Skip to content

Stress Incontinence Trial With Elitone Device

Randomized Controlled Study of Efficacy of Elitone Device For the Treatment of Mild-Moderate Stress Urinary Incontinence

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03782116
Enrollment
87
Registered
2018-12-20
Start date
2018-09-01
Completion date
2019-03-31
Last updated
2025-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stress Urinary Incontinence

Brief summary

This is a randomized controlled study in which subjects are assigned to either a treatment group or a control (sham) group. Pre- and post-study outcome measures evaluate the change in incontinence episodes on women with mild-moderate stress urinary incontinence.

Detailed description

The Elitone device delivers electrical muscle stimulation to pelvic floor muscles through a disposable surface electrode shaped to fit the perineal region. In typical use women self-administer treatment 20 minutes per day, 5x per week, for 6-12 weeks. Elidah is initiating a prospective, randomized clinical study to demonstrate device efficacy. The study expands a similar pilot to 60 subjects, adds a control arm (sham device) and includes additional outcome measures. Like the earlier study, subjects will self-administer treatment over multiple weeks while maintaining daily logs of their treatment and incontinence symptoms. This is a home-use study, which does not require clinic visits. Accordingly, this allows subject recruitment from across US.

Interventions

DEVICETranscutaneous electrical stimulation (Elitone)

Transcutaneous perineal area electrical stimulation

Sponsors

Elidah, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The device looks identical, but the waveform is different. Randomization, programming and recording of which waveform is done by a third party separate from those listed above.

Intervention model description

Randomization

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
21 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Predominant Mild-moderate stress incontinence symptoms as determined by self-reported typical number of accidents of 1 per 24 hours or more.

Exclusion criteria

* Severe incontinence as determined by self-reported \>5 accidents in 24-hr period * Currently pregnant, may be pregnant, attempting to become pregnant, or delivery within previous 6 weeks * Implanted cardiac device, untreated cardiac arrhythmia or suffer from other heart problems. * Cancer, epilepsy or cognitive dysfunction * Vaginal or pelvic surgery within previous 6 months * Complete denervation of the pelvic floor * History or symptoms of urinary retention, extra-urethral incontinence, overflow incontinence * Active urinary tract infection (UTI) or history of recurrent UTIs (more than three in a year) * Recurrent vaginitis (bacterial/fungal) * Pelvic pain/painful bladder syndrome * Underlying neurologic/neuromuscular disorder * Severe Obesity as defined by BMI \>= 35 * Chronic coughing * Impaired decision making, drug or alcohol dependence, or suicidal thoughts. * Anyone who lacks the capacity to consent for themselves or who requires a legal representative to give informed consent.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Efficacy Assessed by Percent Reduction in Urinary Incontinence Episodes12 weeksThe percent reduction in average number of urinary incontinence episodes over 12 weeks.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Efficacy Assessed by Percent Reduction in Average Pad Weight12 weeksThe percent reduction of pad weight in a day over the 12 weeks.
Efficacy Assessed by Change in Incontinence Quality of Life Questionnaire (I-QOL)12 weeksThe efficacy assessed by change in Incontinence quality of life questionnaire (I-QOL). It comprises 22 questions, to which the subject provides a numeric response on a 1-5 scale. 1 = not at all , 2 = a little, 3 = moderately, 4 = quite a bit and 5 = extremely. The score is the sum of the numeric responses, which can range from 22 to 110. The lower the value the less times it happens and the better outcome.
Pads Per Day12 weeksReduction of number of pads used per day

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Treatment
Elitone Surface electrical stimulation with a treatment waveform (medium frequency modulated at 50Hz) Transcutaneous electrical stimulation (Elitone): Transcutaneous perineal area electrical stimulation
35
Control
Elitone Sham surface electrical stimulation at a very low frequency not known to contract muscles. Transcutaneous electrical stimulation (Elitone): Transcutaneous perineal area electrical stimulation
13
Total48

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Completed IntervetionLost to Follow-up117
Completed IntervetionWithdrawal by Subject65
Included in AnalysisProtocol Violation55

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTreatmentTotalControl
Age, Continuous48.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.3
47.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
44.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
35 participants48 participants13 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
35 Participants48 Participants13 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Stress incontinence leaks/day2.81 leaks/day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.01
2.76 leaks/day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.05
2.65 leaks/day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.17

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 350 / 13
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 350 / 13
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 350 / 13

Outcome results

Primary

Efficacy Assessed by Percent Reduction in Urinary Incontinence Episodes

The percent reduction in average number of urinary incontinence episodes over 12 weeks.

Time frame: 12 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TreatmentEfficacy Assessed by Percent Reduction in Urinary Incontinence Episodes52.8 percent reduction in leaks/dayStandard Deviation 36.3
ControlEfficacy Assessed by Percent Reduction in Urinary Incontinence Episodes7.9 percent reduction in leaks/dayStandard Deviation 55.9
Secondary

Efficacy Assessed by Change in Incontinence Quality of Life Questionnaire (I-QOL)

The efficacy assessed by change in Incontinence quality of life questionnaire (I-QOL). It comprises 22 questions, to which the subject provides a numeric response on a 1-5 scale. 1 = not at all , 2 = a little, 3 = moderately, 4 = quite a bit and 5 = extremely. The score is the sum of the numeric responses, which can range from 22 to 110. The lower the value the less times it happens and the better outcome.

Time frame: 12 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TreatmentEfficacy Assessed by Change in Incontinence Quality of Life Questionnaire (I-QOL)20.8 Change of score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.8
ControlEfficacy Assessed by Change in Incontinence Quality of Life Questionnaire (I-QOL)10.3 Change of score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.8
Secondary

Efficacy Assessed by Percent Reduction in Average Pad Weight

The percent reduction of pad weight in a day over the 12 weeks.

Time frame: 12 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TreatmentEfficacy Assessed by Percent Reduction in Average Pad Weight38.3 percentage reduction in pad weightStandard Deviation 62.4
ControlEfficacy Assessed by Percent Reduction in Average Pad Weight25.3 percentage reduction in pad weightStandard Deviation 48.8
Secondary

Pads Per Day

Reduction of number of pads used per day

Time frame: 12 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TreatmentPads Per Day35.0 percentage reductionStandard Deviation 34.1
ControlPads Per Day8.2 percentage reductionStandard Deviation 59.9

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026