Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
Conditions
Brief summary
The suggested clinical trial is part of the KidsAP project funded by the European Commission's Horizon 2020 Framework Programme and JDRF. It evaluates the use of the Artificial Pancreas (closed loop system) in very young children with type 1 diabetes (T1D) aged 1-7 years. This outcome study aims to determine whether 24/7 automated closed loop glucose control improves time in range compared to sensor augmented pump therapy. An extension phase will evaluate the effect of long-term home use of the 24/7 automated hybrid closed loop insulin delivery system on glucose control (UK sites only). The study employs an open-label, multi-centre, multi-national, randomized, two-period, crossover design. Participants undergo a 2-4 week run-in period, followed by two 16-week treatment periods (one for each therapy) separated by a 1-4 week washout. The order of treatments is randomized. Up to 80 young children (with a target of 72 randomized subjects) on insulin pump therapy will be recruited from paediatric outpatient diabetes clinics. Before using the study devices, participants and their parents/guardians receive training on the safe use of the study pump, continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) device, and hybrid closed loop system. Nursery or school carers may also be trained if needed. During the closed loop arm, subjects use the system for 16 weeks under free-living conditions at home and in nursery/school without remote monitoring. In the control arm, subjects use sensor augmented pump therapy for 16 weeks under similar conditions, with regular contact and 24/7 telephone support from the study team. The primary endpoint is the time spent in the target glucose range (3.9-10.0 mmol/l) as recorded by CGM. Secondary outcomes include the time spent with glucose levels above and below target and other CGM metrics. Safety assessments include the frequency and severity of hypoglycaemic episodes and diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). In the extension phase, participants have follow-up contacts every 3 months, with the primary endpoint measured over 18 months from the end of the primary phase and compared to sensor augmented pump therapy during that phase. Secondary outcomes, safety, and utility will be assessed similarly.
Detailed description
Purpose of clinical trial: To determine whether 24/7 automated hybrid closed loop will improve glucose control as measured by time within the target range compared with sensor augmented pump therapy in very young children with T1D. Study objectives: The study objective is to evaluate the safety, efficacy and utility of automated hybrid closed loop glucose control in very young children with type 1 diabetes. 1. EFFICACY: The objective is to assess the ability of a hybrid closed loop system to maintain CGM glucose levels within the target range of 3.9 to 10 mmol/l (70 to 180 mg/dl) in comparison with sensor augmented pump therapy in very young children with type 1 diabetes. 2. SAFETY: The objective is to evaluate the safety of closed loop glucose control compared with sensor augmented pump therapy in terms of episodes and severity of hypoglycaemia, frequency of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) and nature and severity of other adverse events. 3. UTILITY: The objective is to determine the acceptability and duration of use of the closed loop system in this population. 4. HUMAN FACTORS: The objective is to assess emotional and behavioural characteristics of participants and parents/guardians and their response to the closed loop system and clinical trial using validated surveys and semi-structured qualitative interviews. 5. HEALTH ECONOMICS: The objective is to perform a cost utility analysis to inform reimbursement decision-making. Participating clinical centres: 1. Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK 2. Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK 3. DECCP, Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg, Grand Duché de Luxembourg 4. University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany 5. Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria 6. Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria 7. Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria Sample Size: 72 participants randomised (8-12 participants per centre). At the primary phase final visit, participants (UK sites only) on sensor-augmented pump therapy as their standard clinical care will be invited to participate in an extension phase of closed loop therapy for a further 18 months. Maximum duration of study for a subject: 11 months (primary phase). 29 months for participants (UK sites only) opting to participate in 18-month extension phase. Recruitment: The subjects will be recruited through paediatric diabetes outpatient clinics at participating clinical centres (see above). Enrolment will target up to 80 (aiming for 8-12 participants per centre) to allow for dropouts during run-in. Participants (UK sites only) completing the primary phase, who are on sensor-augmented pump therapy as their standard clinical care, will be invited to participate in the extension phase. Consent: Written informed consent will be obtained from all parents/guardians and written assent from older children before any study related activities. Additional written consent will be obtained for the extension phase from all parents/guardians. Baseline Assessment: Eligible subjects will undergo a baseline assessment including a blood sample for the measurement of HbA1c. Questionnaires will be completed by parents/guardians. Pre-Study Training and Run-in: Training sessions on the use of the study CGM and insulin pump will be provided by the research team. During a 2-4 week run-in period, subjects will use study CGM and insulin pump. For compliance and to assess the ability of the subject to use the study devices safely, at least 8 days of CGM data need to be recorded and safe use of study insulin pump demonstrated during the last 14 days of run-in period. The CGM data will also be used to assess baseline glucose control and may be used for treatment optimization as necessary. Competency Assessment: Competency on the use of study insulin pump and study CGM will be evaluated using a competency assessment tool developed by the research team. Training may be repeated if required. Randomisation: Eligible subjects will be randomised using randomisation software to the initial use of automated hybrid closed loop glucose system or to sensor augmented pump therapy for 16 weeks with a 1 to 4 week washout period before crossing over to the other study arm. Automated day and night closed loop insulin delivery (intervention arm) Participants in the closed loop arm and their caregivers will receive an additional training session covering the use of the closed loop system provided by the research team prior to starting closed loop insulin delivery. During this 1-2 hour session, parents/guardians will operate the system under the supervision of the clinical research team. Competency on the use of closed loop system will be evaluated. Thereafter, subjects and their parents/guardians will use the hybrid closed loop system for 16 weeks at home. Crossover Assessment: At the end of the first study arm, a blood sample for the measurement of HbA1c will be taken and weight and height will be measured. Validated surveys evaluating the impact of the devices employed on quality of life, psychosocial function, diabetes management and treatment satisfaction will be completed. Parents/guardians will be invited to be interviewed to gather feedback on and reactions to their current treatment, the clinical trial, and quality of life changes. Sensor augmented pump therapy (control arm): Participants in the sensor augmented pump therapy arm and their caregivers will receive refresher training on key aspects of insulin pump therapy and CGM use. Subjects and their parents/guardians will continue using sensor augmented pump therapy for 16 weeks at home. Study contacts: Participants will be contacted 24h after starting each study arm to ensure there are no concerns regarding the study devices. In between study visits, participants will be contacted by the study team (email/phone) once monthly and 3-monthly in the extension phase, in order to record any adverse events, device deficiencies, and changes in insulin settings, other medical conditions and/or medication. In case of any problems related to the technical device or diabetes management such as hypo- or hyperglycaemia, subjects will be able to contact a 24-hour telephone helpline to the local research team at any time. The local research team will have access to central 24 hour advice on technical issues. End of study assessments (primary phase): A blood sample will be taken for measurement of HbA1c at the end of the study. Height and weight will be recorded. Study devices will be downloaded and returned. Participants will resume usual care using their pre-study insulin pump. Validated surveys evaluating the impact of the devices employed on quality of life, psychosocial function and diabetes management and treatment satisfaction will be completed. Parents/guardians will be invited to participate in a sleep sub-study prior to the final visit (UK & Luxembourg only). Parents/guardians will be invited to be interviewed to gather feedback on and reactions to their current treatment, the clinical trial, and quality of life changes. Extension Phase (UK sites only): Follow up contacts will be conducted 3-monthly, in line with routine clinic visits, including recording of adverse events, medical history, insulin requirements and HbA1c. After 18 months from the end of the primary phase, parents/guardians will complete validated questionnaires evaluating the impact of the technology on quality of life, diabetes management, sleep quality and fear of hypoglycaemia. Height and weight will be measured. A blood sample will be taken for measurement of HbA1c at the end of the extension phase Procedures for safety monitoring during trial: Standard operating procedures for monitoring and reporting of all adverse events will be in place, including serious adverse events (SAE), serious adverse device effects (SADE) and specific adverse events (AE) such as severe hypoglycaemia. A data safety and monitoring board (DSMB) will be informed of all serious adverse events and any unanticipated serious adverse device effects that occur during the study and will review compiled adverse event data at periodic intervals. Criteria for withdrawal of subjects on safety grounds: A subject/guardian may terminate participation in the study at any time without necessarily giving a reason and without any personal disadvantage. An investigator can stop the participation of a subject after consideration of the benefit/risk ratio. Possible reasons are: * Serious adverse events * Non-compliance * Serious protocol violation * Decision by the investigator, or the sponsor, that termination is in the subject's best medical interest * Allergic reaction to insulin
Interventions
CamAPS FX closed loop system comprises: * Dana insulin pump (Diabecare, Sooil, Seoul, South Korea) * Dexcom G6 real-time CGM sensor (Dexcom, Northridge, CA, USA) * An Android smartphone hosting CamAPS FX app with the Cambridge model predictive control algorithm and communicating wirelessly with the insulin pump and glucose sensor * Cloud upload system to monitor CGM/insulin data
Study insulin pump and study CGM.
Sponsors
Study design
Intervention model description
Device: CamAPS FX The automated closed loop system (CamAPS FX) will consist of: * Dana RS insulin pump (Diabecare, Sooil, Seoul, South Korea) * Dexcom G6 real-time CGM sensor (Dexcom, Northridge, CA, USA) * An Android smartphone hosting CamAPS FX app with the Cambridge model predictive control algorithm and communicating wirelessly with the insulin pump and glucose sensor * Cloud upload system to monitor CGM/insulin data.
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
1. Age between 1 and 7 years (inclusive) (Luxembourg and Austria) 2. Age between 2 and 7 years (inclusive) (Germany and UK) 3. Type 1 diabetes as defined by WHO for at least 6 months \[WHO definition: 'The aetiological type named type 1 encompasses the majority of cases which are primarily due to beta-cell destruction, and are prone to ketoacidosis. Type 1 includes those cases attributable to an autoimmune process, as well as those with beta-cell destruction for which neither an aetiology nor a pathogenesis is known (idiopathic). It does not include those forms of beta-cell destruction or failure to which specific causes can be assigned (e.g. cystic fibrosis, mitochondrial defects, etc.).'\] 4. Insulin pump user (with or without continuous glucose monitoring or flash glucose monitoring system) for at least 3 months, with subject/carer good knowledge of insulin self-adjustment as judged by the investigator 5. On sensor-augmented pump as standard clinical care (extension phase only) 6. Treated with rapid or ultra-rapid acting insulin analogue 7. Subject/carer is willing to perform regular finger-prick blood glucose monitoring, with at least 2 blood glucose measurements taken every day 8. Screening HbA1c ≤ 11% (97mmol/mol) on analysis from local laboratory 9. Willing to wear glucose sensor 10. Willing to wear closed loop system 24/7 during intervention arm 11. The subject/carer is willing to follow study specific instructions 12. The subject/carer is willing to upload pump and CGM data at regular intervals
Exclusion criteria
1. Physical or psychological disease likely to interfere with the normal conduct of the study and interpretation of the study results as judged by the investigator 2. Untreated coeliac disease or thyroid disease based on local investigations prior to study enrolment 3. Current treatment with drugs known to interfere with glucose metabolism, e.g. systemic corticosteroids 4. Use of closed loop insulin delivery within the past 2 months 5. Known or suspected allergy to insulin 6. Carer's lack of reliable telephone facility for contact 7. Subject/carer's severe visual impairment 8. Subject/carer's severe hearing impairment 9. Medically documented allergy towards the adhesive (glue) of plasters or subject is unable to tolerate tape adhesive in the area of sensor placement 10. Serious skin diseases (e.g. psoriasis vulgaris, bacterial skin diseases) located in parts of the body which could potentially be used for localisation of the glucose sensor) 11. Sickle cell disease, haemoglobinopathy; or has received red blood cell transfusion or erythropoietin within 3 months prior to time of screening 12. Plan to receive red blood cell transfusion or erythropoietin over the course of study participation 13. Subject/carer not proficient in English (UK, Germany, Austria, Luxembourg) or German (Germany, Austria, Luxembourg) or French (Luxembourg) Additional
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Time in Target (3.9 to 10.0 mmol/l) (70 to 180 mg/dl) | 16-week home stay | Between group difference in time spent with sensor glucose levels between 3.9 to 10.0 mmol/l (70 to 180 mg/dl) during the 4 months intervention period. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Key Endpoint: HbA1c | 16-week home stay | HbA1c is measured in % as per NGSP |
| Key Endpoint: Mean Sensor Glucose | 16-week home stay | Mean sensor glucose is calculated from CGM readings over the study period to reflect overall glycemic control. |
| AUC of Glucose Below 3.5 mmol/l (63 mg/dl) | 16-week home stay | Area under the curve of sensor glucose readings below 3.5mmol/l (63mg/dl). Glucose AUC was calculated by trapezoidal approximation of sensor glucose levels. |
| BMI SDS | 16-week home stay | BMI Standard Deviation Score |
| Total, Basal, and Bolus Insulin Dose | 16-week home stay | Median daily total, basal and bolus insulin use |
| Key Endpoint: Time Spent Below Target Glucose (3.9 mmol/l) (70 mg/dl) | 16-week home stay | Percentage of time spent with sensor glucose readings below target glucose (3.9mmol/l)(70mg/dl) |
| Standard Deviation | 16-week home stay | Standard deviation of sensor glucose levels |
| Coefficient of Variation (Percentage) of Glucose Levels | 16-week home stay | Coefficient of variation (percentage) of sensor glucose levels |
| Key Endpoint: Time Spent Above Target Glucose (10.0 mmol/l) (180 mg/dl) | 16-week home stay | Percentage of time spent with sensor glucose readings above target glucose (10.0mmol/l) (180mg/dl) |
| Time With Glucose Levels in Significant Hyperglycaemia (Glucose Levels > 16.7 mmol/l) (300 mg/dl) | 16-week home stay | Percentage of time spent with glucose levels in significant hyperglycaemia (glucose levels \> 16.7mmol/l) (300mg/dl) |
| Number of Episodes of Severe Hypoglycaemia | 16-week home stay | This outcome measure records the total number of severe hypoglycaemic episodes-defined as events requiring external assistance-experienced during the study period. Episodes are captured through patient records and clinical confirmation. |
| Number of Subjects Experiencing Severe Hypoglycaemia | 16-week home stay | Count of subjects with at least one severe hypoglycaemic event during the study. Severe events are defined as episodes requiring external assistance. |
| Frequency of Diabetic Ketoacidosis | 16-week home stay | The incidence of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) episodes will be recorded as the number of confirmed events during the study |
| Frequency and Nature of Other Adverse Events | 16-week home stay | The frequency and nature of other adverse events will be recorded throughout the study. All events not directly linked to the intervention will be documented, detailing their onset, duration, severity, and potential relation to the treatment. |
| Percentage of Time of CGM Availability | 16-week home stay | This outcome assesses the percentage of time the continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system is active and delivering valid data. |
| Percentage of Time of Closed-loop Operation | 16-week home stay | This outcome measure determines the percentage of the total study period during which the closed-loop insulin delivery system operates as intended. |
| Frequency and Nature of Other Serious Adverse Events | 16-week home stay | Frequency and nature of other serious adverse events will be documented, including type, severity, and potential treatment association. |
| Time With Glucose Levels <3.0 mmol/l (54 mg/dl) | 16-week home stay | Percentage of time spent with glucose levels \< 3.0mmol/l (54 mg/dl) |
Countries
Austria, Germany, Luxembourg, United Kingdom
Participant flow
Recruitment details
81 participants were enrolled between 17 May 201 9 and 16 June 2020 at 7 paediatric diabetes centres in the UK, Luxembourg, Austria and Germany.
Pre-assignment details
74 out of 81 enrolled participants were randomised. Of those not randomised two were withdrawn by the site due to safety concerns and five chose not to continue with the study.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Closed-loop Insulin Delivery First, Then Sensor-augmented Pump Therapy Unsupervised home use of day and night automated hybrid closed loop insulin delivery system for 16 weeks.
Intervention: Device: CamAPS FX
CamAPS FX: CamAPS FX closed loop system comprises:
* Dana insulin pump (Diabecare, Sooil, Seoul, South Korea)
* Dexcom G6 real-time CGM sensor (Dexcom, Northridge, CA, USA)
* An Android smartphone hosting CamAPS FX app with the Cambridge model predictive control algorithm and communicating wirelessly with the insulin pump and glucose sensor
* Cloud upload system to monitor CGM/insulin data
Following a 1-4 week washout period, use of sensor-augmented pump therapy for 16 weeks.
Sensor augmented therapy: Study insulin pump and study CGM. | 39 |
| Sensor Augmented Pump Therapy First, Then Closed-loop Insulin Delivery Sensor augmented pump therapy for 16 weeks.
Sensor augmented therapy: Study insulin pump and study CGM.
Following a 1-4 week washout period, unsupervised home use of day and night automated hybrid closed loop insulin delivery system for 16 weeks.
Intervention: Device: CamAPS FX
CamAPS FX: CamAPS FX closed loop system comprises:
* Dana insulin pump (Diabecare, Sooil, Seoul, South Korea)
* Dexcom G6 real-time CGM sensor (Dexcom, Northridge, CA, USA)
* An Android smartphone hosting CamAPS FX app with the Cambridge model predictive control algorithm and communicating wirelessly with the insulin pump and glucose sensor
* Cloud upload system to monitor CGM/insulin data | 35 |
| Total | 74 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Period 1 | Withdrawal by Subject | 0 | 1 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Sensor Augmented Pump Therapy First, Then Closed-loop Insulin Delivery | Total | Closed-loop Insulin Delivery First, Then Sensor-augmented Pump Therapy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 5.6 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.7 | 5.6 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.6 | 5.6 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.4 |
| BMI percentile (age- and sex-adjusted) | 71.1 percentile STANDARD_DEVIATION 24.6 | 69.1 percentile STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.8 | 67.3 percentile STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.2 |
| Coefficient of variation of glucose | 41.1 % | 41.6 % | 42.4 % |
| Continuous glucose monitoring metrics at baseline Median percent of time with sensor glucose >180mg/dL (%) | 36.7 percentage of time | 34.4 percentage of time | 32.2 percentage of time |
| Continuous glucose monitoring metrics at baseline Median percent of time with sensor glucose >300mg/dL (%) | 3.8 percentage of time | 3.7 percentage of time | 3.4 percentage of time |
| Continuous glucose monitoring metrics at baseline Median percent of time with sensor glucose <54mg/dL (%) | 0.6 percentage of time | 0.7 percentage of time | 0.8 percentage of time |
| Continuous glucose monitoring metrics at baseline Median percent of time with sensor glucose <70mg/dL (%) | 3.9 percentage of time | 4.4 percentage of time | 4.5 percentage of time |
| Continuous Glucose Monitor Use Current | 32 Participants | 67 Participants | 35 Participants |
| Continuous Glucose Monitor Use In past but not current | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Continuous Glucose Monitor Use Never | 2 Participants | 6 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Duration of diabetes | 2.7 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.9 | 2.6 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.8 | 2.5 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.7 |
| HbA1c | 57 mmol/mol STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.1 | 56.6 mmol/mol STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.2 | 56.3 mmol/mol STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.4 |
| HbA1c at screening | 7.4 % of glucose linked to haemoglobin STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6 | 7.3 % of glucose linked to haemoglobin STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7 | 7.3 % of glucose linked to haemoglobin STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7 |
| Mean sensor glucose | 162.1 mg/dL STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.6 | 162.1 mg/dL STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.6 | 162.1 mg/dL STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.6 |
| Median total daily insulin (U/kg/day) | 0.77 Units/kg/day | 0.76 Units/kg/day | 0.76 Units/kg/day |
| Percent of time in glucose range of 70-180 mg/dl | 60.8 % STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.9 | 61.2 % STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.1 | 61.5 % STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5 |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Asian | 1 Participants | 2 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Black | 0 Participants | 2 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Multiple | 2 Participants | 4 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized White | 32 Participants | 66 Participants | 34 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 10 Participants | 31 Participants | 21 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 25 Participants | 43 Participants | 18 Participants |
| Standard deviation of glucose | 66.6 mg/dL | 66.6 mg/dL | 66.6 mg/dL |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 73 | 0 / 74 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 20 / 73 | 18 / 74 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 1 / 73 | 1 / 74 |
Outcome results
Time in Target (3.9 to 10.0 mmol/l) (70 to 180 mg/dl)
Between group difference in time spent with sensor glucose levels between 3.9 to 10.0 mmol/l (70 to 180 mg/dl) during the 4 months intervention period.
Time frame: 16-week home stay
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Closed-loop Period | Time in Target (3.9 to 10.0 mmol/l) (70 to 180 mg/dl) | 71.6 Percent of time spent in target range | Standard Deviation 5.9 |
| Sensor-augmented Pump Period | Time in Target (3.9 to 10.0 mmol/l) (70 to 180 mg/dl) | 62.9 Percent of time spent in target range | Standard Deviation 9 |
AUC of Glucose Below 3.5 mmol/l (63 mg/dl)
Area under the curve of sensor glucose readings below 3.5mmol/l (63mg/dl). Glucose AUC was calculated by trapezoidal approximation of sensor glucose levels.
Time frame: 16-week home stay
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Closed-loop Period | AUC of Glucose Below 3.5 mmol/l (63 mg/dl) | 0.1 mg*min/dL |
| Sensor-augmented Pump Period | AUC of Glucose Below 3.5 mmol/l (63 mg/dl) | 0.1 mg*min/dL |
BMI SDS
BMI Standard Deviation Score
Time frame: 16-week home stay
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Closed-loop Period | BMI SDS | 71 Percentile | Standard Deviation 23 |
| Sensor-augmented Pump Period | BMI SDS | 70 Percentile | Standard Deviation 26 |
Coefficient of Variation (Percentage) of Glucose Levels
Coefficient of variation (percentage) of sensor glucose levels
Time frame: 16-week home stay
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Closed-loop Period | Coefficient of Variation (Percentage) of Glucose Levels | 41 Percent |
| Sensor-augmented Pump Period | Coefficient of Variation (Percentage) of Glucose Levels | 41 Percent |
Frequency and Nature of Other Adverse Events
The frequency and nature of other adverse events will be recorded throughout the study. All events not directly linked to the intervention will be documented, detailing their onset, duration, severity, and potential relation to the treatment.
Time frame: 16-week home stay
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Closed-loop Period | Frequency and Nature of Other Adverse Events | Number of participants with one adverse event | 15 Participants |
| Closed-loop Period | Frequency and Nature of Other Adverse Events | Number of participants with no adverse events | 53 Participants |
| Closed-loop Period | Frequency and Nature of Other Adverse Events | Number of participants with two or more adverse events | 5 Participants |
| Sensor-augmented Pump Period | Frequency and Nature of Other Adverse Events | Number of participants with one adverse event | 12 Participants |
| Sensor-augmented Pump Period | Frequency and Nature of Other Adverse Events | Number of participants with no adverse events | 56 Participants |
| Sensor-augmented Pump Period | Frequency and Nature of Other Adverse Events | Number of participants with two or more adverse events | 6 Participants |
Frequency and Nature of Other Serious Adverse Events
Frequency and nature of other serious adverse events will be documented, including type, severity, and potential treatment association.
Time frame: 16-week home stay
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Closed-loop Period | Frequency and Nature of Other Serious Adverse Events | 0 Participants |
| Sensor-augmented Pump Period | Frequency and Nature of Other Serious Adverse Events | 1 Participants |
Frequency of Diabetic Ketoacidosis
The incidence of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) episodes will be recorded as the number of confirmed events during the study
Time frame: 16-week home stay
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Closed-loop Period | Frequency of Diabetic Ketoacidosis | 0 Participants |
| Sensor-augmented Pump Period | Frequency of Diabetic Ketoacidosis | 0 Participants |
Key Endpoint: HbA1c
HbA1c is measured in % as per NGSP
Time frame: 16-week home stay
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Closed-loop Period | Key Endpoint: HbA1c | 6.6 % of glucose linked to haemoglobin molec | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| Sensor-augmented Pump Period | Key Endpoint: HbA1c | 7.0 % of glucose linked to haemoglobin molec | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
Key Endpoint: HbA1c
HbA1c, measured using standardized, validated assays, serves as an indicator of long-term glycemic control, reflecting the average blood glucose levels over approximately 3 months.
Time frame: 16 weeks
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Closed-loop Period | Key Endpoint: HbA1c | 49.0 mmol/mol | Standard Deviation 5.9 |
| Sensor-augmented Pump Period | Key Endpoint: HbA1c | 52.8 mmol/mol | Standard Deviation 7.2 |
Key Endpoint: Mean Sensor Glucose
Mean sensor glucose is calculated from CGM readings over the study period to reflect overall glycemic control.
Time frame: 16-week home stay
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Closed-loop Period | Key Endpoint: Mean Sensor Glucose | 145.8 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 11.8 |
| Sensor-augmented Pump Period | Key Endpoint: Mean Sensor Glucose | 158.1 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 18.5 |
Key Endpoint: Time Spent Above Target Glucose (10.0 mmol/l) (180 mg/dl)
Percentage of time spent with sensor glucose readings above target glucose (10.0mmol/l) (180mg/dl)
Time frame: 16-week home stay
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Closed-loop Period | Key Endpoint: Time Spent Above Target Glucose (10.0 mmol/l) (180 mg/dl) | 22.9 Percent of time spent |
| Sensor-augmented Pump Period | Key Endpoint: Time Spent Above Target Glucose (10.0 mmol/l) (180 mg/dl) | 31.7 Percent of time spent |
Key Endpoint: Time Spent Below Target Glucose (3.9 mmol/l) (70 mg/dl)
Percentage of time spent with sensor glucose readings below target glucose (3.9mmol/l)(70mg/dl)
Time frame: 16-week home stay
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Closed-loop Period | Key Endpoint: Time Spent Below Target Glucose (3.9 mmol/l) (70 mg/dl) | 4.9 Percent of time spent |
| Sensor-augmented Pump Period | Key Endpoint: Time Spent Below Target Glucose (3.9 mmol/l) (70 mg/dl) | 4.5 Percent of time spent |
Number of Episodes of Severe Hypoglycaemia
This outcome measure records the total number of severe hypoglycaemic episodes-defined as events requiring external assistance-experienced during the study period. Episodes are captured through patient records and clinical confirmation.
Time frame: 16-week home stay
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Closed-loop Period | Number of Episodes of Severe Hypoglycaemia | 1 number of events |
| Sensor-augmented Pump Period | Number of Episodes of Severe Hypoglycaemia | 0 number of events |
Number of Subjects Experiencing Severe Hypoglycaemia
Count of subjects with at least one severe hypoglycaemic event during the study. Severe events are defined as episodes requiring external assistance.
Time frame: 16-week home stay
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Closed-loop Period | Number of Subjects Experiencing Severe Hypoglycaemia | 1 Participants |
| Sensor-augmented Pump Period | Number of Subjects Experiencing Severe Hypoglycaemia | 0 Participants |
Percentage of Time of CGM Availability
This outcome assesses the percentage of time the continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system is active and delivering valid data.
Time frame: 16-week home stay
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Closed-loop Period | Percentage of Time of CGM Availability | 99 Time using CGM (%) |
| Sensor-augmented Pump Period | Percentage of Time of CGM Availability | 99 Time using CGM (%) |
Percentage of Time of Closed-loop Operation
This outcome measure determines the percentage of the total study period during which the closed-loop insulin delivery system operates as intended.
Time frame: 16-week home stay
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Closed-loop Period | Percentage of Time of Closed-loop Operation | 95 Time using closed-loop (%) |
Standard Deviation
Standard deviation of sensor glucose levels
Time frame: 16-week home stay
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Closed-loop Period | Standard Deviation | 58.6 mg/dL |
| Sensor-augmented Pump Period | Standard Deviation | 64.2 mg/dL |
Time With Glucose Levels <3.0 mmol/l (54 mg/dl)
Percentage of time spent with glucose levels \< 3.0mmol/l (54 mg/dl)
Time frame: 16-week home stay
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Closed-loop Period | Time With Glucose Levels <3.0 mmol/l (54 mg/dl) | 1.0 Percent of time spent |
| Sensor-augmented Pump Period | Time With Glucose Levels <3.0 mmol/l (54 mg/dl) | 0.9 Percent of time spent |
Time With Glucose Levels in Significant Hyperglycaemia (Glucose Levels > 16.7 mmol/l) (300 mg/dl)
Percentage of time spent with glucose levels in significant hyperglycaemia (glucose levels \> 16.7mmol/l) (300mg/dl)
Time frame: 16-week home stay
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Closed-loop Period | Time With Glucose Levels in Significant Hyperglycaemia (Glucose Levels > 16.7 mmol/l) (300 mg/dl) | 2.0 Percent of time spent |
| Sensor-augmented Pump Period | Time With Glucose Levels in Significant Hyperglycaemia (Glucose Levels > 16.7 mmol/l) (300 mg/dl) | 3.1 Percent of time spent |
Total, Basal, and Bolus Insulin Dose
Median daily total, basal and bolus insulin use
Time frame: 16-week home stay
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Closed-loop Period | Total, Basal, and Bolus Insulin Dose | Total daily insulin use | 16.9 Units/day |
| Closed-loop Period | Total, Basal, and Bolus Insulin Dose | Total daily basal insulin use | 8.0 Units/day |
| Closed-loop Period | Total, Basal, and Bolus Insulin Dose | Total daily bolus insulin use | 8.6 Units/day |
| Sensor-augmented Pump Period | Total, Basal, and Bolus Insulin Dose | Total daily insulin use | 17.6 Units/day |
| Sensor-augmented Pump Period | Total, Basal, and Bolus Insulin Dose | Total daily basal insulin use | 5.7 Units/day |
| Sensor-augmented Pump Period | Total, Basal, and Bolus Insulin Dose | Total daily bolus insulin use | 11.0 Units/day |