Skip to content

The Correlation Between the Length of Stay in Post Acute Care(PAC) and General Improvements in Stroke Patients

The Correlation Between the Length of Stay in Post Acute Care(PAC) and General Improvements in Stroke Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03778905
Enrollment
305
Registered
2018-12-19
Start date
2018-12-03
Completion date
2019-06-22
Last updated
2020-07-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Brief summary

Post-Acute Care(PAC) had been inaugurated in Taiwan for almost four years and current essays revealed positive effects upon general improvements in stroke patient after PAC training. During acute phase, a stroke patient would admit to internal medicine or surgical ward and transferred to rehabilitative ward for more intensive therapeutic programs, restoring muscle power and promoting activity of daily life(ADL) ability. Under relative stable condition, the patient would transfer to PAC institution or hospitals afterwards for continuing rehabilitative program if the patient is acknowledged to have rehabilitative potentials. However, there's still lacking of investigation upon whether the length of stay in PAC correlates to general improvements. Thus, stroke patients' functional ability, such as activities of daily living (ADL) function, swallowing ability and so on, as well as their corresponding scales were assessed on the first and last day during PAC hospitalization. Statistical analysis was conducted via SPSS ver21.0 to compare the relationship of improvements in functional ability and the length of stay in PAC. We're looking forward to the final results!

Detailed description

Functional ability in stroke patients are evaluated by following measurements. Activity of daily life (ADL) function was estimated through modified Rankin scale(MRS) and Barthel index(BI), swallowing ability by functional oral intake scale, nutritional status via mini nutritional assessment, life quality through EuroQoL-5D, instrumental ADL function by Lawton-Brody IADL Scale(IADL), balance/coordination via Berg Balance Test, walking speed through Usual Gait Speed, cardiopulmonary capability by Six-Minute Walk Test, occupational mobility (amount use/quality) via Motor Activity Log, language through concise Chinese aphasia test, motor function of upper extremities by Fugl-Meyer Assessment and so on.

Interventions

OTHERRehabilitation

The stroke patients who admitted to post acute care(PAC) institution would undergo regular rehabilitation.

Sponsors

Chimei Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* \>18 y/o * acute onset of stroke within 30 days * Modified Rankin Scale 2\ 4

Exclusion criteria

* patients refused to join post acute care(PAC) program * hemodynamic unstable * disease progression

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Activity of daily life function35 daysActivity of daily life function is evaluated by both Barthel index(Range: 0\ 100 score; higher score indicates better function) and Modified Rankin Scale(Grade 1\ 6; the lower grade indicates better function). Task-oriented activity of daily life is assessed by Industrial activity of daily life(Range: Male 0\ 5 score and female 0\ 8 score; Higher score indicates better function)
Nutritional status35 daysNutritional status is evaluated by Mini nutritional assessment(Range: 0.0\ 30.0). Higher score indicates better function
Oral intake function35 daysOral intake is evaluated by Functional oral intake scale(Range: level 1\ 7). Higher level indicates better function.
Cardiopulmonary capacity35 daysCardiopulmonary capacity is evaluated by 6-minute walk test, which requires the patients to walk as much as they can within 6 minutes. Walking length is presented in meters. Longer distance and more meters indicate better function.
Walking speed35 daysWalking speed is evaluated by Usual Gait Speed, which require the patients to walk certain distance and record the time that needed to finish the whole course. Time is presented with seconds. The shorter time and lower seconds indicate better function.
Upper motor hand function35 daysUpper motor hand function is evaluated by Fugl-Meyer assessment(Range 0\ 44 scores) Higher scores indicate better function.
Life quality35 daysLife quality is evaluated by EuroQoL-5D(Range: 5\ 15 scores). Lower scores indicate better life quality.
Balance and coordination35 daysBalance and coordination is evaluated by Berg-Balance test(Range: 0\ 56). Higher scores indicate better function.
Cognition35 daysCognition is evaluated by Mini-Mental Sate Examination(Range: 0\ 30 score). Higher scores indicate better cognition.
Speech function35 daysSpeech function is evaluated by Concise Chinese Aphasia Test(Range: 1\ 12 scores). Higher scores indicate better speech function

Countries

Taiwan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026