Skip to content

IANB Success Rate With and Without Panoramic Help

The Success of the Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block Anesthesia With Alveolar Nerve Localization by Using of Panoramic Radiography in Comparison to Routine IAN Block Anesthesia: RCT

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03786211
Enrollment
30
Registered
2018-12-24
Start date
2018-11-12
Completion date
2019-02-28
Last updated
2018-12-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anesthesia, Anesthesia; Functional

Keywords

Mandible, Anesthesia

Brief summary

Since it is difficult to achieve anesthesia in lower jaw and the success rate of IANB is low and there are a lot of anatomic variations for the location of inferior alveolar nerve in different races, investigators decided to compare the success rate of inferior alveolar nerve block, with and without using a panoramic radiograph in Bandar Abbas population, and see if using a panoramic radiograph can increase the preciseness of the injection.

Detailed description

This is a double blinded cross-over randomized controlled trial study conducted on all the patients of the dental clinic indicated for bilateral extraction or filling. The randomization method is block balanced randomization. All patients will ask to fulfill the ethical Form. This form acquired demographic information (e.g. age, sex) about patients. A panoramic radiograph will take from those who matched the inclusion criteria and signed the agreement. Then a tooth from one side will be treated and the tooth from the other side of the mouth will treat at least 2 weeks later by the same dentist.

Interventions

PROCEDUREIANB by the guide of Panoramic

IANB will be injected by the guide of panoramic radiograph

PROCEDUREIANB without the guide of Panoramic

IANB will be injected without the guide of panoramic radiograph, in the routine way.

Sponsors

Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patients indicated for bilateral tooth extractions of fillings. * Physically and mentally healthy patients who could express their pain. * having panoramic radiograph from the past six months for other dental purposes.

Exclusion criteria

* sensitive to the regular anesthetics containing epinephrine. * patients with acute or chronic pericoronitis. * pregnancy * trismus

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Number of participants with good Anesthesia30 minutes after injection

Countries

Iran

Contacts

Primary ContactSajad Ansarifard, DDS, PhD
Sajad.ansarifard@hums.ac.ir?989366584476
Backup ContactHossein Dabbagh
hossein.dabagh@hums.ac.ir

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026