Skip to content

Evaluation of the Infinity Deep Brain Stimulation Electrode Screening Mode Tool

Evaluation of the Infinity Deep Brain Stimulation Electrode Screening Mode Tool

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03794661
Acronym
EVIDENT
Enrollment
8
Registered
2019-01-07
Start date
2019-06-26
Completion date
2020-12-16
Last updated
2022-03-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Essential Tremor, Parkinson's Disease

Brief summary

The objective of this clinical investigation is to characterize the clinical performance of Abbott's Clinician Programmer Electrode Screening Mode tool (InformityTM tool) in programming InfinityTM deep brain stimulation (DBS) systems for patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) or essential tremor (ET).

Detailed description

This is a prospective, non-randomized, single-arm, multi-center, post-market clinical investigation designed to evaluate Abbott's Informity tool for Infinity DBS systems. This clinical investigation will be conducted at up to 5 centers in the United States. Up to 40 patients were intended to enroll in the study. However the study was stopped after enrolling 8 subjects at 3 sites. Subjects participating in this clinical investigation will be followed for 6 months. The expected duration of enrollment is 6 months. The total duration of the clinical investigation is expected to be 18 months. The primary and secondary endpoints will be evaluated when all subjects have completed their 6 month follow-up visits

Interventions

DEVICEClinician programmer electrode screening mode tool

Provides a standardized workflow to guide clinicians or trained healthcare providers through the deep brain stimulation monopolar review screening process

Sponsors

Abbott Medical Devices
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Masking description

Outcomes assessor will be masked to subjects' deep brain stimulation programming.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Parkinson's disease patients: 1. Patient must provide written informed consent prior to any clinical study related procedure. 2. Patient is 18 to 80 years of age. 3. Patient is diagnosed with Parkinson's disease for at least 4 years according to standard practice. 4. Patient is willing to maintain a constant dose of anti-Parkinson's disease medication indicated as best medical management for at least 1 month prior to study enrollment. 5. Patient is willing and able to comply with the follow-up schedule for the length of the study. 6. Patient has been implanted with an 8-channel directional Infinity deep brain stimulation system in the subthalamic nucleus (STN) within the last 12 months. 7. Patient has had stable deep brain stimulation programming settings for at least 1 month prior to study enrollment. Essential tremor patients: 1. Patient must provide written informed consent prior to any clinical study related procedure. 2. Patient is 18 to 80 years of age. 3. Patient is diagnosed with essential tremor for at least 4 years according to standard practice. 4. Patient is willing to maintain a constant dose of anti-tremor medication indicated as best medical management for at least 1 month prior to study enrollment. 5. Patient is willing and able to comply with the follow-up schedule for the length of the study. 6. Patient has been implanted with an 8-channel directional Infinity deep brain stimulation system in the ventral intermediate (Vim) thalamus within the last 12 months. 7. Patient has had stable deep brain stimulation programming settings for at least 1 month prior to study enrollment.

Exclusion criteria

1. Individuals unable to make the decision to participate in a clinical investigation on their own. 2. Patient is currently programmed with segmented electrodes, and cannot tolerate omnidirectional programming. 3. Patient is being evaluated for a lead revision. 4. Patient has untreated clinically significant depression. 5. Patient has dementia that interferes with their ability to co-operate or comply with study requirements or comprehend the informed consent, as determined by the investigator. 6. Patient abuses drugs or alcohol. 7. Patient is currently enrolled or plans to enroll in another concurrent study that may confound the results of this clinical investigation. 8. Patient has a confirmation of diagnosis of a terminal illness associated with survival \<12 months. 9. Presence of other anatomic or comorbid conditions, or other medical, social, or psychological conditions that, in the investigator's opinion, could limit the patient's ability to participate in the clinical study or to comply with follow-up requirements, or impact the scientific soundness of the clinical study results. 10. Pregnant or nursing patients and those who plan pregnancy during the clinical study follow-up period.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Therapeutic Window Size With Selected Contact at the Informity Programming Visit Compared to BaselineAt Day 21 compared to baselineTherapeutic window was defined as the electrical current at which the side effect appeared minus the electrical current at which complete therapeutic benefit was obtained. The reported value is the range of current between first side effect appearance and complete therapeutic benefit. The 'Selected contact' is the therapeutic window for the contact configuration selected for the patient's programming. The 'best contact' is the therapeutic window for the contact configuration that showed the widest therapeutic window during Informity testing.
Change in Therapeutic Window Size With Best Contact at the Informity Programming Visit Compared to BaselineAt Day 21 compared to baselineTherapeutic window was defined as the electrical current at which the side effect appeared minus the electrical current at which complete therapeutic benefit was obtained. The reported value is the range of current between first side effect appearance and complete therapeutic benefit. The 'Selected contact' is the therapeutic window for the contact configuration selected for the patient's programming. The 'best contact' is the therapeutic window for the contact configuration that showed the widest therapeutic window during Informity testing.
Change in Therapeutic Electrical Energy Delivered (TEED) With Selected Contact at the Informity Programming Visit Compared to BaselineAt Day 21 compared to baselineTEED measures the total energy delivered by the deep brain stimulation system, and is represented as delivery over a set, arbitrary period of time. TEED is determined by the programmed stimulation parameters and measured system impedance. The 'Selected contact' is the contact configuration selected for the patient's programming. The 'best contact' is the contact configuration with the lowest TEED during Informity testing.
Change in Therapeutic Electrical Energy Delivered (TEED) With Best Contact at the Informity Programming Visit Compared to BaselineAt Day 21 compared to baselineTEED measures the total energy delivered by the deep brain stimulation system, and is represented as delivery over a set, arbitrary period of time. TEED is determined by the programmed stimulation parameters and measured system impedance. The 'Selected contact' is the contact configuration selected for the patient's programming. The 'best contact' is the contact configuration with the lowest TEED during Informity testing.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Quality of Life for Essential Tremor Subjects as Measured by the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor (QUEST) at 6 MonthsAt 6 monthsMean quality of life will be measured by the QUEST for ET subjects at 6 months follow-up visit. The QUEST questionnaire consists of 30 items, which are rated from 0 to 4, corresponding to the frequency (from never to always). Those 30 items assess how tremor impacts a function or how it can be associated with feelings or attitudes. The 30 items contribute to five sub scales (number of items contributing to each scale in parentheses): Physical/ADL (9), Psychosocial (9), Communication (3), Hobbies/Leisure (3), and Work/Finances (6). The score on each sub scale is expressed as a percentage of the total score possible, with a higher score indicating greater dissatisfaction with that domain of QOL. Maximal score of 100 indicates worse quality of life, while minimal score 0 corresponds to best quality of life.
Mean Duration of ProgrammingAt Day 21Duration of programming at the Informity programming visit compared to the most recent programming session prior to enrollment
Motor Symptom Evaluation for ET Subjects- Change in Fahn Tolosa Marin Tremor Rating Scale (FTM-TRS) Scores at 3 MonthsAt 3 months compared to baselineChange in Fahn-Tolosa-Marin tremor rating scale for ET subjects at 3-month follow-up visit compared to baseline. Fahn-Tolosa-Marin tremor rating scale scores are expressed as a percentage of the total score possible (range of 0% to 100%), and lower scores indicate less severe motor symptoms.
Change in Therapeutic Electrical Energy Delivered (TEED) at 6 MonthsAt 6 months compared to baselineChange in TEED at the 6-month follow-up visit compared to baseline
Change in Therapeutic Electrical Energy Delivered (TEED) at 3 MonthsAt 3 months compared to baselineChange in TEED at the 3-month follow-up visit compared to baseline
Motor Symptom Evaluation for ET Subjects- Change in Fahn Tolosa Marin Tremor Rating Scale (FTM-TRS) Scores at 6 MonthsAt 6 months compared to baselineChange in Fahn-Tolosa-Marin tremor rating scale for ET subjects at 6-month follow-up visit compared to baseline. Fahn-Tolosa-Marin tremor rating scale scores are expressed as a percentage of the total score possible (range of 0% to 100%), and lower scores indicate less severe motor symptoms.
Mean Quality of Life for Essential Tremor Subjects as Measured by the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor (QUEST) at BaselineAt baselineMean quality of life will be measured by the QUEST for ET subjects at baseline. The QUEST questionnaire consists of 30 items, which are rated from 0 to 4, corresponding to the frequency (from never to always). Those 30 items assess how tremor impacts a function or how it can be associated with feelings or attitudes. The 30 items contribute to five sub scales (number of items contributing to each scale in parentheses): Physical/ADL (9), Psychosocial (9), Communication (3), Hobbies/Leisure (3), and Work/Finances (6). The score on each sub scale is expressed as a percentage of the total score possible, with a higher score indicating greater dissatisfaction with that domain of QOL. Maximal score of 100 indicates worse quality of life, while minimal score 0 corresponds to best quality of life.
Mean Quality of Life for Essential Tremor Subjects as Measured by the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor (QUEST) at 3 MonthsAt 3 monthsMean quality of life will be measured by the QUEST for ET subjects at 3 months follow-up visit. The QUEST questionnaire consists of 30 items, which are rated from 0 to 4, corresponding to the frequency (from never to always). Those 30 items assess how tremor impacts a function or how it can be associated with feelings or attitudes. The 30 items contribute to five sub scales (number of items contributing to each scale in parentheses): Physical/ADL (9), Psychosocial (9), Communication (3), Hobbies/Leisure (3), and Work/Finances (6). The score on each sub scale is expressed as a percentage of the total score possible, with a higher score indicating greater dissatisfaction with that domain of QOL. Maximal score of 100 indicates worse quality of life, while minimal score 0 corresponds to best quality of life.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study enrolled a total of 8 subjects at 3 investigation sites. Of which seven subjects were diagnosed with Essential Tremor and one subject with Parkinson's Disease. The first subject enrollment was on June 26, 2019.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Single Arm
Clinician programmer electrode screening mode tool Clinician programmer electrode screening mode tool: Provides a standardized workflow to guide clinicians or trained healthcare providers through the deep brain stimulation monopolar review screening process
8
Total8

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSingle Arm
Age, Continuous64 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
Essential Tremor7 Participants
Parkinson's Disease1 Participants
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected— Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
8 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants
Years of essential tremor symptoms26 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16
Years since initial diagnosis of essential tremor16 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 8
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 8
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 8

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Therapeutic Electrical Energy Delivered (TEED) With Best Contact at the Informity Programming Visit Compared to Baseline

TEED measures the total energy delivered by the deep brain stimulation system, and is represented as delivery over a set, arbitrary period of time. TEED is determined by the programmed stimulation parameters and measured system impedance. The 'Selected contact' is the contact configuration selected for the patient's programming. The 'best contact' is the contact configuration with the lowest TEED during Informity testing.

Time frame: At Day 21 compared to baseline

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Single ArmChange in Therapeutic Electrical Energy Delivered (TEED) With Best Contact at the Informity Programming Visit Compared to BaselineBaseline46.6 microjoule (μJ)Standard Deviation 30.2
Single ArmChange in Therapeutic Electrical Energy Delivered (TEED) With Best Contact at the Informity Programming Visit Compared to BaselineInformity Programming31.4 microjoule (μJ)Standard Deviation 23.9
Primary

Change in Therapeutic Electrical Energy Delivered (TEED) With Selected Contact at the Informity Programming Visit Compared to Baseline

TEED measures the total energy delivered by the deep brain stimulation system, and is represented as delivery over a set, arbitrary period of time. TEED is determined by the programmed stimulation parameters and measured system impedance. The 'Selected contact' is the contact configuration selected for the patient's programming. The 'best contact' is the contact configuration with the lowest TEED during Informity testing.

Time frame: At Day 21 compared to baseline

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Single ArmChange in Therapeutic Electrical Energy Delivered (TEED) With Selected Contact at the Informity Programming Visit Compared to BaselineBaseline46.6 microjoule (μJ)Standard Deviation 30.2
Single ArmChange in Therapeutic Electrical Energy Delivered (TEED) With Selected Contact at the Informity Programming Visit Compared to BaselineInformity Programming65.6 microjoule (μJ)Standard Deviation 94.5
Primary

Change in Therapeutic Window Size With Best Contact at the Informity Programming Visit Compared to Baseline

Therapeutic window was defined as the electrical current at which the side effect appeared minus the electrical current at which complete therapeutic benefit was obtained. The reported value is the range of current between first side effect appearance and complete therapeutic benefit. The 'Selected contact' is the therapeutic window for the contact configuration selected for the patient's programming. The 'best contact' is the therapeutic window for the contact configuration that showed the widest therapeutic window during Informity testing.

Time frame: At Day 21 compared to baseline

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Single ArmChange in Therapeutic Window Size With Best Contact at the Informity Programming Visit Compared to BaselineBaseline1.37 milliampere (mA)Standard Deviation 1.48
Single ArmChange in Therapeutic Window Size With Best Contact at the Informity Programming Visit Compared to BaselineInformity Programming2.34 milliampere (mA)Standard Deviation 1.29
Primary

Change in Therapeutic Window Size With Selected Contact at the Informity Programming Visit Compared to Baseline

Therapeutic window was defined as the electrical current at which the side effect appeared minus the electrical current at which complete therapeutic benefit was obtained. The reported value is the range of current between first side effect appearance and complete therapeutic benefit. The 'Selected contact' is the therapeutic window for the contact configuration selected for the patient's programming. The 'best contact' is the therapeutic window for the contact configuration that showed the widest therapeutic window during Informity testing.

Time frame: At Day 21 compared to baseline

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Single ArmChange in Therapeutic Window Size With Selected Contact at the Informity Programming Visit Compared to BaselineBaseline1.37 milliampere (mA)Standard Deviation 1.48
Single ArmChange in Therapeutic Window Size With Selected Contact at the Informity Programming Visit Compared to BaselineInformity Programming1.80 milliampere (mA)Standard Deviation 1.35
Secondary

Change in Therapeutic Electrical Energy Delivered (TEED) at 3 Months

Change in TEED at the 3-month follow-up visit compared to baseline

Time frame: At 3 months compared to baseline

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Single ArmChange in Therapeutic Electrical Energy Delivered (TEED) at 3 MonthsBaseline44.8 milliampere (mA)Standard Deviation 32.7
Single ArmChange in Therapeutic Electrical Energy Delivered (TEED) at 3 Months3 months75.1 milliampere (mA)Standard Deviation 70.1
Secondary

Change in Therapeutic Electrical Energy Delivered (TEED) at 6 Months

Change in TEED at the 6-month follow-up visit compared to baseline

Time frame: At 6 months compared to baseline

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Single ArmChange in Therapeutic Electrical Energy Delivered (TEED) at 6 MonthsBaseline44.8 milliampere (mA)Standard Deviation 32.7
Single ArmChange in Therapeutic Electrical Energy Delivered (TEED) at 6 Months6 months76.0 milliampere (mA)Standard Deviation 75
Secondary

Mean Duration of Programming

Duration of programming at the Informity programming visit compared to the most recent programming session prior to enrollment

Time frame: At Day 21

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Single ArmMean Duration of ProgrammingLast programming session76 minutesStandard Deviation 70
Single ArmMean Duration of ProgrammingInformity programming session85 minutesStandard Deviation 37
Secondary

Mean Quality of Life for Essential Tremor Subjects as Measured by the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor (QUEST) at 3 Months

Mean quality of life will be measured by the QUEST for ET subjects at 3 months follow-up visit. The QUEST questionnaire consists of 30 items, which are rated from 0 to 4, corresponding to the frequency (from never to always). Those 30 items assess how tremor impacts a function or how it can be associated with feelings or attitudes. The 30 items contribute to five sub scales (number of items contributing to each scale in parentheses): Physical/ADL (9), Psychosocial (9), Communication (3), Hobbies/Leisure (3), and Work/Finances (6). The score on each sub scale is expressed as a percentage of the total score possible, with a higher score indicating greater dissatisfaction with that domain of QOL. Maximal score of 100 indicates worse quality of life, while minimal score 0 corresponds to best quality of life.

Time frame: At 3 months

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Single ArmMean Quality of Life for Essential Tremor Subjects as Measured by the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor (QUEST) at 3 MonthsCommunication19 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11
Single ArmMean Quality of Life for Essential Tremor Subjects as Measured by the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor (QUEST) at 3 MonthsWork / Finance14 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24
Single ArmMean Quality of Life for Essential Tremor Subjects as Measured by the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor (QUEST) at 3 MonthsHobbies / Leisure25 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 31
Single ArmMean Quality of Life for Essential Tremor Subjects as Measured by the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor (QUEST) at 3 MonthsPhysical28 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20
Single ArmMean Quality of Life for Essential Tremor Subjects as Measured by the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor (QUEST) at 3 MonthsPsychosocial12 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8
Secondary

Mean Quality of Life for Essential Tremor Subjects as Measured by the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor (QUEST) at 6 Months

Mean quality of life will be measured by the QUEST for ET subjects at 6 months follow-up visit. The QUEST questionnaire consists of 30 items, which are rated from 0 to 4, corresponding to the frequency (from never to always). Those 30 items assess how tremor impacts a function or how it can be associated with feelings or attitudes. The 30 items contribute to five sub scales (number of items contributing to each scale in parentheses): Physical/ADL (9), Psychosocial (9), Communication (3), Hobbies/Leisure (3), and Work/Finances (6). The score on each sub scale is expressed as a percentage of the total score possible, with a higher score indicating greater dissatisfaction with that domain of QOL. Maximal score of 100 indicates worse quality of life, while minimal score 0 corresponds to best quality of life.

Time frame: At 6 months

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Single ArmMean Quality of Life for Essential Tremor Subjects as Measured by the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor (QUEST) at 6 MonthsCommunication15 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13
Single ArmMean Quality of Life for Essential Tremor Subjects as Measured by the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor (QUEST) at 6 MonthsWork / Finance5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14
Single ArmMean Quality of Life for Essential Tremor Subjects as Measured by the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor (QUEST) at 6 MonthsHobbies / Leisure20 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 32
Single ArmMean Quality of Life for Essential Tremor Subjects as Measured by the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor (QUEST) at 6 MonthsPhysical41 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26
Single ArmMean Quality of Life for Essential Tremor Subjects as Measured by the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor (QUEST) at 6 MonthsPsychosocial13 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12
Secondary

Mean Quality of Life for Essential Tremor Subjects as Measured by the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor (QUEST) at Baseline

Mean quality of life will be measured by the QUEST for ET subjects at baseline. The QUEST questionnaire consists of 30 items, which are rated from 0 to 4, corresponding to the frequency (from never to always). Those 30 items assess how tremor impacts a function or how it can be associated with feelings or attitudes. The 30 items contribute to five sub scales (number of items contributing to each scale in parentheses): Physical/ADL (9), Psychosocial (9), Communication (3), Hobbies/Leisure (3), and Work/Finances (6). The score on each sub scale is expressed as a percentage of the total score possible, with a higher score indicating greater dissatisfaction with that domain of QOL. Maximal score of 100 indicates worse quality of life, while minimal score 0 corresponds to best quality of life.

Time frame: At baseline

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Single ArmMean Quality of Life for Essential Tremor Subjects as Measured by the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor (QUEST) at BaselineCommunication7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13
Single ArmMean Quality of Life for Essential Tremor Subjects as Measured by the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor (QUEST) at BaselineWork / Finance17 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23
Single ArmMean Quality of Life for Essential Tremor Subjects as Measured by the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor (QUEST) at BaselineHobbies / Leisure35 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 35
Single ArmMean Quality of Life for Essential Tremor Subjects as Measured by the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor (QUEST) at BaselinePhysical36 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22
Single ArmMean Quality of Life for Essential Tremor Subjects as Measured by the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor (QUEST) at BaselinePsychosocial24 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14
Secondary

Motor Symptom Evaluation for ET Subjects- Change in Fahn Tolosa Marin Tremor Rating Scale (FTM-TRS) Scores at 3 Months

Change in Fahn-Tolosa-Marin tremor rating scale for ET subjects at 3-month follow-up visit compared to baseline. Fahn-Tolosa-Marin tremor rating scale scores are expressed as a percentage of the total score possible (range of 0% to 100%), and lower scores indicate less severe motor symptoms.

Time frame: At 3 months compared to baseline

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Single ArmMotor Symptom Evaluation for ET Subjects- Change in Fahn Tolosa Marin Tremor Rating Scale (FTM-TRS) Scores at 3 Months3 months19.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.8
Single ArmMotor Symptom Evaluation for ET Subjects- Change in Fahn Tolosa Marin Tremor Rating Scale (FTM-TRS) Scores at 3 MonthsBaseline20.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.8
Secondary

Motor Symptom Evaluation for ET Subjects- Change in Fahn Tolosa Marin Tremor Rating Scale (FTM-TRS) Scores at 6 Months

Change in Fahn-Tolosa-Marin tremor rating scale for ET subjects at 6-month follow-up visit compared to baseline. Fahn-Tolosa-Marin tremor rating scale scores are expressed as a percentage of the total score possible (range of 0% to 100%), and lower scores indicate less severe motor symptoms.

Time frame: At 6 months compared to baseline

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Single ArmMotor Symptom Evaluation for ET Subjects- Change in Fahn Tolosa Marin Tremor Rating Scale (FTM-TRS) Scores at 6 MonthsBaseline20.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.8
Single ArmMotor Symptom Evaluation for ET Subjects- Change in Fahn Tolosa Marin Tremor Rating Scale (FTM-TRS) Scores at 6 Months6 months18.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.2

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026