Skip to content

Study to Evaluate Dupilumab Monotherapy in Pediatric Patients With Peanut Allergy

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Dupilumab Monotherapy in Pediatric Patients With Peanut Allergy

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03793608
Enrollment
25
Registered
2019-01-04
Start date
2019-03-12
Completion date
2021-05-12
Last updated
2022-05-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Peanut Allergy

Brief summary

The primary objective of the study is to assess the tolerability of peanut protein in pediatric patients (6-17 years old) treated with dupilumab monotherapy, in which tolerability is defined as the proportion of patients who safely pass a double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) at week 24. The secondary objectives are: * To determine whether dupilumab treatment improves peanut tolerability, defined as a change in the cumulative tolerated dose (log transformed) of peanut protein during a DBPCFC * To evaluate the safety and tolerability of dupilumab treatment in peanut allergic patients * To evaluate the effects of dupilumab treatment on the levels of peanut-specific Immunoglobulin E (IgE) * To evaluate the treatment effect of dupilumab on the average wheal size after a titrated skin prick test (SPT), as measured by area under curve (AUC) of the average wheal size induced by peanut extract at different concentrations * To assess the incidence of treatment-emergent anti-drug antibodies (ADA) to dupilumab in patients over time

Interventions

DRUGDupilumab

Dupilumab weight-based dosing will be administered subcutaneously (SC) in a single-use, pre-filled syringe every two weeks (Q2W)

Sponsors

Sanofi
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Years to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: * Patient has a clinical history of allergy to peanuts or peanut-containing foods (symptom\[s\] of reaction due to exposure). * Experience dose-limiting symptoms at or before the challenge dose of peanut protein on screening DBPCFC conducted in accordance with Practical Issues in Allergology, Joint United States/European Union Initiative (PRACTALL) guidelines. And not experiencing dose limiting symptoms to placebo * Serum IgE to peanut of ≥10 kilo units (kUA)/L and/or a SPT to peanut ≥8 mm compared to a negative control * Patients/legal guardians must be trained on the proper use of the epinephrine autoinjector device to be allowed to enroll in the study * Patients with other known food allergies must agree to eliminate these other food items from their diet so as not to confound the safety and efficacy data from the study Key

Exclusion criteria

* Any previous exposure to marketed dupilumab or dupilumab in a clinical trial * Member of the clinical site study team or his/her immediate family * History of other chronic disease (other than asthma, AD, or allergic rhinitis) requiring therapy * History of frequent or recent severe, life-threatening episode of anaphylaxis or anaphylactic shock as defined by more than 3 episodes of anaphylaxis within the past year and/or an episode of anaphylaxis within 60 days of screening DBPCFC * History of eosinophilic gastrointestinal disease * History of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis * Severe, unstable asthma at time of enrollment or any patient with Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) \<80% of predicted or asthma control questionnaire (ACQ)\>1.5 * Use of systemic corticosteroids within 2 months prior to screening Note: Other protocol Inclusion/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Treated With Dupilumab Who Passed a DBPCFC With at Least 444 mg (Cumulative) Peanut Protein at Week 24At Week 24Symptoms considered to be allergic were graded using the Consortium of Food Allergy Research (CoFAR) Grading Scale for Systemic Allergic Reactions. The scale is Grade 1 (Mild) through 5, the higher the grade, the more severe the allergic reaction. Participants were considered to have passed the DBPCFC if they did not experience any objective Grade 1 reaction. Percentage of participants treated with dupilumab who passed the DBPCFC with at least 444 mg (cumulative) peanut protein at Week 24 was reported.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Treated With Dupilumab Who Passed a DBPCFC With at Least 444 mg (Cumulative) Peanut Protein at Week 36At Week 36Symptoms considered to be allergic were graded using the Consortium of Food Allergy Research (CoFAR) Grading Scale for Systemic Allergic Reactions. The scale is Grade 1 (Mild) through 5, the higher the grade, the more severe the allergic reaction. Participants were considered to have passed the DBPCFC if they did not experience any objective Grade 1 reaction. Only participants treated with dupilumab who passed at least 444 mg (cumulative) peanut challenge at Week 24 were eligible for Week 36 DBFC.
Percentage of Participants Treated With Dupilumab Who Passed a DBPCFC With at Least 1044 mg (Cumulative) Peanut Protein at Week 24At Week 24Symptoms considered to be allergic were graded using the Consortium of Food Allergy Research (CoFAR) Grading Scale for Systemic Allergic Reactions. The scale is Grade 1 (Mild) through 5, the higher the grade, the more severe the allergic reaction. Participants were considered to have passed the DBPCFC if they did not experience any objective Grade 1 reaction. Percentage of participants treated with dupilumab who passed a DBPCFC with at least 1044 mg (cumulative) peanut protein at Week 24 was reported.
Percentage of Participants Treated With Dupilumab Who Passed a DBPCFC With at Least 1044 mg (Cumulative) Peanut Protein at Week 36At Week 36Symptoms considered to be allergic were graded using the Consortium of Food Allergy Research (CoFAR) Grading Scale for Systemic Allergic Reactions. The scale is Grade 1 (Mild) through 5, the higher the grade, the more severe the allergic reaction. Participants were considered to have passed the DBPCFC if they did not experience any objective Grade 1 reaction. Only participants treated with dupilumab who passed at least 444 mg (cumulative) peanut challenge at Week 24 were eligible for Week 36 DBFC.
Percentage of Participants Treated With Dupilumab Who Passed a DBPCFC With at Least 2044 mg (Cumulative) Peanut Protein at Week 24At Week 24Symptoms considered to be allergic were graded using the Consortium of Food Allergy Research (CoFAR) Grading Scale for Systemic Allergic Reactions. The scale is Grade 1 (Mild) through 5, the higher the grade, the more severe the allergic reaction. Participants were considered to have passed the DBPCFC if they did not experience any objective Grade 1 reaction. Percentage of participants treated with dupilumab who passed a DBPCFC with at least 2044 mg (cumulative) peanut protein at Week 24 was reported.
Change From Baseline in Cumulative Tolerated Dose (Log Transformed) of Peanut Protein During a DBPCFC at Weeks 24 and 36Weeks 24 and 36Change from baseline in cumulative tolerated dose (log transformed) of peanut protein during a DBPCFC at Week 24 and Week 36 was reported.
Percent Change From Baseline in Peanut-specific Immunoglobulin E (sIgE) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, and 36Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, and 36Percent change from baseline in sIgE at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, and 36 was reported.
Change From Baseline in Titrated Skin Prick Test (SPT) Measured by Average Wheal Size Area Under the Curve (AUC) After Peanut Allergen Stimulation at Different Concentrations at Weeks 4, 12, 24, and 36Weeks 4, 12, 24, and 36The titrated SPT is the skin testing for atopic response at different concentrations of peanut extract with saline as negative control and histamine as positive controls. Wheal size induced by peanut extract at each concentration was calculated as average of largest diameter and perpendicular midpoint diameter. The AUC for titrated SPT was calculated using the mean wheal diameter versus the concentration at which the wheal diameter was measured, which was then normalized to concentration. Change from baseline in titrated SPT as measured by average wheal size AUC after peanut allergen stimulation at different concentrations at Weeks 4, 12, 24, and 36 was reported.
Percentage of Participants With Grade 2 or Above Allergic Reactions During the DBPCFC at Week 24At Week 24Symptoms considered to be allergic were graded using the Consortium of Food Allergy Research (CoFAR) Grading Scale for Systemic Allergic Reactions. The scale is Grade 1 (Mild) through 5, the higher the grade, the more severe the allergic reaction. Percentage of participants with Grade 2 (Moderate) or above allergic reactions during the DBPCFC at Week 24 was reported.
Percentage of Participants Who Used Epinephrine as a Rescue Medication During the DBPCFC at Week 24At Week 24Percentage of participants who used Epinephrine as a rescue medication during the DBPCFC at Week 24 was reported.
Percentage of Participants Treated With Dupilumab Who Passed a DBPCFC With at Least 2044 mg (Cumulative) Peanut Protein at Week 36At Week 36Symptoms considered to be allergic were graded using the Consortium of Food Allergy Research (CoFAR) Grading Scale for Systemic Allergic Reactions. The scale is Grade 1 (Mild) through 5, the higher the grade, the more severe the allergic reaction. Participants were considered to have passed the DBPCFC if they did not experience any objective Grade 1 reaction. Only participants treated with dupilumab who passed at least 444 mg (cumulative) peanut challenge at Week 24 were eligible for Week 36 DBFC.

Countries

Canada, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Twenty-five participants met eligibility criteria. One of the 25 participants was randomized under the original double-blind placebo-controlled protocol and received placebo-matching dupilumab. Following implementation of Protocol Amendment 1, 24 participants were enrolled under the open-label design & received open-label treatment with dupilumab.

Pre-assignment details

A double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) consisting of increasing amounts of peanut protein up to a cumulative total of 144 mg and a matching placebo challenge consisting of placebo material (oat protein) were given to confirm current peanut allergy. Food challenges were performed on different days in random order (1-day placebo, 1-day peanut protein), at least 24 hours, but not more than 7 days, apart. Both food challenge days were required to evaluate eligibility.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Dupilumab
Participants enrolled under open-label treatment protocol with weight of greater than or equal to (\>=) 20 kilograms (kg) and less than (\<) 60 kg received a subcutaneous (SC) injection of dupilumab 200 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W) after a loading dose of 400 mg on Day 1 up to Week 22; participants with weight of \>=60 kg received a SC injection of dupilumab 300 mg Q2W after a loading dose of 600 mg on Day 1 up to Week 22. At Week 24, all participants underwent a DBPCFC up to 2044 mg peanut protein (cumulative) or placebo to assess tolerability.
24
Total24

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDupilumab
Age, Continuous11.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.28
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
22 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
19 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
18 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 10 / 24
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 111 / 24
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 10 / 24

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants Treated With Dupilumab Who Passed a DBPCFC With at Least 444 mg (Cumulative) Peanut Protein at Week 24

Symptoms considered to be allergic were graded using the Consortium of Food Allergy Research (CoFAR) Grading Scale for Systemic Allergic Reactions. The scale is Grade 1 (Mild) through 5, the higher the grade, the more severe the allergic reaction. Participants were considered to have passed the DBPCFC if they did not experience any objective Grade 1 reaction. Percentage of participants treated with dupilumab who passed the DBPCFC with at least 444 mg (cumulative) peanut protein at Week 24 was reported.

Time frame: At Week 24

Population: The SAF included all participants who received dupilumab.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
DupilumabPercentage of Participants Treated With Dupilumab Who Passed a DBPCFC With at Least 444 mg (Cumulative) Peanut Protein at Week 248.3 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Cumulative Tolerated Dose (Log Transformed) of Peanut Protein During a DBPCFC at Weeks 24 and 36

Change from baseline in cumulative tolerated dose (log transformed) of peanut protein during a DBPCFC at Week 24 and Week 36 was reported.

Time frame: Weeks 24 and 36

Population: The SAF included all participants who received dupilumab.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DupilumabChange From Baseline in Cumulative Tolerated Dose (Log Transformed) of Peanut Protein During a DBPCFC at Weeks 24 and 36Change at Week 240.69 Log Transformed MilligramsStandard Deviation 1.822
DupilumabChange From Baseline in Cumulative Tolerated Dose (Log Transformed) of Peanut Protein During a DBPCFC at Weeks 24 and 36Change at Week 363.38 Log Transformed MilligramsStandard Deviation 3.096
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Titrated Skin Prick Test (SPT) Measured by Average Wheal Size Area Under the Curve (AUC) After Peanut Allergen Stimulation at Different Concentrations at Weeks 4, 12, 24, and 36

The titrated SPT is the skin testing for atopic response at different concentrations of peanut extract with saline as negative control and histamine as positive controls. Wheal size induced by peanut extract at each concentration was calculated as average of largest diameter and perpendicular midpoint diameter. The AUC for titrated SPT was calculated using the mean wheal diameter versus the concentration at which the wheal diameter was measured, which was then normalized to concentration. Change from baseline in titrated SPT as measured by average wheal size AUC after peanut allergen stimulation at different concentrations at Weeks 4, 12, 24, and 36 was reported.

Time frame: Weeks 4, 12, 24, and 36

Population: The SAF included all participants who received dupilumab.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DupilumabChange From Baseline in Titrated Skin Prick Test (SPT) Measured by Average Wheal Size Area Under the Curve (AUC) After Peanut Allergen Stimulation at Different Concentrations at Weeks 4, 12, 24, and 36Change at Week 4-0.633 millimeter (mm)Standard Deviation 2.0604
DupilumabChange From Baseline in Titrated Skin Prick Test (SPT) Measured by Average Wheal Size Area Under the Curve (AUC) After Peanut Allergen Stimulation at Different Concentrations at Weeks 4, 12, 24, and 36Change at Week 12-0.174 millimeter (mm)Standard Deviation 2.0618
DupilumabChange From Baseline in Titrated Skin Prick Test (SPT) Measured by Average Wheal Size Area Under the Curve (AUC) After Peanut Allergen Stimulation at Different Concentrations at Weeks 4, 12, 24, and 36Change at Week 24-0.232 millimeter (mm)Standard Deviation 2.061
DupilumabChange From Baseline in Titrated Skin Prick Test (SPT) Measured by Average Wheal Size Area Under the Curve (AUC) After Peanut Allergen Stimulation at Different Concentrations at Weeks 4, 12, 24, and 36Change at Week 36-0.364 millimeter (mm)Standard Deviation 2.1419
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Treated With Dupilumab Who Passed a DBPCFC With at Least 1044 mg (Cumulative) Peanut Protein at Week 24

Symptoms considered to be allergic were graded using the Consortium of Food Allergy Research (CoFAR) Grading Scale for Systemic Allergic Reactions. The scale is Grade 1 (Mild) through 5, the higher the grade, the more severe the allergic reaction. Participants were considered to have passed the DBPCFC if they did not experience any objective Grade 1 reaction. Percentage of participants treated with dupilumab who passed a DBPCFC with at least 1044 mg (cumulative) peanut protein at Week 24 was reported.

Time frame: At Week 24

Population: The SAF included all participants who received dupilumab.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
DupilumabPercentage of Participants Treated With Dupilumab Who Passed a DBPCFC With at Least 1044 mg (Cumulative) Peanut Protein at Week 240.0 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Treated With Dupilumab Who Passed a DBPCFC With at Least 1044 mg (Cumulative) Peanut Protein at Week 36

Symptoms considered to be allergic were graded using the Consortium of Food Allergy Research (CoFAR) Grading Scale for Systemic Allergic Reactions. The scale is Grade 1 (Mild) through 5, the higher the grade, the more severe the allergic reaction. Participants were considered to have passed the DBPCFC if they did not experience any objective Grade 1 reaction. Only participants treated with dupilumab who passed at least 444 mg (cumulative) peanut challenge at Week 24 were eligible for Week 36 DBFC.

Time frame: At Week 36

Population: A subset of the SAF that included only participants who passed the DBPCFC of at least 444 mg (cumulative) at Week 24.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
DupilumabPercentage of Participants Treated With Dupilumab Who Passed a DBPCFC With at Least 1044 mg (Cumulative) Peanut Protein at Week 3650.0 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Treated With Dupilumab Who Passed a DBPCFC With at Least 2044 mg (Cumulative) Peanut Protein at Week 24

Symptoms considered to be allergic were graded using the Consortium of Food Allergy Research (CoFAR) Grading Scale for Systemic Allergic Reactions. The scale is Grade 1 (Mild) through 5, the higher the grade, the more severe the allergic reaction. Participants were considered to have passed the DBPCFC if they did not experience any objective Grade 1 reaction. Percentage of participants treated with dupilumab who passed a DBPCFC with at least 2044 mg (cumulative) peanut protein at Week 24 was reported.

Time frame: At Week 24

Population: The SAF included all participants who received dupilumab.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
DupilumabPercentage of Participants Treated With Dupilumab Who Passed a DBPCFC With at Least 2044 mg (Cumulative) Peanut Protein at Week 240.0 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Treated With Dupilumab Who Passed a DBPCFC With at Least 2044 mg (Cumulative) Peanut Protein at Week 36

Symptoms considered to be allergic were graded using the Consortium of Food Allergy Research (CoFAR) Grading Scale for Systemic Allergic Reactions. The scale is Grade 1 (Mild) through 5, the higher the grade, the more severe the allergic reaction. Participants were considered to have passed the DBPCFC if they did not experience any objective Grade 1 reaction. Only participants treated with dupilumab who passed at least 444 mg (cumulative) peanut challenge at Week 24 were eligible for Week 36 DBFC.

Time frame: At Week 36

Population: A subset of the SAF that included only participants who passed the DBPCFC of at least 444 mg (cumulative) at Week 24.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
DupilumabPercentage of Participants Treated With Dupilumab Who Passed a DBPCFC With at Least 2044 mg (Cumulative) Peanut Protein at Week 360.0 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Treated With Dupilumab Who Passed a DBPCFC With at Least 444 mg (Cumulative) Peanut Protein at Week 36

Symptoms considered to be allergic were graded using the Consortium of Food Allergy Research (CoFAR) Grading Scale for Systemic Allergic Reactions. The scale is Grade 1 (Mild) through 5, the higher the grade, the more severe the allergic reaction. Participants were considered to have passed the DBPCFC if they did not experience any objective Grade 1 reaction. Only participants treated with dupilumab who passed at least 444 mg (cumulative) peanut challenge at Week 24 were eligible for Week 36 DBFC.

Time frame: At Week 36

Population: A subset of the SAF that included only participants who passed the DBPCFC of at least 444 mg (cumulative) at Week 24.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
DupilumabPercentage of Participants Treated With Dupilumab Who Passed a DBPCFC With at Least 444 mg (Cumulative) Peanut Protein at Week 3650.0 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Used Epinephrine as a Rescue Medication During the DBPCFC at Week 24

Percentage of participants who used Epinephrine as a rescue medication during the DBPCFC at Week 24 was reported.

Time frame: At Week 24

Population: The SAF included all participants who received dupilumab.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
DupilumabPercentage of Participants Who Used Epinephrine as a Rescue Medication During the DBPCFC at Week 2441.7 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Grade 2 or Above Allergic Reactions During the DBPCFC at Week 24

Symptoms considered to be allergic were graded using the Consortium of Food Allergy Research (CoFAR) Grading Scale for Systemic Allergic Reactions. The scale is Grade 1 (Mild) through 5, the higher the grade, the more severe the allergic reaction. Percentage of participants with Grade 2 (Moderate) or above allergic reactions during the DBPCFC at Week 24 was reported.

Time frame: At Week 24

Population: The SAF included all participants who received dupilumab.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
DupilumabPercentage of Participants With Grade 2 or Above Allergic Reactions During the DBPCFC at Week 2433.3 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Peanut-specific Immunoglobulin E (sIgE) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, and 36

Percent change from baseline in sIgE at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, and 36 was reported.

Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, and 36

Population: The SAF included all participants who received dupilumab.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
DupilumabPercent Change From Baseline in Peanut-specific Immunoglobulin E (sIgE) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, and 36Percent change at Week 4-7.86 Percent Change
DupilumabPercent Change From Baseline in Peanut-specific Immunoglobulin E (sIgE) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, and 36Percent change at Week 8-21.03 Percent Change
DupilumabPercent Change From Baseline in Peanut-specific Immunoglobulin E (sIgE) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, and 36Percent change at Week 12-32.10 Percent Change
DupilumabPercent Change From Baseline in Peanut-specific Immunoglobulin E (sIgE) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, and 36Percent change at Week 16-32.22 Percent Change
DupilumabPercent Change From Baseline in Peanut-specific Immunoglobulin E (sIgE) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, and 36Percent change at Week 24-49.25 Percent Change
DupilumabPercent Change From Baseline in Peanut-specific Immunoglobulin E (sIgE) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, and 36Percent change at Week 36-58.43 Percent Change

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 7, 2026