Skip to content

Effisayil™ 1: A Study to Test Spesolimab (BI 655130) in Patients With a Flare-up of a Skin Disease Called Generalized Pustular Psoriasis

Effisayil™ 1:Multi-center, Double-blind, Randomised, Placebo-controlled, Phase II Study to Evaluate Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of a Single Intravenous Dose of Spesolimab (BI 655130) in Patients With Generalized Pustular Psoriasis (GPP) Presenting With an Acute Flare of Moderate to Severe Intensity

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03782792
Enrollment
53
Registered
2018-12-20
Start date
2019-01-31
Completion date
2021-01-05
Last updated
2025-10-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Generalized Pustular Psoriasis

Brief summary

To evaluate efficacy, safety, and tolerability of spesolimab (BI 655130) compared to placebo in patients with Generalized Pustular Psoriasis (GPP) presenting with an acute flare of moderate to severe intensity.

Interventions

DRUGSpesolimab

Solution for infusion

DRUGPlacebo

Solution for infusion

Sponsors

Boehringer Ingelheim
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with GPPGA of 0 or 1 and a known and documented history of GPP per European Rare And Severe Psoriasis Expert Network (ERASPEN) criteria regardless of IL36RN mutation status, with previous evidence of fever, and/or asthenia, and/or myalgia, and/or elevated C-reactive protein, and/or leucocytosis with peripheral blood neutrophilia (above ULN) OR \-- Patients with an acute flare of moderate to severe intensity meeting the (ERASPEN) criteria of GPP with a known and documented history of GPP (per ERASPEN criteria) regardless of IL36RN mutation status, with previous evidence of fever, and/or asthenia, and/or myalgia, and/or elevated C-reactive protein, and/or leucocytosis with peripheral blood neutrophilia (above ULN) * Male or female patients, aged 18 to 75 years at screening. * Signed and dated written informed consent prior to admission to the study in accordance with ICH GCP and local legislation prior to start of any screening procedures. * Women of childbearing potential must be ready and able to use highly effective methods of birth control per ICH M3 (R2) that result in a low failure rate of less than 1% per year when used consistently and correctly. Note: A woman is considered of childbearing potential, i.e. fertile, following menarche and until becoming postmenopausal unless permanently sterile. Permanent sterilisation methods include hysterectomy, bilateral salpingectomy and bilateral oophorectomy. Tubal ligation is not a method of permanent sterilization. A postmenopausal state is defined as no menses for 12 months without an alternative medical cause * Further inclusion criteria apply

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with SAPHO (Synovitis-acne-pustulosis-hyperostosis-osteitis) syndrome. * Patients with primary erythrodermic psoriasis vulgaris. * Patients with primary plaque psoriasis vulgaris without presence of pustules or with pustules that are restricted to psoriatic plaques. * Drug-triggered Acute Generalized Exanthematous Pustulosis (AGEP). * Immediate life-threatening flare of GPP or requiring intensive care treatment, according to the investigator's judgement. Life-threatening complications mainly include, but are not limited to, cardiovascular/cytokine driven shock, pulmonary distress syndrome, or renal failure. * Severe, progressive, or uncontrolled hepatic disease, defined as \>3- fold Upper Limit of Normal (ULN) elevation in AST or ALT or alkaline phosphatase, or \>2-fold ULN elevation in total bilirubin. * Further

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of Patients With a Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Physician Global Assessment (GPPGA) Pustulation Subscore of 0 Indicating no Visible Pustules at Week 1At Week 1.The Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Physician Global Assessment (GPPGA) relies on clinical assessment of the Generalized Pustular Psoriasis (GPP) patient's skin presentation. The investigator (or qualified site personnel) scored the erythema, pustules, and scaling of all GPP lesions from 0 to 4. The GPPGA pustulation subscore ranges from 0 to 4 where: 0 = clear; 1. = almost clear; 2. = mild: 3. = moderate; 4. = severe. A lower GPPGA pustulation subscore indicates a better outcome. A GPPGA pustulation subscore of 0 means no visible pustules. The proportion of patients who achieved a GPPGA pustulation subscore of 0 at Week 1 is reported.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of Patients With a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index for Generalized Pustular Psoriasis (GPPASI) 75 at Week 4At Week 4.Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (GPPASI) provides a numeric scoring for a patient's overall Generalized Pustular Psoriasis (GPP) disease state, ranging from 0 to 72. It is a linear combination of percent of surface area of skin affected by erythema, pustules, and scaling and the severity of erythema, pustules, and scaling (desquamation) over 4 body regions (head, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs). A higher score indicates a worse disease state, while a score of 0 indicates no disease. GPPASI 75 is based on the percent reduction from baseline, generally summarized as a dichotomous outcome based on achieving over an 75% reduction. Proportion of patients with GPPASI 75 at Week 4 is reported.
Change From Baseline in Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Week 4Baseline and at Week 4.The pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is a participant-administered single-item scale designed to measure skin pain intensity from generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) using a 100 millimeter (mm) horizontal VAS. Overall severity of participant's skin pain from GPP is indicated by placing a single mark on the horizontal 100 mm scale from 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (pain as bad as one can imagine). Change from baseline was calculated by subtracting the VAS score at baseline from the VAS score at Week 4. A negative change indicates an improvement from baseline. Death, any use of escape medication, OL Spesolimab at Day 8, or rescue medication with Spesolimab after Day 8, prior to observing the endpoint was considered to reflect a failure to achieve the endpoint outcome, i.e. non-response (NR). NR is not a missing value but the worst possible outcome of the endpoint. For example, if the achieved data is (NR, NR, NR, NR, NR, NR, 2, 3, 3, 3, 5) then Q1 is NR, median is NR and Q3 is 3.
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Symptom Scale (PSS) Score at Week 4Baseline and at Week 4.PSS is a 4-item patient-reported outcome instrument that assesses the severity of psoriasis symptoms in moderate to severe psoriasis patients. The symptoms included are: pain, redness, itching, and burning. The symptom severity was assessed using a 5 point scale ranging from 0 to 4 where 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=very severe. The symptom scores are added to an unweighted total score (range: 0 to 16). A lower PSS score indicates a better outcome. Change from baseline =PSS score at Week 4 - PSS score at baseline. Death, any use of escape medication, OL Spesolimab at Day 8, or rescue medication with Spesolimab after Day 8, prior to observing the endpoint was considered to reflect a failure to achieve the endpoint outcome, i.e. non-response (NR). NR is not a missing value but the worst possible outcome of the endpoint. For example, if the achieved data is (NR, NR, NR, NR, NR, NR, 2, 3, 3, 3, 5) then Q1 is NR, median is NR and Q3 is 3.
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) - Fatigue Score at Week 4Baseline and at Week 4.The FACIT-Fatigue is a 13-item questionnaire that assesses self-reported fatigue and its impact upon daily activities and function. Each items is scored from 0 to 4. Score range is 0 (extreme fatigue)-52 (no fatigue). Change from baseline=FACIT Fatigue score at Week 4- FACIT-Fatigue score at baseline. Death, any use of escape medication, OL Spesolimab at Day 8, or rescue medication with Spesolimab after Day 8, prior to observing the endpoint was considered to reflect a failure to achieve the endpoint outcome, i.e. non-response (NR). NR is not a missing value but the worst possible outcome of the endpoint. For example, if the achieved data is s (NR, NR, NR, NR, NR, NR, 2, 3, 3, 3, 5) then Q1 is NR, median is NR and Q3 is 3.
Proportion of Patients With a Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Physician Global Assessment (GPPGA) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 4At Week 4.GPPGA relied on clinical assessment of the Generalized Pustular Psoriasis (GPP) patient's skin presentation. The GPPGA total score is calculated by taking the mean of the erythema subscore, pustules subscore and scaling/crusting subscore. The severity of each subscore was assessed using a 5 point scale score ranging from 0 to 4 (0=clear, 1=almost clear, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe). The final GPPGA score is assigned as follows: * 0, if scores for all three scores are 0, * 1, if 0 \< mean \< 1.5, * 2, if 1.5 ≤ mean \< 2.5, * 3, if 2.5 ≤ mean \< 3.5, * 4, if mean ≥ 3.5. A lower GPPGA score indicates a better outcome, with 0 being clear and 1 being almost clear. The proportion of participants with a GPPGA score of 0 or 1 at Week 4 is reported.
Proportion of Patients With a Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Physician Global Assessment (GPPGA) Pustulation Sub-score of 0 Indicating no Visible Pustules at Week 4At Week 4.The Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Physician Global Assessment (GPPGA) relies on clinical assessment of the Generalized Pustular Psoriasis (GPP) patient's skin presentation. The investigator (or qualified site personnel) scores the erythema, pustules, and scaling of all GPP lesions from 0 to 4. The GPPGA pustulation subscore ranges from 0 to 4 where: 0 = clear; 1. = almost clear; 2. = mild: 3. = moderate; 4. = severe. A lower GPPGA pustulation subscore indicates a better outcome. The proportion of patients who achieved a GPPGA pustulation subscore of 0 at Week 1 is reported.
Proportion of Patients With a Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (GPPASI) 50 at Week 4At Week 4.Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (GPPASI) provides a numeric scoring for a patient's overall Generalized Pustular Psoriasis (GPP) disease state, ranging from 0 to 72. It is a linear combination of percent of surface area of skin affected by erythema, pustules, and scaling and the severity of erythema, pustules, and scaling (desquamation) over 4 body regions (head, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs). A higher score indicates a worse disease state, while a score of 0 indicates no disease. GPPASI 50 is based on the percent reduction from baseline, generally summarized as a dichotomous outcome based on achieving over an 50 % reduction. Proportion of patients with GPPASI 50 at Week 4 is reported.
Key Secondary: Proportion of Patients With a Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Physician Global Assessment (GPPGA) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 1At Week 1.GPPGA relied on clinical assessment of the Generalized Pustular Psoriasis (GPP) patient's skin presentation. The GPPGA total score was calculated by taking the mean of the erythema subscore, pustules subscore and scaling/crusting subscore. The severity of each subscore was assessed using a 5 point scale score ranging from 0 to 4 (0=clear, 1=almost clear, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe). The final GPPGA score is assigned as follows: * 0, if scores for all three subscores are 0, * 1, if 0 \< mean \< 1.5, * 2, if 1.5 ≤ mean \< 2.5, * 3, if 2.5 ≤ mean \< 3.5, * 4, if mean ≥ 3.5. A lower GPPGA score indicates a better outcome, with 0 being clear and 1 being almost clear. The proportion of patients with a GPPGA score of 0 or 1 at Week 1 is reported.
Proportion of Patients With a Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (GPPASI) 50 at Week 1At Week 1.Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (GPPASI) provides a numeric scoring for a patient's overall Generalized Pustular Psoriasis (GPP) disease state, ranging from 0 to 72. It is a linear combination of percent of surface area of skin affected by erythema, pustules, and scaling and the severity of erythema, pustules, and scaling (desquamation) over 4 body regions (head, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs). A higher score indicates a worse disease state, while a score of 0 indicates no disease. GPPASI 50 is based on the percent reduction from baseline, generally summarized as a dichotomous outcome based on achieving over an 50 % reduction. Proportion of patients with GPPASI 50 at Week 1 is reported.
Percent Change in Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (GPPASI) From Baseline at Week 1At Week 1.Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (GPPASI) provides a numeric scoring for a patient's overall Generalized Pustular Psoriasis (GPP) disease state, ranging from 0 to 72. It is a linear combination of percent of surface area of skin affected by erythema, pustules, and scaling and the severity of erythema, pustules, and scaling (desquamation) over 4 body regions (head, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs). A higher score indicates a worse disease state, while a score of 0 indicates no disease. The percent change from baseline at Week 1 is calculated as: % GPPASI change from baseline = (GPPASI at Week 1 - GPPASI at baseline) \*100/GPPASI at baseline. If % GPPASI change from baseline is positive, it means the disease is becoming worse.
Occurrence of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) up to Week 1From start of treatment until Day 7, up to 7 days.TEAEs were all Adverse Events (AEs) occurring between start of treatment and Day 8 (Day 8 excluded). AEs that started before first drug intake and deteriorated under treatment were also considered as 'treatment-emergent'. The exposure-adjusted incidence rate was calculated as: Incidence rate \[1/100 patients-years\] = 100 × number of patients with AE / Total AE specific time at risk \[patient-years\] where: Time at risk \[patient-years\] = (date of onset of TEAE - study drug start date + 1) /365.25
Number of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) up to Week 1From start of treatment until Day 7, up to 7 days.TEAEs were all Adverse Events (AEs) occurring between start of treatment and Day 8 (Day 8 excluded). AEs that started before first drug intake and deteriorated under treatment were also considered as 'treatment-emergent'.
Occurrence of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Within the Treatment PhaseFrom start of treatment until end of the residual effect period (REP) but censored at any use of open label spesolimab, up to 16 weeks.TEAEs were all Adverse Events (AEs) occurring between start of treatment and end of the residual effect period (REP) (16 weeks). AEs that started before first drug intake and deteriorated under treatment were also considered as 'treatment-emergent'. The exposure-adjusted incidence rate was calculated as: Incidence rate \[1/100 patients-years\] = 100 × number of patients with AE / Total AE specific time at risk \[patient-years\] where Time at risk where: Time at risk \[patient-years\] = (date of onset of TEAE - study drug start date + 1) /365.25 If, for a patient, the selected TEAE did not occur then the time at risk was censored at min * Date of death * For patients who did not roll over into the Open Label Extension (OLE) study: last contact date Visit14/15 * For patients who rolled over into the OLE study: the 1st dose in the OLE study * Drug stop date + 112 days * Date of Day 8 if OL spesolimab was given * Date of rescue medication if spesolimab was given.
Number of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Within the Treatment PhaseFrom start of treatment until end of the residual effect period (REP) but censored at any use of open label spesolimab, up to 16 weeks.TEAEs were all Adverse Events (AEs) occurring between start of treatment and end of the residual effect period (REP) (16 weeks). AEs that started before first drug intake and deteriorated under treatment were also considered as 'treatment-emergent'.
Percent Change in Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (GPPASI) From Baseline at Week 4Baseline and at Week 4.GPPASI provides a numeric scoring for a patient's overall Generalized Pustular Psoriasis (GPP) disease state, ranging from 0 (no disease) to 72 (worse disease state). It is a linear combination of percent of surface area of skin affected by erythema, pustules, and scaling and the severity of erythema, pustules, and scaling (desquamation) over 4 body regions (head, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs). %GPPASI change from baseline=(GPPASI at Week 4-GPPASI at baseline) \*100/(GPPASI at baseline). Death, any use of escape medication, OL Spesolimab at Day 8, or rescue medication with Spesolimab after Day 8, prior to observing the endpoint was considered to reflect a failure to achieve the endpoint outcome, i.e. non-response (NR).NR is not a missing value but the worst possible outcome of the endpoint. For example, if the achieved data is (NR, NR, NR, NR, NR, NR, 2, 3, 3, 3, 5) then Q1 is NR, median is NR and Q3 is 3. Planned statistical analysis were not performed due to lack of valid data.

Countries

China, France, Germany, Japan, Malaysia, Singapore, South Korea, Switzerland, Taiwan, Thailand, Tunisia, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This was a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group, single-dose trial with 2 treatment groups (spesolimab and placebo) to evaluate efficacy, tolerability, and safety of spesolimab (BI 655130) compared with placebo in patients with Generalized Pustular Psoriasis (GPP) presenting with an acute flare of moderate to severe intensity.

Pre-assignment details

All subjects were screened for eligibility prior to participation in the trial. Subjects attended a specialist site which ensured that they (the subjects) strictly met all inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria. Subjects were not to be allocated to a treatment group if any of the entry criteria were violated.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Patients received intravenously (i.v.) solution for infusion containing 900 milligram (mg) of placebo to spesolimab on Day 1 (D1) of Week 1 (Wk1). Based on the subsequent treatment response, participants were then to be followed up for 12 to 28 weeks. If the severity and progression of the disease worsened within the first week the investigator could treat the patient with a Standard of Care (SoC) treatment of his/her choice (escape medication). If the disease condition was stable, it was recommended to wait until the primary endpoint visit (Wk1/D8) before prescribing an escape medication (SoC) since there was an option to administer open label (OL) spesolimab instead at this time. If escape medication was administered within the first week, the patient was not eligible to receive treatment with a single OL i.v. dose of 900 mg spesolimab on D8. If the condition of the patients worsened after Wk1/D8 patients were eligible to receive rescue treatment with open label spesolimab (only one single rescue i.v. dose of 900 mg spesolimab) after Wk1 to Wk 12.
18
Spesolimab 900 mg i.v SD
Patients received intravenously (i.v.) a single dose (SD) of solution for infusion containing 900 milligram (mg) of spesolimab on Day 1 (D1) of Week 1 (Wk1). Based on the subsequent treatment response, participants were then to be followed up for 12 to 28 weeks. If the severity and progression of the disease worsened within the first week the investigator could treat the patient with a Standard of Care (SoC) treatment of his/her choice (escape medication). If the disease condition was stable, it was recommended to wait until the primary endpoint visit (Wk1/D8) before prescribing an escape medication (SoC) since there was an option to administer open label (OL) spesolimab instead at this time. If escape medication was administered within the first week, the patient was not eligible to receive treatment with a single OL i.v. dose of 900 mg spesolimab on D8. If the condition of the patients worsened after Wk1/D8 patients were eligible to receive rescue treatment with open label spesolimab (only one single rescue i.v. dose of 900 mg spesolimab) after Wk1 to Wk 12.
35
Total53

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyPatient left the country01
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject12

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSpesolimab 900 mg i.v SDTotalPlacebo
Age, Continuous43.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1
43.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.9
42.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.4
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
35 Participants53 Participants18 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
16 Participants29 Participants13 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
19 Participants24 Participants5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
21 Participants36 Participants15 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
14 Participants17 Participants3 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 180 / 350 / 270 / 6
other
Total, other adverse events
13 / 1823 / 3514 / 274 / 6
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 186 / 356 / 272 / 6

Outcome results

Primary

Proportion of Patients With a Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Physician Global Assessment (GPPGA) Pustulation Subscore of 0 Indicating no Visible Pustules at Week 1

The Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Physician Global Assessment (GPPGA) relies on clinical assessment of the Generalized Pustular Psoriasis (GPP) patient's skin presentation. The investigator (or qualified site personnel) scored the erythema, pustules, and scaling of all GPP lesions from 0 to 4. The GPPGA pustulation subscore ranges from 0 to 4 where: 0 = clear; 1. = almost clear; 2. = mild: 3. = moderate; 4. = severe. A lower GPPGA pustulation subscore indicates a better outcome. A GPPGA pustulation subscore of 0 means no visible pustules. The proportion of patients who achieved a GPPGA pustulation subscore of 0 at Week 1 is reported.

Time frame: At Week 1.

Population: Randomized Set (RS) (via estimand EN-NRI): This patient set included all randomized patients. EN = Any assessments after death, or any use of escape medication due to disease worsening (defined as worsening of clinical status or GPP skin and/or systemic symptoms as defined by the investigator) prior to Week 1 were considered to represent a non-response. NRI = Non-response imputation for any missing data.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboProportion of Patients With a Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Physician Global Assessment (GPPGA) Pustulation Subscore of 0 Indicating no Visible Pustules at Week 10.056 Proportion of participants
Spesolimab 900 mg i.v SDProportion of Patients With a Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Physician Global Assessment (GPPGA) Pustulation Subscore of 0 Indicating no Visible Pustules at Week 10.543 Proportion of participants
Comparison: The Suissa-Shuster Z-pooled test was implemented to test the treatment effect on the primary endpoint on the RS (estimand EN) at a 1-sided, alpha level of 0.025. Confidence intervals (95%) around the risk difference were produced using the Chan and Zhang method.p-value: 0.000495% CI: [0.215, 0.672]Suissa-Shuster Z-pooled test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) - Fatigue Score at Week 4

The FACIT-Fatigue is a 13-item questionnaire that assesses self-reported fatigue and its impact upon daily activities and function. Each items is scored from 0 to 4. Score range is 0 (extreme fatigue)-52 (no fatigue). Change from baseline=FACIT Fatigue score at Week 4- FACIT-Fatigue score at baseline. Death, any use of escape medication, OL Spesolimab at Day 8, or rescue medication with Spesolimab after Day 8, prior to observing the endpoint was considered to reflect a failure to achieve the endpoint outcome, i.e. non-response (NR). NR is not a missing value but the worst possible outcome of the endpoint. For example, if the achieved data is s (NR, NR, NR, NR, NR, NR, 2, 3, 3, 3, 5) then Q1 is NR, median is NR and Q3 is 3.

Time frame: Baseline and at Week 4.

Population: Randomized Set (RS) (via estimand EN-LOCF): This patient set included all randomized patients. EN = Any assessments after death, or any use of escape medication before or after Day 8, open-label spesolimab at Day 8, or rescue medication with spesolimab after Day 8 were considered to represent a non-response and assigned with the worst possible outcomes in rank analysis. LOCF = last observation carried forward imputation for any missing data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) - Fatigue Score at Week 4NA Units on a scale
Spesolimab 900 mg i.v SDChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) - Fatigue Score at Week 43.00 Units on a scale
Comparison: The effect of spesolimab was evaluated by a Wilcoxon rank test using the RS. Any assessments after death, the use of escape medication (before or after Day 8), open label spesolimab on Day 8, or rescue medication with spesolimab after Day 8 were assigned worst ranks for the testing. Missing data at Week 4 were imputed and handled via assessment of ranks.p-value: 0.0012Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Week 4

The pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is a participant-administered single-item scale designed to measure skin pain intensity from generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) using a 100 millimeter (mm) horizontal VAS. Overall severity of participant's skin pain from GPP is indicated by placing a single mark on the horizontal 100 mm scale from 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (pain as bad as one can imagine). Change from baseline was calculated by subtracting the VAS score at baseline from the VAS score at Week 4. A negative change indicates an improvement from baseline. Death, any use of escape medication, OL Spesolimab at Day 8, or rescue medication with Spesolimab after Day 8, prior to observing the endpoint was considered to reflect a failure to achieve the endpoint outcome, i.e. non-response (NR). NR is not a missing value but the worst possible outcome of the endpoint. For example, if the achieved data is (NR, NR, NR, NR, NR, NR, 2, 3, 3, 3, 5) then Q1 is NR, median is NR and Q3 is 3.

Time frame: Baseline and at Week 4.

Population: Randomized Set (RS) (via estimand EN-LOCF): This patient set included all randomized patients. EN = Death or any use of escape medication before or after Day 8, open-label spesolimab at Day 8, or rescue medication with spesolimab after Day 8 were considered to represent a non-response and assigned with the worst possible outcomes in rank analysis. LOCF = last observation carried forward imputation for any missing data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Week 4NA Units on a scale
Spesolimab 900 mg i.v SDChange From Baseline in Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Week 4-22.45 Units on a scale
Comparison: The effect of spesolimab was evaluated by a Wilcoxon rank test using the RS. Any assessments after death, the use of escape medication (before or after Day 8), open label spesolimab on Day 8, or rescue medication with spesolimab after Day 8 were assigned worst ranks for the testing. Missing data at Week 4 were imputed and handled via assessment of ranks.p-value: 0.0012Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Symptom Scale (PSS) Score at Week 4

PSS is a 4-item patient-reported outcome instrument that assesses the severity of psoriasis symptoms in moderate to severe psoriasis patients. The symptoms included are: pain, redness, itching, and burning. The symptom severity was assessed using a 5 point scale ranging from 0 to 4 where 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=very severe. The symptom scores are added to an unweighted total score (range: 0 to 16). A lower PSS score indicates a better outcome. Change from baseline =PSS score at Week 4 - PSS score at baseline. Death, any use of escape medication, OL Spesolimab at Day 8, or rescue medication with Spesolimab after Day 8, prior to observing the endpoint was considered to reflect a failure to achieve the endpoint outcome, i.e. non-response (NR). NR is not a missing value but the worst possible outcome of the endpoint. For example, if the achieved data is (NR, NR, NR, NR, NR, NR, 2, 3, 3, 3, 5) then Q1 is NR, median is NR and Q3 is 3.

Time frame: Baseline and at Week 4.

Population: Randomized Set (RS) (via estimand EN-LOCF): This patient set included all randomized patients. EN = Any assessments after death, or any use of escape medication before or after Day 8, open-label spesolimab at Day 8, or rescue medication with spesolimab after Day 8 were considered to represent a non-response and assigned with the worst possible outcomes in rank analysis. LOCF = last observation carried forward imputation for any missing data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Psoriasis Symptom Scale (PSS) Score at Week 4NA Units on a scale
Spesolimab 900 mg i.v SDChange From Baseline in Psoriasis Symptom Scale (PSS) Score at Week 4-2.0 Units on a scale
Comparison: The effect of spesolimab was evaluated by a Wilcoxon rank test using the RS. Any assessments after death, the use of escape medication (before or after Day 8), open label spesolimab on Day 8, or rescue medication with spesolimab after Day 8 were assigned worst ranks for the testing. Missing data at Week 4 were imputed and handled via assessment of ranks.p-value: 0.0044Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Key Secondary: Proportion of Patients With a Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Physician Global Assessment (GPPGA) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 1

GPPGA relied on clinical assessment of the Generalized Pustular Psoriasis (GPP) patient's skin presentation. The GPPGA total score was calculated by taking the mean of the erythema subscore, pustules subscore and scaling/crusting subscore. The severity of each subscore was assessed using a 5 point scale score ranging from 0 to 4 (0=clear, 1=almost clear, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe). The final GPPGA score is assigned as follows: * 0, if scores for all three subscores are 0, * 1, if 0 \< mean \< 1.5, * 2, if 1.5 ≤ mean \< 2.5, * 3, if 2.5 ≤ mean \< 3.5, * 4, if mean ≥ 3.5. A lower GPPGA score indicates a better outcome, with 0 being clear and 1 being almost clear. The proportion of patients with a GPPGA score of 0 or 1 at Week 1 is reported.

Time frame: At Week 1.

Population: Randomized Set (RS) (via estimand EN-NRI): This patient set included all randomized patients. EN =Any assessments after death, or any use of escape medication due to disease worsening (defined as worsening of clinical status or GPP skin and/or systemic symptoms as defined by the investigator) prior to Week 1 were considered to represent a non-response. NRI = Non-response imputation for any missing data.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboKey Secondary: Proportion of Patients With a Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Physician Global Assessment (GPPGA) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 10.111 Proportion of participants
Spesolimab 900 mg i.v SDKey Secondary: Proportion of Patients With a Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Physician Global Assessment (GPPGA) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 10.429 Proportion of participants
Comparison: The Suissa-Shuster Z-pooled test was implemented to test the treatment effect on the RS (estimand EN) at a 1-sided, alpha level of 0.025. Confidence intervals (95%) around the risk difference were produced using the Chan and Zhang method.p-value: 0.011895% CI: [0.022, 0.527]Suissa-Shuster Z-pooled test
Secondary

Number of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) up to Week 1

TEAEs were all Adverse Events (AEs) occurring between start of treatment and Day 8 (Day 8 excluded). AEs that started before first drug intake and deteriorated under treatment were also considered as 'treatment-emergent'.

Time frame: From start of treatment until Day 7, up to 7 days.

Population: Safety Analysis set (SAF): This patient set included all patients who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug on Day 1. Patients were analyzed according to the actual treatment received.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) up to Week 112 Participants
Spesolimab 900 mg i.v SDNumber of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) up to Week 127 Participants
Secondary

Number of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Within the Treatment Phase

TEAEs were all Adverse Events (AEs) occurring between start of treatment and end of the residual effect period (REP) (16 weeks). AEs that started before first drug intake and deteriorated under treatment were also considered as 'treatment-emergent'.

Time frame: From start of treatment until end of the residual effect period (REP) but censored at any use of open label spesolimab, up to 16 weeks.

Population: Safety Analysis set (SAF): This patient set included all patients who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug on Day 1. Patients were analyzed according to the actual treatment received.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Within the Treatment Phase13 Participants
Spesolimab 900 mg i.v SDNumber of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Within the Treatment Phase29 Participants
Secondary

Occurrence of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) up to Week 1

TEAEs were all Adverse Events (AEs) occurring between start of treatment and Day 8 (Day 8 excluded). AEs that started before first drug intake and deteriorated under treatment were also considered as 'treatment-emergent'. The exposure-adjusted incidence rate was calculated as: Incidence rate \[1/100 patients-years\] = 100 × number of patients with AE / Total AE specific time at risk \[patient-years\] where: Time at risk \[patient-years\] = (date of onset of TEAE - study drug start date + 1) /365.25

Time frame: From start of treatment until Day 7, up to 7 days.

Population: Safety Analysis set (SAF): This patient set included all patients who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug on Day 1. Patients were analyzed according to the actual treatment received.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboOccurrence of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) up to Week 16445.6 events per 100 patient-years at risk
Spesolimab 900 mg i.v SDOccurrence of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) up to Week 18650.7 events per 100 patient-years at risk
Secondary

Occurrence of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Within the Treatment Phase

TEAEs were all Adverse Events (AEs) occurring between start of treatment and end of the residual effect period (REP) (16 weeks). AEs that started before first drug intake and deteriorated under treatment were also considered as 'treatment-emergent'. The exposure-adjusted incidence rate was calculated as: Incidence rate \[1/100 patients-years\] = 100 × number of patients with AE / Total AE specific time at risk \[patient-years\] where Time at risk where: Time at risk \[patient-years\] = (date of onset of TEAE - study drug start date + 1) /365.25 If, for a patient, the selected TEAE did not occur then the time at risk was censored at min * Date of death * For patients who did not roll over into the Open Label Extension (OLE) study: last contact date Visit14/15 * For patients who rolled over into the OLE study: the 1st dose in the OLE study * Drug stop date + 112 days * Date of Day 8 if OL spesolimab was given * Date of rescue medication if spesolimab was given.

Time frame: From start of treatment until end of the residual effect period (REP) but censored at any use of open label spesolimab, up to 16 weeks.

Population: Safety Analysis set (SAF): This patient set included all patients who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug on Day 1. Patients were analyzed according to the actual treatment received.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboOccurrence of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Within the Treatment Phase3083.3 events per 100 patient-years at risk
Spesolimab 900 mg i.v SDOccurrence of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Within the Treatment Phase2391.0 events per 100 patient-years at risk
Secondary

Percent Change in Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (GPPASI) From Baseline at Week 1

Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (GPPASI) provides a numeric scoring for a patient's overall Generalized Pustular Psoriasis (GPP) disease state, ranging from 0 to 72. It is a linear combination of percent of surface area of skin affected by erythema, pustules, and scaling and the severity of erythema, pustules, and scaling (desquamation) over 4 body regions (head, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs). A higher score indicates a worse disease state, while a score of 0 indicates no disease. The percent change from baseline at Week 1 is calculated as: % GPPASI change from baseline = (GPPASI at Week 1 - GPPASI at baseline) \*100/GPPASI at baseline. If % GPPASI change from baseline is positive, it means the disease is becoming worse.

Time frame: At Week 1.

Population: Randomized Set (RS) (via estimand EN-LOCF): This patient set included all randomized patients. EN = Any assessments after death, or any use of escape medication before or after Day 8, open-label spesolimab at Day 8, or rescue medication with spesolimab after Day 8 were considered to represent a non-response and assigned with the worst possible outcomes in rank analysis. LOCF = last observation carried forward imputation for any missing data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
PlaceboPercent Change in Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (GPPASI) From Baseline at Week 11.02 Percentage change
Spesolimab 900 mg i.v SDPercent Change in Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (GPPASI) From Baseline at Week 1-42.80 Percentage change
Comparison: Any assessments after death, the use of escape medication (before or after Day 8), open label spesolimab on Day 8, or rescue medication with spesolimab after Day 8 and assigned with the worst possible outcomes in rank analysis. Missing data at Week 4 were imputed and handled via assessment of ranks.95% CI: [-67.32, 12.76]
Secondary

Percent Change in Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (GPPASI) From Baseline at Week 4

GPPASI provides a numeric scoring for a patient's overall Generalized Pustular Psoriasis (GPP) disease state, ranging from 0 (no disease) to 72 (worse disease state). It is a linear combination of percent of surface area of skin affected by erythema, pustules, and scaling and the severity of erythema, pustules, and scaling (desquamation) over 4 body regions (head, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs). %GPPASI change from baseline=(GPPASI at Week 4-GPPASI at baseline) \*100/(GPPASI at baseline). Death, any use of escape medication, OL Spesolimab at Day 8, or rescue medication with Spesolimab after Day 8, prior to observing the endpoint was considered to reflect a failure to achieve the endpoint outcome, i.e. non-response (NR).NR is not a missing value but the worst possible outcome of the endpoint. For example, if the achieved data is (NR, NR, NR, NR, NR, NR, 2, 3, 3, 3, 5) then Q1 is NR, median is NR and Q3 is 3. Planned statistical analysis were not performed due to lack of valid data.

Time frame: Baseline and at Week 4.

Population: Randomized Set (RS) (via estimand EN-LOCF): This patient set included all randomized patients. EN = Any assessments after death, or any use of escape medication before or after Day 8, open-label spesolimab at Day 8, or rescue medication with spesolimab after Day 8 were considered to represent a non-response and assigned with the worst possible outcomes in rank analysis. LOCF = last observation carried forward imputation for any missing data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
PlaceboPercent Change in Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (GPPASI) From Baseline at Week 4NA Percentage change
Spesolimab 900 mg i.v SDPercent Change in Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (GPPASI) From Baseline at Week 4-60.50 Percentage change
Secondary

Proportion of Patients With a Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (GPPASI) 50 at Week 1

Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (GPPASI) provides a numeric scoring for a patient's overall Generalized Pustular Psoriasis (GPP) disease state, ranging from 0 to 72. It is a linear combination of percent of surface area of skin affected by erythema, pustules, and scaling and the severity of erythema, pustules, and scaling (desquamation) over 4 body regions (head, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs). A higher score indicates a worse disease state, while a score of 0 indicates no disease. GPPASI 50 is based on the percent reduction from baseline, generally summarized as a dichotomous outcome based on achieving over an 50 % reduction. Proportion of patients with GPPASI 50 at Week 1 is reported.

Time frame: At Week 1.

Population: Randomized Set (RS) (via estimand EN-NRI): This patient set included all randomized patients. EN = Any assessments after death, or the use of escape medication (before or after Day 8), or open-label spesolimab at Day 8, or rescue medication with spesolimab after Day 8, was considered a failure to achieve the endpoint outcome (i.e. non-response). NRI = Non-response imputation for any missing data.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboProportion of Patients With a Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (GPPASI) 50 at Week 10.278 Proportion of participants
Spesolimab 900 mg i.v SDProportion of Patients With a Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (GPPASI) 50 at Week 10.429 Proportion of participants
Comparison: Confidence intervals (95%) around the risk difference were produced using the Chan and Zhang method.95% CI: [-0.138, 0.401]
Secondary

Proportion of Patients With a Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (GPPASI) 50 at Week 4

Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (GPPASI) provides a numeric scoring for a patient's overall Generalized Pustular Psoriasis (GPP) disease state, ranging from 0 to 72. It is a linear combination of percent of surface area of skin affected by erythema, pustules, and scaling and the severity of erythema, pustules, and scaling (desquamation) over 4 body regions (head, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs). A higher score indicates a worse disease state, while a score of 0 indicates no disease. GPPASI 50 is based on the percent reduction from baseline, generally summarized as a dichotomous outcome based on achieving over an 50 % reduction. Proportion of patients with GPPASI 50 at Week 4 is reported.

Time frame: At Week 4.

Population: Randomized Set (RS) (via estimand EN-NRI): This patient set included all randomized patients. EN = Any assessments after death, or the use of escape medication (before or after Day 8), or open-label spesolimab at Day 8, or rescue medication with spesolimab after Day 8, was considered a failure to achieve the endpoint outcome (i.e. non-response). NRI = Non-response imputation for any missing data.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboProportion of Patients With a Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (GPPASI) 50 at Week 40.111 Proportion of participants
Spesolimab 900 mg i.v SDProportion of Patients With a Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (GPPASI) 50 at Week 40.543 Proportion of participants
Comparison: Confidence intervals (95%) around the risk difference were produced using the Chan and Zhang method.95% CI: [0.096, 0.636]
Secondary

Proportion of Patients With a Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Physician Global Assessment (GPPGA) Pustulation Sub-score of 0 Indicating no Visible Pustules at Week 4

The Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Physician Global Assessment (GPPGA) relies on clinical assessment of the Generalized Pustular Psoriasis (GPP) patient's skin presentation. The investigator (or qualified site personnel) scores the erythema, pustules, and scaling of all GPP lesions from 0 to 4. The GPPGA pustulation subscore ranges from 0 to 4 where: 0 = clear; 1. = almost clear; 2. = mild: 3. = moderate; 4. = severe. A lower GPPGA pustulation subscore indicates a better outcome. The proportion of patients who achieved a GPPGA pustulation subscore of 0 at Week 1 is reported.

Time frame: At Week 4.

Population: Randomized Set (RS) (via estimand EN-NRI): This patient set included all randomized patients. EN = Any assessments after death, or the use of escape medication (before or after Day 8), or open-label spesolimab at Day 8, or rescue medication with spesolimab after Day 8, was considered a failure to achieve the endpoint outcome (i.e. non-response). NRI = Non-response imputation for any missing data.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboProportion of Patients With a Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Physician Global Assessment (GPPGA) Pustulation Sub-score of 0 Indicating no Visible Pustules at Week 40.111 Proportion of participants
Spesolimab 900 mg i.v SDProportion of Patients With a Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Physician Global Assessment (GPPGA) Pustulation Sub-score of 0 Indicating no Visible Pustules at Week 40.514 Proportion of participants
Comparison: Confidence intervals (95%) around the risk difference were produced using the Chan and Zhang method.95% CI: [0.096, 0.607]
Secondary

Proportion of Patients With a Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Physician Global Assessment (GPPGA) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 4

GPPGA relied on clinical assessment of the Generalized Pustular Psoriasis (GPP) patient's skin presentation. The GPPGA total score is calculated by taking the mean of the erythema subscore, pustules subscore and scaling/crusting subscore. The severity of each subscore was assessed using a 5 point scale score ranging from 0 to 4 (0=clear, 1=almost clear, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe). The final GPPGA score is assigned as follows: * 0, if scores for all three scores are 0, * 1, if 0 \< mean \< 1.5, * 2, if 1.5 ≤ mean \< 2.5, * 3, if 2.5 ≤ mean \< 3.5, * 4, if mean ≥ 3.5. A lower GPPGA score indicates a better outcome, with 0 being clear and 1 being almost clear. The proportion of participants with a GPPGA score of 0 or 1 at Week 4 is reported.

Time frame: At Week 4.

Population: Randomized Set (RS) (via estimand EN-NRI): This patient set included all randomized patients. EN = Any assessments after death, or the use of escape medication (before or after Day 8), or open-label spesolimab at Day 8, or rescue medication with spesolimab after Day 8, was considered a failure to achieve the endpoint outcome (i.e. non-response). NRI = Non-response imputation for any missing data.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboProportion of Patients With a Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Physician Global Assessment (GPPGA) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 40.111 Proportion of participants
Spesolimab 900 mg i.v SDProportion of Patients With a Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Physician Global Assessment (GPPGA) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 40.486 Proportion of participants
Comparison: Confidence intervals (95%) around the risk difference were produced using the Chan and Zhang method.95% CI: [0.058, 0.581]
Secondary

Proportion of Patients With a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index for Generalized Pustular Psoriasis (GPPASI) 75 at Week 4

Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (GPPASI) provides a numeric scoring for a patient's overall Generalized Pustular Psoriasis (GPP) disease state, ranging from 0 to 72. It is a linear combination of percent of surface area of skin affected by erythema, pustules, and scaling and the severity of erythema, pustules, and scaling (desquamation) over 4 body regions (head, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs). A higher score indicates a worse disease state, while a score of 0 indicates no disease. GPPASI 75 is based on the percent reduction from baseline, generally summarized as a dichotomous outcome based on achieving over an 75% reduction. Proportion of patients with GPPASI 75 at Week 4 is reported.

Time frame: At Week 4.

Population: Randomized Set (RS) (via estimand EN-NRI): This patient set included all randomized patients. EN = Any assessments after death, or any use of escape medication before or after Day 8, open-label spesolimab at Day 8, or rescue medication with spesolimab after Day 8 were considered to represent a non-response. NRI = Non-response imputation for any missing data.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboProportion of Patients With a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index for Generalized Pustular Psoriasis (GPPASI) 75 at Week 40.111 Proportion of participants
Spesolimab 900 mg i.v SDProportion of Patients With a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index for Generalized Pustular Psoriasis (GPPASI) 75 at Week 40.457 Proportion of participants
Comparison: The Suissa-Shuster Z-pooled test was implemented to test the treatment effect on the RS (estimand EN) at a 1-sided, alpha level of 0.025. Confidence intervals (95%) around the risk difference were produced using the Chan and Zhang method.p-value: 0.008195% CI: [0.058, 0.554]Suissa-Shuster Z-pooled test

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 15, 2026