S.). The theoretical framework for this study is Max Weber's Rational Choice Theory (RCT). The research questions will focus on understanding post-ICU QOL and the patients' experience with rehabilitative services following critical illness. A phenomenological study design is being employed, using semi-structured individual interviews with critical illness survivors. Data from the interviews will be coded for thematic analysis. The implications for social change include defining the meaning of QOL for an ICU survivor and improving healthcare policies for the therapies necessary to return survivors to a life worth living.

Detailed description

The purpose of this qualitative study is to understand the patient perception of QOL after surviving critical illness and how survivors can help illuminate gaps in current health policies to provide better recovery resources for this growing population. The central research questions are: RQ1: What are the issues important to preserve quality of life from the perspective of critical illness survivors? RQ2: How do survivors of critical illness describe rehabilitative services after discharge?

Interventions

semi-structured interviews

Sponsors

Wake Forest University Health Sciences
CollaboratorOTHER
Walden University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
OTHER

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* critical illness survivors within 18 months of ICU discharge * minimum 48 hours of mechanical ventilation * ability to read and understand English * over the age of 18

Exclusion criteria

* emotional or psychological inability to participate in a 30-min interview * not meeting inclusion criteria

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
RQ1: What are the issues important to preserve quality of life from the perspective of critical illness survivors?6 monthssemi-structured, open-ended qualitative interview

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactMichelle M McMoon
michelle.mcmoon@waldenu.edu410-300-2786

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026