Skip to content

Non-warfarin Oral AntiCoagulant Resumption After Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Atrial Fibrillation Patients

Non-warfarin Oral AntiCoagulant Resumption After Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Atrial Fibrillation Patients (NOAC-GAP) - a Randomised Controlled Study

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03785080
Acronym
NOAC-GAP
Enrollment
552
Registered
2018-12-24
Start date
2019-03-11
Completion date
2025-12-30
Last updated
2020-05-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding

Keywords

gastrointestinal bleeding, stroke, thromboembolism, atrial fibrillation, NOAC

Brief summary

Current clinical society guidelines and statements are non-specific and relatively open-ended regarding the optimal timing to restart non-warfarin oral anticoagulant (NOAC) after gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who require the prophylactic medication for stroke prevention. These patients are at increased risk for devastating future thromboembolic events including stroke if NOAC is not resumed promptly, whilst premature resumption of anticoagulants can result in recurrent GIB, haemorrhage, anaemia, myocardial ischaemia and infarction in those with ischaemic heart disease, and even death. However, the question as to how early a NOAC can be safely restarted after acute GIB has not been previously answered, and there remains an important knowledge gap.

Detailed description

The effectiveness and relative safety of NOACs have been demonstrated in large international studies where reductions in the incidence of stroke in patients with AF have been reported. However, the benefits of an anticoagulant are offset by increased incident rates of bleeding including gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) and, less commonly, intracranial bleeding, warranting careful anticoagulation management during periods when patients are susceptible to the risks for bleeding, stroke and thromboembolism. The exact duration for withholding NOAC after acute GIB is unknown and in general, current clinical society guidelines and statements are non-specific and relatively open-ended regarding the optimal timing to restart non-warfarin oral anticoagulant (NOAC) after gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who require the prophylactic medication for stroke prevention. These patients are at increased risk for devastating future thromboembolic events including stroke if NOAC is not resumed, whilst premature resumption of anticoagulants can result in recurrent GIB, haemorrhage, anaemia, myocardial ischaemia and infarction in those with ischaemic heart disease, and even death. The purpose of this study is to determine if restarting NOAC very early after endoscopic haemostasis of bleeding peptic ulcer lesions is equivalent to early resumption in AF patients in terms of safety and efficacy for prevention of recurrent bleeding freedom from GIB recurrence, while maintaining undiminished benefits in reducing incident rates of systemic thromboembolism.

Interventions

OTHERrestart NOAC very early

withhold NOAC less than 24 hours Post OGD

OTHERrestart NOAC early

withhold NOAC for 72 to 84 hours Post OGD

Sponsors

Chinese University of Hong Kong
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥18 years * History of AF * Taking any kind of NOAC at the time of index acute GIB * Acute upper GIB (non-variceal bleeding lesions accounting for the GIB) with or without endoscopic treatment confirmed endoscopic haemostasis verified by GI specialist * Patient or next-of-kin able to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Concomitant stroke (including TIA) at the time of index GIB * Requiring bridging IV heparin therapy * Portal hypertension * Known bleeding diathesis * Other conditions precluding use of NOAC at the time of randomisation * Pregnancy * Tumour bleeding * Antidote administration to reverse anticoagulation effect of NOACs

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding30 daysmelaena and/or haematemesis with drop in Hb \>2g/dL and confirmation of bleeding by endoscopy.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding90 daysmelaena and/or haematemesis with drop in Hb \>2g/dL and confirmation of bleeding by endoscopy.
Ischemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack30 daysan acute episode of neurologic deficit of presumed vascular or cardioembolic origin; its presence will be confirmed by a member of the neurology service
Systemic thromboembolism30 daysany clinical and/or radiographic acute stroke and/or an acute peripheral arterial thromboembolic event including acute limb ischaemia, coronary embolism and arterial thromboembolism
Death6 monthsAll-cause mortality

Countries

Australia, Hong Kong, Singapore

Contacts

Primary ContactBing Yee SUEN, BSN
suenbingyee@cuhk.edu.hk+852 3505 2640
Backup ContactMing Yeung HO, BSc
andrewho@cuhk.edu.hk+852 2637 1398

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026