Cirrhosis, Hepatic Encephalopathy
Conditions
Keywords
fecal microbial transplant, cirrhosis, hepatic encephalopathy
Brief summary
Patients with end stage of liver disease or cirrhosis can develop confusion due to high ammonia and inflammation. This confusion is brought upon by changes in the bacteria in the bowels and may not respond to current standard of care treatments. Repeated episodes of confusion can make it difficult for patients to function and may result in multiple admissions to the hospital and burden on the family. The investigators have studied using a healthy person's stool to replace the bowel bacteria, called fecal microbial transplant, in small studies with good results. In this trial the investigators propose to perform these procedures using an upper and lower route in Veterans who suffer from this condition and follow them for safety and HE and related hospitalizations over 6 months. The investigators will compare this to placebo treatments and hope that this intervention can improve the health and daily functioning of affected patients.
Detailed description
Indication: Cirrhosis and hepatic encephalopathy Study Objectives: To evaluate the safety and tolerability of fecal transplant in patients with cirrhosis and hepatic encephalopathy Rationale and Supporting Evidence: Hepatic encephalopathy affects 30-45% of patients with cirrhosis and adversely affects survival in these patients. The mainstay of treatment for hepatic encephalopathy (HE) has long been the manipulation of the gut flora through antibiotics, prebiotics or probiotics. The current first and second line therapies for HE in the US are lactulose and rifaximin respectively that uniquely act within the confines of the gut lumen with encouraging clinical results. However, there is a subset of patients with HE that continues to recur despite being on both treatments. This patient group is at a higher risk of poor outcomes because HE has now been removed from liver transplant priority and multiple episodes of HE can result in cumulative brain injury which may be irreversible. Therefore, the prevention of recurrent HE is an important therapeutic goal. The investigators' group and other reports have shown that patients with HE and cirrhosis are more likely to have overgrowth of potentially pathogenic bacterial taxa such as Enterobacteriaceae and reduction of autochthonous species such as Lachnospiraceae and Ruminococcaceae in the stool and the colonic mucosa. This has been linked to poor performance on cognitive tests that are a hallmark of HE and with increased systemic inflammation in these patients. Therefore, a gut-based therapeutic option that can potentially improve the recurrence rate and the overall prognosis is needed. Fecal transplant has been shown to be effective in conditions with predominant gut-bacterial overgrowth or alteration such as recurrent Clostridium difficile and inflammatory bowel disease. Safe protocols have been developed across the world and studies are being performed in the US under FDA-monitored INDs. Limitations to performing fecal transplant include identifying and screening appropriate donors, which is time consuming and costly, with the cost typically falling to the patient or donor as the required screening is generally not covered by insurance. The investigators' preliminary data suggest that a one-time administration of an FMT-enema using a rationally-selected donor is safe in patients with cirrhosis and recurrent HE. However, given the small bowel overgrowth and the predominantly small bowel location for bacterial translocation in cirrhosis, which is out of the reach of an enema, an upper GI route for FMT needs to be explored. In the investigators' published experience, a single enema from a rationally-derived donor was associated with significantly lower total and HE-related hospitalizations compared to patients who were randomized to standard of care, with a stable long-term course over \>1 year. The investigators' data show that FMT was associated with favorable changes in fecal bile acid (BA) profile with a decrease in proportions of fecal secondary BAs, conjugated BAs and increase in sulfated BAs, indicating a healthier milieu. The investigators also have preliminary data defining the safety of oral FMT capsules in patients with cirrhosis and HE in a current trial led by us. The use of combined oral and rectal routes of FMT, which can potentially alleviate both small bowel and colonic translocation are likely to be better than either alone. Overall aim: To determine the effect of dual oral and rectal administration of FMT from a rational donor on clinical outcomes (HE and related hospitalizations, brain function, quality of life) and host-microbiota interactions (microbial composition and bile acid composition with systemic and intestinal inflammation), compared to single route of administration and placebo, along with a second oral capsular FMT vs placebo administration in patients with cirrhosis and HE using a randomized, phase II clinical trial. Design overview: Four groups of outpatients with cirrhosis will be randomized using random sequence generator into placebo and FMT groups and followed for 6 months under an FDA IND double-blind clinical trial.
Interventions
Oral capsules of FMT
FMT enema
Placebo
Sponsors
Study design
Intervention model description
Subjects will be divided into 4 groups via randomization Group 1: Dual oral and rectal FMT, Group 2: Oral FMT and rectal placebo, Group 3: Oral placebo and rectal FMT and Group 4: Oral and rectal placebo
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Cirrhosis diagnosed by either of the following in a patient with chronic liver disease * Liver Biopsy * Radiologic evidence of varices, cirrhosis or portal hypertension * Laboratory evidence of platelet count \<100,000 or AST/ALT ratio\>1 * Endoscopic evidence of varices or portal gastropathy * Fibroscan values suggestive of cirrhosis * On treatment for hepatic encephalopathy (patient can be on lactulose and rifaximin) * Able to give written, informed consent (demonstrated by mini-mental status exam\>25 at the time of consenting) * Women of child bearing potential must agree to use effective contraception for the duration of the study and for 10 days prior and 30 days after the study * Negative pregnancy test in women of childbearing age
Exclusion criteria
* MELD score \>22 * WBC count \<1000 cells/mm3 * Platelet count\<25,000/mm3 * TIPS in place for less than a month * Currently on antibiotics apart from rifaximin * Infection at the time of the FMT (diagnosed by blood culture positivity, urinalysis, paracentesis as needed) * Hospitalization for any non-elective cause within the last 1 month * Patients who are pregnant or nursing (will be checked using a urine pregnancy test) * Patients who are incarcerated * Patients who are incapable of giving their own informed consent * Patients who are immuno-compromised due to the following reasons: * HIV infection (any CD4 count) * Inherited/primary immune disorders * Current or recent (\<3 mos) treatment with anti-neoplastic agent * Current or recent (\<3 mos) treatment with any immunosuppressant medications \[including but not limited to monoclonal antibodies to B and T cells, anti-TNF agents, glucocorticoids, antimetabolites (azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine), calcineurin inhibitors (tacrolimus, cyclosporine), mycophenolate mofetil\]. * Subjects who are otherwise immunocompetent and have discontinued any immunosuppressant medications 3 or more months prior to enrollment may be eligible to enroll * Patients on renal replacement therapy * Patients with untreated, in-situ colorectal cancer * Patients with a history of chronic intrinsic GI diseases such as inflammatory bowel disease * ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease or microscopic colitis * eosinophilic gastroenteritis or celiac disease * Major gastro-intestinal or intra-abdominal surgery in the last three months Other
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Serious Adverse Events Related to FMT | 6 months | Number of patients with serious adverse events between groups related to FMT, especially related to HE |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Microbial Diversity in Stool | 6 months | Shannon diversity index compared to baseline and engraftment related to the donor at baseline, within 30 days and then monthly till 6 months. Ranges usually from 0-10, higher values represent a better diversity. There are no maximum values. |
| Sickness Impact Profile Change | 30 days and 6 months | Quality of life assessment change defined by Sickness Impact Profile total score at 30 days and 6 months between groups. This is a percentage result ranges usually from 0-100. A higher score indicates worse quality of life related to the participant's health within 24 hours. |
| Psychometric Hepatic Encephalopathy Score Performance Change | 60 days | Cognitive assessment change using the Psychometric hepatic encephalopathy score between groups at 60 days Range is -15 to +5 and higher is better |
| Adverse Events Related to FMT | 6 months | Number of patients with adverse events that do not fit the criteria of serious adverse events between groups related to FMT |
| Change in Microbial Diversity in Saliva | 60 days | Shannon diversity index compared to baseline at 30 days and then monthly till 6 months. Ranges usually from 0-10. Higher values represent a better diversity. There are no maximum values. |
| HE Related Events | 6 months | Number of patients with Hepatic encephalopathy related events |
| EncephalApp Stroop Off and On Time Change | 60 days | Cognitive assessment change using the Stroop Off and On Time change at 60 days and 6 months. This is in seconds. EncephalApp stroop is a computerized test of attention, psychomotor speed and cognitive flexibility. A higher time required to complete 5 correct runs in both Off and On stages is the measure here. There no maximum values but the lower amount of time that is needed, the better is the cognitive function. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Placebo Oral and rectal placebo at visit 2 Oral placebo at day 30
Placebo: Placebo | 15 |
| Group 3: Oral Placebo and Rectal FMT Oral placebo and rectal FMT at visit 2 Oral placebo at day 30
Fecal Microbial Transplant Enema: FMT enema
Placebo: Placebo | 15 |
| Group 2: Oral FMT and Rectal Placebo Oral FMT and rectal placebo at visit 2 Oral FMT at day 30
Fecal Microbial transplant Capsules: Oral capsules of FMT | 15 |
| Group 1: Dual Oral and Rectal FMT Dual Oral and rectal FMT at visit 2 Oral FMT at day 30
Fecal Microbial transplant Capsules: Oral capsules of FMT
Fecal Microbial Transplant Enema: FMT enema | 15 |
| Total | 60 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Group 3: Oral Placebo and Rectal FMT | Group 2: Oral FMT and Rectal Placebo | Group 1: Dual Oral and Rectal FMT | Total | Placebo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 60.6 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.3 | 63.0 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.7 | 65.0 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.1 | 63.0 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.2 | 63.4 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.5 |
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | — | — | — | 0 Participants | — |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 15 Participants | 15 Participants | 15 Participants | 60 Participants | 15 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 1 Participants | 3 Participants | 5 Participants | 12 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 14 Participants | 12 Participants | 10 Participants | 48 Participants | 12 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 1 / 15 | 0 / 15 | 1 / 15 | 1 / 15 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 15 | 0 / 15 | 0 / 15 | 0 / 15 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 6 / 15 | 5 / 15 | 5 / 15 | 6 / 15 |
Outcome results
Serious Adverse Events Related to FMT
Number of patients with serious adverse events between groups related to FMT, especially related to HE
Time frame: 6 months
Population: number of patients
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Serious Adverse Events Related to FMT | 0 Participants |
| Group 3: Oral Placebo and Rectal FMT | Serious Adverse Events Related to FMT | 0 Participants |
| Group 2: Oral FMT and Rectal Placebo | Serious Adverse Events Related to FMT | 0 Participants |
| Group 1: Dual Oral and Rectal FMT | Serious Adverse Events Related to FMT | 0 Participants |
Adverse Events Related to FMT
Number of patients with adverse events that do not fit the criteria of serious adverse events between groups related to FMT
Time frame: 6 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Adverse Events Related to FMT | 0 Participants |
| Group 3: Oral Placebo and Rectal FMT | Adverse Events Related to FMT | 0 Participants |
| Group 2: Oral FMT and Rectal Placebo | Adverse Events Related to FMT | 0 Participants |
| Group 1: Dual Oral and Rectal FMT | Adverse Events Related to FMT | 0 Participants |
Change in Microbial Diversity in Saliva
Shannon diversity index compared to baseline at 30 days and then monthly till 6 months. Ranges usually from 0-10. Higher values represent a better diversity. There are no maximum values.
Time frame: 60 days
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change in Microbial Diversity in Saliva | 1.55 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.39 |
| Group 3: Oral Placebo and Rectal FMT | Change in Microbial Diversity in Saliva | 1.57 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.72 |
| Group 2: Oral FMT and Rectal Placebo | Change in Microbial Diversity in Saliva | 1.57 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.3 |
| Group 1: Dual Oral and Rectal FMT | Change in Microbial Diversity in Saliva | 1.56 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.29 |
Change in Microbial Diversity in Stool
Shannon diversity index compared to baseline and engraftment related to the donor at baseline, within 30 days and then monthly till 6 months. Ranges usually from 0-10, higher values represent a better diversity. There are no maximum values.
Time frame: 6 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change in Microbial Diversity in Stool | 1.45 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.37 |
| Group 3: Oral Placebo and Rectal FMT | Change in Microbial Diversity in Stool | 1.46 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.33 |
| Group 2: Oral FMT and Rectal Placebo | Change in Microbial Diversity in Stool | 1.71 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.33 |
| Group 1: Dual Oral and Rectal FMT | Change in Microbial Diversity in Stool | 1.53 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.72 |
EncephalApp Stroop Off and On Time Change
Cognitive assessment change using the Stroop Off and On Time change at 60 days and 6 months. This is in seconds. EncephalApp stroop is a computerized test of attention, psychomotor speed and cognitive flexibility. A higher time required to complete 5 correct runs in both Off and On stages is the measure here. There no maximum values but the lower amount of time that is needed, the better is the cognitive function.
Time frame: 60 days
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | EncephalApp Stroop Off and On Time Change | 218.5 units on a scale (seconds) |
| Group 3: Oral Placebo and Rectal FMT | EncephalApp Stroop Off and On Time Change | 194.1 units on a scale (seconds) |
| Group 2: Oral FMT and Rectal Placebo | EncephalApp Stroop Off and On Time Change | 184.8 units on a scale (seconds) |
| Group 1: Dual Oral and Rectal FMT | EncephalApp Stroop Off and On Time Change | 235.3 units on a scale (seconds) |
HE Related Events
Number of patients with Hepatic encephalopathy related events
Time frame: 6 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | HE Related Events | 6 Participants |
| Group 3: Oral Placebo and Rectal FMT | HE Related Events | 0 Participants |
| Group 2: Oral FMT and Rectal Placebo | HE Related Events | 2 Participants |
| Group 1: Dual Oral and Rectal FMT | HE Related Events | 2 Participants |
Psychometric Hepatic Encephalopathy Score Performance Change
Cognitive assessment change using the Psychometric hepatic encephalopathy score between groups at 60 days Range is -15 to +5 and higher is better
Time frame: 60 days
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Psychometric Hepatic Encephalopathy Score Performance Change | -7 score on a scale |
| Group 3: Oral Placebo and Rectal FMT | Psychometric Hepatic Encephalopathy Score Performance Change | -3 score on a scale |
| Group 2: Oral FMT and Rectal Placebo | Psychometric Hepatic Encephalopathy Score Performance Change | -5 score on a scale |
| Group 1: Dual Oral and Rectal FMT | Psychometric Hepatic Encephalopathy Score Performance Change | -5.5 score on a scale |
Sickness Impact Profile Change
Quality of life assessment change defined by Sickness Impact Profile total score at 30 days and 6 months between groups. This is a percentage result ranges usually from 0-100. A higher score indicates worse quality of life related to the participant's health within 24 hours.
Time frame: 30 days and 6 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Sickness Impact Profile Change | 9.63 units on a scale |
| Group 3: Oral Placebo and Rectal FMT | Sickness Impact Profile Change | 15.62 units on a scale |
| Group 2: Oral FMT and Rectal Placebo | Sickness Impact Profile Change | 18.15 units on a scale |
| Group 1: Dual Oral and Rectal FMT | Sickness Impact Profile Change | 15.94 units on a scale |