Skip to content

Evaluation the Effects of French Maritime Pine Bark Extract on the Clinical Status in Traumatic Brain Injury Patients

Evaluation the Effects of French Maritime Pine Bark Extract Supplementation on the Inflammatory Biomarkers, Nutritional and Clinical Status in Traumatic Brain Injury Patients, in Intensive Care Unit; A Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03777683
Enrollment
67
Registered
2018-12-17
Start date
2019-04-14
Completion date
2020-02-20
Last updated
2020-05-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Traumatic Brain Injury

Brief summary

Introduction: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is one of the major health and socioeconomic problems in the world. Immune-enhancing enteral formula has been proven to significantly reduce infection rate in TBI patient. One of the ingredients that can be used in immunonutrition formulas to reduce inflammation and oxidative stress is French maritime pine bark extract. Objective: The main objective of present study is surveying the effect of French maritime pine bark extract on the clinical, nutritional and inflammatory status of TBI patients as the first human study in the world. Method: this is double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Block randomization are used. Intervention group will receive French maritime pine bark extract supplement (OLIGOPIN) 150 mg for 10 days. Control group will receive placebo for the same duration. Inflammatory status (IL-6, IL- 1β, C-reactive protein) and oxidative stress status (Malondialdehyde, total antioxidant capacity), at the base line, at the 5th day and at the end of the study (10th day) are measured. APACHE ІІ (acute physiologic and chronic health evaluation II) for assessment of clinical status of patients and Nutric questionnaires for assessment of nutritional status filled out at the base line, 5th day and the end of study. SOFA (sequential organ failure assessment) questionnaire for assessment of organ failure filled out every other day. The mortality rate will be asked by phone within 28 days of the start of the intervention. Weight, body mass index and body composition at baseline, 5th day and 10th day of intervention are measured. All analyses will be conducted by initially assigned study arm in an intention-to-treat analysis. The data will be expressed as mean ± SD.

Detailed description

Randomization: investigators randomly assign eligible patients on enrolment (1:1) to either the control group or the intervention group. Randomization is stratified by site and a randomization list of unique patient identifiers is generated by the study statistician using a computer-generated random block size. The classification is based on age (18 to 40 and 40 to 65 years old), gender (male / female) and APACHEII score (0 to 35 and 35 to 71) using quadruple blocks.

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTDietary Supplement (OLIGOPIN)

investigators obtained ethical approval from the Research Ethics Committees of the Mashhad University of medical sciences. investigators enroll 60 patients who are admitted to ICU at hospitals of university. All eligible patients or their first degree relatives give informed consent before participating. Participants are randomly (block stratification) divided in two groups. At the first visit, baseline data are gathered and intervention group (n=30) will receive Oligopin supplement. In order to control the confounding effect of food intake, both the control and the intervention group receive the standard formulas based on their daily required energy via enteral root feeding.

OTHERPlacebo

investigators obtained ethical approval from the Research Ethics Committees of the Mashhad University of medical sciences. investigators enroll 60 patients who are admitted to ICU at hospitals of university. All eligible patients or their first degree relatives give informed consent before participating. Participants are randomly (block stratification) divided in two groups. At the first visit, baseline data are gathered and control group (n=30) will receive oral capsules containing 130 mg Microcrystalline Cellulose. In order to control the confounding effect of food intake, both the control and the intervention group receive the standard formulas based on their daily required energy via enteral root feeding.

Sponsors

Mashhad University of Medical Sciences
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

On enrolment, study nutritionist or clinicians take a consecutive sealed opaque envelope containing the unique patient identifier but not the study group, to which they remain masked. A paired set of sealed envelopes are kept in a locked cabinet in the study laboratory, label with the unique patient identifier and containing the study group allocation. These are opened by the nutritionist. Investigators, all study staff hospital attending clinical teams, and patients were masked to the study group allocation.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Admission in ICU due to TBI2 * 18 year ≤ age ≤ 65 year * GCS score ˃ 8 * Stable hemodynamic and metabolic status in the first 24 to 48 hours * Having enteral nutritional support * Fill out the informed consent form by the patient or first-degree relatives of the patient

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnancy and lactation * Morbid obesity: BMI ≥ 40 * Failure to start enteral nutrition in the first 24-48 hours * Suffering from autoimmune disorders and HIV/Aids * Suffering or having History of cancer and any liver failure * Receiving positive inotropic medications including Dopamine, Dobutamine and Epinephrine * Severe and active bleeding * Suffering from Sepsis * Having history of known food allergies

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
change of Nutric score5 and 10 daysThe NUTRIC score (Nutrition assessment in critically ill) is a rapid assessment of nutritional state based on illness severity, age and co-morbidities. Sum of points: 6-10: CATEGORY: High Score. Sum of points: 0-5: CATEGORY: LOW Score High score associated with worse clinical outcomes (mortality, ventilation).These patients are the most likely to benefit from the aggressive nutrition therapy. LOW Score: These patients have a low malnutrition risk
change of IL-65 and 10 daysInflammatory markers
change of IL-1β5 and 10 daysInflammatory marker
change of CRP5 and 10 daysInflammatory marker
change of Malondialdehyde5 and 10 daysOxidative stress marker
change of total anti- oxidant capacity5 and 10 daysanti-oxidative stress marker
change of weight5 and 10 daysmeasurement is done via portable scale
change of body fat percentage5 and 10 daysmeasurement is done via Bio impedance device Inbody
change of Body mass index5 and 10 daysit is calculated by Equation
change of acute physiologic and chronic health evaluation II score5 and 10 daysThe Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) is a severity score and mortality estimation tool developed from a large sample of ICU patients in the United States. Interpretation: Score: 0-4: Death Rate (%):4, Score: 5-9:Death Rate (%):8, Score: 10-14:Death Rate (%):15, Score: 15-19:Death Rate (%):25, Score: 20-24:Death Rate (%):40, Score: 25-29:Death Rate (%):55, Score: 30-34:Death Rate (%):75. Score: ˃ 34 :Death Rate (%):85.
change of sequential organ failure assessment score1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 10 daysThe Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) is a morbidity severity score and mortality estimation tool developed from a large sample of ICU patients throughout the world. The SOFA was designed to focus on organ dysfunction and morbidity, with less of an emphasis on mortality prediction. Interpretation: Score: 0-6: Death Rate (%):\< 10%, Score: 7-9:Death Rate (%):15 - 20%, Score: 10-12:Death Rate (%):40 - 50%, Score: 13-14:Death Rate (%):50 - 60%, Score: 15:Death Rate (%):\> 80%, Score: 15-24:Death Rate (%):\> 90%.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
28-day mortality28 daysthe rate of mortality

Countries

Iran

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 28, 2026