Skip to content

Severe Influenza Trial of ARbidol

Oseltamivir and Arbidol Combination Antiviral Therapy Versus Oseltamivir Monotherapy for the Treatment of Severe influenza: a Multicentre, Double-blind, Randomised Phase 3 Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03787459
Acronym
STAR
Enrollment
200
Registered
2018-12-26
Start date
2019-01-18
Completion date
2024-10-17
Last updated
2025-06-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Influenza

Keywords

severe influenza, arbidol, oseltamivir, ordinal scale

Brief summary

This is a multicenter, randomised, double-blind, controlled study to assess the efficacy and safety of arbidol plus oseltamivir, compared with oseltamivir alone in approximately 200 hospitalized adults and adolescent patients with confirmed severe influenza. Patients should be randomised as soon as possible after screening (no later than 12 hours), providing they are within 7 days of symptom onset. Patients will be assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive an arbidol plus oseltamivir, or oseltamivir plus placebo. Rescreening of patients who fail to meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be permitted only once, providing the time from symptom onset to randomization is still within 7 days. Arbidol/placebo will be administrated as 200mg TID from Days 1-7. Oseltamivir will be administered as 75mg twice daily from Days 1-7 (dose to be adjusted for renal impairment). Oseltamivir could be continued till influenza PCR negative. Both drugs, along with the corresponding placebo for arbidol, will be started at the time of randomization.

Interventions

Oseltamivir plus Arbidol will be administrated from Days 1-7.

DRUGPlacebos

Oseltamivir plus placebos will be administrated from Days 1-7.

Sponsors

University of Oxford
CollaboratorOTHER
Peking University
CollaboratorOTHER
National Institute for Viral Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Capital Medical University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Hospitalized males or females with a positive antigen or PCR test for influenza virus infection 2. Age ≥16 years at the time of signing Informed Consent Form 3. Arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2)/ pulse oxygen saturation (SPO2) ≤94% in room air condition 4. ≤ 7 days since symptom onset. The onset of symptoms is defined as either: Time of the first increase in body temperature (an increase of at least 1ºC from normal body temperature- ≥38℃); Time when the patient experiences at least one general or respiratory symptom. 5. Willingness to use contraception for 7 days after the end of treatment

Exclusion criteria

1. Physicians make a decision that trial involvement is not in patients' best interest, or any condition that does not allow the protocol to be followed safely. 2. Patient refusal to accept invasive organ support treatment if needed 3. More than 3 consecutive doses of NAIs within 2 days before enrolment (including oseltamivir, zanamivir, peramivir) 4. Women who are pregnant (including a positive pregnancy test at enrolment), breastfeeding, or within 2 weeks post-partum. The following female subjects do not need to undergo a pregnancy test at enrolment: a. Postmenopausal (defined as cessation of regular menstrual periods for 2 years or more and confirmed by a follicle-stimulating hormone test) women. b. Women who are surgically sterile by hysterectomy, bilateral oophorectomy, or tubal ligation. 5. Any condition requiring renal replacement therapy 6. Severe liver disease (Child-Pugh score ≥ C) 7. A history of hypersensitivity to arbidol or oseltamivir (Tamiflu®) 8. Currently or have been involved in another anti-influenza treatment trial in the last 28 days 9. Patients who, in the opinion of the investigator, would be unlikely to comply with required study visits, self-assessments, and interventions

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The primary efficacy endpoint was time to clinical status improvement (the event) up to 28 days28 daysthe event defined as seven-category ordinal scale of clinical status after enrolment decrease by two category or discharged

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Day 28 mortality rate28 days
Proportion of Clinical Improvement (≥2-category decline / discharge with improvement) at Days 7, 14, and 28 since arbidol initiationUp to 28 days
Proportion of Patients at Each Category of the 7-category Ordinal Scale at Days 7, 14, and 28up to 28 days
Time to decline of one category on the seven-category ordinal scale of clinical status lasting for 48h, or hospital discharge within 28 days, daysUp to 28 daysthe event defined as seven-category ordinal scale of clinical status after enrolment decrease by one category or discharged
Incidence of Secondary Infection, Secondary Aspergillus and Bacterial InfectionUp to 28 days
Patients Requiring Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy (CRRT) After TreatmentUp to 28 days
Duration of Mechanical Ventilation (days), Oxygen Therapy (days), Hospitalization (days), Time from Randomization to Discharge (days), Time from Randomization to Death (days)Up to 28 days

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026