Skip to content

Positive End-expiratory Pressure (PEEP) in Predicting Fluid Responsiveness in Patients Undergoing One-lung Ventilation

The Influence of Positive End-expiratory Pressure (PEEP) in Predicting Fluid Responsiveness in Patients Undergoing One-lung Ventilation

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03794414
Enrollment
40
Registered
2019-01-07
Start date
2019-01-31
Completion date
2020-06-26
Last updated
2020-07-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lung Cancer, Lung Diseases

Brief summary

The present study is to evaluate the effect of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in predicting fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing one-lung ventilation.

Detailed description

Appropriate fluid challenge is crucial during lung surgery under one-lung ventilation. Applying PEEP in mechanically ventilating patients changes dynamic hemodynamic parameters (stroke volume variation, pulse pressure variation), which is more pronounced in hypovolemic patients. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the mechanically ventilating patients under one-lung ventilation requiring fluid resuscitation by applying PEEP to predict fluid responsiveness. The investigators hypothesized that applying PEEP in one-lung ventilating patients can also change dynamic parameters and the magnitude of the change of stroke volume variation, pulse pressure variation can predict fluid responsiveness. The investigator applied PEEP 10 mmHg in one-lung ventilating patients and observed the dynamic parameters including stroke volume variation, pulse pressure variation and then infused 6ml/kg of crystalloid for fluid challenge and diagnosed fluid responsiveness as 10% increase of stroke volume after fluid challenge.

Interventions

PROCEDUREPEEP challenge

apply PEEP 10 mmHg in one-lung ventilating patients.

Sponsors

Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patients undergoing lung surgery under one-lung ventilation

Exclusion criteria

* arrhythmia * moderate to severe valvular heart disease moderate to severe pericardial effusion left ventricular ejection fraction \< 40% * moderate to severe chronic obstructive lung disease * unable to insert oesophageal Doppler Monitor (ODM) probe ( esophageal stent, esophageal cancer, previous esophageal surgery, esophageal stricture, esophageal varices, pharyngeal pouch and severe coagulopathy ) * patient refusal * cannot understand the protocol * less than 50kg or over 100kg in weight

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
pulse pressure variation5 minutes after PEEP challengeTemporary increase of PEEP will be able to predict fluid responsiveness using increase of pulse pressure variation over 1%.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
stroke volume variation5 minutes after PEEP challengeTemporary increase of PEEP will be able to predict fluid responsiveness using increase of stroke volume variation over 1%.

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026