Skip to content

Comparison Between 2 Techniques for Bilateral Salpingectomy

Comparison Between 2 Techniques for Bilateral Salpingectomy During Cesarean Section

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03788421
Enrollment
51
Registered
2018-12-27
Start date
2019-01-01
Completion date
2021-09-01
Last updated
2022-03-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sterility, Female

Brief summary

A comparison between 2 techniques for bilateral salpingectomy during cesarean section. Primary outcomes are total operative time and bilateral completion of the randomized procedure. Secondary outcomes included surgical complications and post operation complications.

Detailed description

Ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynecologic malignancy. Major contributors to this high mortality are the lack of effective screening strategies, diagnosis at advanced stage of presentation as well as the high risk of recurrence. In the last years the Gynecologic Associations worldwide have recommended that total salpingectomy be considered for potential ovarian cancer risk reduction in benign gynecologic surgeries after completion of childbearing. However, the data are limit regarding the Preferred surgical technique during cesarean section. In this randomized controled trial the investigators will compare between various techniques for bilateral salpingectomy during cesarean section. Primary outcomes are total operative time and bilateral completion of the randomized procedure. Secondary outcomes included surgical complications and post operation complications.

Interventions

DEVICELIGASURE

Electricity based cautery tool used during both laparoscopic and open surgery for optimal hemostasis.

PROCEDUREClamping and suturing

Step by step clamping and suturing of the mesosalpinx until achievement of total salpingectomy.

Sponsors

Rambam Health Care Campus
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Caregiver)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Participants undergoing elective Cesarean Section and are interested and have signed informed consent regarding bilateral salpingectomy.

Exclusion criteria

* Inability to give informed consent. * Preterm delivery (\< 37 weeks' gestation). * Fetal demise. * Prenatal diagnosis of fetal or placental abnormalities. * Previous tubal surgery. * The use of anticoagulants. * Associated immunosuppressive conditions.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total salpingectomy time.Up to 1 week from recruitmentTime in minutes from beginning of salpingectomy procedure until end of the salpingectomy procedure.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Bleeding during cesarean sectionUp to 4 hours from the beginning of the procedureEstimated amount of bleeding in milliliters during the whole cesarean section.
Hemoglobin levelUp to 5 days from surgeryChanges in hemoglobin level before and after surgery
Blood transfusion rateUp to 5 days from surgeryThe rate of blood transfusion post cesarean section
Bleeding during salpingectomyUp to 4 hours from the beginning of the procedureEstimated amount of bleeding in milliliters during the salpingectomy procedure
Visual analogue scoreUp to 2 weeks from surgeryPain scoring between 0-10 post-surgery
Wound complicationsUp to 2 weeks from surgeryThe rate of wound complications postpartum.
Need for opioidsUp to 2 weeks from surgeryThe rate of opioid treatment postpartum
Postoperative stayUp to 2 weeks from surgeryThe length of maternal postoperative stay.

Countries

Israel

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026