Skip to content

Effectiveness of Picture Exchange Communication System on Gingival Health of Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders

Effectiveness of Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS) on Dental Plaque and Gingival Health of Children With Autism

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03791385
Enrollment
37
Registered
2019-01-02
Start date
2011-04-30
Completion date
2011-10-31
Last updated
2019-01-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Autism Spectrum Disorder

Keywords

Autism Spectrum Disorder, Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS), Tooth-brushing program, Gingival index, Plaque index

Brief summary

The Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS) is a communication system for children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). The aim of this study was to assess the effect of a PECS-based tooth-brushing program on gingival health in children with ASD and assess parents' perception of PECS. This was a prospective interventional study. Using PECS as a pictures/cards series showing a structured tooth-brushing method, 37 children with ASD (31 males, 6 females) (average age 9.49±4.10, 4-16 years) and their parents/caregivers were trained on tooth-brushing twice, two weeks apart. Data collected after examinations (baseline, 3, 6-months) included gingival and plaque indices (GI, PI) and two questionnaires (baseline, 6-months) for demographic data and parents' perception of PECS including: difficulty rating (easy, hard, very hard) and PECS usefulness.

Detailed description

The need for improved oral hygiene routines in individuals with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) has been documented in many reports. The Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS), which is a series of pictures that show a structured method and technique for teeth brushing, was chosen for this study since it is a proven communication system for children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). The aim of the study was to assess the effect of a PECS-based tooth-brushing program on gingival health in children with ASD and assess parents' perception of PECS. This was a prospective interventional study. Using PECS as a pictures/cards series showing a structured tooth-brushing method, 37 children with ASD (31 males, 6 females) (average age 9.49±4.10, 4-16 years) and their parents/caregivers were trained on tooth-brushing twice, two weeks apart. The pictures were placed in the bathroom, at home and/or at the autism center. Data collected after examinations (baseline, 3, 6-months) included gingival and plaque indices (GI, PI) and two questionnaires (baseline, 6-months) for demographic data and parents' perception of PECS including: difficulty rating (easy, hard, very hard) and whether they found PECS useful in teaching their children how to brush their teeth (yes or no).

Interventions

A communication system frequently used with non-verbal children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) that uses a series of pictures that describe how a certain activity is done, in our case showing a structured method and technique for teeth brushing.

Sponsors

Jordan University of Science and Technology
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Children with ASD ages 4-16 years

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
4 Years to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Children diagnosed with ASD. * Age between 4 and 18 years old.

Exclusion criteria

* Children unable to cooperate for data collection (poor behavior during dental examination).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Gingival index score6 monthsThis score indicates the level of gingival inflammation upon examination of teeth, reported as the average score calculated as (total score for all teeth/number of examined teeth): Score 0 (Absence of inflammation), Score 1 (Mild inflammation: slight change in colour (more red) and little change in texture (loss of stippling), No bleeding on probing), Score 2 (Moderate inflammation: moderate glazing, redness, edema and hypertrophy; bleeding on probing), Score 3 (Severe inflammation: marked redness and edema; tendency to spontaneous bleeding; ulceration). A lower score indicates less gingival inflammation (better gingival health) and vice versa.
Plaque index score6 monthsThis score indicates the level of plaque (and reflects level of oral hygiene) upon examination of teeth, reported as the average score, calculated as (total score for all teeth/number of examined teeth): Score 0 (No plaque), Score 1 (Plaque not visible by eye, only detectable using a dental probe), Score 2 (Plaque visible by eye & detectable with a dental probe along the gingival margin of the tooth), Score 4 (Thick layer of plaque visible by eye & detectable by probe covering more than the gingival margin of the tooth). A lower score indicates less plaque (meaning better oral hygiene) and vice versa.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Parents' rating of PECS difficulty6 monthsParents were asked to rate PECS difficulty as: easy, hard, very hard. This was assessed through a questionnaire.
PECS usefulness6 monthsParents were asked whether PECS was useful in teaching their children how to brush their teeth: yes, no. This was assessed through a questionnaire.

Countries

Jordan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026