Skip to content

Effect of Intervention for Colonoscopy Quality is Associated With the Personal Characteristics

Effect of Intervention for Improving Colonoscopy Quality is Associated With the Personal Characteristics of the Endoscopist

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03796169
Enrollment
15
Registered
2019-01-08
Start date
2018-12-12
Completion date
2020-02-12
Last updated
2020-09-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colonoscopy, Human Characteristics

Brief summary

This study aims to investigate whether the personal characteristics of the endoscopist is associated with effect of interventions for colonoscopy quality improvement. This is a prospective, 9-month, multicenter, single-blind study. Baseline quality indicators including adenoma detection rate, polyp detection rate, withdrawal time and adenomas per colonoscopy of each endoscopist were measured in the health promotion centers of academic hospitals for 3 months. Follow-up measurements of quality indicators were repeated every 3 months after each interventions (personal notification of quality indicators, open notification of quality indicators, and colonoscopy quality education by a GI faculty. At the end of the study, personal characteristics of each endoscopist was evaluated using fear of negative evaluation scale, cognitive flexibility inventory, and almost perfect scale.

Detailed description

Suboptimal colonoscopy quality is associated with development of interval colorectal cancer and colorectal cancer-related death. It is uncertain how to improve colonoscopy quality effectively. The quality of screening colonoscopy for colorectal cancer depends on the endoscopist who performed the examination. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of endoscopists' personal characteristics on the quality of colonoscopy and effectiveness of intervention.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALPersonal notification

Baseline quality indicators of each endoscopist were measured and those were notified individually.

BEHAVIORALOpen notification

Quality indicators were measured for 3 months after 1st interventions and those were notified openly

BEHAVIORALEducation

Quality indicators were measured for 3 months after 2nd interventions and educated the importance of colonoscopy quality by a GI faculty

Sponsors

Saint Vincent's Hospital, Korea
CollaboratorOTHER
Uijeongbu St. Mary Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Seoul St. Mary's Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
SCREENING
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Highly experienced board-certified gastroenterologists performed colonoscopies in health screening endoscopy centers. * Endoscopists who sign the consent * Patients for quality indicators of endoscopists * routinely perform outpatient screening, surveillance and diagnostic colonoscopy (first-time screening colonoscopies performed and had no previous colonoscopy within 3 years).

Exclusion criteria

* endoscopists who refuse to sign the consent * Patients for quality indicators of endoscopists * Known hereditary polyposis syndrome, Inflammatory bowel disease, those with surgically altered anatomy, undergone previous colonoscopy within 3 years

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Measurement of overall adenoma detection rate9 monthsPrimary outcome measures include overall adenoma detection rate.
Measurement of adenoma detection rate after personal notification3 months after personal notificationPrimary outcome measures include adenoma detection rate after personal notification
Measurement of adenoma detection rate after open notification3 months after open notificationPrimary outcome measures include adenoma detection rate after open notification
Measurement of adenoma detection rate after education3 months after educationPrimary outcome measures include adenoma detection rate after education

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Measurement of polyp detection rate after open notification3 months after open notificationPrimary outcome measures include polyp detection rate after open notification
Measurement of polyp detection rate after education3 months after educationPrimary outcome measures include polyp detection rate after education
Measurement of withdrawal time after personal notification3 months after personal notificationPrimary outcome measures include withdrawal time after personal notification
Measurement of withdrawal time after open notification3 months after open notificationPrimary outcome measures include withdrawal time after open notification
Measurement of overall polyp detection rate9 monthsSecondary outcome measures include overall polyp detection rate.
Measurement of adenomas per colonoscopy after personal notification3 months after personal notificationPrimary outcome measures include adenomas per colonoscopy after personal notification.
Measurement of adenomas per colonoscopy after open notification3 months after open notificationPrimary outcome measures include adenomas per colonoscopy after open notification
Measurement of adenomas per colonoscopy after education3 months after educationPrimary outcome measures include adenoma detection rate after education
Measurement of withdrawal time after education3 months after educationPrimary outcome measures include withdrawal time after education
Measurement of overall withdrawal time9 monthsSecondary outcome measures include overall withdrawal time.
Measurement of overall adenomas per colonoscopy9 monthsSecondary outcome measures include overall adenomas per colonoscopy.
Measurement of polyp detection rate after personal notification3 months after personal notificationPrimary outcome measures include polyp detection rate after personal notification

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 9, 2026