Skip to content

Single-Versus Multiple-dose Antimicrobial Prophylaxis for Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy in Achalasia

Randomized Control Study Comparing Single-Versus Multiple-dose Antimicrobial Prophylaxis for Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy in Achalasia

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03784365
Acronym
SMAPP
Enrollment
40
Registered
2018-12-21
Start date
2018-12-01
Completion date
2020-03-31
Last updated
2020-01-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Achalasia Cardia

Keywords

oesophageal aperistalsis

Brief summary

Achalasia cardia is a primary oesophageal motility disorder of unknown etiology. Recently, peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has gained widespread acceptance as an effective treatment modality for achalasia. Major adverse events are uncommon with POEM. Since the operator works close to mediastinum during the POEM procedure, there is a potential for infectious complications. Therefore, intravenous antibiotics are universally used to prevent infection-related adverse events. There is no fixed protocol or duration of antibiotics for the same.

Detailed description

POEM is a novel minimally invasive treatment for achalasia, which emerged as an offshoot of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). Major adverse events during POEM are rare and therefore, the procedure is considered safe. Bacteremia can occur after endoscopic procedures like esophageal dilation, sclerotherapy of varices, and instrumentation of obstructed bile ducts. Bacteremia has been advocated as a surrogate marker for risk of infection-related complications. In POEM procedure, the endoscopist works in close proximity to mediastinum and peritoneal cavity. Therefore, the potential for infection-related complications is high. However, despite of different antibiotic protocols at different centers, the reported incidence of infection-related complications is very low. At present, prophylactic antibiotics are universally initiated before starting the POEM procedure and continued for a variable duration after POEM ranging from 1 day to 7 days. Data from surgical studies indicate that prolonged administration of antibiotics for longer than 24 hours may not be beneficial. Prolonged use of antibiotics not only increases the costs and exposure to drug toxicity directly but also may be associated with an increased risk of acquired antibiotic resistance as well as infection with Clostridium difficile. With this background, we planned a study to evaluate the difference in the infectious complications between short vs long duration antibiotic in patients with achalasia undergoing POEM.

Interventions

DRUGOne dose of Cefo-perazone Sulbactum

Antibiotic

Sponsors

Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, India
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All the patient(aged 18-65) who underwent POEM for achalasia cardia.

Exclusion criteria

* Unwillingness to give written informed consent * Patients with multiple co morbidities. * Immunocompromised patients /on steroid therapy. * Patients with indications for antibiotic prophylaxis (infective endocarditis). * Patients who have received antibiotics in the last 1 week . * Patients who have possible signs of infection during preparation for POEM

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Infectious complications associated with POEM1 monthThe primary outcome of the study is to estimate the difference in the incidence of infectious complications in the two groups

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adverse events associated with administration of intravenous antibiotics1-monthBoth the groups will be compared for the incidence of complications associated with the use of intravenous antibiotics
Comparison of erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) between the two groups72 hoursBoth the groups will be compared for mean ESR at 1-hour
Incidence of positive blood cultures72 hoursThe main secondary outcome is difference in the incidence of positive blood cultures between the two groups
Comparison of serum Procalcitonin between the two groups72 hoursDifference in the mean serum procalcitonin values between both the groups
Comparison of inflammatory markers (CRP) between the two groups72 hoursBoth the groups will be compared for mean blood C-reactive protein (CRP)

Countries

India

Contacts

Primary ContactBhushan Bhaware
drbhushanbhaware3@gmail.com9833022139

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 11, 2026