Skip to content

Association Between IVUS and OCT Parameters and Invasive Physiologic Indices

Intravascular Ultrasound and Optical Coherence Tomography-Defined Optimal Criteria and Plaque Characteristics for Defining the Functional Significance of Coronary Stenoses Using Resting and Hyperemic Physiologic Indices

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03795714
Enrollment
166
Registered
2019-01-08
Start date
2017-11-17
Completion date
2019-03-31
Last updated
2019-01-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ischemic Heart Disease

Keywords

Intravascular Ultrasound, Optical Coherence Tomography, Fractional Flow Reserve, Diastolic Pressure Ratio, Resting Full-Cycle Ratio, Ischemic Heart Disease, Instantaneous Wave-free Ratio

Brief summary

1. to evaluate diagnostic accuracy and performance of IVUS and OCT-derived quantitative parameters to predict functional significance of stenosis defined using all the available physiologic indices. 2. to explores the association between intravascular imaging-derived plaque characteristics and invasive physiologic indices.

Detailed description

Given the inherent limitations of coronary angiography to depict the presence of functionally significant epicardial coronary stenosis and discrepancy between angiographic stenosis severity and the presence of myocardial ischemia, invasive physiologic indices such as fractional flow reserve (FFR) or instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) has been a standard method to guide decision of revascularization. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) are an intracoronary imaging method able to provide information about lumen area, vessel area, plaque burden, and plaque characteristics that can be used for the guidance of revascularization procedure. Several previous studies explored the diagnostic performance of intravascular imaging-defined quantitative parameters to predict functional significance defined by FFR, however, quantitative parameter derived from intravascular imaging showed only moderate diagnostic accuracy and the optimal cut-off value of intravascular imaging-derived minimal lumen area (MLA) or minimal lumen diameter (MLD) were varied according to the patient population, interrogated vessels, and the location of target lesions, suggesting limited clinical relevance of judging functional significance of target stenosis using intravascular imaging alone. Nevertheless, the adoption rate of FFR-guided decision has been limited due to various reasons and intravascular image-guided decision has been still used in substantial proportion of the patients. Recently, new resting pressure-derived indices including resting full-cycle ratio (RFR) or diastolic pressure ratio (dPR) have been introduced as other substitutes for iFR, which does not require administration of hyperemic agents, therefore, possess more convenient in daily practice. Recent study with the largest sample size demonstrated identical diagnostic property and prognostic implication among iFR, RFR, and dPR. As those resting pressure-derived indices might have more generalizability for daily practice, it is expected to raise the adoption rate of physiologic interrogation. Therefore, understanding the association between all the available physiologic indices and intravascular imaging-derived quantitative and qualitative parameters might be important in clinical decision for patient who underwent invasive coronary angiography. In this regard, the investigators sought to evaluate diagnostic accuracy and performance of intravascular imaging-derived quantitative parameters to predict functional significance of stenosis defined using all the available physiologic indices and further explores the association between IVUS and OCT-derived plaque characteristics and invasive physiologic indices.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTIVUS or OCT and Invasive physiologic indices

IVUS or OCT measurement in order to evaluate the lesion morphology and stent optimization, and invasive physiologic measurement in order to functional significance of epicardial stenosis

Sponsors

Samsung Medical Center
CollaboratorOTHER
Seoul National University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients who suspected ischemic heart disease, and underwent invasive physiologic assessment and intravascular ultrasound

Exclusion criteria

* Cardiogenic shock * Graft vessel * In-stent restenosis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Diagnostic accuracy of percent diameter stenosis assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by fractional flow reserve (FFR)During Cardiac CathDiagnostic accuracy of percent diameter stenosis assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by FFR ≤0.80
Diagnostic accuracy of percent diameter stenosis assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR)During Cardiac CathDiagnostic accuracy of percent diameter stenosis assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by iFR ≤0.89
Diagnostic accuracy of percent diameter stenosis assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by diastolic pressure ratio (dPR)During Cardiac CathDiagnostic accuracy of percent diameter stenosis assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by dPR ≤0.89
Diagnostic accuracy of percent diameter stenosis assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by resting full-cycle ratio (RFR)During Cardiac CathDiagnostic accuracy of percent diameter stenosis assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by RFR ≤0.89
Diagnostic accuracy of minimal lumen diameter assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by FFRDuring Cardiac CathDiagnostic accuracy of minimal lumen diameter assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by FFR ≤0.80
Diagnostic accuracy of minimal lumen diameter assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by iFRDuring Cardiac CathDiagnostic accuracy of minimal lumen diameter assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by iFR ≤0.89
Diagnostic accuracy of minimal lumen diameter assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by dPRDuring Cardiac CathDiagnostic accuracy of minimal lumen diameter assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by dPR ≤0.89
Diagnostic accuracy of minimal lumen diameter assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by RFRDuring Cardiac CathDiagnostic accuracy of minimal lumen diameter assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by RFR ≤0.89
Diagnostic accuracy of minimal lumen area assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by FFRDuring Cardiac CathDiagnostic accuracy of minimal lumen area assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by FFR ≤0.80
Diagnostic accuracy of minimal lumen area assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by iFRDuring Cardiac CathDiagnostic accuracy of minimal lumen area assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by iFR ≤0.89
Diagnostic accuracy of minimal lumen area assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by dPRDuring Cardiac CathDiagnostic accuracy of minimal lumen area assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by dPR ≤0.89
Diagnostic accuracy of minimal lumen area assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by RFRDuring Cardiac CathDiagnostic accuracy of minimal lumen area assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by RFR ≤0.89
Diagnostic accuracy of plaque burden assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by FFRDuring Cardiac CathDiagnostic accuracy of plaque burden assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by FFR ≤0.80
Diagnostic accuracy of plaque burden assessed by IVUS to predict functional significance assessed by iFRDuring Cardiac CathDiagnostic accuracy of plaque burden assessed by IVUS to predict functional significance defined by iFR ≤0.89
Diagnostic accuracy of plaque burden assessed by IVUS to predict functional significance assessed by dPRDuring Cardiac CathDiagnostic accuracy of plaque burden assessed by IVUS to predict functional significance defined by dPR ≤0.89
Diagnostic accuracy of plaque burden assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by RFRDuring Cardiac CathDiagnostic accuracy of plaque burden assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by RFR ≤0.89

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sensitivity of plaque burden assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by FFRDuring Cardiac CathSensitivity of plaque burden assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by FFR ≤0.80
Sensitivity of plaque burden assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by iFRDuring Cardiac CathSensitivity of plaque burden assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by iFR ≤0.89
Sensitivity of plaque burden assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by dPRDuring Cardiac CathSensitivity of plaque burden assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by dPR ≤0.89
Sensitivity of plaque burden assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by RFRDuring Cardiac CathSensitivity of minimal lumen area assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by RFR ≤0.89
Specificity of percent diameter stenosis assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by FFRDuring Cardiac CathSpecificity of percent diameter stenosis assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by FFR ≤0.80
Specificity of percent diameter stenosis assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by iFRDuring Cardiac CathSpecificity of percent diameter stenosis assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by iFR ≤0.89
Specificity of percent diameter stenosis assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by dPRDuring Cardiac CathSpecificity of percent diameter stenosis assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by dPR ≤0.89
Specificity of percent diameter stenosis assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by RFRDuring Cardiac CathSpecificity of percent diameter stenosis assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by RFR ≤0.89
Specificity of minimal lumen diameter assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by FFRDuring Cardiac CathSpecificity of minimal lumen diameter assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by FFR ≤0.80
Specificity of minimal lumen diameter assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by iFRDuring Cardiac CathSpecificity of minimal lumen diameter assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by iFR ≤0.89
Specificity of minimal lumen diameter assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by dPRDuring Cardiac CathSpecificity of minimal lumen diameter assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by dPR ≤0.89
Specificity of minimal lumen diameter assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by RFRDuring Cardiac CathSpecificity of minimal lumen diameter assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by RFR ≤0.89
Specificity of minimal lumen area assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by FFRDuring Cardiac CathSpecificity of minimal lumen area assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by FFR ≤0.80
Specificity of minimal lumen area assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by iFRDuring Cardiac CathSpecificity of minimal lumen area assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by iFR ≤0.89
Specificity of minimal lumen area assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by dPRDuring Cardiac CathSpecificity of minimal lumen area assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by dPR ≤0.89
Specificity of minimal lumen area assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by RFRDuring Cardiac CathSpecificity of minimal lumen area assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by RFR ≤0.89
Specificity of plaque burden assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by FFRDuring Cardiac CathSpecificity of plaque burden assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by FFR ≤0.80
Specificity of plaque burden assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by iFRDuring Cardiac CathSpecificity of plaque burden assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by iFR ≤0.89
Specificity of plaque burden assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by dPRDuring Cardiac CathSpecificity of plaque burden assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by dPR ≤0.89
Specificity of plaque burden assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by RFRDuring Cardiac CathSpecificity of plaque burden assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by RFR ≤0.89
Linear correlation between percent diameter stenosis and FFRDuring Cardiac CathLinear regression analysis between percent diameter stenosis and FFR
Linear correlation between percent diameter stenosis and iFRDuring Cardiac CathLinear regression analysis between percent diameter stenosis and iFR
Linear correlation between percent diameter stenosis and dPRDuring Cardiac CathLinear regression analysis between percent diameter stenosis and dPR
Linear correlation between percent diameter stenosis and RFRDuring Cardiac CathLinear regression analysis between percent diameter stenosis and RFR
Linear correlation between minimal lumen diameter and FFRDuring Cardiac CathLinear regression analysis between minimal lumen diameter and FFR
Linear correlation between minimal lumen diameter and iFRDuring Cardiac CathLinear regression analysis between minimal lumen diameter and iFR
Linear correlation between minimal lumen diameter and dPRDuring Cardiac CathLinear regression analysis between minimal lumen diameter and dPR
Linear correlation between minimal lumen diameter and RFRDuring Cardiac CathLinear regression analysis between minimal lumen diameter and RFR
Linear correlation between plaque burden and FFRDuring Cardiac CathLinear regression analysis between plaque burden and FFR
Linear correlation between plaque burden and iFRDuring Cardiac CathLinear regression analysis between plaque burden and iFR
Linear correlation between plaque burden and dPRDuring Cardiac CathLinear regression analysis between plaque burden and dPR
Linear correlation between plaque burden and RFRDuring Cardiac CathLinear regression analysis between plaque burden and RFR
Discriminatory function of percent diameter stenosis to predict functional significance assessed by FFRDuring Cardiac CathDiscriminatory function of percent diameter stenosis to predict functional significance defined by FFR≤0.80
Discriminatory function of percent diameter stenosis to predict functional significance assessed by iFRDuring Cardiac CathDiscriminatory function of percent diameter stenosis to predict functional significance defined by iFR≤0.89
Linear correlation between minimal lumen area and FFRDuring Cardiac CathLinear regression analysis between minimal lumen area and FFR
Discriminatory function of percent diameter stenosis to predict functional significance assessed by RFRDuring Cardiac CathDiscriminatory function of percent diameter stenosis to predict functional significance defined by RFR≤0.89
Discriminatory function of minimal lumen diameter to predict functional significance assessed by FFRDuring Cardiac CathDiscriminatory function of minimal lumen diameter to predict functional significance defined by FFR≤0.80
Discriminatory function of minimal lumen diameter to predict functional significance assessed by iFRDuring Cardiac CathDiscriminatory function of minimal lumen diameter to predict functional significance defined by iFR≤0.89
Discriminatory function of minimal lumen diameter to predict functional significance assessed by dPRDuring Cardiac CathDiscriminatory function of minimal lumen diameter to predict functional significance defined by dPR≤0.89
Discriminatory function of minimal lumen diameter to predict functional significance assessed by RFRDuring Cardiac CathDiscriminatory function of minimal lumen diameter to predict functional significance defined by RFR≤0.89
Discriminatory function of minimal lumen area to predict functional significance assessed by FFRDuring Cardiac CathDiscriminatory function of minimal lumen area to predict functional significance defined by FFR≤0.80
Discriminatory function of minimal lumen area to predict functional significance assessed by iFRDuring Cardiac CathDiscriminatory function of minimal lumen area to predict functional significance defined by iFR≤0.89
Discriminatory function of minimal lumen area to predict functional significance assessed by dPRDuring Cardiac CathDiscriminatory function of minimal lumen area to predict functional significance defined by dPR≤0.89
Discriminatory function of minimal lumen area to predict functional significance assessed by RFRDuring Cardiac CathDiscriminatory function of minimal lumen area to predict functional significance defined by RFR≤0.89
Discriminatory function of plaque burden to predict functional significance assessed by FFRDuring Cardiac CathDiscriminatory function of plaque burden to predict functional significance defined by FFR≤0.80
Discriminatory function of plaque burden to predict functional significance assessed by iFRDuring Cardiac CathDiscriminatory function of plaque burden to predict functional significance defined by iFR≤0.89
Discriminatory function of plaque burden to predict functional significance assessed by dPRDuring Cardiac CathDiscriminatory function of plaque burden to predict functional significance defined by dPR≤0.89
Discriminatory function of plaque burden to predict functional significance assessed by RFRDuring Cardiac CathDiscriminatory function of plaque burden to predict functional significance defined by RFR≤0.89
Discriminatory function of percent diameter stenosis to predict functional significance assessed by dPRDuring Cardiac CathDiscriminatory function of percent diameter stenosis to predict functional significance defined by dPR≤0.89
Linear correlation between minimal lumen area and iFRDuring Cardiac CathLinear regression analysis between minimal lumen area and iFR
Linear correlation between minimal lumen area and dPRDuring Cardiac CathLinear regression analysis between minimal lumen area and dPR
Linear correlation between minimal lumen area and RFRDuring Cardiac CathLinear regression analysis between minimal lumen area and RFR
Sensitivity of percent diameter stenosis assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by FFRDuring Cardiac CathSensitivity of percent diameter stenosis assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by FFR ≤0.80
Sensitivity of percent diameter stenosis assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by iFRDuring Cardiac CathSensitivity of percent diameter stenosis assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by iFR ≤0.89
Sensitivity of percent diameter stenosis assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by dPRDuring Cardiac CathSensitivity of percent diameter stenosis assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by dPR ≤0.89
Sensitivity of percent diameter stenosis assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by RFRDuring Cardiac CathSensitivity of percent diameter stenosis assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by RFR ≤0.89
Sensitivity of minimal lumen diameter assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by FFRDuring Cardiac CathSensitivity of minimal lumen diameter assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by FFR ≤0.80
Sensitivity of minimal lumen diameter assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by iFRDuring Cardiac CathSensitivity of minimal lumen diameter assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by iFR ≤0.89
Sensitivity of minimal lumen diameter assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by dPRDuring Cardiac CathSensitivity of minimal lumen diameter assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by dPR ≤0.89
Sensitivity of minimal lumen diameter assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by RFRDuring Cardiac CathSensitivity of minimal lumen diameter assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by RFR ≤0.89
Sensitivity of minimal lumen area assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by FFRDuring Cardiac CathSensitivity of minimal lumen area assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by FFR ≤0.80
Sensitivity of minimal lumen area assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by iFRDuring Cardiac CathSensitivity of minimal lumen area assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by iFR ≤0.89
Sensitivity of minimal lumen area assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by dPRDuring Cardiac CathSensitivity of minimal lumen area assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by dPR ≤0.89
Sensitivity of minimal lumen area assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by RFRDuring Cardiac CathSensitivity of minimal lumen area assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by RFR ≤0.89

Countries

South Korea

Contacts

Primary ContactJoo Myung Lee, MD, MPH, PhD
drone80@hanmail.net82-10-8884-8439
Backup ContactKi Hong Choi, MD
cardiokh@gmail.com82-10-8875-1648

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 1, 2026