Deep Vein Thrombosis, Thromboses, Venous
Conditions
Keywords
Wells Clinical score, Thromboprophylaxis
Brief summary
This study aimed (1) revaluating the efficacy of the Wells' clinical prediction score for an inpatient population; and the weight of the presence of thromboprophylaxis treatment on the score, and (2) evaluating the correlation of a risk stratification established between a physician specialised in thrombosis and any other doctor.
Interventions
Each patient received Doppler ultrasound for research of DVT, no matter the risk stratification.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Any patient addressed to an Vascular Medicine unit for a clinical suspicion of DVT, with risk stratification through the modified Wells score by the referent doctor.
Exclusion criteria
* Patient addressed to our Vascular Medicine unit for any other reason. * Patient addressed to our Vascular Medicine unit for DVT detection to help in a pulmonary embolism suspicion. * Age under 18 yo * Patients unable to express their informed consent.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Performance of the Wells Clinical prediction score | For enrollment to end of enrollment at 12 months | Analyse area under the curve (AUC) of the Wells' score ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) curve for an inpatient population |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Impact of thromboprophylaxis treatment | For enrollment to end of enrollment at 12 months | Compare area under curve of ROC curves of Wells' score between an inpatient population with or without thromboprophylaxis treatment |
| Coherency of Wells' score between an doctor specialized in thrombosis and any other doctor. | For enrollment to end of enrollment at 12 months | Compare Area under curve for ROC curves of Wells' score between an doctor specialized in thrombosis and any other doctor. |
Countries
France