Peripheral Arterial Disease
Conditions
Brief summary
Prospective, multi-center 1:1 randomized trial to compare efficacy and safety of a stent-avoiding (using drug coated balloons) versus a stent-preferred (using drug eluting or interwoven stents) approach for treatment of complex femoropopliteal lesions TASC II (TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease) Type B-D (stenosis \>10cm, occlusions \>5cm).
Detailed description
Prospective, multi-center 1:1 randomized Study. Patients will be stratified according to a stent-avoiding (study arm) or stent-preferred (control arm) In total 120 patient will be enrolled in this study, each strata will include 60 patients. All enrolled patients will be followed up for 24 month to asses the incidence of restenosis by duplex ultrasound and major adverse events. Follow-up visits occur at 6, 12 and 24 month intervals as well as telephone visit after 1,36, 48 and 60 month.
Interventions
DEVICEStent-avoiding
Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), in which a balloon is advanced and inflated in the obstructed artery for several seconds to minutes, has become the standard endovascular treatment for peripheral arteries
DEVICEStent-based
Stenting, in which a stent is advanced and implanted in the obstructed artery, has become the standard endovascular treatment for peripheral arteries
Sponsors
University of Leipzig
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
1. Subject age ≥ 18 2. Subject has been informed of the nature of the study, agrees to participate, and has signed a Medical Ethics Committee approved consent form Subject understands the duration of the study, agrees to attend follow-up visits, and agrees to complete the required testing. 3. Subject has a de novo or restenotic lesion with ≥ 70% stenosis documented angiographically and no prior stent in the target lesion. 4. Rutherford Becker Classification 2-4 5. Both treatment options seem feasible at the operator's discretion 6. Femoropopliteal lesions classified as TASC II Type B-D with a maximum lesion length ≤ 30cm not involving the infrageniculate popliteal artery are eligible. 7. Reference vessel diameter (RVD) ≥ 4 mm and ≤ 6.5 mm by visual estimation. 8. Patency of at least one (1) infrapopliteal artery to the ankle (\< 50% diameter stenosis) in continuity with the native femoropopliteal artery. The inflow artery(ies) cannot be treated using a drug eluting stent or drug coated balloon 9. A guidewire has successfully traversed the target treatment segment.
Exclusion criteria
1. Failure to successfully cross the target lesion 2. Angiographic evidence of severe calcification that makes a stent-avoiding approach not feasible at the operator's discretion. 3. Femoropopliteal lesions classified as TASC II Typ A (single stenosis \>=10cm and single occlusion \>=5cm) 4. Presence of fresh thrombus in the lesion. 5. Presence of aneurysm in the target vessel/s 6. Presence of a stent in the target lesion 7. Prior vascular surgery of the target lesion. 8. Stroke or heart attack within 3 months prior to enrollment 9. Any planned surgical procedure or intervention performed within 30 days prior to or post index procedure 10. SFA or PPA disease in the opposite leg that requires treatment at the index procedure 11. Enrolled in another investigational drug, device or biologic study that interferes with the study 12. Life expectancy of less than one year 13. Known allergies or sensitivity to heparin, aspirin, other anticoagulant/ antiplatelet therapies, paclitaxel or contrast media that cannot be adequately pre-treated prior to index procedure 14. Rutherford classification of 0, 1, 5 or 6. 15. Significant gastrointestinal bleeding or any coagulopathy that would contraindicate the use of anti-platelet therapy. 16. Platelet count \<100,000 mm3 or \>600,000 mm3 17. Receiving dialysis or immunosuppressant therapy 18. Pregnant or lactating females. 19. History of major amputation in the same limb as the target lesion 20. Chronic kidney disease (serum creatinine \> 3 mg/dL)
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Primary patency - Absence of clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) and/or restenosis defined as a peak systolic velocity ratio (PSVR) > 2.4 assessed by ultrasound | 1 Year |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Walking capacity - Walking capacity assessed by Walking impairment questionnaire score at 6, 12 and 24 | 2 Year | The graded score is multiplied by a pre-specified weight for each distance, speed, or number of stair flights. The products are summed and divided by the maximum possible score to obtain a percent score, ranging from 0 (representing the inability to perform any of the tasks) to 100 (representing no difficult with any of the tasks) |
| Ankle-brachial index - Clinical improvment assessed by Ankle-brachial index at 6, 12 and 24 month | 2 Year | The ABI is calculated by dividing the systolic blood pressure at the ankle by the systolic blood pressure in the arm. An ABI between and including 0.9 and 1.2 considered normal (free from significant PAD), while a lesser than 0.9 indicates arterial disease |
| Rutherford category - Clinical improvment assessed by Rutherford category at 6, 12 and 24 month | 2 Year | This classification system consists of four grades and seven categories (categories 0-6): Grade 0, Category 0: asymptomatic Grade I, Category 1: mild claudication Grade I, Category 2: moderate claudication Grade I, Category 3: severe claudication Grade II, Category 4: rest pain Grade III, Category 5: minor tissue loss; ischemic ulceration not exceeding ulcer of the digits of the foot Grade IV, Category 6: major tissue loss; severe ischemic ulcers or frank gangrene |
| Freedom from device and procedure-related death, all-cause death, target limb major amputation and clinically-driven target lesion revascularization | 5 Years | — |
Countries
Germany
Contacts
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORDierk Scheinert, Prof. Dr.
University Clinic Leipzig
Outcome results
None listed