Skip to content

Emotional Competence and Compassion Online-Training

Scientific Evaluation of Online-Trainings for Emotional Competence, Compassion and Relationship Competences

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03789929
Acronym
ECCO
Enrollment
400
Registered
2018-12-31
Start date
2019-01-01
Completion date
2020-07-31
Last updated
2019-02-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Emotional Intelligence

Keywords

Stress, Emotion

Brief summary

In this study two different online-courses about emotional competence and compassion are scientifically evaluated with psychometric questionnaires and heart rate variability measuring.

Detailed description

Stress and stress related diseases are becoming a huge health burden in modern societies. Psycho-emotional stress plays a key role in stress regulation. Therefore this study aims to investigate the effects of online-courses addressing emotion regulation. For this aim several different online-courses about emotional competence and compassion are scientifically evaluated with psychometric questionnaires and heart rate variability measuring. The courses are planned by the trainers and people register on their own initiative. The courses have a duration of 4 weeks or three months. They consist of video lectures that explain the content as well as videos giving exercises about the character of the different feelings and about the characteristics of emotions. They teach practices on how to use feelings as an empowering force in life and how to deal with difficult emotions.

Interventions

In this 4 weeks course participants learn how to process difficult emotions that has been overwhelming in the past. They learn how they can use the support of other people and support other people in the processing emotions within a simple and easy to learn setting.

BEHAVIORALFeelings as Powers

In this 3 months course participants learn about the empowering potential of their feelings as well as the difficult aspects of them. In addition to that they learn techniques how to deal with difficult emotions.

Sponsors

Charite University, Berlin, Germany
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* 18-85 years * participation in one of the included courses * e-mail address

Exclusion criteria

* participation in another study * no verbal communication (german) possible * dementia or another disease that limits cognitive abilities

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Self-Report Measure for the Assessment of Emotion Regulation Skills (SEK-27)Assessing change from baseline to 3 months and 6 months after baseline in single workshops and baseline to 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after baseline in the yearly programAssessing full scale, range 0-108, higher score meaning a better outcome

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The World Health Organisation- Five Well-Being Index (WHO-5)Assessing change from baseline to 3 months and 6 months after baseline in single workshops and baseline to 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after baseline in the yearly programAssessing full scale, range 0-100, higher score meaning a better outcome
General Self-efficacy Short Scale (ASKU)Assessing change from baseline to 3 months and 6 months after baseline in single workshops and baseline to 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after baseline in the yearly programAssessing full scale, range 3-15, higher score meaning a better outcome
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)Assessing change from baseline to 3 months and 6 months after baseline in single workshops and baseline to 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after baseline in the yearly programAssessing full scale, range 0-42, lower score meaning a better outcome
Saarbrücken Personality Questionnaire (SPF) based on the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI)Assessing change from baseline to 3 months and 6 months after baseline in single workshops and baseline to 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after baseline in the yearly programAssessing full scale, range 16-80, higher score meaning a better outcome
Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10)Assessing change from baseline to 3 months and 6 months after baseline in single workshops and baseline to 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after baseline in the yearly programAssessing full scale, range 0-40, lower score meaning a better outcome
Medical Outcomes Study Short Form (MOS SF-36)Assessing change from baseline to 3 months and 6 months after baseline in single workshops and baseline to 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after baseline in the yearly programAssessing full scale, range 0-100, higher score meaning a better outcome
Heart Rate Variability (HRV)Assessing change from baseline to 3 and 6 months after baseline in the yearly program24h measuring
Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS)Assessing change from baseline to 3 months and 6 months after baseline in single workshops and baseline to 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after baseline in the yearly programAssessing full scale, range 15-90, higher score meaning a better outcome

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Primary ContactMichael Jeitler, Dr.
michael.jeitler@charite.de+49 30 80505 693
Backup ContactVanessa Bähr
vanessa.baehr@charite.de+49 176 32360472

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026