Skip to content

Botulinum Toxin Type A Injection After Topical Anesthesia Versus Petrolatum Ointment

Randomized, Single Center, Masked Study Comparing the Efficacy of Botulinum Toxin Type A Injection After Topical Anesthesia Versus Petrolatum Ointment

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03799484
Enrollment
14
Registered
2019-01-10
Start date
2019-01-04
Completion date
2019-06-14
Last updated
2020-06-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Forehead Rhytides, Forehead Wrinkles

Keywords

Rhytides, Forehead Wrinkles

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether there is a difference in clinical effect, duration of effect, level of discomfort and patient satisfaction in patients receiving topical anesthesia on one side of the forehead and petrolatum ointment on the other prior to Botulinum Toxin Type A administration for the treatment of forehead rhytides.

Detailed description

This is a prospective, randomized, double-masked, comparative study in patients who present at the Robert Cizik Eye Clinic with horizontal forehead rhytides requiring treatment with botulinum toxin Type A (Botox ®; Allergan, Irvine, CA, USA). The objective of this study is to determine whether there is a difference in clinical effect (weakness/paralysis of the frontalis muscle), duration of effect, level of discomfort and patient satisfaction in patients receiving topical anesthesia (2.5% lidocaine/2.5 % prilocaine cream, Impax Laboratories, LLC) on one side of the forehead and petrolatum ointment on the other prior to BTX-A administration for the treatment of forehead rhytides. * Primary outcome variable is change of eyebrow excursion on each side of the forehead from baseline to each follow-up visit. * Secondary outcome variables * Duration of effect, defined as the elapsed time from injection to the end of botulinum, such that return of baseline frontalis function, i.e. within 2 mm of baseline value * Perception of pain immediately after injection at each side * Patient satisfaction for each side * Patient's perception of difference in efficacy

Interventions

DRUGBotulinum toxin type A

Botulinum toxin type A will be administered to both sides

DRUG2.5% lidocaine/2.5% prilocaine

2.5% lidocaine/2.5% prilocaine will be applied to one side of the forehead

petrolatum ointment will be applied to one side of the forehead

Sponsors

Robert Cizik Eye Clinic
CollaboratorOTHER
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Randomization will only be known by the principal investigator performing the injections and will not be disclosed to the participants or the brow excursion examiner.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* 18 to 65 years of age * Presence of horizontal forehead rhytides * Good eyebrow excursion (greater than or equal to 5 mm) * Able to understand and sign an informed consent form that has been approved by the Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects

Exclusion criteria

* Previous injection of botulinum toxin in the intended treatment area for the study within the last 4 months * Known allergy to botulinum toxin * Known history of sensitivity to local anesthetics of the amide type * Existing disorder of neuromuscular transmission * Usage of medication with effect on neuromuscular function * Women of childbearing potential (who are not postmenopausal for at least 1 year or surgically sterile), who are pregnant or nursing or intend to become pregnant during the time of the study * Significant brow asymmetry (\> 5mm) * Unable to follow-up for the duration of the study (16 weeks)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Eyebrow ExcursionBaselineParticipants will be asked to raise the brows, and the excursion of the brow from resting position to maximum elevation will be measured in millimeters.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Perception of Pain Immediately After Injection as Assessed by a Visual Analogue ScaleImmediately after botox injectionA visual analogue scale will be used to assess pain. The scale ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (the worse pain possible), with lower scores indicating a better outcome.
Participant Satisfaction With Overall Appearance of Forehead as Assessed by a Patient Satisfaction SurveyWeek 2The survey will be assessed using a rating scale with the following categories: very satisfied, satisfied, neutral, dissatisfied, and very dissatisfied.
Duration of Botulinum Toxin Type A Effectweek 16Loss of Botulinum Toxin Type A effect is defined as return of baseline frontalis muscle function (function prior to injection) as indicated by eyebrow excursion measurement within 2 millimeters of baseline value.
Participant Satisfaction With Appearance of Left Side of Forehead as Assessed by a Patient Satisfaction SurveyWeek 2The survey will be assessed using a rating scale with the following categories: very satisfied, satisfied, neutral, dissatisfied, and very dissatisfied.
Number of Participants Who Perceive a Difference in Efficacy Between the 2 Sides of Their FaceWeek 2Participants will be asked if there is a noticeable difference between the 2 sides of their face.
Participant Satisfaction With Appearance of Right Side of Forehead as Assessed by a Patient Satisfaction SurveyWeek 2The survey will be assessed using a rating scale with the following categories: very satisfied, satisfied, neutral, dissatisfied, and very dissatisfied.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Participants
2.5% Lidocaine/2.5% Prilocaine Cream will be applied to one side of the forehead and Petrolatum Ointment to the other side of the forehead prior to administration of Botulinum Toxin Type A Injection.
14
Total14

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Participants
Age, Continuous35.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.7
Distance between both lateral canthi98.29 millimeters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.43
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic
6 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
7 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
14 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
9 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
5 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 140 / 14
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 140 / 14
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 140 / 14

Outcome results

Primary

Eyebrow Excursion

Time frame: week 16

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Topical AnesthesiaEyebrow Excursion8.21 millimetersStandard Deviation 2.89
PetrolatumEyebrow Excursion8.07 millimetersStandard Deviation 2.97
Primary

Eyebrow Excursion

Participants will be asked to raise the brows, and the excursion of the brow from resting position to maximum elevation will be measured in millimeters.

Time frame: Baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Topical AnesthesiaEyebrow Excursion10.57 millimetersStandard Deviation 3.3
PetrolatumEyebrow Excursion10.57 millimetersStandard Deviation 3.16
Primary

Eyebrow Excursion

Participants will be asked to raise the brows, and the excursion of the brow from resting position to maximum elevation will be measured in millimeters.

Time frame: Week 2

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Topical AnesthesiaEyebrow Excursion3.46 millimetersStandard Deviation 2.76
PetrolatumEyebrow Excursion3.43 millimetersStandard Deviation 2.93
Primary

Eyebrow Excursion

Participants will be asked to raise the brows, and the excursion of the brow from resting position to maximum elevation will be measured in millimeters.

Time frame: Week 6

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Topical AnesthesiaEyebrow Excursion5.96 millimetersStandard Deviation 2.62
PetrolatumEyebrow Excursion5.68 millimetersStandard Deviation 2.55
Secondary

Duration of Botulinum Toxin Type A Effect

Loss of Botulinum Toxin Type A effect is defined as return of baseline frontalis muscle function (function prior to injection) as indicated by eyebrow excursion measurement within 2 millimeters of baseline value.

Time frame: week 16

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Topical AnesthesiaDuration of Botulinum Toxin Type A Effect14.2857 weeksStandard Error 1.2317
PetrolatumDuration of Botulinum Toxin Type A Effect15.2857 weeksStandard Error 0.7301
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Perceive a Difference in Efficacy Between the 2 Sides of Their Face

Participants will be asked if there is a noticeable difference between the 2 sides of their face.

Time frame: Week 2

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Topical AnesthesiaNumber of Participants Who Perceive a Difference in Efficacy Between the 2 Sides of Their Face3 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Perceive a Difference in Efficacy Between the 2 Sides of Their Face

Participants will be asked if there is a noticeable difference between the 2 sides of their face.

Time frame: Week 16

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Topical AnesthesiaNumber of Participants Who Perceive a Difference in Efficacy Between the 2 Sides of Their Face0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Perceive a Difference in Efficacy Between the 2 Sides of Their Face

Participants will be asked if there is a noticeable difference between the 2 sides of their face.

Time frame: Week 6

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Topical AnesthesiaNumber of Participants Who Perceive a Difference in Efficacy Between the 2 Sides of Their Face2 Participants
Secondary

Participant Satisfaction With Appearance of Left Side of Forehead as Assessed by a Patient Satisfaction Survey

The survey will be assessed using a rating scale with the following categories: very satisfied, satisfied, neutral, dissatisfied, and very dissatisfied.

Time frame: Week 6

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Topical AnesthesiaParticipant Satisfaction With Appearance of Left Side of Forehead as Assessed by a Patient Satisfaction Surveyneutral1 Participants
Topical AnesthesiaParticipant Satisfaction With Appearance of Left Side of Forehead as Assessed by a Patient Satisfaction Surveydissatisfied0 Participants
Topical AnesthesiaParticipant Satisfaction With Appearance of Left Side of Forehead as Assessed by a Patient Satisfaction Surveyvery dissatisfied0 Participants
Topical AnesthesiaParticipant Satisfaction With Appearance of Left Side of Forehead as Assessed by a Patient Satisfaction Surveyvery satisfied6 Participants
Topical AnesthesiaParticipant Satisfaction With Appearance of Left Side of Forehead as Assessed by a Patient Satisfaction Surveysatisfied7 Participants
Secondary

Participant Satisfaction With Appearance of Left Side of Forehead as Assessed by a Patient Satisfaction Survey

The survey will be assessed using a rating scale with the following categories: very satisfied, satisfied, neutral, dissatisfied, and very dissatisfied.

Time frame: Week 16

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Topical AnesthesiaParticipant Satisfaction With Appearance of Left Side of Forehead as Assessed by a Patient Satisfaction Surveyvery satisfied8 Participants
Topical AnesthesiaParticipant Satisfaction With Appearance of Left Side of Forehead as Assessed by a Patient Satisfaction Surveysatisfied2 Participants
Topical AnesthesiaParticipant Satisfaction With Appearance of Left Side of Forehead as Assessed by a Patient Satisfaction Surveyneutral1 Participants
Topical AnesthesiaParticipant Satisfaction With Appearance of Left Side of Forehead as Assessed by a Patient Satisfaction Surveydissatisfied3 Participants
Topical AnesthesiaParticipant Satisfaction With Appearance of Left Side of Forehead as Assessed by a Patient Satisfaction Surveyvery dissatisfied0 Participants
Secondary

Participant Satisfaction With Appearance of Left Side of Forehead as Assessed by a Patient Satisfaction Survey

The survey will be assessed using a rating scale with the following categories: very satisfied, satisfied, neutral, dissatisfied, and very dissatisfied.

Time frame: Week 2

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Topical AnesthesiaParticipant Satisfaction With Appearance of Left Side of Forehead as Assessed by a Patient Satisfaction Surveyvery satisfied8 Participants
Topical AnesthesiaParticipant Satisfaction With Appearance of Left Side of Forehead as Assessed by a Patient Satisfaction Surveysatisfied6 Participants
Topical AnesthesiaParticipant Satisfaction With Appearance of Left Side of Forehead as Assessed by a Patient Satisfaction Surveyneutral0 Participants
Topical AnesthesiaParticipant Satisfaction With Appearance of Left Side of Forehead as Assessed by a Patient Satisfaction Surveydissatisfied0 Participants
Topical AnesthesiaParticipant Satisfaction With Appearance of Left Side of Forehead as Assessed by a Patient Satisfaction Surveyvery dissatisfied0 Participants
Secondary

Participant Satisfaction With Appearance of Right Side of Forehead as Assessed by a Patient Satisfaction Survey

The survey will be assessed using a rating scale with the following categories: very satisfied, satisfied, neutral, dissatisfied, and very dissatisfied.

Time frame: Week 6

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Topical AnesthesiaParticipant Satisfaction With Appearance of Right Side of Forehead as Assessed by a Patient Satisfaction Surveyvery satisfied7 Participants
Topical AnesthesiaParticipant Satisfaction With Appearance of Right Side of Forehead as Assessed by a Patient Satisfaction Surveysatisfied5 Participants
Topical AnesthesiaParticipant Satisfaction With Appearance of Right Side of Forehead as Assessed by a Patient Satisfaction Surveyneutral2 Participants
Topical AnesthesiaParticipant Satisfaction With Appearance of Right Side of Forehead as Assessed by a Patient Satisfaction Surveydissatisfied0 Participants
Topical AnesthesiaParticipant Satisfaction With Appearance of Right Side of Forehead as Assessed by a Patient Satisfaction Surveyvery dissatisfied0 Participants
Secondary

Participant Satisfaction With Appearance of Right Side of Forehead as Assessed by a Patient Satisfaction Survey

The survey will be assessed using a rating scale with the following categories: very satisfied, satisfied, neutral, dissatisfied, and very dissatisfied.

Time frame: Week 2

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Topical AnesthesiaParticipant Satisfaction With Appearance of Right Side of Forehead as Assessed by a Patient Satisfaction Surveyvery satisfied8 Participants
Topical AnesthesiaParticipant Satisfaction With Appearance of Right Side of Forehead as Assessed by a Patient Satisfaction Surveysatisfied6 Participants
Topical AnesthesiaParticipant Satisfaction With Appearance of Right Side of Forehead as Assessed by a Patient Satisfaction Surveyneutral0 Participants
Topical AnesthesiaParticipant Satisfaction With Appearance of Right Side of Forehead as Assessed by a Patient Satisfaction Surveydissatisfied0 Participants
Topical AnesthesiaParticipant Satisfaction With Appearance of Right Side of Forehead as Assessed by a Patient Satisfaction Surveyvery dissatisfied0 Participants
Secondary

Participant Satisfaction With Appearance of Right Side of Forehead as Assessed by a Patient Satisfaction Survey

The survey will be assessed using a rating scale with the following categories: very satisfied, satisfied, neutral, dissatisfied, and very dissatisfied.

Time frame: Week 16

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Topical AnesthesiaParticipant Satisfaction With Appearance of Right Side of Forehead as Assessed by a Patient Satisfaction Surveyvery satisfied8 Participants
Topical AnesthesiaParticipant Satisfaction With Appearance of Right Side of Forehead as Assessed by a Patient Satisfaction Surveysatisfied2 Participants
Topical AnesthesiaParticipant Satisfaction With Appearance of Right Side of Forehead as Assessed by a Patient Satisfaction Surveyneutral1 Participants
Topical AnesthesiaParticipant Satisfaction With Appearance of Right Side of Forehead as Assessed by a Patient Satisfaction Surveydissatisfied3 Participants
Topical AnesthesiaParticipant Satisfaction With Appearance of Right Side of Forehead as Assessed by a Patient Satisfaction Surveyvery dissatisfied0 Participants
Secondary

Participant Satisfaction With Overall Appearance of Forehead as Assessed by a Patient Satisfaction Survey

The survey will be assessed using a rating scale with the following categories: very satisfied, satisfied, neutral, dissatisfied, and very dissatisfied.

Time frame: Week 6

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Topical AnesthesiaParticipant Satisfaction With Overall Appearance of Forehead as Assessed by a Patient Satisfaction Surveyvery satisfied7 Participants
Topical AnesthesiaParticipant Satisfaction With Overall Appearance of Forehead as Assessed by a Patient Satisfaction Surveysatisfied6 Participants
Topical AnesthesiaParticipant Satisfaction With Overall Appearance of Forehead as Assessed by a Patient Satisfaction Surveyneutral1 Participants
Topical AnesthesiaParticipant Satisfaction With Overall Appearance of Forehead as Assessed by a Patient Satisfaction Surveydissatisfied0 Participants
Topical AnesthesiaParticipant Satisfaction With Overall Appearance of Forehead as Assessed by a Patient Satisfaction Surveyvery dissatisfied0 Participants
Secondary

Participant Satisfaction With Overall Appearance of Forehead as Assessed by a Patient Satisfaction Survey

The survey will be assessed using a rating scale with the following categories: very satisfied, satisfied, neutral, dissatisfied, and very dissatisfied.

Time frame: Week 2

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Topical AnesthesiaParticipant Satisfaction With Overall Appearance of Forehead as Assessed by a Patient Satisfaction Surveydissatisfied0 Participants
Topical AnesthesiaParticipant Satisfaction With Overall Appearance of Forehead as Assessed by a Patient Satisfaction Surveyvery dissatisfied0 Participants
Topical AnesthesiaParticipant Satisfaction With Overall Appearance of Forehead as Assessed by a Patient Satisfaction Surveyvery satisfied8 Participants
Topical AnesthesiaParticipant Satisfaction With Overall Appearance of Forehead as Assessed by a Patient Satisfaction Surveysatisfied6 Participants
Topical AnesthesiaParticipant Satisfaction With Overall Appearance of Forehead as Assessed by a Patient Satisfaction Surveyneutral0 Participants
Secondary

Participant Satisfaction With Overall Appearance of Forehead as Assessed by a Patient Satisfaction Survey

The survey will be assessed using a rating scale with the following categories: very satisfied, satisfied, neutral, dissatisfied, and very dissatisfied.

Time frame: Week 16

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Topical AnesthesiaParticipant Satisfaction With Overall Appearance of Forehead as Assessed by a Patient Satisfaction Surveyvery satisfied8 Participants
Topical AnesthesiaParticipant Satisfaction With Overall Appearance of Forehead as Assessed by a Patient Satisfaction Surveysatisfied2 Participants
Topical AnesthesiaParticipant Satisfaction With Overall Appearance of Forehead as Assessed by a Patient Satisfaction Surveyneutral1 Participants
Topical AnesthesiaParticipant Satisfaction With Overall Appearance of Forehead as Assessed by a Patient Satisfaction Surveydissatisfied3 Participants
Topical AnesthesiaParticipant Satisfaction With Overall Appearance of Forehead as Assessed by a Patient Satisfaction Surveyvery dissatisfied0 Participants
Secondary

Perception of Pain Immediately After Injection as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale

A visual analogue scale will be used to assess pain. The scale ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (the worse pain possible), with lower scores indicating a better outcome.

Time frame: Immediately after botox injection

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Topical AnesthesiaPerception of Pain Immediately After Injection as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale2.43 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.55
PetrolatumPerception of Pain Immediately After Injection as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale3.96 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.74

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026