Skip to content

FMT in Cirrhosis and Hepatic Encephalopathy

Fecal Microbiota Transplant in Veterans With Cirrhosis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03796598
Enrollment
60
Registered
2019-01-08
Start date
2019-07-29
Completion date
2023-12-20
Last updated
2025-05-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cirrhosis, Hepatic Encephalopathy

Keywords

fecal microbial transplant, cirrhosis, hepatic encephalopathy

Brief summary

Patients with end stage of liver disease or cirrhosis can develop confusion due to high ammonia and inflammation. This confusion is brought upon by changes in the bacteria in the bowels and may not respond to current standard of care treatments. Repeated episodes of confusion can make it difficult for patients to function and may result in multiple admissions to the hospital and burden on the family. The investigators have studied using a healthy person's stool to replace the bowel bacteria, called fecal microbial transplant, in small studies with good results. In this trial the investigators propose to perform these procedures using an upper and lower route in Veterans who suffer from this condition and follow them for safety and HE and related hospitalizations over 6 months. The investigators will compare this to placebo treatments and hope that this intervention can improve the health and daily functioning of affected patients.

Detailed description

Indication: Cirrhosis and hepatic encephalopathy Study Objectives: To evaluate the safety and tolerability of fecal transplant in patients with cirrhosis and hepatic encephalopathy Rationale and Supporting Evidence: Hepatic encephalopathy affects 30-45% of patients with cirrhosis and adversely affects survival in these patients. The mainstay of treatment for hepatic encephalopathy (HE) has long been the manipulation of the gut flora through antibiotics, prebiotics or probiotics. The current first and second line therapies for HE in the US are lactulose and rifaximin respectively that uniquely act within the confines of the gut lumen with encouraging clinical results. However, there is a subset of patients with HE that continues to recur despite being on both treatments. This patient group is at a higher risk of poor outcomes because HE has now been removed from liver transplant priority and multiple episodes of HE can result in cumulative brain injury which may be irreversible. Therefore, the prevention of recurrent HE is an important therapeutic goal. The investigators' group and other reports have shown that patients with HE and cirrhosis are more likely to have overgrowth of potentially pathogenic bacterial taxa such as Enterobacteriaceae and reduction of autochthonous species such as Lachnospiraceae and Ruminococcaceae in the stool and the colonic mucosa. This has been linked to poor performance on cognitive tests that are a hallmark of HE and with increased systemic inflammation in these patients. Therefore, a gut-based therapeutic option that can potentially improve the recurrence rate and the overall prognosis is needed. Fecal transplant has been shown to be effective in conditions with predominant gut-bacterial overgrowth or alteration such as recurrent Clostridium difficile and inflammatory bowel disease. Safe protocols have been developed across the world and studies are being performed in the US under FDA-monitored INDs. Limitations to performing fecal transplant include identifying and screening appropriate donors, which is time consuming and costly, with the cost typically falling to the patient or donor as the required screening is generally not covered by insurance. The investigators' preliminary data suggest that a one-time administration of an FMT-enema using a rationally-selected donor is safe in patients with cirrhosis and recurrent HE. However, given the small bowel overgrowth and the predominantly small bowel location for bacterial translocation in cirrhosis, which is out of the reach of an enema, an upper GI route for FMT needs to be explored. In the investigators' published experience, a single enema from a rationally-derived donor was associated with significantly lower total and HE-related hospitalizations compared to patients who were randomized to standard of care, with a stable long-term course over \>1 year. The investigators' data show that FMT was associated with favorable changes in fecal bile acid (BA) profile with a decrease in proportions of fecal secondary BAs, conjugated BAs and increase in sulfated BAs, indicating a healthier milieu. The investigators also have preliminary data defining the safety of oral FMT capsules in patients with cirrhosis and HE in a current trial led by us. The use of combined oral and rectal routes of FMT, which can potentially alleviate both small bowel and colonic translocation are likely to be better than either alone. Overall aim: To determine the effect of dual oral and rectal administration of FMT from a rational donor on clinical outcomes (HE and related hospitalizations, brain function, quality of life) and host-microbiota interactions (microbial composition and bile acid composition with systemic and intestinal inflammation), compared to single route of administration and placebo, along with a second oral capsular FMT vs placebo administration in patients with cirrhosis and HE using a randomized, phase II clinical trial. Design overview: Four groups of outpatients with cirrhosis will be randomized using random sequence generator into placebo and FMT groups and followed for 6 months under an FDA IND double-blind clinical trial.

Interventions

Oral capsules of FMT

OTHERPlacebo

Placebo

Sponsors

VA Office of Research and Development
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Subjects will be divided into 4 groups via randomization Group 1: Dual oral and rectal FMT, Group 2: Oral FMT and rectal placebo, Group 3: Oral placebo and rectal FMT and Group 4: Oral and rectal placebo

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Cirrhosis diagnosed by either of the following in a patient with chronic liver disease * Liver Biopsy * Radiologic evidence of varices, cirrhosis or portal hypertension * Laboratory evidence of platelet count \<100,000 or AST/ALT ratio\>1 * Endoscopic evidence of varices or portal gastropathy * Fibroscan values suggestive of cirrhosis * On treatment for hepatic encephalopathy (patient can be on lactulose and rifaximin) * Able to give written, informed consent (demonstrated by mini-mental status exam\>25 at the time of consenting) * Women of child bearing potential must agree to use effective contraception for the duration of the study and for 10 days prior and 30 days after the study * Negative pregnancy test in women of childbearing age

Exclusion criteria

* MELD score \>22 * WBC count \<1000 cells/mm3 * Platelet count\<25,000/mm3 * TIPS in place for less than a month * Currently on antibiotics apart from rifaximin * Infection at the time of the FMT (diagnosed by blood culture positivity, urinalysis, paracentesis as needed) * Hospitalization for any non-elective cause within the last 1 month * Patients who are pregnant or nursing (will be checked using a urine pregnancy test) * Patients who are incarcerated * Patients who are incapable of giving their own informed consent * Patients who are immuno-compromised due to the following reasons: * HIV infection (any CD4 count) * Inherited/primary immune disorders * Current or recent (\<3 mos) treatment with anti-neoplastic agent * Current or recent (\<3 mos) treatment with any immunosuppressant medications \[including but not limited to monoclonal antibodies to B and T cells, anti-TNF agents, glucocorticoids, antimetabolites (azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine), calcineurin inhibitors (tacrolimus, cyclosporine), mycophenolate mofetil\]. * Subjects who are otherwise immunocompetent and have discontinued any immunosuppressant medications 3 or more months prior to enrollment may be eligible to enroll * Patients on renal replacement therapy * Patients with untreated, in-situ colorectal cancer * Patients with a history of chronic intrinsic GI diseases such as inflammatory bowel disease * ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease or microscopic colitis * eosinophilic gastroenteritis or celiac disease * Major gastro-intestinal or intra-abdominal surgery in the last three months Other

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Serious Adverse Events Related to FMT6 monthsNumber of patients with serious adverse events between groups related to FMT, especially related to HE

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Microbial Diversity in Stool6 monthsShannon diversity index compared to baseline and engraftment related to the donor at baseline, within 30 days and then monthly till 6 months. Ranges usually from 0-10, higher values represent a better diversity. There are no maximum values.
Sickness Impact Profile Change30 days and 6 monthsQuality of life assessment change defined by Sickness Impact Profile total score at 30 days and 6 months between groups. This is a percentage result ranges usually from 0-100. A higher score indicates worse quality of life related to the participant's health within 24 hours.
Psychometric Hepatic Encephalopathy Score Performance Change60 daysCognitive assessment change using the Psychometric hepatic encephalopathy score between groups at 60 days Range is -15 to +5 and higher is better
Adverse Events Related to FMT6 monthsNumber of patients with adverse events that do not fit the criteria of serious adverse events between groups related to FMT
Change in Microbial Diversity in Saliva60 daysShannon diversity index compared to baseline at 30 days and then monthly till 6 months. Ranges usually from 0-10. Higher values represent a better diversity. There are no maximum values.
HE Related Events6 monthsNumber of patients with Hepatic encephalopathy related events
EncephalApp Stroop Off and On Time Change60 daysCognitive assessment change using the Stroop Off and On Time change at 60 days and 6 months. This is in seconds. EncephalApp stroop is a computerized test of attention, psychomotor speed and cognitive flexibility. A higher time required to complete 5 correct runs in both Off and On stages is the measure here. There no maximum values but the lower amount of time that is needed, the better is the cognitive function.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Oral and rectal placebo at visit 2 Oral placebo at day 30 Placebo: Placebo
15
Group 3: Oral Placebo and Rectal FMT
Oral placebo and rectal FMT at visit 2 Oral placebo at day 30 Fecal Microbial Transplant Enema: FMT enema Placebo: Placebo
15
Group 2: Oral FMT and Rectal Placebo
Oral FMT and rectal placebo at visit 2 Oral FMT at day 30 Fecal Microbial transplant Capsules: Oral capsules of FMT
15
Group 1: Dual Oral and Rectal FMT
Dual Oral and rectal FMT at visit 2 Oral FMT at day 30 Fecal Microbial transplant Capsules: Oral capsules of FMT Fecal Microbial Transplant Enema: FMT enema
15
Total60

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGroup 3: Oral Placebo and Rectal FMTGroup 2: Oral FMT and Rectal PlaceboGroup 1: Dual Oral and Rectal FMTTotalPlacebo
Age, Continuous60.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.3
63.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.7
65.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.1
63.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.2
63.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.5
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
15 Participants15 Participants15 Participants60 Participants15 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants3 Participants5 Participants12 Participants3 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
14 Participants12 Participants10 Participants48 Participants12 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 150 / 151 / 151 / 15
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 150 / 150 / 150 / 15
serious
Total, serious adverse events
6 / 155 / 155 / 156 / 15

Outcome results

Primary

Serious Adverse Events Related to FMT

Number of patients with serious adverse events between groups related to FMT, especially related to HE

Time frame: 6 months

Population: number of patients

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboSerious Adverse Events Related to FMT0 Participants
Group 3: Oral Placebo and Rectal FMTSerious Adverse Events Related to FMT0 Participants
Group 2: Oral FMT and Rectal PlaceboSerious Adverse Events Related to FMT0 Participants
Group 1: Dual Oral and Rectal FMTSerious Adverse Events Related to FMT0 Participants
Secondary

Adverse Events Related to FMT

Number of patients with adverse events that do not fit the criteria of serious adverse events between groups related to FMT

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboAdverse Events Related to FMT0 Participants
Group 3: Oral Placebo and Rectal FMTAdverse Events Related to FMT0 Participants
Group 2: Oral FMT and Rectal PlaceboAdverse Events Related to FMT0 Participants
Group 1: Dual Oral and Rectal FMTAdverse Events Related to FMT0 Participants
Secondary

Change in Microbial Diversity in Saliva

Shannon diversity index compared to baseline at 30 days and then monthly till 6 months. Ranges usually from 0-10. Higher values represent a better diversity. There are no maximum values.

Time frame: 60 days

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange in Microbial Diversity in Saliva1.55 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.39
Group 3: Oral Placebo and Rectal FMTChange in Microbial Diversity in Saliva1.57 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.72
Group 2: Oral FMT and Rectal PlaceboChange in Microbial Diversity in Saliva1.57 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3
Group 1: Dual Oral and Rectal FMTChange in Microbial Diversity in Saliva1.56 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.29
Secondary

Change in Microbial Diversity in Stool

Shannon diversity index compared to baseline and engraftment related to the donor at baseline, within 30 days and then monthly till 6 months. Ranges usually from 0-10, higher values represent a better diversity. There are no maximum values.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange in Microbial Diversity in Stool1.45 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.37
Group 3: Oral Placebo and Rectal FMTChange in Microbial Diversity in Stool1.46 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.33
Group 2: Oral FMT and Rectal PlaceboChange in Microbial Diversity in Stool1.71 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.33
Group 1: Dual Oral and Rectal FMTChange in Microbial Diversity in Stool1.53 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.72
Secondary

EncephalApp Stroop Off and On Time Change

Cognitive assessment change using the Stroop Off and On Time change at 60 days and 6 months. This is in seconds. EncephalApp stroop is a computerized test of attention, psychomotor speed and cognitive flexibility. A higher time required to complete 5 correct runs in both Off and On stages is the measure here. There no maximum values but the lower amount of time that is needed, the better is the cognitive function.

Time frame: 60 days

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
PlaceboEncephalApp Stroop Off and On Time Change218.5 units on a scale (seconds)
Group 3: Oral Placebo and Rectal FMTEncephalApp Stroop Off and On Time Change194.1 units on a scale (seconds)
Group 2: Oral FMT and Rectal PlaceboEncephalApp Stroop Off and On Time Change184.8 units on a scale (seconds)
Group 1: Dual Oral and Rectal FMTEncephalApp Stroop Off and On Time Change235.3 units on a scale (seconds)
Secondary

HE Related Events

Number of patients with Hepatic encephalopathy related events

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboHE Related Events6 Participants
Group 3: Oral Placebo and Rectal FMTHE Related Events0 Participants
Group 2: Oral FMT and Rectal PlaceboHE Related Events2 Participants
Group 1: Dual Oral and Rectal FMTHE Related Events2 Participants
Secondary

Psychometric Hepatic Encephalopathy Score Performance Change

Cognitive assessment change using the Psychometric hepatic encephalopathy score between groups at 60 days Range is -15 to +5 and higher is better

Time frame: 60 days

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
PlaceboPsychometric Hepatic Encephalopathy Score Performance Change-7 score on a scale
Group 3: Oral Placebo and Rectal FMTPsychometric Hepatic Encephalopathy Score Performance Change-3 score on a scale
Group 2: Oral FMT and Rectal PlaceboPsychometric Hepatic Encephalopathy Score Performance Change-5 score on a scale
Group 1: Dual Oral and Rectal FMTPsychometric Hepatic Encephalopathy Score Performance Change-5.5 score on a scale
Secondary

Sickness Impact Profile Change

Quality of life assessment change defined by Sickness Impact Profile total score at 30 days and 6 months between groups. This is a percentage result ranges usually from 0-100. A higher score indicates worse quality of life related to the participant's health within 24 hours.

Time frame: 30 days and 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
PlaceboSickness Impact Profile Change9.63 units on a scale
Group 3: Oral Placebo and Rectal FMTSickness Impact Profile Change15.62 units on a scale
Group 2: Oral FMT and Rectal PlaceboSickness Impact Profile Change18.15 units on a scale
Group 1: Dual Oral and Rectal FMTSickness Impact Profile Change15.94 units on a scale

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 7, 2026