Skip to content

Nursing Narratives, Reflective Practice and Professional Development (NarratUN)

Narratives and Reflective Practice: A Programme for the Development of Professional Competences in Nursing

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03791411
Acronym
NarratUN
Enrollment
69
Registered
2019-01-02
Start date
2016-10-01
Completion date
2017-06-30
Last updated
2019-01-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Narrative Medicine

Keywords

Clinical Narratives, Respect, Intentional presence, knowing the person, Professional development

Brief summary

Background: In addition to foster reflective practice, clinical narratives may be used as a means to improve nurses' critical thinking and their acquisition of clinical competencies. However, few studies have studied their potential value to promote nursing professional development and there is no evidence that shows their value as a tool to improve nurses' competencies to provide a person-centred nursing care. Purpose: To evaluate the preliminary efficacy of narratives for the development of three nursing professional competences -respect, intentional presence and knowing the person- paramount to provide person-centred care. Method: A pilot quasi-experimental study. A total of 34 nurses enrolled in a global training course of a nursing specialization were recruited in September 2016. All the nurses received a multi-component intervention based on the Critical Reflexive Inquiry Model. The strategies of this program consisted in the writing of 3 narratives; 3 masterclass of 3, 2 and 3 hours respectively; a discussion group; and a face-to-face interview. The NarratUN Evaluation tool was used to assess outcomes. The primary outcome was the difference in the mean of respect, intentional presence and knowing the person pre and post intervention. Changes within nurses were analyzed using Wilcoxon signed Rank test.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Universidad de Navarra
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Being in a specialized training programme

Exclusion criteria

* Not being in a specialized training programme

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Respect. Measurement tool: NarratUN Evaluation Tool (NET)9 monthThe difference in the mean of respect value (pre-post)
Intentional presence. Measurement tool: NarratUN Evaluation Tool (NET)9 monthThe difference in the mean of intentional presence value (pre-post)
Knowing the person. Measurement tool: NarratUN Evaluation Tool (NET)9 monthThe difference in the mean of knowing the person value (pre-post)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Handling the narrative. Measurement tool: NarratUN Evaluation Tool (NET)9 monthThe difference in the mean of Handling the narrative value (pre-post)
Knowing the person. Measurement tool: NarratUN Evaluation Tool (NET)2 month follow-upThe difference in the mean of knowing the person value along different times of the study
Respect. Measurement tool: NarratUN Evaluation Tool (NET)2 month follow-upThe difference in the mean of respect value along different times of the study
Intentional presence. Measurement tool: NarratUN Evaluation Tool (NET)2 month follow-upThe difference in the mean of intentional presence value along different times of the study

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026