Skip to content

Oral Hygiene in Patients With Orthodontic Fixed Appliances

Efficacy of Different Methods of Teeth Cleaning on Oral Hygiene in Patients With Orthodontic Fixed Appliances

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03789812
Enrollment
100
Registered
2018-12-31
Start date
2018-12-03
Completion date
2019-07-15
Last updated
2018-12-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Oral Hygiene

Brief summary

The study aims to compare the efficacy of the use of different methods of teeth cleaning on the oral hygiene in patients with orthodontic fixed appliance

Detailed description

Subjects were randomized into four groups, the first group will receive manual tooth brush with super floss, the second group will receive electric tooth brush with super floss, the third group will receive manual tooth brush with water dental flosser and the fourth group will receive electric tooth brush with water flosser.

Interventions

DEVICEManual toothbrush

Soft manual toothbrush (Oral B) will be used to brush occlusal, buccal and lingual teeth surfaces.

Electric toothbrush (Jetpik JP210) will be used to brush occlusal, buccal and lingual teeth surfaces.

Superfloss (Oral B) will be used to clean interproximal teeth surfaces.

Dental water jet (Jetpik JP210) will be used to clean interproximal teeth surfaces.

Sponsors

Riyadh Colleges of Dentistry and Pharmacy
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
TRIPLE (Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
14 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. participants with fixed orthodontic appliance. 2. participants age 14 years and above and didn't have mental of physical disabilities. 3. participants willing to comply with given oral hygiene instructions.

Exclusion criteria

1. patients with mental retardation. 2. patients with systematic diseases.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in plaque indexbaseline, after 4 weeks and after 8 weeksplaque index: 0 no plaque, 1 plaque seen only on tip of explorer or with disclosing agents, 2 plaque seen with naked eye, 3 abundance of plaque
Change in gingival indexbaseline, after 4 weeks and after 8 weeksgingival index: 0, normal gingiva, 1 mild inflammation- slight change in color, slight edema and bleeding on probing. 2 moderate inflammation - redness, edema and bleeding on probing. 3, sever inflammation - redness, edema, and tendency to spontaneous bleeding

Countries

Saudi Arabia

Contacts

Primary ContactOmar H Alkadhi
omar.alkadhi@riyadh.edu.sa966505154754

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026