Skip to content

A Novel Low-Cost Tool for a More Efficient and Reliable Weight-for-Height/Length Assessment

A Novel Low-Cost Tool for a More Efficient and Reliable Weight-for-Height/Length Assessment

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03780348
Acronym
Yared's-tool
Enrollment
510
Registered
2018-12-19
Start date
2018-12-31
Completion date
2019-02-28
Last updated
2018-12-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Severe Acute Malnutrition, Wasting

Keywords

Weigh-for-Height/Length, Assessment

Brief summary

Weight-for-height/length z-score is one of the indicators used to diagnose acute malnutrition. In the existing method, the assessment involves three steps and takes significant time with a wider room for errors. A new tool is developed to address these drawbacks. A preliminary testing done show encouraging results, but a more robust study is needed. This research will b done with the objective of comparing diagnostic efficiency and reliability of the 'new' method against the 'existing' one using a diagnostic randomized clinical trial method.

Detailed description

Acute malnutrition is a major underlying and direct cause of child death. Weight-for-height/length z score (WHZ) is one of the indicators used to assess nutritional status of children. In the existing method, the assessment involves three steps; measuring height, measuring weight and deciding WHZ using a reference graphs or tables. The assessment takes significant time and has wider room for errors. Due to these drawbacks, it is not used at community level where regular active finding takes place. A new tool is developed to address these drawbacks. It reduces the steps to two aiming at reducing errors and saving time and energy. This study will compare efficiency and reliability of WHZ assessments done with the new tool against the existing method using a diagnostic randomized clinical trial. Trained health workers will do WHZ assessments in under five children mobilized for nutrition screening program. The 'average time' needed and proportions of 'classification errors' will be compared between the new and the existing methods. Assessments done by two anthropometry experts will be used as gold standard. The study will determine the gains of the new tool and can potentially change the global practice and help early detection of huge number of wasted children that are being missed.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTNew Method

A 'new' WHZ tool will be used to assess children.

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTExisting Method

'Existing' WHZ tools will be used to assess children

Sponsors

JSI Research & Training Institute, Inc.
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Masking description

The caregivers of the children, the care provider linking the children to either of the groups and the investigator will not know which group each child is joining and which group is using which method.

Intervention model description

Children will be assigned for nutrition status assessment to either of the two groups that use the 'new' or the 'existing' assessment method

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
No minimum to 5 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All children under five years of age living in the study area.

Exclusion criteria

* Children for whom weigh-for-height assessments can not be done due to physical deformities and disabilities.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Diagnostic ReliabilityIn 3 monthsProportion of 'assessment errors' between the groups will be compared against that of the gold standard (i.e the assessment done by two experts for each child'
Efficiency of assessmentin 3 monthsThe average time needed to complete WHZ assessments using the 'new' method will be compared with that of the 'existing' method
Reliability of WHZ assessments done by community Health Extension Workersin 3 monthsProportion of 'assessment errors' by health-extension workers will be compared with that of the 'nurses' and the 'experts'

Contacts

Primary ContactYared A Fantaye, MD, MPH
yared_abebe@et.jsi.org+251 911944651

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026