Handling, Hemorrhage, Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases, Postoperative Hemorrhage, Postoperative Pain, Surgery--Complications, Tonsillectomy, Tonsillitis Chronic
Conditions
Brief summary
Tonsillectomies are frequently followed by severe postoperative pain, hence high analgetics consumption and prolonged hospitalization. Also, postoperative hemorrhages can be hazardous. Constant evaluation of surgical techniques is paramount to improve safety and cost-effectiveness. Frequently tonsillectomies are performed in cold steel technique. Aim of this study will be the evaluation of handling, surgical time, postoperative pain and postoperative hemorrhage rates using the BiZactTM-Device in comparison to traditional techniques on the contralateral side. In one patient, two different techniques will be used. The primary objective will be the surgical time. Regardless of surgeon handedness, surgeons will randomly be assigned to either start with the left or right tonsil, and randomly either to start with the BiZact™ Device or with cold steel methods. Additionally, time to stop bleeding, intraoperative blood loss, tonsil mobility, device handling, as well as wound healing will be assessed.
Detailed description
Although stricter indication criteria have been implanted (especially in Austria since 2008), tonsillectomies are still performed very frequently. Post-surgical bleeding can potentially be life-threatening, and occur within 3 weeks after tonsillectomy. A broad survey in Great Britain revealed a postoperative hemorrhage rate in 33.921 patients between 1.5 and 5.4 %, varying on hospital size. Small collectives also showed rates up to 21.7%. Worldwide, different techniques are used. Generally, cold steel and hot techniques can be distinguished, although often current-carrying (hot) and cold instruments are used alternately. Postoperative pain seems to be uninfluenced by technique, whereas postoperative hemorrhage rates seem to be higher in hot techniques. LigaSure® is a bipolar current-carrying device, which is able to seal vessels. Simultaneously tissue impedance is measured to control energy application. In this way only the required energy levels are applied. Therefore LigaSure® can also be referred as a softened hot technique. In 2005 Lachanas et al. compared the LigaSure®-technique with the cold steel technique in 200 patients and found significantly less postoperative pain in favor of the LigaSure®-technique. Postoperative hemorrhage rates were not higher with LigaSure®. Based on the LigaSure®-scissors, Medtronic introduced a device specifically developed and licensed for tonsillectomies (BiZactTM). Aim of this study will be the evaluation of handling, surgical time, postoperative pain and postoperative hemorrhage rates in comparison to traditional techniques on the contralateral side. In one patient, two different techniques will be used. This side-controlled evaluation of surgical techniques in tonsillectomies has been proven successfully in previous studies.
Interventions
DEVICEBiZactTM Open Sealer/Divider
The BiZactTM Open Sealer/Divider creates a seal by application of radiofrequency (RF) electrosurgical energy to blood and lymphatic vessels or tissue bundles interposed between the jaws of the instrument. A cutting blade within the instrument is surgeon-activated to divide tissue. It is a single-use device and will not be reused in other patients.
Sponsors
Medical University of Vienna
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)
Masking description
Patients will not be informed which side was operated with the BiZact™ device. Surgeons however inevitably know side. The side will also be documented in the surgical report. Follow-up specialists must refrain from reading through surgical reports, thus not know which technique was used for which side. Discharging letters will not include technique information.
Intervention model description
Cross-over block design with block sizes of 12, such that after 12 patients every group was chosen three times. 48 patients in 4 groups (BiZactTM first / BiZactTM second, BiZactTM right / BiZactTM left side).
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
14 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Age 14 and older * Written informed consent (in case of underage participant also parental informed consent) * Assigned for Tonsillectomy on both sides due to chronic tonsillitis
Exclusion criteria
* History of abscesses in tonsillar region * Coagulation disorder (as assessed by a coagulation questionnaire and blood results) * Suspicion of untreated malignancy of any kind * Planned removal of only one tonsil
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| surgical time | 1 hour (intraoperative) | For the aim of the study surgical time is defined as time from superior mucosal incision to the moment when the removed tonsil is placed on instrument table (recorded by theatre staff - stopwatch). |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Time to stop bleeding | 1 hour (intraoperative) | Time to stop bleeding per side after tonsil removal (recorded by theatre staff - stopwatch) |
| intraoperative blood loss | 1 hour (intraoperative) | intraoperative blood loss as measured by A) secretion/blood volume in suction device side separately B) number of used swabs C) swab weight (documented by surgical assistant, side separately at the earliest time point after removal out of the oral cavity - weighing scale provided only for this investigation) |
| Postoperative pain assessment | Day of surgery until 2 months after surgery | Postoperative pain assessment A) using a side specific questionnaire (visual analogue scales (VAS-Scale) 0-100mm: differences of more than 16mm can be judged as significant in style of Bijur et al. 2001) on days 0, 1, 3, 5, 7 and 10. B) follow-up phone call 2 months after surgery (or in-visit as preferred by the patient) assesses for swallowing difficulties and residual pain in side comparison. |
| Wound healing | approx. 10 days after surgery | Wound healing on a VAS-Scales for each side (from 0 very nice tissue / no inflammation to 100mm scale very thick fibrin / strong inflammation as seen by redness/secretion) (evaluated by ENT specialist not familiar with previous randomized side in course of postoperative follow-up visit including review of histological findings) |
| Tonsil mobility intraoperatively | intraoperative | Tonsil mobility intraoperatively on a VAS-Scales for each side (from 0 not mobile to 100mm very easy to move) |
Countries
Austria
Outcome results
None listed