Skip to content

Comparing Laparoscopic and Open Surgery for Pancreatic Carcinoma

Total Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Carcinoma(TJDBPS07) a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03785743
Enrollment
200
Registered
2018-12-24
Start date
2019-03-01
Completion date
2027-05-01
Last updated
2022-03-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Laparoscopic, Pancreatic Carcinoma, Pancreaticoduodenectomy

Keywords

Pancreatic Carcinoma, Laparoscopic, Pancreaticoduodenectomy, Survival

Brief summary

Background: Pancreatic cancer (PC) is one of the most aggressive malignant neoplasms with poor outcomes. Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) is the only curative treatment for PC. Minimally invasive surgery has been progressively developed, first with the advent of hybrid-laparoscopy and recently with the total laparoscopy surgeries, but a number of issues are currently being debated, including the superiority between total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (TLPD)and the open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD). Studies comparing these two surgery techniques are merging and randomized controlled trials (RCT) are lacking but clearly required. Methods/design: TJDBPS07 is a multicenter prospective, randomized controlled, trial comparing TLPD and OPD in pancreatic cancers. A total of 200 patients with pancreatic cancer underwent PD will be randomly allocated to the TLPD group or OPD group with an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pattern. The trial's aim is to exploring the overall survival (OS), disease free survival (DFS) and quality of life. The duration of the entire trial is seven years including prearrangement, a presumably five-year follow-up and analyses. Discussion: Despite the fact there are several RCTs comparing minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (MIPD) and Open approach or LPD versus OPD. This trial will be the first comparing TLPD and OPD in a large multicenter setting. TJDBPS01 trial is hypothesized to assess whether TLPD has superiority over OPD in recovery and other aspects.

Interventions

PROCEDURETLPD Surgery

TLPD

PROCEDUREOPD Surgery

OPD

Sponsors

Shandong Provincial Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
Xinqiao Hospital of Chongqing
CollaboratorOTHER
Hunan Provincial People's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
The First Hospital of Jilin University
CollaboratorOTHER
Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University
CollaboratorOTHER
The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University
CollaboratorOTHER
Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine
CollaboratorOTHER
Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College
CollaboratorOTHER
First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
Peking Union Medical College Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Henan Provincial People's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Fujian Medical University Union Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Fudan University
CollaboratorOTHER
Tongji Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age between 18 years and 75 years. 2. Histologically confirmed PDAC or clinically diagnosed PDAC by an MDT without histopathologic evidence. 3. Patients feasible to undergo both LPD and OPD according to MDT evaluations. 4. Patients understanding and willing to comply with this trial. 5. Provision of written informed consent before patient registration. 6. Patients meeting the curative treatment intent in accordance with clinical guidelines.

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients with distant metastases, including peritoneal, liver, distant lymph node metastases, and involvement of other organs. 2. Patients requiring left, central or total pancreatectomy or other palliative surgery. 3. Preoperative American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) score ≥ 4. 4. History of other malignant disease. 5. Pregnant or breast-feeding women. 6. Patients with serious mental disorders. 7. Patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy. 8. Patients with vascular invasion and requiring vascular resection as evaluated by the MDT team according to abdominal imaging data. 9. Body mass index \> 35 kg/m2. 10. Patients participating in any other clinical trials within 3 months.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
5-year overall survival5 year5-year overall survival

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
disease-free survival5 yearsthe interval between the day of surgery and the day of tumour recurrence
90-day mortality90 daysthe percentage of patients who died within 90 days postoperatively
complication rate90 dayscomplications related to PD
overall survival5 yearsthe interval between the day of surgery and the day of death for various reasons
length of stay90 daysthe number of nights spent in the hospital from the end of the surgical procedure until discharge or death
intraoperative indicators90 daysdescription of the patients' intraoperative condition relating to the safety of patients
comprehensive complication index90 dayscalculated as the sum of all complications that are weighted for their severity

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactRenyi Qin
172356995@qq.com+8602783665314
Backup ContactHag Zhang
172356995@qq.com+8602783665314

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 12, 2026