Skip to content

STroke Secondary Prevention With Catheter ABLation and EDoxaban for Patients With Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation: STABLED Study

STroke Secondary Prevention With Catheter ABLation and EDoxaban for Patients With Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation: STABLED Study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03777631
Acronym
STABLED
Enrollment
251
Registered
2018-12-17
Start date
2018-04-01
Completion date
2026-03-31
Last updated
2023-11-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation Non-Rheumatic, Ischemic Stroke

Keywords

anticoagulation treatment, catheter ablation

Brief summary

Catheter ablation (CA) has been reported to reduce risk of stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) in retrospective studies, but risk and benefit of CA has not been well elucidated in NVAF with recent cerebral infarction in prospective randomized trials.

Detailed description

In patients with NVAF, stroke is an independent risk factor for a subsequent cerebral infarction. Although anticoagulant therapy can effectively reduce thromboembolic events, the reported annual recurrence rate in NVAF and previous stroke patients in the real-world is not low even with appropriate antithrombotic treatment; 8.6% in patients with guideline adherent antithrombotic therapy and around 5% in patients treated with anticoagulant therapy. NVAF and recent stroke is high-risk population for stroke recurrence even with anticoagulant therapy, and developing optimal secondary prevention strategy is an urgent task. Catheter ablation (CA) is now widely used to treat symptoms related to NVAF. Some retrospective studies showed a beneficial effect of CA for stroke prevention using age-/sex-matching or propensity-score matching. Moreover, CA have a potential to improve survival or prevent heart failure development in patients with AF. However, the effect of CA for secondary stroke prevention or impact of CA for NVAF patients with recent ischemic stroke for survival or developing heart failure has not been evaluated in a prospective randomized trial. Therefore, in the present study, we intend to compare two groups of patients with NVAF with a history of cerebral infarction: a group receiving standard medical therapy (control group) and a group receiving standard medical therapy plus CA (CA group).

Interventions

PROCEDURECatheter ablation

CA should be performed within 1-6 months from the onset of cerebral infarction. CA is based on pulmonary vein isolation, with atrial ablation as required.

Sponsors

Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Nippon Medical School
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

The included patients were randomly allocated to two groups: (1) Standard medical treatment group and (2) Catheter ablation additional group.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥20 or ≤85 years at time of giving informed consent * Nonvalvular atrial fibrillation * History of stroke in previous 6 months * Current or planned treatment with edoxaban * Modified Rankin scale ≤3

Exclusion criteria

* Symptomatic paroxysmal AF resistant to anti-arrhythmic drugs * Presence of left atrial thrombus and left atrial appendage on transthoracic echocardiography, computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging * Unable to take anticoagulation therapy for any reason, including tendency to bleed or considered at high risk for bleeding from anticoagulation therapy. * Presence of severe renal disorder (estimated creatinine clearance \<30 mL/min by Cockroft-Gault equation) * Previous CA or surgical intervention for AF * History of treatment with a left atrial appendage closure device * Left atrial diameter ≥55 mm on transthoracic echocardiography * Ejection fraction ≤35% on transthoracic echocardiography * Persistent AF for ≥10 years * Pregnant or possibility of pregnancy * Unlikely to complete the study, such as due to progressive malignant tumor * Participating or planning to participate in another clinical trial * Unwilling to participates * Judged as incompatible for the study by the investigators

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Composite of recurrence of cerebral infarction, systemic embolism, all-cause death, hospitalization for heart failure.Up to 6 yearsComposite of recurrence of cerebral infarction, systemic embolism, all-cause death, hospitalization for heart failure.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Recurrence of cerebral infarction in patients with or without discontinuation of EdoxabanUp to 6 yearsRecurrence of cerebral infarction in patients with or without discontinuation of Edoxaban
Intracranial hemorrhageUp to 6 yearsIntracranial hemorrhage
Composite eventsUp to 6 yearsall-cause death, onset of stroke, systemic embolism, hospitalization for heart failure, and serious adverse event caused by CA
The rate of and related factors to discontinuation of EdoxabanUp to 6 yearsThe rate of and related factors to discontinuation of Edoxaban
Recurrence of cerebral infarctionUp to 6 yearsRecurrence of cerebral infarction
Systemic embolismUp to 6 yearsSymptomatic systemic embolism to other regions than brain, e.g. peripheral or visceral arteries
All-cause deathUp to 6 yearsAll-cause death
Cardiovascular deathUp to 6 yearsCardiovascular death
Hospitalization for heart failureUp to 6 yearsHospitalization for heart failure
Any bleedingUp to 6 yearsAny bleeding

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of all adverse events, not restricted to CA maneuver-related adverse eventsWithin 1 month after CAIncidence of all adverse events, not restricted to CA maneuver-related adverse events
Drug reaction to edoxabanUp to 6 yearsDrug reaction to edoxaban
Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (safety and tolerability)Within 1 month after CAIncidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (safety and tolerability)

Countries

Japan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 3, 2026