Skip to content

Comparisons of Novel Double-lumen Endobronchial Tube for Blind Lung Isolation Technique With Conventional Double-lumen Endobronchial Tube in Patients Undergoing One-lung Ventilation

Comparisons of Novel Double-lumen Endobronchial Tube for Blind Lung Isolation Technique With Conventional Double-lumen Endobronchial Tube in Patients Undergoing One-lung Ventilation

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03782090
Enrollment
190
Registered
2018-12-20
Start date
2018-09-05
Completion date
2019-01-31
Last updated
2019-05-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Intubation Tube(Intubation Using Double Lumen Endobronchial Tube)

Brief summary

The study is prospectively conducted on 190 patients aged between 20 and 85 years, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I - III, undergoing one-lung ventilation for thoracic surgery. Patients were randomly allocated into either control group (n = 95) or experimental group (n = 95) by a computerized randomization table. The size of endobronchial tube is decided based on the diameter of left main bronchus measured on the CT finding of patients. After induction of general anesthesia, in patients assigned to control group, endobronchial intubation is performed using conventional technique with left-sided double-lumen endobronchial tube (Shiley®, Covidien, Mansfield, MA, USA). In experimental group, patients are intubated with novel double-lumen endobronchial tube (Ankor®,Insung Medical, Wonjou, S. Korea). During intubation, the carina cuff of Ankor® is inflated after the tube is rotated 90º toward the left. The tube is advanced until slight resistance is felt, then the carina cuff is deflated. In both groups, fiberoptic bronchoscope is performed to evaluate the position of endobronchial tube after intubation. If endobronchial tube is not in optimal position, the depth of tube is corrected to optimal position under guidance of fiberoptic bronchoscope. Airway injury is confirmed using fiberoptic bronchoscope before extubation. The success of endobronchial intubation, position of endobronchial tube, the corrected depth of endobronchial tube, time consumption for endobronchial intubation and complication of intubation such as airway injury, pain, and hoarseness are compared between two groups.

Interventions

DEVICEEndobronchial intubation

1. In control group, endobronchial intubation is performed using conventional technique with left-sided double-lumen endobronchial tube(Shiley®). The tube is introduced into the glottis via direct laryngoscopy. After the tube tip passes the vocal cord, the tube is rotated 90º toward the left. The tube is advanced according to the depth(cm) of the tube calculated by the height of patient(12.5+0.1\*height). Afterwards, the depth of the tube is adjusted by the compliance of both lung. 2. In experimental group, patients are intubated with novel double-lumen endobronchial tube(Ankor®). The tube is introduced into the glottis via direct laryngoscopy. After the tube tip passes the vocal cord, the tube is rotated 90º toward the left. Once the carinal cuff of the tube is passed through the vocal cord of patients, the carinal cuff is inflated with 5-8ml of air. The tube is advanced until the tube stops itself at some point along the tracheobronchial tree. And then the carinal cuff is deflated.

Sponsors

Yonsei University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

Patients, investigators who evaluate complication of intubation are blinded to the study group.

Intervention model description

Patients were randomly allocated into either control group (n = 95) or experimental group (n = 95) by a computerized randomization table. In control group, endobronchial intubation is performed using conventional technique with left-sided double-lumen endotracheal tube (Shiley®, Covidien, Mansfield, MA, USA). In experimental group, patients are intubated with novel double-lumen endotracheal tube (Ankor®,Insung Medical, Wonjou, S. Korea).

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. ASA classification 1-3 2. aged between 20 to 85 3. undergoing one lung ventilation using left-sided double-lumen endobronchial tube for thoracic surgery

Exclusion criteria

1. Expected difficult intubation (neck extension\<35 degrees, mandibular-hyoid distance \< 6 cm, sternomental distance \< 12.5 cm) 2. anomaly of tracheobronchial tree 3. intraluminal lesion in left or right bronchus 4. Obesity (Body Mass Index \> 30) 5. upper respiratory infection 6. Thoracic surgical history 7. blood coagulation disorder 8. emergency operation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Optimal position of double-lumen endobronchial tube1 day (after intubation)On fiberoptic bronchoscopic view after intubation, optimal position of double-lumen endobronchial tube is defined when the bronchial cuff of the tube is immediately below the tracheal carina and there is a clear view of the left subcarina with unobstructed left upper and lower bronchi.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The corrected depth of endobronchial tube1 day (after intubation)The corrected depth of endobronchial tube is defined as the difference between the depth of endobronchial tube before and after the depth of tube is corrected to optimal position under guidance of fiberoptic.

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026