Skip to content

Effects of SGLT-2 Inhibition on Myocardial Fibrosis and Inflammation as Assessed by Cardiac MRI in Patients With DM2

Effects of SGLT-2 Inhibition With Dapagliflozin on Myocardial Fibrosis and Inflammation as Assessed by Cardiac MRI With T1- and T2-mapping in Patients With Type-2 Diabetes

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03782259
Enrollment
62
Registered
2018-12-20
Start date
2019-02-26
Completion date
2022-11-16
Last updated
2023-12-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Myocardial Fibrosis, Myocardial Inflammation, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Brief summary

There is an unmet need for Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) risk reduction in patients with Type 2 Diabetes. In recent trials there has been promising findings of more effective glucose management and reductions in overall CVD events and hospitalization for heart failure with SGLT-2 inhibition. Using the capability of cardiac MRI with T1- and T2-mapping in assessments of myocardial fibrosis and inflammation, the investigators propose to conduct a clinical trial to investigate the effects of SGLT-2 inhibition with dapagliflozin on myocardial strain, fibrosis and inflammation as assessed by cardiac MRI with T1- and T2-mapping in patients with type-2 diabetes. Over approximately 12 months subjects will have 6 clinical visits at the investigators research clinic. During this time subjects will be randomized to receive either active 10mg dapagliflozin or a matching placebo. 2 MRI scans at one of the two University of Washington research imaging centers will take place. One at randomization and the second scan will occur approximately 12 months after the first scan.

Detailed description

Given the unmet needs for CVD risk reduction in patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM), the promising findings of more effective glucose management and reductions in overall CVD events and hospitalization for heart failure with SGLT-2 inhibition demonstrated in recent trials, and the capability of cardiac MRI (CMRI) with T1- and T2-mapping in assessments of myocardial fibrosis and inflammation, the investigators propose to conduct a staged research program using adaptive study design to investigate the effects of SGLT-2 inhibition with dapagliflozin on myocardial strain, fibrosis and inflammation as assessed by cardiac MRI with T1- and T2-mapping in patients with type-2 diabetes. A total of 60 subjects with \>=18 years of age, type-2 diabetes history \>=5 years and HbA1C 7-10% will be randomized at 1:1 to Dapagliflozin 10mg or matching placebo once daily for 1 year. All subjects will be followed every 3 months for clinical and laboratory evaluations and assessments. All subjects will undergo CMRI at baseline and 1 year. The primary myocardial strain endpoint includes global myocardial longitudinal strain (GLS). Myocardial fibrosis endpoint is change in extracellular volume fraction (ECV) as assessed by T1-mapping over 12 months. ECV combines native and contrast-enhanced T1 mapping. The change of the T1 relaxation rate (i.e., 1/T1) in blood between pre- and post-contrast imaging is converted with the blood hematocrit into a reference for plasma T1, which serves as reference for the T1 changes in tissue.

Interventions

DRUGdapagliflozin

Subjects will either receive 10mg tabs of dapagliflozin or identical looking placebo - inactive medication. Subjects have an equal chance of receiving dapagliflozin or placebo. Which treatment subjects receive is decided at random by a computer (purely by chance, like the tossing of a coin). Neither subjects nor the Study Site personnel will know which treatment subjects are assigned to. The study drug must be taken daily. The subject's other medications will not be changed by the study.

OTHERPlacebo

Placebo

Sponsors

AstraZeneca
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
University of Washington
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SCREENING
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Randomized, double-blind and placebo controlled cardiac MRI study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Men and women at least 18 years of age 2. Subjects with type-2 diabetes history \>=5 years 3. HbA1C 7-10% with glucose control medications including insulin, metformin or sulfonylurea 4. Medically stable 5. Willing to participate and sign informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

1. Contraindication to MRI 2. Currently or within last three months treatment with a SGLT2 inhibitor 3. Currently taking glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1 receptor antagonist 4. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) \<60 mL/min/1.73 m2 5. Unstable or rapidly progressive renal disease 6. Hypotension with systolic blood pressure (SBP) \<100 mmHg 7. Hypersensitivity to dapagliflozin or any excipients 8. Patients with severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh class C) 9. Patients with active hepatitis B or C infection 10. Any of the following CV/Vascular Diseases within 3 months prior to signing the consent at enrollment, as assessed by the investigator: 1. Myocardial infarction 2. Cardiac surgery or revascularization (CABG/PTCA) 3. Unstable angina 4. Heart Failure - New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class IV 5. Transient ischemic attack (TIA) or significant cerebrovascular disease 6. Unstable or previously undiagnosed arrhythmia 7. Established peripheral artery disease (PAD) (18) Active bladder cancer (19) Recent episode of Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), frequent episodes of DKA (20) High risk of fractures, amputations and fibrosis (21) Women of child-bearing potential (ie, those who are not chemically or surgically sterilized or who are not post-menopausal) who have a positive pregnancy test at enrollment or randomization, OR women who are not willing to use a medically accepted method of contraception that is considered reliable in the judgment of the investigator, from the time of signing the informed consent until two weeks after the last dose of study drug, OR women who are breast-feeding.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Extracellular Volume Fraction (ECV)Approximately 12 MonthsCardiac MRI using T1-mapping is capable of quantifying myocardial extracellular volume (ECV), a surrogate of fibrosis, with excellent inter- and intra-observer variability. Cardiac fibrosis was assessed by cardiac MRI T1 mapping to calculate ECV at two timepoints, baseline and at approximately 1 year. ECV combines native and contrast-enhanced T1 mapping. Extracellular Volume (ECV) maps were generated offline using MATLAB software. ECV was calculated from native and post-contrast T1 values for blood and myocardial tissue, the partition coefficient lambda (λ), and hematocrit using the following formulas: ECV = λ(1-hematocrit); λ = (1/T1 myocardium post-contrast-1/T1 myocardium-native)/(1/T1 blood post-contrast-1/T1 blood-native).
Global Myocardial StrainApproximately 12 MonthsGlobal myocardial strain measured from cardiac MRI with T1-mapping at two timepoints. MRI at Randomization and MRI at approximately 12 Months. Myocardial strain measurements with feature tracking will be performed to measure myocardial strain from the Balanced Steady State Free Precession (bSSFP) short-axis and long-axis cine images. Long-axis cine images will be further used to compute global myocardial strain. Ancova test with adjusted for baseline global myocardial strain will be used to compare change in global myocardial strain over 12 months between 2 treatment groups. Global myocardial strain reported as longitudinal, radial, and circumferential at baseline and 1 year.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
T2 Relaxation TimeApproximately 12 MonthsChange from baseline in T2 relaxation time measured from cardiac MRI with T2-mapping at two timepoints. MRI at Randomization and MRI at approximately 12 Months

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
HbA1CApproximately 12 MonthsHemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) assessed at Baseline and every 3 months for approximately 12 months, Baseline and 12 months reported
Fasting GlucoseApproximately 12 MonthsFasting glucose assessed at Baseline and every 3 months for approximately 12 months, Baseline and 12 months reported
hsCRPApproximately 12 MonthsInflammatory marker hsCRP assessed at Baseline and every 6 months for approximately 12 months, Baseline and 12 months reported

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
10mg tabs placebo matching dapagliflozin. Placebo: Placebo
31
Dapagliflozin
10mg tabs of dapagliflozin dapagliflozin: Subjects will either receive 10mg tabs of dapagliflozin or identical looking placebo - inactive medication. Subjects have an equal chance of receiving dapagliflozin or placebo. Which treatment subjects receive is decided at random by a computer (purely by chance, like the tossing of a coin). Neither subjects nor the Study Site personnel will know which treatment subjects are assigned to. The study drug must be taken daily. The subject's other medications will not be changed by the study.
31
Total62

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up11
Overall StudyMoved out of state02
Overall StudyMRI incompatibility: Pacemaker implanted prior to subject final MRI scan01
Overall StudySubject discontinued intervention10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboDapagliflozinTotal
Age, Continuous62 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
62 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
62 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
Angina2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Coronary artery bypass surgery2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Current smoker3 Participants2 Participants5 Participants
Diabetes mellitus31 Participants31 Participants62 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
4 Participants1 Participants5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
27 Participants30 Participants57 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Family history myocardial infarction11 Participants12 Participants23 Participants
Family history stroke11 Participants14 Participants25 Participants
History myocardial infarction2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Hyperlipidemia18 Participants21 Participants39 Participants
Hypertension19 Participants19 Participants38 Participants
Percutaneous coronary intervention1 Participants3 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
6 Participants3 Participants9 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
3 Participants3 Participants6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
20 Participants23 Participants43 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
31 participants31 participants62 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
5 Participants6 Participants11 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
26 Participants25 Participants51 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 310 / 31
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 310 / 31
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 310 / 31

Outcome results

Primary

Extracellular Volume Fraction (ECV)

Cardiac MRI using T1-mapping is capable of quantifying myocardial extracellular volume (ECV), a surrogate of fibrosis, with excellent inter- and intra-observer variability. Cardiac fibrosis was assessed by cardiac MRI T1 mapping to calculate ECV at two timepoints, baseline and at approximately 1 year. ECV combines native and contrast-enhanced T1 mapping. Extracellular Volume (ECV) maps were generated offline using MATLAB software. ECV was calculated from native and post-contrast T1 values for blood and myocardial tissue, the partition coefficient lambda (λ), and hematocrit using the following formulas: ECV = λ(1-hematocrit); λ = (1/T1 myocardium post-contrast-1/T1 myocardium-native)/(1/T1 blood post-contrast-1/T1 blood-native).

Time frame: Approximately 12 Months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboExtracellular Volume Fraction (ECV)Baseline28.5 Percentage of total tissue volumeStandard Deviation 2.1
PlaceboExtracellular Volume Fraction (ECV)1 year28.7 Percentage of total tissue volumeStandard Deviation 2.3
PlaceboExtracellular Volume Fraction (ECV)Difference (1 year - baseline)0.24 Percentage of total tissue volumeStandard Deviation 2.16
DapagliflozinExtracellular Volume Fraction (ECV)Baseline27.7 Percentage of total tissue volumeStandard Deviation 2.9
DapagliflozinExtracellular Volume Fraction (ECV)1 year28.4 Percentage of total tissue volumeStandard Deviation 2
DapagliflozinExtracellular Volume Fraction (ECV)Difference (1 year - baseline)0.71 Percentage of total tissue volumeStandard Deviation 2.75
p-value: <0.0125Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Primary

Global Myocardial Strain

Global myocardial strain measured from cardiac MRI with T1-mapping at two timepoints. MRI at Randomization and MRI at approximately 12 Months. Myocardial strain measurements with feature tracking will be performed to measure myocardial strain from the Balanced Steady State Free Precession (bSSFP) short-axis and long-axis cine images. Long-axis cine images will be further used to compute global myocardial strain. Ancova test with adjusted for baseline global myocardial strain will be used to compare change in global myocardial strain over 12 months between 2 treatment groups. Global myocardial strain reported as longitudinal, radial, and circumferential at baseline and 1 year.

Time frame: Approximately 12 Months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboGlobal Myocardial StrainGlobal myocardial longitudinal strain - 1 year-11.3 Change in length as a percentageStandard Deviation 5.1
PlaceboGlobal Myocardial StrainGlobal myocardial radial strain - Difference (1 year - baseline)4.01 Change in length as a percentageStandard Deviation 10.19
PlaceboGlobal Myocardial StrainGlobal myocardial radial strain - Baseline27.3 Change in length as a percentageStandard Deviation 7.1
PlaceboGlobal Myocardial StrainGlobal myocardial circumferential strain - Baseline-15.7 Change in length as a percentageStandard Deviation 2.8
PlaceboGlobal Myocardial StrainGlobal myocardial longitudinal strain - Difference (1 year - baseline)-0.24 Change in length as a percentageStandard Deviation 5.32
PlaceboGlobal Myocardial StrainGlobal myocardial circumferential strain - 1 year-16.7 Change in length as a percentageStandard Deviation 2.9
PlaceboGlobal Myocardial StrainGlobal myocardial radial strain - 1 year31.3 Change in length as a percentageStandard Deviation 10.4
PlaceboGlobal Myocardial StrainGlobal myocardial circumferential strain - Difference (1 year - baseline)-0.97 Change in length as a percentageStandard Deviation 3.28
PlaceboGlobal Myocardial StrainGlobal myocardial longitudinal strain - Baseline-11.0 Change in length as a percentageStandard Deviation 3.9
DapagliflozinGlobal Myocardial StrainGlobal myocardial circumferential strain - Difference (1 year - baseline)0.05 Change in length as a percentageStandard Deviation 3.21
DapagliflozinGlobal Myocardial StrainGlobal myocardial longitudinal strain - Baseline-12.9 Change in length as a percentageStandard Deviation 3.4
DapagliflozinGlobal Myocardial StrainGlobal myocardial longitudinal strain - 1 year-12.0 Change in length as a percentageStandard Deviation 3.8
DapagliflozinGlobal Myocardial StrainGlobal myocardial longitudinal strain - Difference (1 year - baseline)0.88 Change in length as a percentageStandard Deviation 4.06
DapagliflozinGlobal Myocardial StrainGlobal myocardial radial strain - Baseline31.2 Change in length as a percentageStandard Deviation 8.7
DapagliflozinGlobal Myocardial StrainGlobal myocardial radial strain - 1 year33.9 Change in length as a percentageStandard Deviation 9.5
DapagliflozinGlobal Myocardial StrainGlobal myocardial radial strain - Difference (1 year - baseline)2.71 Change in length as a percentageStandard Deviation 9.38
DapagliflozinGlobal Myocardial StrainGlobal myocardial circumferential strain - Baseline-17.8 Change in length as a percentageStandard Deviation 2.9
DapagliflozinGlobal Myocardial StrainGlobal myocardial circumferential strain - 1 year-17.7 Change in length as a percentageStandard Deviation 3.6
p-value: <0.0125Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

T2 Relaxation Time

Change from baseline in T2 relaxation time measured from cardiac MRI with T2-mapping at two timepoints. MRI at Randomization and MRI at approximately 12 Months

Time frame: Approximately 12 Months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboT2 Relaxation TimeBaseline48.6 millisecondsStandard Deviation 3.3
PlaceboT2 Relaxation Time1 year50.2 millisecondsStandard Deviation 3.8
PlaceboT2 Relaxation TimeDifference (1 year - baseline)1.61 millisecondsStandard Deviation 4.14
DapagliflozinT2 Relaxation TimeBaseline50.5 millisecondsStandard Deviation 4.3
DapagliflozinT2 Relaxation Time1 year50.0 millisecondsStandard Deviation 5.7
DapagliflozinT2 Relaxation TimeDifference (1 year - baseline)-0.51 millisecondsStandard Deviation 6.59
Other Pre-specified

Fasting Glucose

Fasting glucose assessed at Baseline and every 3 months for approximately 12 months, Baseline and 12 months reported

Time frame: Approximately 12 Months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
PlaceboFasting GlucoseBaseline164.5 mg/dLStandard Deviation 46.4
PlaceboFasting Glucose1 year161.0 mg/dLStandard Deviation 55.9
PlaceboFasting GlucoseDifference (1 year - baseline)-3.48 mg/dLStandard Deviation 39.56
DapagliflozinFasting GlucoseBaseline159.8 mg/dLStandard Deviation 42.5
DapagliflozinFasting Glucose1 year126.8 mg/dLStandard Deviation 36.9
DapagliflozinFasting GlucoseDifference (1 year - baseline)-33.04 mg/dLStandard Deviation 55.08
Other Pre-specified

HbA1C

Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) assessed at Baseline and every 3 months for approximately 12 months, Baseline and 12 months reported

Time frame: Approximately 12 Months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboHbA1CBaseline7.8 percentageStandard Deviation 0.9
PlaceboHbA1C1 year8.0 percentageStandard Deviation 1
PlaceboHbA1CDifference (1 year - baseline)0.11 percentageStandard Deviation 1.17
DapagliflozinHbA1CBaseline7.9 percentageStandard Deviation 0.8
DapagliflozinHbA1C1 year7.4 percentageStandard Deviation 0.8
DapagliflozinHbA1CDifference (1 year - baseline)-.52 percentageStandard Deviation 0.95
Other Pre-specified

hsCRP

Inflammatory marker hsCRP assessed at Baseline and every 6 months for approximately 12 months, Baseline and 12 months reported

Time frame: Approximately 12 Months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlacebohsCRP1 year1.8 mg/dLStandard Deviation 0.3
PlacebohsCRPDifference (1 year - baseline).12 mg/dLStandard Deviation 2.2
PlacebohsCRPBaseline2.4 mg/dLStandard Deviation 0.5
DapagliflozinhsCRPBaseline1.7 mg/dLStandard Deviation 1.6
DapagliflozinhsCRP1 year2.5 mg/dLStandard Deviation 4.1
DapagliflozinhsCRPDifference (1 year - baseline)0.81 mg/dLStandard Deviation 2.95

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 27, 2026