Skip to content

Radiofrequency Ablation Combined With Recombinant Human Adenovirus Type 5 in the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Radiofrequency Ablation Combined With Local Injection of Recombinant Human Adenovirus Type 5 in the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma:A Multicenter Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03790059
Enrollment
160
Registered
2018-12-31
Start date
2016-10-31
Completion date
2020-09-30
Last updated
2019-10-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Keywords

radiofrequency ablation, hepatocellular carcinoma, recombinant human adenovirus type 5 injection

Brief summary

The primary reason for recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is the micro-metastatic lesion that has not been ablated and inactivated in the transitional area.Some clinical trials have confirmed that H101(recombinant human adenovirus type 5 injection) has selective oncolysis in a variety of solid tumors.However, there are no reports that H101 which is injected during surgery can improve the efficacy of RFA in liver cancer at present.Therefore,We used a multicenter prospective randomized controlled study as the main method to prospectively compare the short-term and long-term efficacy of RFA combined with H101 group and traditional RFA group in the treatment of small liver cancer (single lesion , diameter less than or equal to 3cm,to evaluate the value of RFA combined with H101 injection in reducing the postoperative recurrence rate of small hepatocellular carcinoma, and to provide a reliable evidence-based medical basis for the selection of treatment methods for small hepatocellular carcinoma.

Detailed description

The primary reason for recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is the micro-metastatic lesion that has not been ablated and inactivated in the transitional area.Oncolytic virus H101 is a genetically engineered adenovirus that lacks Elb 55ku protein.Some clinical trials have confirmed that H101 has selective oncolysis in a variety of solid tumors.Furthermore,research shows that the directly dissolving tumor activity of H101 enhanced obviously and activate the body's anti-tumor immune to induce the distal antitumor effect under the condition of mild high temperature (40 ℃ and 42 ℃).The transition zone of RFA can provide the appropriate mild high temperature.However, there are no reports that H101 which is injected during surgery can improve the efficacy of RFA in liver cancer at present.Therefore,We used a multicenter prospective randomized controlled study as the main method to prospectively compare the short-term and long-term efficacy of RFA combined with H101 group and traditional RFA group in the treatment of small liver cancer (single lesion , diameter less than or equal to 3cm,to evaluate the value of RFA combined with H101 injection in reducing the postoperative recurrence rate of small hepatocellular carcinoma, and to provide a reliable evidence-based medical basis for the selection of treatment methods for small hepatocellular carcinoma.

Interventions

DRUGH101

Intraoperative injection of H101 can improve the efficacy of RFA in hepatocellular carcinoma.

PROCEDURERFA

Treat the samll HCC with the RFA.

Sponsors

Southwest Hospital, China
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. The patients understand the content and significance of the study and we obtain a written informed consent from them. 2. The patients' gender are not limited and are between the ages of 18 and 75. 3. Liver function of Child-Pugh Class A or B;The retention rate of indocyanine green for 15 minutes is less than or equal to 20%. 4. The ECOG score is 0. 5. The diagnosis was a single hepatocellular carcinoma with a diameter of no more than 3cm. 6. There were no other related diseases affecting RFA treatment.

Exclusion criteria

1. There are tumor emboli in the large vessels of the liver;distant metastasis of HCC. 2. The patient has or has had a history of refractory ascites,hepatic encephalopathy, or esophageal varices hemorrhage. 3. The patient was complicated with other malignant tumors. 4. The patient has severe cardiac, renal and other organ dysfunction. 5. In addition to viral hepatitis, there are other active infectious diseases.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Tumor-free survivaltwo-years tumor-free survival.Postoperative tumor-free survival is an evaluation of tumor recurrence and metastasis.It's also an evaluation of the efficacy of the experimental group

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall survivaltwo-years overall survival.The percentage of patients who receive certain treatments and are still alive after years of follow-up.

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactKai Feng, M.D
fengkai7688@hotmail.com+86-23-13228683383

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026