Essential Tremor, Parkinson's Disease
Conditions
Brief summary
The objective of this clinical investigation is to characterize the clinical performance of Abbott's Clinician Programmer Electrode Screening Mode tool (InformityTM tool) in programming InfinityTM deep brain stimulation (DBS) systems for patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) or essential tremor (ET).
Detailed description
This is a prospective, non-randomized, single-arm, multi-center, post-market clinical investigation designed to evaluate Abbott's Informity tool for Infinity DBS systems. This clinical investigation will be conducted at up to 5 centers in the United States. Up to 40 patients were intended to enroll in the study. However the study was stopped after enrolling 8 subjects at 3 sites. Subjects participating in this clinical investigation will be followed for 6 months. The expected duration of enrollment is 6 months. The total duration of the clinical investigation is expected to be 18 months. The primary and secondary endpoints will be evaluated when all subjects have completed their 6 month follow-up visits
Interventions
Provides a standardized workflow to guide clinicians or trained healthcare providers through the deep brain stimulation monopolar review screening process
Sponsors
Study design
Masking description
Outcomes assessor will be masked to subjects' deep brain stimulation programming.
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Parkinson's disease patients: 1. Patient must provide written informed consent prior to any clinical study related procedure. 2. Patient is 18 to 80 years of age. 3. Patient is diagnosed with Parkinson's disease for at least 4 years according to standard practice. 4. Patient is willing to maintain a constant dose of anti-Parkinson's disease medication indicated as best medical management for at least 1 month prior to study enrollment. 5. Patient is willing and able to comply with the follow-up schedule for the length of the study. 6. Patient has been implanted with an 8-channel directional Infinity deep brain stimulation system in the subthalamic nucleus (STN) within the last 12 months. 7. Patient has had stable deep brain stimulation programming settings for at least 1 month prior to study enrollment. Essential tremor patients: 1. Patient must provide written informed consent prior to any clinical study related procedure. 2. Patient is 18 to 80 years of age. 3. Patient is diagnosed with essential tremor for at least 4 years according to standard practice. 4. Patient is willing to maintain a constant dose of anti-tremor medication indicated as best medical management for at least 1 month prior to study enrollment. 5. Patient is willing and able to comply with the follow-up schedule for the length of the study. 6. Patient has been implanted with an 8-channel directional Infinity deep brain stimulation system in the ventral intermediate (Vim) thalamus within the last 12 months. 7. Patient has had stable deep brain stimulation programming settings for at least 1 month prior to study enrollment.
Exclusion criteria
1. Individuals unable to make the decision to participate in a clinical investigation on their own. 2. Patient is currently programmed with segmented electrodes, and cannot tolerate omnidirectional programming. 3. Patient is being evaluated for a lead revision. 4. Patient has untreated clinically significant depression. 5. Patient has dementia that interferes with their ability to co-operate or comply with study requirements or comprehend the informed consent, as determined by the investigator. 6. Patient abuses drugs or alcohol. 7. Patient is currently enrolled or plans to enroll in another concurrent study that may confound the results of this clinical investigation. 8. Patient has a confirmation of diagnosis of a terminal illness associated with survival \<12 months. 9. Presence of other anatomic or comorbid conditions, or other medical, social, or psychological conditions that, in the investigator's opinion, could limit the patient's ability to participate in the clinical study or to comply with follow-up requirements, or impact the scientific soundness of the clinical study results. 10. Pregnant or nursing patients and those who plan pregnancy during the clinical study follow-up period.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Therapeutic Window Size With Selected Contact at the Informity Programming Visit Compared to Baseline | At Day 21 compared to baseline | Therapeutic window was defined as the electrical current at which the side effect appeared minus the electrical current at which complete therapeutic benefit was obtained. The reported value is the range of current between first side effect appearance and complete therapeutic benefit. The 'Selected contact' is the therapeutic window for the contact configuration selected for the patient's programming. The 'best contact' is the therapeutic window for the contact configuration that showed the widest therapeutic window during Informity testing. |
| Change in Therapeutic Window Size With Best Contact at the Informity Programming Visit Compared to Baseline | At Day 21 compared to baseline | Therapeutic window was defined as the electrical current at which the side effect appeared minus the electrical current at which complete therapeutic benefit was obtained. The reported value is the range of current between first side effect appearance and complete therapeutic benefit. The 'Selected contact' is the therapeutic window for the contact configuration selected for the patient's programming. The 'best contact' is the therapeutic window for the contact configuration that showed the widest therapeutic window during Informity testing. |
| Change in Therapeutic Electrical Energy Delivered (TEED) With Selected Contact at the Informity Programming Visit Compared to Baseline | At Day 21 compared to baseline | TEED measures the total energy delivered by the deep brain stimulation system, and is represented as delivery over a set, arbitrary period of time. TEED is determined by the programmed stimulation parameters and measured system impedance. The 'Selected contact' is the contact configuration selected for the patient's programming. The 'best contact' is the contact configuration with the lowest TEED during Informity testing. |
| Change in Therapeutic Electrical Energy Delivered (TEED) With Best Contact at the Informity Programming Visit Compared to Baseline | At Day 21 compared to baseline | TEED measures the total energy delivered by the deep brain stimulation system, and is represented as delivery over a set, arbitrary period of time. TEED is determined by the programmed stimulation parameters and measured system impedance. The 'Selected contact' is the contact configuration selected for the patient's programming. The 'best contact' is the contact configuration with the lowest TEED during Informity testing. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Mean Quality of Life for Essential Tremor Subjects as Measured by the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor (QUEST) at 6 Months | At 6 months | Mean quality of life will be measured by the QUEST for ET subjects at 6 months follow-up visit. The QUEST questionnaire consists of 30 items, which are rated from 0 to 4, corresponding to the frequency (from never to always). Those 30 items assess how tremor impacts a function or how it can be associated with feelings or attitudes. The 30 items contribute to five sub scales (number of items contributing to each scale in parentheses): Physical/ADL (9), Psychosocial (9), Communication (3), Hobbies/Leisure (3), and Work/Finances (6). The score on each sub scale is expressed as a percentage of the total score possible, with a higher score indicating greater dissatisfaction with that domain of QOL. Maximal score of 100 indicates worse quality of life, while minimal score 0 corresponds to best quality of life. |
| Mean Duration of Programming | At Day 21 | Duration of programming at the Informity programming visit compared to the most recent programming session prior to enrollment |
| Motor Symptom Evaluation for ET Subjects- Change in Fahn Tolosa Marin Tremor Rating Scale (FTM-TRS) Scores at 3 Months | At 3 months compared to baseline | Change in Fahn-Tolosa-Marin tremor rating scale for ET subjects at 3-month follow-up visit compared to baseline. Fahn-Tolosa-Marin tremor rating scale scores are expressed as a percentage of the total score possible (range of 0% to 100%), and lower scores indicate less severe motor symptoms. |
| Change in Therapeutic Electrical Energy Delivered (TEED) at 6 Months | At 6 months compared to baseline | Change in TEED at the 6-month follow-up visit compared to baseline |
| Change in Therapeutic Electrical Energy Delivered (TEED) at 3 Months | At 3 months compared to baseline | Change in TEED at the 3-month follow-up visit compared to baseline |
| Motor Symptom Evaluation for ET Subjects- Change in Fahn Tolosa Marin Tremor Rating Scale (FTM-TRS) Scores at 6 Months | At 6 months compared to baseline | Change in Fahn-Tolosa-Marin tremor rating scale for ET subjects at 6-month follow-up visit compared to baseline. Fahn-Tolosa-Marin tremor rating scale scores are expressed as a percentage of the total score possible (range of 0% to 100%), and lower scores indicate less severe motor symptoms. |
| Mean Quality of Life for Essential Tremor Subjects as Measured by the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor (QUEST) at Baseline | At baseline | Mean quality of life will be measured by the QUEST for ET subjects at baseline. The QUEST questionnaire consists of 30 items, which are rated from 0 to 4, corresponding to the frequency (from never to always). Those 30 items assess how tremor impacts a function or how it can be associated with feelings or attitudes. The 30 items contribute to five sub scales (number of items contributing to each scale in parentheses): Physical/ADL (9), Psychosocial (9), Communication (3), Hobbies/Leisure (3), and Work/Finances (6). The score on each sub scale is expressed as a percentage of the total score possible, with a higher score indicating greater dissatisfaction with that domain of QOL. Maximal score of 100 indicates worse quality of life, while minimal score 0 corresponds to best quality of life. |
| Mean Quality of Life for Essential Tremor Subjects as Measured by the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor (QUEST) at 3 Months | At 3 months | Mean quality of life will be measured by the QUEST for ET subjects at 3 months follow-up visit. The QUEST questionnaire consists of 30 items, which are rated from 0 to 4, corresponding to the frequency (from never to always). Those 30 items assess how tremor impacts a function or how it can be associated with feelings or attitudes. The 30 items contribute to five sub scales (number of items contributing to each scale in parentheses): Physical/ADL (9), Psychosocial (9), Communication (3), Hobbies/Leisure (3), and Work/Finances (6). The score on each sub scale is expressed as a percentage of the total score possible, with a higher score indicating greater dissatisfaction with that domain of QOL. Maximal score of 100 indicates worse quality of life, while minimal score 0 corresponds to best quality of life. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
The study enrolled a total of 8 subjects at 3 investigation sites. Of which seven subjects were diagnosed with Essential Tremor and one subject with Parkinson's Disease. The first subject enrollment was on June 26, 2019.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Single Arm Clinician programmer electrode screening mode tool
Clinician programmer electrode screening mode tool: Provides a standardized workflow to guide clinicians or trained healthcare providers through the deep brain stimulation monopolar review screening process | 8 |
| Total | 8 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Single Arm | — |
|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 64 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9 | — |
| Essential Tremor | 7 Participants | — |
| Parkinson's Disease | 1 Participants | — |
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | — | — Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 8 participants | — |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 4 Participants | — |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 4 Participants | — |
| Years of essential tremor symptoms | 26 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 16 | — |
| Years since initial diagnosis of essential tremor | 16 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10 | — |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 8 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 1 / 8 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 2 / 8 |
Outcome results
Change in Therapeutic Electrical Energy Delivered (TEED) With Best Contact at the Informity Programming Visit Compared to Baseline
TEED measures the total energy delivered by the deep brain stimulation system, and is represented as delivery over a set, arbitrary period of time. TEED is determined by the programmed stimulation parameters and measured system impedance. The 'Selected contact' is the contact configuration selected for the patient's programming. The 'best contact' is the contact configuration with the lowest TEED during Informity testing.
Time frame: At Day 21 compared to baseline
Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Single Arm | Change in Therapeutic Electrical Energy Delivered (TEED) With Best Contact at the Informity Programming Visit Compared to Baseline | Baseline | 46.6 microjoule (μJ) | Standard Deviation 30.2 |
| Single Arm | Change in Therapeutic Electrical Energy Delivered (TEED) With Best Contact at the Informity Programming Visit Compared to Baseline | Informity Programming | 31.4 microjoule (μJ) | Standard Deviation 23.9 |
Change in Therapeutic Electrical Energy Delivered (TEED) With Selected Contact at the Informity Programming Visit Compared to Baseline
TEED measures the total energy delivered by the deep brain stimulation system, and is represented as delivery over a set, arbitrary period of time. TEED is determined by the programmed stimulation parameters and measured system impedance. The 'Selected contact' is the contact configuration selected for the patient's programming. The 'best contact' is the contact configuration with the lowest TEED during Informity testing.
Time frame: At Day 21 compared to baseline
Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Single Arm | Change in Therapeutic Electrical Energy Delivered (TEED) With Selected Contact at the Informity Programming Visit Compared to Baseline | Baseline | 46.6 microjoule (μJ) | Standard Deviation 30.2 |
| Single Arm | Change in Therapeutic Electrical Energy Delivered (TEED) With Selected Contact at the Informity Programming Visit Compared to Baseline | Informity Programming | 65.6 microjoule (μJ) | Standard Deviation 94.5 |
Change in Therapeutic Window Size With Best Contact at the Informity Programming Visit Compared to Baseline
Therapeutic window was defined as the electrical current at which the side effect appeared minus the electrical current at which complete therapeutic benefit was obtained. The reported value is the range of current between first side effect appearance and complete therapeutic benefit. The 'Selected contact' is the therapeutic window for the contact configuration selected for the patient's programming. The 'best contact' is the therapeutic window for the contact configuration that showed the widest therapeutic window during Informity testing.
Time frame: At Day 21 compared to baseline
Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Single Arm | Change in Therapeutic Window Size With Best Contact at the Informity Programming Visit Compared to Baseline | Baseline | 1.37 milliampere (mA) | Standard Deviation 1.48 |
| Single Arm | Change in Therapeutic Window Size With Best Contact at the Informity Programming Visit Compared to Baseline | Informity Programming | 2.34 milliampere (mA) | Standard Deviation 1.29 |
Change in Therapeutic Window Size With Selected Contact at the Informity Programming Visit Compared to Baseline
Therapeutic window was defined as the electrical current at which the side effect appeared minus the electrical current at which complete therapeutic benefit was obtained. The reported value is the range of current between first side effect appearance and complete therapeutic benefit. The 'Selected contact' is the therapeutic window for the contact configuration selected for the patient's programming. The 'best contact' is the therapeutic window for the contact configuration that showed the widest therapeutic window during Informity testing.
Time frame: At Day 21 compared to baseline
Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Single Arm | Change in Therapeutic Window Size With Selected Contact at the Informity Programming Visit Compared to Baseline | Baseline | 1.37 milliampere (mA) | Standard Deviation 1.48 |
| Single Arm | Change in Therapeutic Window Size With Selected Contact at the Informity Programming Visit Compared to Baseline | Informity Programming | 1.80 milliampere (mA) | Standard Deviation 1.35 |
Change in Therapeutic Electrical Energy Delivered (TEED) at 3 Months
Change in TEED at the 3-month follow-up visit compared to baseline
Time frame: At 3 months compared to baseline
Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Single Arm | Change in Therapeutic Electrical Energy Delivered (TEED) at 3 Months | Baseline | 44.8 milliampere (mA) | Standard Deviation 32.7 |
| Single Arm | Change in Therapeutic Electrical Energy Delivered (TEED) at 3 Months | 3 months | 75.1 milliampere (mA) | Standard Deviation 70.1 |
Change in Therapeutic Electrical Energy Delivered (TEED) at 6 Months
Change in TEED at the 6-month follow-up visit compared to baseline
Time frame: At 6 months compared to baseline
Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Single Arm | Change in Therapeutic Electrical Energy Delivered (TEED) at 6 Months | Baseline | 44.8 milliampere (mA) | Standard Deviation 32.7 |
| Single Arm | Change in Therapeutic Electrical Energy Delivered (TEED) at 6 Months | 6 months | 76.0 milliampere (mA) | Standard Deviation 75 |
Mean Duration of Programming
Duration of programming at the Informity programming visit compared to the most recent programming session prior to enrollment
Time frame: At Day 21
Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Single Arm | Mean Duration of Programming | Last programming session | 76 minutes | Standard Deviation 70 |
| Single Arm | Mean Duration of Programming | Informity programming session | 85 minutes | Standard Deviation 37 |
Mean Quality of Life for Essential Tremor Subjects as Measured by the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor (QUEST) at 3 Months
Mean quality of life will be measured by the QUEST for ET subjects at 3 months follow-up visit. The QUEST questionnaire consists of 30 items, which are rated from 0 to 4, corresponding to the frequency (from never to always). Those 30 items assess how tremor impacts a function or how it can be associated with feelings or attitudes. The 30 items contribute to five sub scales (number of items contributing to each scale in parentheses): Physical/ADL (9), Psychosocial (9), Communication (3), Hobbies/Leisure (3), and Work/Finances (6). The score on each sub scale is expressed as a percentage of the total score possible, with a higher score indicating greater dissatisfaction with that domain of QOL. Maximal score of 100 indicates worse quality of life, while minimal score 0 corresponds to best quality of life.
Time frame: At 3 months
Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Single Arm | Mean Quality of Life for Essential Tremor Subjects as Measured by the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor (QUEST) at 3 Months | Communication | 19 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11 |
| Single Arm | Mean Quality of Life for Essential Tremor Subjects as Measured by the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor (QUEST) at 3 Months | Work / Finance | 14 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 24 |
| Single Arm | Mean Quality of Life for Essential Tremor Subjects as Measured by the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor (QUEST) at 3 Months | Hobbies / Leisure | 25 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 31 |
| Single Arm | Mean Quality of Life for Essential Tremor Subjects as Measured by the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor (QUEST) at 3 Months | Physical | 28 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 20 |
| Single Arm | Mean Quality of Life for Essential Tremor Subjects as Measured by the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor (QUEST) at 3 Months | Psychosocial | 12 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8 |
Mean Quality of Life for Essential Tremor Subjects as Measured by the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor (QUEST) at 6 Months
Mean quality of life will be measured by the QUEST for ET subjects at 6 months follow-up visit. The QUEST questionnaire consists of 30 items, which are rated from 0 to 4, corresponding to the frequency (from never to always). Those 30 items assess how tremor impacts a function or how it can be associated with feelings or attitudes. The 30 items contribute to five sub scales (number of items contributing to each scale in parentheses): Physical/ADL (9), Psychosocial (9), Communication (3), Hobbies/Leisure (3), and Work/Finances (6). The score on each sub scale is expressed as a percentage of the total score possible, with a higher score indicating greater dissatisfaction with that domain of QOL. Maximal score of 100 indicates worse quality of life, while minimal score 0 corresponds to best quality of life.
Time frame: At 6 months
Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Single Arm | Mean Quality of Life for Essential Tremor Subjects as Measured by the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor (QUEST) at 6 Months | Communication | 15 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 13 |
| Single Arm | Mean Quality of Life for Essential Tremor Subjects as Measured by the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor (QUEST) at 6 Months | Work / Finance | 5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 14 |
| Single Arm | Mean Quality of Life for Essential Tremor Subjects as Measured by the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor (QUEST) at 6 Months | Hobbies / Leisure | 20 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 32 |
| Single Arm | Mean Quality of Life for Essential Tremor Subjects as Measured by the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor (QUEST) at 6 Months | Physical | 41 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 26 |
| Single Arm | Mean Quality of Life for Essential Tremor Subjects as Measured by the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor (QUEST) at 6 Months | Psychosocial | 13 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 12 |
Mean Quality of Life for Essential Tremor Subjects as Measured by the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor (QUEST) at Baseline
Mean quality of life will be measured by the QUEST for ET subjects at baseline. The QUEST questionnaire consists of 30 items, which are rated from 0 to 4, corresponding to the frequency (from never to always). Those 30 items assess how tremor impacts a function or how it can be associated with feelings or attitudes. The 30 items contribute to five sub scales (number of items contributing to each scale in parentheses): Physical/ADL (9), Psychosocial (9), Communication (3), Hobbies/Leisure (3), and Work/Finances (6). The score on each sub scale is expressed as a percentage of the total score possible, with a higher score indicating greater dissatisfaction with that domain of QOL. Maximal score of 100 indicates worse quality of life, while minimal score 0 corresponds to best quality of life.
Time frame: At baseline
Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Single Arm | Mean Quality of Life for Essential Tremor Subjects as Measured by the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor (QUEST) at Baseline | Communication | 7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 13 |
| Single Arm | Mean Quality of Life for Essential Tremor Subjects as Measured by the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor (QUEST) at Baseline | Work / Finance | 17 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 23 |
| Single Arm | Mean Quality of Life for Essential Tremor Subjects as Measured by the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor (QUEST) at Baseline | Hobbies / Leisure | 35 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 35 |
| Single Arm | Mean Quality of Life for Essential Tremor Subjects as Measured by the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor (QUEST) at Baseline | Physical | 36 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 22 |
| Single Arm | Mean Quality of Life for Essential Tremor Subjects as Measured by the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor (QUEST) at Baseline | Psychosocial | 24 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 14 |
Motor Symptom Evaluation for ET Subjects- Change in Fahn Tolosa Marin Tremor Rating Scale (FTM-TRS) Scores at 3 Months
Change in Fahn-Tolosa-Marin tremor rating scale for ET subjects at 3-month follow-up visit compared to baseline. Fahn-Tolosa-Marin tremor rating scale scores are expressed as a percentage of the total score possible (range of 0% to 100%), and lower scores indicate less severe motor symptoms.
Time frame: At 3 months compared to baseline
Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Single Arm | Motor Symptom Evaluation for ET Subjects- Change in Fahn Tolosa Marin Tremor Rating Scale (FTM-TRS) Scores at 3 Months | 3 months | 19.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.8 |
| Single Arm | Motor Symptom Evaluation for ET Subjects- Change in Fahn Tolosa Marin Tremor Rating Scale (FTM-TRS) Scores at 3 Months | Baseline | 20.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.8 |
Motor Symptom Evaluation for ET Subjects- Change in Fahn Tolosa Marin Tremor Rating Scale (FTM-TRS) Scores at 6 Months
Change in Fahn-Tolosa-Marin tremor rating scale for ET subjects at 6-month follow-up visit compared to baseline. Fahn-Tolosa-Marin tremor rating scale scores are expressed as a percentage of the total score possible (range of 0% to 100%), and lower scores indicate less severe motor symptoms.
Time frame: At 6 months compared to baseline
Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Single Arm | Motor Symptom Evaluation for ET Subjects- Change in Fahn Tolosa Marin Tremor Rating Scale (FTM-TRS) Scores at 6 Months | Baseline | 20.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.8 |
| Single Arm | Motor Symptom Evaluation for ET Subjects- Change in Fahn Tolosa Marin Tremor Rating Scale (FTM-TRS) Scores at 6 Months | 6 months | 18.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.2 |