Skip to content

18F-DOPA-PET/MRI Scan in Imaging Elderly Patients With Newly Diagnosed Grade IV Malignant Glioma or Glioblastoma During Planning for a Short Course of Proton Beam Radiation Therapy

Phase II Study of Short Course Hypofractionated Proton Beam Therapy Incorporating 18F-DOPA-PET/MRI for Elderly Patients With Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03778294
Enrollment
43
Registered
2018-12-19
Start date
2019-03-28
Completion date
2023-11-26
Last updated
2025-07-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Glioblastoma, Malignant Glioma

Brief summary

This phase II trial studies how well fluorodopa F 18-positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging scan (18F-DOPA-PET/MRI) works in imaging elderly patients with newly diagnosed grade IV malignant glioma or glioblastoma during planning for a short course of proton beam radiation therapy. 18F-DOPA is a chemical tracer that highlights certain cells during imaging. PET scan, is a metabolic imaging technique which takes advantage of how tumor cells take up nutrients differently than normal tissue. MRI scans are used to guide radiation therapy for most brain tumors. Hypofractionated proton beam therapy delivers higher doses of radiation therapy over a shorter period of time and may kill more tumor cells and have fewer side effects. Using 18FDOPA-PET scans along with MRI scans may be able to provide the radiation doctor with information on tumor tissue versus normal, healthy tissue and may help the doctor more accurately plan the radiation treatment.

Detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. Compare overall survival at 12 months for grade IV glioma patients after radiation therapy targeting volumes designed with both 18F-DOPA-PET and conventional magnetic resonance (MR) image (or PET/computed tomography \[CT\]) information with historical controls. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. Compare progression free survival at 12 months after radiation therapy targeting volumes designed with both 18F-DOPA-PET and conventional MR image information with historical controls. II. Determine acute and late effect toxicity after hypofractionated proton beam radiotherapy treatment including areas of high 18F-DOPA-PET uptake (T/N \> 2.0). CORRELATIVE RESEARCH OBJECTIVES: I. Compare radiotherapy (RT) treatment volumes defined by MR only with RT treatment volumes defined with both PET and MR information for grade IV glioma patients. II. Compare differences in RT volumes identified using biopsy-validated thresholds as highly aggressive disease comparing 18F-DOPA uptake and relative cerebral blood volume (relCBV) from perfusion MRI (pMRI) as well as differences in RT volumes identified using biopsy-validated thresholds as tumor extent comparing 18F-DOPA uptake and diffusion maps from diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) will be evaluated. III. Evaluate quality of life after radiotherapy using European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) questionnaires compared with historical controls from Keim-Guibert et al. IV. Compare differences in proton radiation planning utilizing radiobiologic modeling/evaluation techniques performed at Mayo Clinic Rochester to linear energy transfer distribution evaluation at Mayo Clinic Arizona. OUTLINE: Patients receive 18F-DOPA intravenously (IV) and undergo PET/MRI or PET/CT imaging scan. Patients then receive proton beam radiotherapy over 5 or 10 consecutive days excluding weekend and standard of care temozolomide on days 1-7 or 1-14. Beginning cycles 2, patients receive standard of care temozolomide on days 1-5. Cycles with temozolomide repeat every 28 days for up to 7 cycles in the in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every 2 months for 1 year, and then periodically for up to 5 years.

Interventions

OTHERQuality-of-Life Assessment

Ancillary studies

OTHERQuestionnaire Administration

Ancillary studies

DRUGTemozolomide

Drug

PROCEDUREComputed Tomography

Undergo PET/CT

Given IV

PROCEDUREMagnetic Resonance Imaging

Undergo PET/MRI

PROCEDUREPositron Emission Tomography

Undergo PET/CT or PET/MRI

RADIATIONProton Beam Radiation Therapy

Receive proton beam RT

Sponsors

Mayo Clinic
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Histologically confirmed newly diagnosed grade IV malignant glioma * Planned radiation treatments at Mayo Clinic Arizona or Mayo Clinic Rochester * Willing to sign release of information for any radiation and/or follow-up records * Provide informed written consent * Patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) \>= 60 mg/min/1.72 m\^2 * Ability to complete questionnaire(s) by themselves or with assistance * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0, 1, 2

Exclusion criteria

* Patients diagnosed with grades I-III glioma * Currently on Avastin at time of treatment * Unable to undergo MRI scans with contrast (e.g. cardiac pacemaker, defibrillator, kidney failure) * Unable to undergo an 18F-DOPA-PET scan (e.g. Parkinson's disease, taking anti-dopaminergic, or dopamine agonist medication or less than 6 half-lives from discontinuance of dopamine agonists) * NOTE: Other potentially interfering drugs: amoxapine, amphetamine, benztropine, buproprion, buspirone, cocaine, mazindol, methamphetamine, methylphenidate, norephedrine, phentermine, phenylpropanolamine, selegiline, paroxetine, citalopram, and sertraline. If a patient is on any of these drugs, list which ones on the on-study form * Pregnant women, nursing women, or men or women of childbearing potential who are unwilling to employ adequate contraception. * NOTE: All women enrolled in this study will be age 65 or over, and at the determination of the principal investigator (PI), will not be of childbearing potential. If the radiology department requires a pregnancy test before administering the 18FDOPA injection, they may perform one per their standard of care

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Survival (OS)Time from registration to death due to any cause, assessed up to 12 monthsThe proportion of successes will be estimated by the number of successes divided by the total number of evaluable patients. Confidence intervals for the true success proportion will be calculated utilizing exact binomial methodology. The distribution of survival time will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier (1958).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression Free SurvivalAt 12 months after radiation therapyDefined as the time from registration to the earliest date documenting disease progression
Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs)Up to 4 yearsThe rate of acute and late treatment-related toxicities for newly diagnosed high-grade glioma patients treated with fluorodopa F 18-positron emission tomography (18F-DOPA PET) image-guided hypofractionated proton beam therapy will be determined, with acute radiotherapy (RT) toxicities graded using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Radiotherapy (RT) Treatment VolumesUp to 5 years post treatmentPaired t-test statistical analysis will be performed to determine if any differences exist and the level of statistical significance between treatment volumes defined by magnetic resonance (MR) only and treatment volumes defined with both positron emission tomography (PET) and MR information.
Quality of Life (QOL)Up to 5 years post treatmentQOL surveys will be compared to data from historical controls. Quality of life will be assessed at baseline and at each magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluation (up to 6 evaluations). QOL will be measured using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) quality of life questionnaire (QLQ)-C30, a 30-item patient-reported questionnaire about patient ability to function, symptoms related to the cancer and its treatment, overall health and quality of life, and perceived financial impact of the cancer and its treatment. 28 of the 30 items are measured on a 1-4 scale (1=not at all; 4=very much) with the remaining two items (overall health and overall quality of life) scored on a 1-7 numeric analogue scale (1=very poor; 7=excellent). The recall period for the EORTC QLQ-C30 is one week. Higher scores indicate better QoL for overall health status and functioning scales, and worse QoL for symptom scales
Differences in Proton Radiation PlanningUp to 5 years post treatmentPaired t-test statistical analysis will be performed to determine if any differences exist and the level of statistical significance between proton plan metrics based off two modeling/evaluation techniques: radiobiologic modeling/evaluation techniques performed at Mayo Clinic Rochester and Linear Energy Transfer (LET) distribution evaluation at Mayo Clinic Arizona

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Treatment (18F-DOPA, PET/MRI, PET/CT, Temozolomide)
Patients receive 18F-DOPA IV and undergo PET/MRI or PET/CT imaging scan. Patients then receive proton beam radiotherapy over 5 or 10 consecutive days excluding weekend and standard of care temozolomide on days 1-7 or 1-14. Beginning cycles 2, patients receive standard of care temozolomide on days 1-5. Cycles with temozolomide repeat every 28 days for up to 7 cycles in the in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.\> \> Computed Tomography: Undergo PET/CT\> \> Fluorodopa F 18: Given IV\> \> Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Undergo PET/MRI\> \> Positron Emission Tomography: Undergo PET/CT or PET/MRI\> \> Proton Beam Radiation Therapy: Receive proton beam RT\> \> Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies\> \> Questionnaire Administration: Ancillary studies\> \> Temozolomide: Drug
39
Total39

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyDeath1
Overall Studydisease progression before treatment2
Overall StudyIssues with insurance1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTreatment (18F-DOPA, PET/MRI, PET/CT, Temozolomide)
Age, Continuous71.617 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.097
Corticosteroid therapy at study entry?
No
18 Participants
Corticosteroid therapy at study entry?
Yes
21 Participants
ECOG Performance Status
0
13 Participants
ECOG Performance Status
1
19 Participants
ECOG Performance Status
2
7 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
38 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants
Extent of surgery
Biopsy
15 Participants
Extent of surgery
Gross total resection
16 Participants
Extent of surgery
Subtotal resection
8 Participants
Family history of brain tumor
No
38 Participants
Family history of brain tumor
Yes
1 Participants
History of seizure
No
29 Participants
History of seizure
Yes
10 Participants
MGMT
Methylated
13 Participants
MGMT
Not available
2 Participants
MGMT
Unmethylated
24 Participants
Neurological Deficit
No
26 Participants
Neurological Deficit
Yes
13 Participants
Path result/Molecular factors
IDH1 mutant
0 Participants
Path result/Molecular factors
IDH1 Wildtype
39 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
37 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
11 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
28 Participants
Use of alternating electrical therapy
No
39 Participants
Use of alternating electrical therapy
Yes
0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
32 / 39
other
Total, other adverse events
39 / 39
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 39

Outcome results

Primary

Overall Survival (OS)

The proportion of successes will be estimated by the number of successes divided by the total number of evaluable patients. Confidence intervals for the true success proportion will be calculated utilizing exact binomial methodology. The distribution of survival time will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier (1958).

Time frame: Time from registration to death due to any cause, assessed up to 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Treatment (18F-DOPA, PET/MRI, PET/CT, Temozolomide)Overall Survival (OS)0.54 proportion of successes
Secondary

Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs)

The rate of acute and late treatment-related toxicities for newly diagnosed high-grade glioma patients treated with fluorodopa F 18-positron emission tomography (18F-DOPA PET) image-guided hypofractionated proton beam therapy will be determined, with acute radiotherapy (RT) toxicities graded using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.

Time frame: Up to 4 years

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Treatment (18F-DOPA, PET/MRI, PET/CT, Temozolomide)Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs)Grade 2 Post Baseline34 Participants
Treatment (18F-DOPA, PET/MRI, PET/CT, Temozolomide)Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs)Grade 3 Post Baseline18 Participants
Treatment (18F-DOPA, PET/MRI, PET/CT, Temozolomide)Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs)Grade 4 Post Baseline5 Participants
Treatment (18F-DOPA, PET/MRI, PET/CT, Temozolomide)Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs)Grade 2 Acute27 Participants
Treatment (18F-DOPA, PET/MRI, PET/CT, Temozolomide)Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs)Grade 3 Acute7 Participants
Treatment (18F-DOPA, PET/MRI, PET/CT, Temozolomide)Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs)Grade 4 Acute0 Participants
Treatment (18F-DOPA, PET/MRI, PET/CT, Temozolomide)Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs)Grade 2 Late24 Participants
Treatment (18F-DOPA, PET/MRI, PET/CT, Temozolomide)Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs)Grade 3 Late14 Participants
Treatment (18F-DOPA, PET/MRI, PET/CT, Temozolomide)Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs)Grade 4 Late5 Participants
Secondary

Progression Free Survival

Defined as the time from registration to the earliest date documenting disease progression

Time frame: Up to 4 years

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Treatment (18F-DOPA, PET/MRI, PET/CT, Temozolomide)Progression Free Survival6.9 months
Secondary

Progression Free Survival

Defined as the time from registration to the earliest date documenting disease progression

Time frame: At 12 months after radiation therapy

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Treatment (18F-DOPA, PET/MRI, PET/CT, Temozolomide)Progression Free Survival0.72 proportion of successes
Other Pre-specified

Differences in Proton Radiation Planning

Paired t-test statistical analysis will be performed to determine if any differences exist and the level of statistical significance between proton plan metrics based off two modeling/evaluation techniques: radiobiologic modeling/evaluation techniques performed at Mayo Clinic Rochester and Linear Energy Transfer (LET) distribution evaluation at Mayo Clinic Arizona

Time frame: Up to 5 years post treatment

Other Pre-specified

Quality of Life (QOL)

QOL surveys will be compared to data from historical controls. Quality of life will be assessed at baseline and at each magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluation (up to 6 evaluations). QOL will be measured using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) quality of life questionnaire (QLQ)-C30, a 30-item patient-reported questionnaire about patient ability to function, symptoms related to the cancer and its treatment, overall health and quality of life, and perceived financial impact of the cancer and its treatment. 28 of the 30 items are measured on a 1-4 scale (1=not at all; 4=very much) with the remaining two items (overall health and overall quality of life) scored on a 1-7 numeric analogue scale (1=very poor; 7=excellent). The recall period for the EORTC QLQ-C30 is one week. Higher scores indicate better QoL for overall health status and functioning scales, and worse QoL for symptom scales

Time frame: Up to 5 years post treatment

Other Pre-specified

Radiotherapy (RT) Treatment Volumes

Paired t-test statistical analysis will be performed to determine if any differences exist and the level of statistical significance between treatment volumes defined by magnetic resonance (MR) only and treatment volumes defined with both positron emission tomography (PET) and MR information.

Time frame: Up to 5 years post treatment

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 9, 2026