Skip to content

The Impact of Lingual Frenotomy on Bottle Feeding Mechanics

The Impact of Lingual Frenotomy on Bottle Feeding Mechanics: a Randomized, Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03793413
Enrollment
47
Registered
2019-01-04
Start date
2019-08-01
Completion date
2021-07-27
Last updated
2021-09-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ankyloglossia, Feeding, Bottle, Feeding Disorder of Infancy and Childhood

Keywords

tongue tie, ankyloglossia, infant feeding, bottle feeding

Brief summary

Conservative estimates show that 3-5% of all infants have tongue tie. These studies only focus on visible, anterior tongue tie. Deeper, more visibly subtle cases of ankyloglossia have not been included in these incidence numbers, so the percentage of children with ankyloglossia is much higher than previously thought. Previous research by the investigators demonstrates that posterior tongue tie can be as problematic as anterior ties. An available FDA-approved feeding solution allows for the measurement of infant sucking motions. This allows for detection of changes following surgical intervention. Previous ultrasound studies show the importance of the upward movement of the tongue, but further lingual movement parameters following frenotomy have not been reported. The primary goal of this study is to record changes in lingual movement following lingual frenotomy. The investigators plan to compare improvements over time between a control, non-intervention group and a frenotomy group. Secondary goals include recording validated outcomes of reflux and feeding efficiency.

Interventions

A lingual frenotomy will be performed using a CO2 laser - using the NFANT bottle feeding system, the intervention arm will be compared against the observation arm to determine if there are changes in lingual mobility parameters during bottle feeding.

Sponsors

The Oregon Clinic
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
3 Weeks to 12 Weeks
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Babies who are already fully or partially bottlefeeding * Have already worked with lactation consultant prior to appointment * Diagnosis of tongue tie

Exclusion criteria

* Severe neurologic/cardiac/pulmonary comorbid diseases * Twins/Triplets * Other oral pathology (ie cleft lip/palate)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Improved sucking parameter on the NFANT bottle feeding system - amplitude10 daysThe NFANT bottle feeding system automatically generates measurements of sucking parameters. The first sucking parameter to be measured is calibrated nipple movement (amplitude)
Improved sucking parameter on the NFANT bottle feeding system - sucking frequency10 daysThe NFANT bottle feeding system automatically generates measurements of sucking parameters. The second sucking parameter to be measured is sucking frequency.
Improved sucking parameter on the NFANT bottle feeding system - sucking duration10 daysThe NFANT bottle feeding system automatically generates measurements of sucking parameters. The second sucking parameter to be measured is sucking duration.
Improved sucking parameter on the NFANT bottle feeding system - sucking smoothness10 daysThe NFANT bottle feeding system automatically generates measurements of sucking parameters. The second sucking parameter to be measured is sucking smoothness.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Measurement of infant reflux10 daysUse of a validated survey (the infant gastroesophageal reflux questionnaire revised or I-GERQ-R questionnaire). The I-GERQ-R utilizes ordinal response scales to measure the severity of symptoms associated with infant gas- troesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Scoring involves the sum- marization of 12 items (score range, 0-42), where lower scores reflect lower symptom severity.
Measurement of feeding efficiency10 daysFeeding efficiency can be measured (volume of intake over measured time)

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026