Skip to content

Left Atrial Appendage Closure in Combination With Catheter Ablation

The Efficacy and Safety of Left Atrial Appendage Closure in Combination With Catheter Ablation in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03788941
Acronym
LAACablation
Enrollment
1200
Registered
2018-12-28
Start date
2017-01-01
Completion date
2024-12-31
Last updated
2023-01-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation

Brief summary

This study is a prospective cohort study aimed at investigating the efficacy and safety of left atrial appendage closure in combination with catheter ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Detailed description

This study is a prospective cohort investigating the efficacy and safety of catheter ablation in combination with left atrial appendage closure in patients with atrial fibrillation. This study will be conducted in accordance with the following procedures: 1. Screen out patients in accordance with the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The following assessments should be made: demographic data, medical history, physical examination, vital signs data, the height and body weight, laboratory parameters, ECG examination, assessment for medication and evaluation for inclusion/exclusion criteria. 2. Participants receive radiofrequency ablation in combination with left atrial appendage closure. Participants will be assessed and observed carefully during and after the operation. 3. The participants will be followed-up in the third, ninth and twelfth months after the treatments. The main follow-up includes the review of ECG, 24h Holter monitoring, echocardiography, transesophageal echocardiography, coronary CT et al. and AFEQT questionnaire, and brain CT or MRI if necessary. Participants' medication and symptoms will also be observed and recorded. The incidence of stroke, systemic embolism, transient ischemic attack, major bleeding and all-cause death; the rate of patients maintaining sinus rhythm, hospitalization due to heart failure, and perioperative complications such as pericardial tamponade, wound hematoma and long-term surgery-related complications will be recorded. Adverse events during the trial will also be assessed and recorded.

Interventions

PROCEDUREleft atrial appendage closure and catheter ablation

Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is a treatment strategy to reduce the risk of left atrial appendage blood clots from entering the bloodstream and causing a stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF). Catheter ablation is a procedure used to remove or terminate a faulty electrical pathway or pathological sites from sections of the hearts of those who are prone to developing cardiac arrhythmias such as atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, supraventricular tachycardias (SVT) and Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome (WPW syndrome). The ablation procedure can be classified by energy source: radiofrequency ablation and cryoablation.

Sponsors

Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. History of paroxysmal/persistent/longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation 2. Refractory to at least one antiarrhythmic drug or unwilling to receive long-term antiarrhythmic drugs; 3. With contraindication of longterm anticoagulation or unwilling to receive longterm anticoagulation 4. CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥ 2 and/or HAS-BLED score ≥ 3 5. Provide informed consent to participate in the study; 6. Between 18-90 years

Exclusion criteria

1. myocardial infarction within 3 months 2. Stroke or systemic embolism within 3 months 3. Plan to receive heart transplantation; 4. Life expectancy less than 1 year; 5. Severe bleeding diseases that cannot be treated with short-term anticoagulants; 6. With left atrial or left atrial appendage thrombus; 7. With uncontrolled malignant tumor ; 8. Obvious liver and kidney dysfunction (ALT, AST more than 2 times the upper limit of normal, or CCr \<50%); 9. Women who are pregnant, or breastfeeding. 10. Other conditions not suitable to the combined procedure.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Deathlong-term after the procedure.all-cause death
stroke/TIA/systemic embolismlong-term after the procedure.The incidence of stroke/TIA events in the participants will be reported. Participants with clinical manifestations of stroke/TIA will undergo neurological examination and CT scans for diagnosis.
Major bleedinglong-term after the procedure.The incidence of major bleeding in the participants will be reported.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Heart failure rehospitalizationafter the procedure.acute heart failure leading to hospitalization
maintenance of sinus rhythmafter the procedure outside the 3-month blanking periodThis refers to the percentage of patients who maintain sinus rhythm after catheter ablation or catheter ablation in combination with left atrial appendage closure. Electrocardiogram can be used to diagnose sinus rhythm or arrhythmias.
procedure-related complicationsafter the procedure.These are usually refer to perioperative complications such as cardiac tamponade, lesion hematoma and pseudoaneurysm et al. which are related to the manipulation of operator. Diagnostic ultrasound imaging can efficiently identify these complications.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Atrial fibrillation effects on quality-of-life (AFEQT) scoresat baseline and after the procedureAt baseline and at the 1-year follow-up visit, patients were required to complete a 20-item questionnaire based on the AF effects on quality-of-life (QoL) (AFEQT, http://www.afeqt.org) measure. The 20-item AFEQT survey evaluated 4 domains regarding the QoL assessment and the perception of treatment, i.e., symptoms, daily activities, treatment-related concerns, and treatment satisfaction. The first three domains constituted the global score. The scores of each individual domain and the global score ranged between 0 and 100, with 100 representing the best health status and 0 being the worst health status possible. A validated culturally and linguistically translated version of the AFEQT for China was used.

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactMu Chen, Dr.
chenmu@xinhuamed.com.cn86 021 25077275

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 17, 2026