Prostate Cancer, Urinary Incontinence
Conditions
Brief summary
Prospective randomized blinded RCT comparing Transdouglas Prostatectomy to classical transperitoneal anterior radical prostatectomy
Detailed description
We will evaluate functional urinary and sexual recovery, oncologic outcomes and postoperative complications in patients over a follow up period of 12 months
Interventions
PROCEDURErobotic Prostatectomy (RARP)
Modification of robotic Prostatectomy Arm A classic technique/ anterior transperitoneal RARP Arm B Transdouglas Technique/retzius-sparing RARP
Sponsors
Heidelberg University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Indication for radical prostatectomy * \>18 years old * Literate * Preoperatively continent * informed signed consent for study
Exclusion criteria
* cT4-Cancer * Withdrawl of consent to study
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Urinary continence | 1 Week after Prostatectomy | Pad use |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Resection margine | pathology report, approximately 1 week postoperatively | — |
| Urinary continence | 3, 6 and 12 months after Prostatectomy | Pad use |
| Postoperative complications | First 12 months after Prostatectomy | — |
| postoperative PSA | 12 months | — |
Countries
Germany
Outcome results
None listed