Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, Trigger Finger
Conditions
Brief summary
Does a difference in patient satisfaction and cosmetic outcome exist between wound closure with absorbable or non-absorbable sutures.
Detailed description
The study will involve randomizing patients to wound closure with absorbable or non-absorbable sutures. We will if scar formation (symptoms and aesthetics) if different between the two types of closures as determined by the patient and observer scar assessment scale version 2.0 (POSAS) and the patient-rated wrist/hand evaluation (PRWHE), between absorbable and non-absorbable suture for wound closure of open carpal tunnel release and trigger finger pulley release.
Interventions
Comparison of two wound closures
Sponsors
Study design
Masking description
Blinded assessment for wound healing
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Any patient greater than or equal to 18 years of age. * Any patient undergoing primary open carpal tunnel release or primary trigger finger pulley release
Exclusion criteria
* Any patient identified outside of the proposed study time period. * Any patient receiving revision surgery * Patients who have had prior ipsilateral palmar or finger surgery * Patients with Dupuytren's disease
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Scar formation with the Patient and Observer Scare Assessment Scale | 1 year | Blinded scar assessment utilizing the patient and observer scar assessment scale version 2.0 (POSAS). The POSAS is scored from the perspective of the patient and a blinded observer independently. Scores range from 1 to 10 with 1 indicating normal skin and 10 indicating the worst scar imaginable. The 1 to 10 scoring is performed in 6 domains of various scar characteristics to obtain a total score ranging from 10 to 60. Additionally, there is an overall scar appearance score that ranges from 1 to 10 with 1 indicating normal skin and 10 indicating the worst scar imaginable. |
Countries
United States
Contacts
Mayo Clinic