Skip to content

Clinical Evaluation of Sectional Matrix Versus Circumferential Matrix for Reproduction of Proximal Contact

Clinical Evaluation of Sectional Matrix Versus Circumferential Matrix for Reproduction of Proximal Contact by Undergraduate Students and Postgraduate Dentists: Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03795727
Enrollment
48
Registered
2019-01-08
Start date
2020-01-20
Completion date
2020-03-12
Last updated
2020-04-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Proximal Contact

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of different matricing techniques either sectional matrix or circumferential matrix on reproduction of optimum proximal contacts and contours during restoration of class II cavities with resin composite by undergraduate students or postgraduate dentists.

Interventions

DEVICEMD ring and precontoured sectional matrix by TOR VM

MD ring (separation ring) and precontoured sectional matrix (thickness 0.035mm hard) and a wedge was used to secure matrix in place

DEVICECircumferential matrix and tofflemire retainer by Kerr

Circumferential matrix (thickness 0.038mm) applied by tofflemire retainer and secured in place with wedge

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Compound class II cavities * Good oral hygiene * No spacing or crowding * Healthy peridontium

Exclusion criteria

* Complex class II cavities * Poor oral hygiene * Spacing or crowding * Evidence of peridontal disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proximal contactUp to 3 hours from randomization till contact is restoredReproduction of proximal contact either optimum, tight or loose (Categorical)

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026