Skip to content

Early Palliative Care for Patients With Haematological Malignancies

Early Palliative Care for Patients With Haematological Malignancies: A Randomised Prospective Study

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03800095
Acronym
CALVI
Enrollment
140
Registered
2019-01-11
Start date
2019-03-14
Completion date
2023-12-31
Last updated
2021-03-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma, Myelodysplastic Syndrome, Palliative Care

Keywords

Supportive care, Early palliative care, Quality of life, Symptoms management, Haematological malignancy

Brief summary

Patients suffering from haematological disease present symptoms of discomfort and currently benefit from palliative care skills only for the management of their end-of-life. However, in medical oncology, more and more studies tend to demonstrate the benefit on the quality of life of an early collaboration between the two specialties. Investigator did the hypothesis that early integration of palliative care with conventional haematological care could decrease discomfort symptoms and add a real benefit on the patients' quality of life .

Detailed description

Patients suffering from haematological disease present symptoms of discomfort and currently benefit from palliative care skills only for the management of their end-of-life. However, in medical oncology, more and more studies tend to demonstrate the benefit on the quality of life of an early collaboration between the two specialties. Investigator did the hypothesis that early integration of palliative care with conventional haematological care could decrease discomfort symptoms and add a real benefit on the patients' quality of life .

Interventions

The follow-up time for each patient is 12 months with evaluation of the main objective by a standardized questionnaire: The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anaemia (FACT-An) Scale at 6 months. Throughout the study, patients included will receive conventional haematological care and the interventional arm will benefit in addition to a monthly consultation by a palliative care team.

Sponsors

Fondation Apicil
CollaboratorOTHER
Association des foulées de la Haute Lozère
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Association CEMSBM
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Connaître et Combattre les Myélodysplasies
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Masking description

no masking

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
70 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients are over 70 years old * Patients from being diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome or after the third line of therapy for high-grade lymphoma.

Exclusion criteria

* All patients with a curative project (induction chemotherapy ou allogenic transplantation) * All patients in a terminal palliative status * Patients who don't speak French, * Patients not able to read and write * Patients who don't agree to participate in the protocol * Patients with psychiatric troubles or cognitive disorders * Patients under guardianship or curatorship, deprived of freedom or under justice protection.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of life evaluation: standardized questionnaireat 6 monthsEvaluation of quality of life by a standardized questionnaire : Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anemia (FACT-An). The higher is the score the better is the quality of life. FACT-An is composed by five subscales: Physical Well-Being \[score range 0-28\], Social/Family Well-Being \[score range 0-28\], Emotional Well-Being \[score range 0-24\], and Functional Well-Being \[score range 0-28\] and specific questions concerning anemia \[score range 0-80\]. The score at each items is summed. The sum is multiplied par the number of items in the subscale and then divided by the number of items answered. This produces the subscale score. The subscale scores are added to derive total score \[score range 0-188\].

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Presence of discomfort symptomsat Day 0, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 monthsevaluated by Edmonton scale (depressive syndrome measured by the geriatric depression scale GDS)
overall survivalat day 1 : from the randomization until the date of death or until 1 year [study end].
Satisfaction of the care pathwaydesired by the patientat 12 months or deathmatching between patients desires writing in the medical file and the providing care
cost-effectiveness analysisat 12 months or deathThe cost criteria selected will be all the direct medical costs inherent in care in both arms (costs of hospitalizations, consultations, treatments, medical devices).

Countries

France

Contacts

Primary ContactLise LACLAUTRE
drci@chu-clermontferrand.fr0473754963

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026