Skip to content

RCA for CRRT in Liver Failure and High Risk Bleeding Patients

The Efficacy and Safety of Regional Citrate Anticoagulation Versus No-anticoagulation for CRRT in Patients With Liver Failure and High Risk Bleeding: a Randomized, Control, Open-labeled Clinical Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03791190
Enrollment
90
Registered
2019-01-02
Start date
2018-09-06
Completion date
2021-08-30
Last updated
2019-01-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Liver Failure

Keywords

CRRT, liver failure, filter lifespan, bleeding

Brief summary

The purpose of this single center, randomized, control, open-labeled study is to evaluate the effect and safety of RCA versus no anticoagulation for CRRT in patients with liver failure and high risk bleeding.

Detailed description

Liver failure (LF) is a common co-morbidity in critical care patients who need continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). Patients with LF are usually associated with impaired coagulation, impaired metabolic ability of anticoagulants, and increased bleeding risk. KDIGO guideline recommended no-anticoagulation for CRRT in patients with liver failure and increased bleeding risk. However, the averaged CRRT circuit lifespan under no-coagulation was reported to be 7-8 hours in patients with liver failure. Commonly, a CRRT regimen needs more than 24 hours treatment, which means 3-4 filters replacement for one regimen in liver failure patients underwent no-anticoagulation CRRT. Several observational studies suggested that regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) during CRRT was effective and safe in patients with liver failure. Therefore, the current opinions on the anticoagulation strategy for CRRT in patients with liver failure and high bleeding risk are controversial. Therefore, the purpose of this single center, randomized, control, open-labeled study is to evaluate the effect and safety of RCA versus no anticoagulation for CRRT in patients with liver failure and high risk bleeding.

Interventions

Sodium citrate (4%) infusion before the filter in order to maintain post-filter ionCa2+ level between 0.25 to 0.35 mmol/L. Calcium gluconate supplementary after the filter to maintain serum ionCa2+ level between 1.0 to 1.2 mmol/L.

OTHERNo-anticoagulation

Patients accepted CRRT without anticoagulant.

Sponsors

Air Force Military Medical University, China
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Liver failure (acute liver failure and chronic liver failure) * High bleeding risk * Scheduled CRRT treatment * Informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Use of other anticoagulants * Uncorrectable hypoxemia (PaO2 \< 60 mmHg) or systemic hypoperfusion shock * Pregnancy or lactation * Fistula, CRRT treatment time \< 12 hours

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Filter failure72 hoursFilter failure

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hypocalcemia72 hoursIonized Ca2+ \< 1.0
Acidosis72 hoursBlood pH \< 7.35
Alkalosis72 hours.Blood pH \> 7.45
Bleeding72 hoursBleeding episode during the CRRT.
Serum Total Ca2+/ion Ca2+ level2, 6, 12, 20, 28, 36, 44, 52, 60, and 72 hours.Serum Total Ca2+/ ionized Ca2+ level
Serum total bilirubin levelEvery 24 hours up to 72 hours.Total bilirubin
Serum AST levelEvery 24 hours up to 72 hours.AST
Serum ALT levelEvery 24 hours up to 72 hours.ALT
Serum citrate concentration2, 6, 12, 20, 28, 36, 44, 52, 60, and 72 hours.Citrate concentration

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactShiren Sun, Doctor
sunshiren@medmail.com.cn+8602984775193
Backup ContactMing Bai, Doctor
mingbai1983@126.comsunshiren@medmail.com.cn

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 8, 2026