Skip to content

KCNQ1 Cascade Screening

A Community-Based Approach to Overcoming Barriers to Cascade Screening for Long QT Syndrome

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03783975
Enrollment
131
Registered
2018-12-21
Start date
2019-03-07
Completion date
2022-12-29
Last updated
2023-06-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Long QT Syndrome

Keywords

Cascade, Screening, Ethical, Legal, Social

Brief summary

The objectives of the protocol are to: (1) evaluate the uptake of cascade screening and preventative therapies after the implementation of a simplified screening process and (2) assess proband and family member perspectives about the return of research results and cascade screening for the KCNQ1 Thr224Met variant. The investigators will conduct a mixed methods study in the Old Order Amish community where the KCNQ1 variant is enriched over 100,000-fold compared to other populations. The intervention will offer free, mail-in, saliva-based genetic testing for family members of probands. The rate of uptake of testing and preventative therapy after the intervention is implemented (i.e. when 'simplified' free, mail-in, saliva-based testing was available) will be compared to data from before the intervention (i.e. when 'traditional' $50 blood-based testing was available to family members) when uptake was essentially zero. The primary outcome is the rate of uptake of cascade screening with the intervention ('simplified'). The secondary outcomes include: extent of disclosure of genotype results before and after the intervention, proportion of informed relatives who get screened before and after the intervention, and the uptake of appropriate preventative care (e.g. seeing a cardiologist and/or taking beta-blocker). The tertiary outcomes are demographic characteristics associated with uptake of cascade screening or uptake of preventative therapy. The investigators will also assess qualitative themes surrounding the return of results process and cascade screening using interviews.

Interventions

GENETICSimplified Cascade Screening

Screening of the KCNQ1 Thr224Met variant for family members of probands

Sponsors

National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI)
CollaboratorNIH
University of Maryland, Baltimore
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
SCREENING
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* KCNQ1Thr224Met proband or first degree family member

Exclusion criteria

* Family members who have not been contacted by probands

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of At-risk Family Members Who Underwent Cascade Screening18 monthsRate of uptake of cascade screening after the intervention ('simplified')

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Extent of Disclosure Determined by Questionnaire18 monthsproportion of family members told after the intervention ('simplified')
Number of Informed Relatives Screened Determined by Questionnaire18 monthsNumber of informed family members tested after the intervention ('simplified')
Number of Participants With an Uptake of Preventative Therapy as Determined by Questionnaire18 monthsUptake of preventative therapy was defined as those taking a beta-blocker if recommended or those who implemented lifestyle modifications if beta-blocker not recommended. The survey was mailed to all probands.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Simplified Cascade Screening
Free, mail-in, saliva-based screening for the KCNQ1 Thr224Met variant. Simplified Cascade Screening: Screening of the KCNQ1 Thr224Met variant for family members of probands
131
Total131

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSimplified Cascade Screening
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
88 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
2 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
41 Participants
Age, Continuous19 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
131 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
131 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
59 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
72 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 131
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 131
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 131

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of At-risk Family Members Who Underwent Cascade Screening

Rate of uptake of cascade screening after the intervention ('simplified')

Time frame: 18 months

Population: 809 family members were eligible to be screened and were considered at-risk.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Simplified Cascade ScreeningPercentage of At-risk Family Members Who Underwent Cascade Screening131 Participants
Secondary

Extent of Disclosure Determined by Questionnaire

proportion of family members told after the intervention ('simplified')

Time frame: 18 months

Population: Because of COVID, too much time had passed since we had originally contacted the probands and we did not think we could get reliable data on how many family members they had told after the intervention. Thus, these data were not collected. During the COVID pandemic we had to switch gears and warn people with LQTS about the risks of QT-prolongation with chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine, and azithromycin.

Secondary

Number of Informed Relatives Screened Determined by Questionnaire

Number of informed family members tested after the intervention ('simplified')

Time frame: 18 months

Population: Number of family members tested of those mailed letters. The overall number of participants analyzed differs from the number in the Participant Flow Module because it represents the number of family members who were mailed letters whereas the participant flow module includes individuals who consented for testing. These numbers are not related to each other because we didn't mail letters to children, although children were eligible for testing.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Simplified Cascade ScreeningNumber of Informed Relatives Screened Determined by Questionnaire27 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With an Uptake of Preventative Therapy as Determined by Questionnaire

Uptake of preventative therapy was defined as those taking a beta-blocker if recommended or those who implemented lifestyle modifications if beta-blocker not recommended. The survey was mailed to all probands.

Time frame: 18 months

Population: We analyzed the number of survey responses obtained for the questions on beta-blocker therapy and lifestyle modifications which is why the numbers are different than those reported in the participant flow module.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Simplified Cascade ScreeningNumber of Participants With an Uptake of Preventative Therapy as Determined by Questionnaire6 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026