Autism Spectrum Disorder, Typical Development
Conditions
Brief summary
This study compares the efficacy of two intervention strategies for improving social outcomes for autistic adolescents and young adults when interacting with unfamiliar non-autistic peers.
Detailed description
Intellectually-capable older adolescents and young adults with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) often struggle to secure and maintain employment, succeed in college, or develop satisfying personal and professional relationships. Current psychosocial interventions for this population have produced limited effects on real-world functioning. These programs typically seek to improve social skill and understanding with the hope that these abilities will translate to better functioning and are often effective at increasing knowledge of social rules and norms,yet these improvements frequently do not translate to better social and life outcomes in the real world. One reason for their limited efficacy may be that the mechanisms involved in real-life social interaction continue to be poorly understood for this population. The current study is designed to specify the factors that predict more or less favorable social outcomes for autistic adolescents and young adults when interacting with an unfamiliar, non-autistic peer, and test a multifaceted intervention for improving these outcomes. The intervention will target both brain and behavior, not only in the individual with ASD but also in their typically-developing (TD) partners. For TD participants, the efficacy of a training program will be tested to determine if social experiences for older adolescents with ASD can be improved by increasing knowledge, acceptance, and understanding of autism among TD individuals. For the participants with ASD, this study will test the efficacy of an innovative, non-invasive neurostimulation session using Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) to target social brain regions involved in perspective-taking and social reciprocity. Social outcomes for each intervention will be compared to a no intervention control condition, and to each other, to provide a comprehensive examination of intrinsic and extrinsic factors contributing to social interaction quality for autistic adolescents and young adults.
Interventions
DEVICEtDCS
Participants either complete active and sham tDCS sessions one week apart or an autism training program.
BEHAVIORALAutism Training
Autism Information Presentation developed by Dr. Grace Iarocci's Autism & Developmental Disorders Lab at Simon Fraser University
Sponsors
The University of Texas at Dallas
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)
Intervention model description
Autistic participants were going to be recruited for an active or sham tDCS session. However, no participants were enrolled in these conditions due to COVID. TD participants were assigned to receive or not receive a training session.
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to 21 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Age: 18-21 * DSM-IV-TR or DSM-5 diagnosis of an Autism Spectrum Disorder * IQ\>70
Exclusion criteria
* Presence or history intellectual impairment (defined as IQ \<70) * Presence or history of medical, cardiac, or neurological disorders that may affect brain function (e.g., cardiac disease, endocrine disorders, renal disease, pulmonary disease, history of seizures or head trauma with unconsciousness for a period of 15 minutes or greater or CNS tumors) * Presence of sensory limitation including visual (e.g., blindness, glaucoma, vision uncorrectable to 20/40) or hearing (e.g. hearing loss) impairments that interfere with assessment * Not proficient in English * Presence of substance abuse in the past one month * Presence of substance dependence not in remission for the past six months * Contraindications for tDCS (e.g., pregnancy or implanted devices such as pace maker)
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Subjective Social Interaction Quality | Interaction with unfamiliar partner occurs immediately following the autism training; self-report measure given immediately after the interaction, duration of completion averages around 2 minutes | Non-autistic participants social interest in autistic partners as measured by the First Impression Scale (Sasson et al., 2017). Four items, each scored on a Likert Scale from 1 to 4 in which higher values indicate greater social interest, are averaged to produce a social interest composite that serves as the primary outcome measure of the non-autistic participant's social interest in their autistic conversation partner. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Active Anodal tDCS Active anodal tDCS followed by behavioral testing Intervention: Device: active anodal tDCS
tDCS: Participants either complete active and sham tDCS sessions one week apart or an autism training program. | 0 |
| Sham tDCS Sham tDCS followed by behavioral testing Intervention: Device: sham tDCS
tDCS: Participants either complete active and sham tDCS sessions one week apart or an autism training program. | 0 |
| Autism Training Program Training program designed to increase autism understanding followed by behavioral testing Intervention:Training program
Autism Training: Autism Information Presentation developed by Dr. Grace Iarocci's Autism & Developmental Disorders Lab at Simon Fraser University | 38 |
| Social Interaction Without Intervention Control condition: Behavioral testing without an intervention component | 40 |
| Total | 78 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Autism Training Program | Social Interaction Without Intervention | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 20.26 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.79 | 20.63 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.75 | 20.45 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.77 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 2 Participants | 8 Participants | 10 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 36 Participants | 32 Participants | 68 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 38 participants | 40 participants | 78 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 38 Participants | 40 Participants | 78 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 38 | 0 / 40 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 38 | 0 / 40 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 38 | 0 / 40 |
Outcome results
Primary
Subjective Social Interaction Quality
Non-autistic participants social interest in autistic partners as measured by the First Impression Scale (Sasson et al., 2017). Four items, each scored on a Likert Scale from 1 to 4 in which higher values indicate greater social interest, are averaged to produce a social interest composite that serves as the primary outcome measure of the non-autistic participant's social interest in their autistic conversation partner.
Time frame: Interaction with unfamiliar partner occurs immediately following the autism training; self-report measure given immediately after the interaction, duration of completion averages around 2 minutes
Population: Zero participants are listed for the Active and Sham tDCS arms because these arms were terminated before data collection began.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Autism Training Program | Subjective Social Interaction Quality | 2.74 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.45 |
| Social Interaction Without Intervention | Subjective Social Interaction Quality | 2.45 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.61 |