Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis
Conditions
Keywords
Polyarticular JIA, Oligoarthritis, Juvenile psoriatic arthritis (JPsA), Enthesitis-related juvenile idiopathic arthritis (ERA)
Brief summary
The reason for this study is to see if the study drug baricitinib given orally is safe and effective in participants with JIA from 2 years to less than 18 years old.
Interventions
Administered orally.
Administered orally.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Participants must have had a diagnosis of active JIA (polyarticular, extended oligoarticular, or enthesitis-related juvenile idiopathic arthritis \[ERA\] including JPsA). * Participants must have had an inadequate response to at least one conventional or biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD).
Exclusion criteria
* Participants must not have systemic JIA, with or without active systemic features. * Participants must not have persistent oligoarticular arthritis. * Participants must not have been previously treated with a Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Time to Disease Flare | Week 12 to Week 44 | A disease flare is defined as a worsening of 30% or more in at least three of the six core Paediatric American College of Rheumatology (PedACR) criteria for juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (JIA) and an improvement of 30% or more in no more than one of the criteria. The six PedACR criteria are: 1) the number of active joints, 2) the number of joints with limited range of motion, 3) physician's global assessment of disease activity, 4) parent's global assessment of the participant's overall well-being, 5) physical function as measured by the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) and 6) acute-phase reactant (high-sensitivity C-reactive protein \[hsCRP\] and erythrocyte sedimentation rate \[ESR\]), the ESR measure is only used as an acute phase reactant in the core criteria. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR50 Responder Index | Week 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40 and 44 | The PedACR50 response is defined as at least 50% improvement from baseline in 3 of any 6 variables in the core set, with no more than 1 of the remaining variables worsening by \> 30%. The 6 core response variables included in the PedACR criteria are: Number of active joints (defined as a joint that is swollen or in the absence of swelling has loss of passive motion accompanied by either pain on motion or joint tenderness) in 73 joints, Number of joints with limited range of motion in 69 joints, Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (21-circle VAS), Parent's Global Assessment of Patient's Overall Well-being, Physical function as assessed by the CHAQ and Acute-phase reactant (hsCRP and ESR). When PedACR response is analyzed as secondary endpoint, ESR measure is only used as acute-phase reactant in the core criteria. |
| Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR70 Responder Index | Week 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40 and 44 | The PedACR70 response is defined as at least 70% improvement from baseline in 3 of any 6 variables in the core set, with no more than 1 of the remaining variables worsening by \> 30%. The 6 core response variables included in the PedACR criteria are: Number of active joints (defined as a joint that is swollen or in the absence of swelling has loss of passive motion accompanied by either pain on motion or joint tenderness) in 73 joints, Number of joints with limited range of motion in 69 joints, Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (21-circle VAS), Parent's Global Assessment of Patient's Overall Well-being, Physical function as assessed by the CHAQ and Acute-phase reactant (hsCRP and ESR). When PedACR response is analyzed as secondary endpoint, ESR measure is only used as acute-phase reactant in the core criteria. |
| Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR90 Responder Index | Week 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40 and 44 | The PedACR90 response is defined as at least 90% improvement from baseline in 3 of any 6 variables in the core set, with no more than 1 of the remaining variables worsening by \> 30%. The 6 core response variables included in the PedACR criteria are: Number of active joints (defined as a joint that is swollen or in the absence of swelling has loss of passive motion accompanied by either pain on motion or joint tenderness) in 73 joints, Number of joints with limited range of motion in 69 joints, Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (21-circle VAS), Parent's Global Assessment of Patient's Overall Well-being, Physical function as assessed by the CHAQ and Acute-phase reactant (hsCRP and ESR). When PedACR response is analyzed as secondary endpoint, ESR measure is only used as acute-phase reactant in the core criteria. |
| Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR100 Responder Index | Week 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40 and 44 | The PedACR100 response is defined as at least 100% improvement from baseline in 3 of any 6 variables in the core set, with no more than 1 of the remaining variables worsening by \> 30%. The 6 core response variables included in the PedACR criteria are: Number of active joints (defined as a joint that is swollen or in the absence of swelling has loss of passive motion accompanied by either pain on motion or joint tenderness) in 73 joints, Number of joints with limited range of motion in 69 joints, Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (21-circle VAS), Parent's Global Assessment of Patient's Overall Well-being, Physical function as assessed by the CHAQ and Acute-phase reactant (hsCRP and ESR). When PedACR response is analyzed as secondary endpoint, ESR measure is only used as acute-phase reactant in the core criteria. |
| Percentage of Participants With Inactive Disease | Week 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40 and 44 | Inactive disease is defined as the presence of all of the following: 1. No joints with active arthritis based on Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score (JADAS) - 27 score, 2. No fever, rash, serositis, splenomegaly, hepatomegaly, or generalized lymphadenopathy attributable to JIA as assessed by the investigator, 3. No active uveitis as assessed by the investigator, 4. Normal ESR or hsCRP (i.e., within normal limits in the local laboratory or, if elevated, not attributable to JIA), 5. Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity indicating no active disease (Score ranges are 0 to 100 and best possible score on scale is 0) and 6. Duration of morning stiffness ≤15 minutes. |
| Percentage of Participants With Minimal Disease Activity | Week 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40 and 44 | Minimal disease activity is calculated based on the scores from the 1. Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity 2. Parent's Global Assessment of Well-Being and 3. the number of swollen joints. If the physician's global assessment of disease activity is ≤3.5 (score range: 0-100), the parent's global rating of patient's overall well-being is ≤2.5 (score range: 0-100), and the swollen joint count is ≤1 (score range: 0-73), then the participant reaches minimal disease activity. if not, minimal disease activity is not reached. |
| Percentage of Participants in Remission | Week 28, 32, 36, 40 and 44 | Remission is defined as inactive disease for at least 24 consecutive weeks. Inactive disease is defined as the presence of all of the following: 1) No joints with active arthritis based on Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score (JADAS)-27 score, 2) No fever, rash, serositis, splenomegaly, hepatomegaly, or generalized lymphadenopathy attributable to JIA as assessed by the investigator, 3) No active uveitis as assessed by the investigator, 4) Normal ESR or hsCRP (i.e., within normal limits in the local laboratory or, if elevated, not attributable to JIA), 5) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity indicating no active disease (best possible score on scale \[0\]) and 6) Duration of morning stiffness ≤15 minutes. |
| Change From Baseline in Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score-27 (JADAS-27) Score | Baseline, Week 44 | The JADAS-27 score is based on 4 components: 1) Physician's global assessment of disease activity on a 0-100 mm VAS, 2) Parent's global assessment of overall well-being on a 0-100 mm VAS, 3) normalized ESR and 4) number of joints (maximum of 27) with active arthritis (cervical spine, elbows, wrists, metacarpophalangeal joints \[from first to third\], proximal interphalangeal joints, hips, knees, and ankles). The scores for the each of the first 3 components range from 0 -10; the score for the final component ranges from 0-27. The overall JADAS-27 score is sum of the 4 components and it ranges from 0-57. A higher score indicates more disease activity. Least square (LS) mean was calculated using Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model which includes treatment, baseline, prior biologic JIA therapy, combined JIA category and predose exposure ESR category value as fixed factors. |
| Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR30 Responder Index | Week 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40 and 44 | The PedACR30 response is defined as at least 30% improvement from baseline in 3 of any 6 variables in the core set, with no more than 1 of the remaining variables worsening by \>30%. The 6 core response variables included in the PedACR criteria are: Number of active joints (defined as a joint that is swollen or in the absence of swelling has loss of passive motion accompanied by either pain on motion or joint tenderness) in 73 joints, Number of joints with limited range of motion in 69 joints, Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (21-circle visual analogue scale \[VAS\]), Parent's Global Assessment of Patient's Overall Well-being, Physical function as assessed by the CHAQ and Acute-phase reactant (hsCRP and ESR). When PedACR response is analyzed as secondary endpoint, ESR measure is only used as acute-phase reactant in the core criteria. |
| Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score | Baseline, Week 44 | PASI is a combined assessment of lesion severity and affected area into a single score: 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease). Body is divided into 4 areas for scoring (head, arms, trunk and legs); each area is scored by itself and scores are combined for final PASI. For each area, percent of skin involved is estimated: 0 (0%) to 6 (90-100%), and severity is estimated by clinical signs, erythema, induration and desquamation; scale 0 (none) to 4 (maximum). Final PASI = sum of severity parameters for each area \* area score weight of section (head: 0.1, arms: 0.2 body: 0.3 legs: 0.4). LS mean was calculated using ANCOVA model which includes treatment, baseline, prior biologic JIA therapy, combined JIA category and predose exposure ESR category value as fixed factors. |
| Change From Baseline in Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Index | Baseline, Week 44 | The SPARCC enthesitis is an index used to measure the severity of enthesitis (sites at which tendons and ligaments attach to bones). The SPARCC assesses 16 sites for enthesitis using a score of 0 for no activity or 1 for activity. Sites assessed include Medial epicondyle (left/right \[L/R\]), Lateral epicondyle (L/R), Supraspinatus insertion into greater tuberosity of humerus (L/R), Greater trochanter (L/R), Quadriceps insertion into superior border of patella (L/R), Patellar ligament insertion into inferior pole of patella or tibial tubercle (L/R), Achilles tendon insertion into calcaneum (L/R), and Plantar fascia insertion into calcaneum (L/R). The SPARCC is the sum of all site scores (range 0 to 16). Higher scores indicate more severe enthesitis. LS mean was calculated using ANCOVA model which includes treatment, baseline, prior biologic JIA therapy, combined JIA category and predose exposure ESR category value as fixed factors. |
| Change From Baseline in Juvenile Spondyloarthritis Disease Activity (JSpADA) Index | Baseline, Week 44 | The JSpADA index is used to evaluate the disease activity of juvenile spondyloarthritis. The JSpADA index scores will be determined by following 8 components: active joint count, active enthesitis count, pain over the past week, CRP level related to juvenile spondyloarthritis activity, morning stiffness greater than 15 minutes, clinical sacroiliitis, uveitis and back mobility. All items are transformed to values of 0, 0.5, or 1, and the total score ranges from 0 to 8, where higher scores indicate more disease activity. LS mean was calculated using ANCOVA model which includes treatment, baseline, prior biologic JIA therapy, combined JIA category and predose exposure ESR category value as fixed factors. |
| Pharmacokinetics (PK): Maximum Plasma Baricitinib Concentration at Steady-State (Cmax, ss) | For Safety/PK period: Day 1, Day 4, Day 14 (pre dose) and Day 14 (post dose). For OLLI period: Day 1, Day 14, Day 28, Day 56 and 84 (pre dose) | Maximum Plasma Baricitinib Concentration at Steady-State |
| PK: Area Under the Baricitinib Concentration-Time Curve During a Dosing Interval at Steady-State (AUCτ,ss) | For Safety/PK period: Day 1, Day 4, Day 14 (pre dose) and Day 14 (post dose). For OLLI period: Day 1, Day 14, Day 28, Day 56 and 84 (pre dose) | Area under the concentration-time curve of Baricitinib during a dosing interval at steady state. |
| Change From Baseline in Immunoglobulin Levels | Baseline, Week 12 | Change from baseline in Serum Immunoglobulin A, Serum Immunoglobulin G and Serum Immunoglobulin M levels at week 12 are presented. |
| Number of Participants With Change of Immunoglobulin G (IgG) Titers | Pre-Vaccination to 4 and 12 Weeks Post-Vaccination | Number of participants with change of IgG titers eligible for tetanus / diphtheria / acellular pertussis (tDaP) vaccine and pneumococcal conjugate are presented. Participants who were immunized with tDaP or pneumococcal conjugate vaccine had their IgG antibody titers to the antigens evaluated preimmunization and at 4 and 12 weeks postimmunization. A primary immune response was assessed in participants who had never received tDaP or pneumococcal conjugate vaccines previously and secondary/booster responses were assessed if the participants had previously received the vaccines. For pneumococcal conjugate vaccine, number of participants with \>= 2-fold increase from baseline in \>=6 pneumococcal serotypes at week 4 and 12 is presented. For tDaP vaccine, number of participants with \>= 4-fold increase from baseline in participants with baseline titer \>=0.1 IU/mL at week 4 and 12 is presented. |
| Number of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability Assessment | Baseline and week 12 | The questionnaire for product acceptability and palatability assessed the participants ability to swallow the tablet, experience relating to the taste, smell and ease of administering and taking the suspension. The questionnaire contained following Questions: Question 1) How did you (your child) like the taste of the medicine? Question 2) How did you (your child) like the smell of the medicine? Question 3) How easy was it for you (your child) to take the medicine today? Question 4) How easy was it for you to use the oral syringe to give your child the dose today? and Question 5) How easy was it for you (your child) to swallow the medicine today? Responses: Liked Very Much, Liked, Neither Liked nor Disliked, Disliked, Disliked Very Much, Very Easy, Easy, Neither Easy nor Hard, Difficult (or Hard) and Very Difficult (or Hard). The number of participants with these responses are presented. Data is presented as Question Number-Response-Time point. |
| Change From Baseline in Arthritis-Related Pain Severity as Measured by the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Item | Baseline, Week 44 | CHAQ assesses the health status and physical function of children with juvenile arthritis over the past week. The CHAQ consists of a Disability Index and a Discomfort Index. The disability index consisted of 30 items grouped into the following 8 domains: dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities. Each item is scored from 0 to 3 (0 = no difficulty; 1 = some difficulty; 2 = much difficulty and 3 = unable to do or not applicable). The scores of 8 domains were averaged to calculate the CHAQ-Disability Index total score. A higher score indicates worse physical function. The discomfort index consisted of Parent's Global Assessment of Well-Being and pain assessment due to illness. The intensity of pain is scored on a VAS scale ranging from 0-100 mm, with zero referring to no pain and 100 referring to very severe pain. A higher score indicates a worse outcome. |
Countries
Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, China, Czechia, Denmark, France, Germany, India, Israel, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Poland, Russia, Spain, Turkey (Türkiye), United Kingdom
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Overall, 220 participants were enrolled: 29 started with the Pharmacokinetics (PK)/Safety period (2 weeks), and one participant was discontinued due to protocol deviation. 191 participants entered into the Open-label lead-in period (OLLI) period, and during week 2, 28 participants from the PK/Safety population entered into the OLLI period.
Pre-assignment details
Participants entered the PK/Safety period (0 to 2 weeks) in staggered enrollment of 4 age groups (12 to \<18, 9 to \<12, 6 to \<9, and 2 to \<6 years). Upon the confirmation of the safety comparability assessment, remaining participants were enrolled directly into the OLLI period (0 to 12 weeks) followed by a double-blind randomised withdrawal placebo-controlled period (DBW) period (12 to 44 weeks) in which participants were randomized to baricitinib or placebo.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Baricitinib Baricitinib was administered QD (once daily) as a 4-mg for adolescent participants (12 to \<18 years of age) and children ≥9 years of age; and 2 mg for children \<9 years of age. Participants \<6 years of age received an oral suspension. Participants ≥6 to \<12 years old had the option of receiving an oral suspension. Participants \>12 years old were supplied tablets. | 220 |
| Total | 220 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| DBW Period | Adverse Event | 2 | 2 |
| DBW Period | Due to epidemic or pandemic | 5 | 6 |
| DBW Period | Failure to Meet Continuation Criteria | 16 | 40 |
| DBW Period | Study team decision | 1 | 0 |
| DBW Period | Withdrawal by Subject | 2 | 1 |
| PK/Safety and OLLI Period | Adverse Event | 1 | 0 |
| PK/Safety and OLLI Period | Due to epidemic or pandemic | 6 | 0 |
| PK/Safety and OLLI Period | Failure to Meet Randomization Criteria | 39 | 0 |
| PK/Safety and OLLI Period | Investigational product was not delivered to the site | 1 | 0 |
| PK/Safety and OLLI Period | Lost to Follow-up | 1 | 0 |
| PK/Safety and OLLI Period | Participant transitioned to JAHX | 1 | 0 |
| PK/Safety and OLLI Period | Protocol Violation | 4 | 0 |
| PK/Safety and OLLI Period | unexplainable flare disease | 1 | 0 |
| PK/Safety and OLLI Period | Withdrawal by Subject | 3 | 0 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Baricitinib |
|---|---|
| Age, Customized Age >=12 to <18 years | 175 Participants |
| Age, Customized Age >=2 to <6 years | 6 Participants |
| Age, Customized Age >=6 to <9 years | 9 Participants |
| Age, Customized Age >=9 to <12 years | 30 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 43 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 133 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 44 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 7 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 48 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 5 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 2 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 6 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 152 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Argentina | 20 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Australia | 1 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Austria | 2 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Belgium | 7 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Brazil | 2 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment China | 18 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Czechia | 12 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Denmark | 1 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment France | 10 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Germany | 26 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment India | 6 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Israel | 15 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Italy | 11 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Japan | 25 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Mexico | 21 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Poland | 7 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Russia | 8 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Spain | 14 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Turkey | 3 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United Kingdom | 11 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 152 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 68 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 220 | 0 / 81 | 0 / 82 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 48 / 220 | 10 / 81 | 26 / 82 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 6 / 220 | 3 / 81 | 4 / 82 |
Outcome results
Time to Disease Flare
A disease flare is defined as a worsening of 30% or more in at least three of the six core Paediatric American College of Rheumatology (PedACR) criteria for juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (JIA) and an improvement of 30% or more in no more than one of the criteria. The six PedACR criteria are: 1) the number of active joints, 2) the number of joints with limited range of motion, 3) physician's global assessment of disease activity, 4) parent's global assessment of the participant's overall well-being, 5) physical function as measured by the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) and 6) acute-phase reactant (high-sensitivity C-reactive protein \[hsCRP\] and erythrocyte sedimentation rate \[ESR\]), the ESR measure is only used as an acute phase reactant in the core criteria.
Time frame: Week 12 to Week 44
Population: DBW Population: All randomized participants from the DBW period who had data for time to disease flare at given time point.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Baricitinib | Time to Disease Flare | NA Weeks |
| Placebo | Time to Disease Flare | 27.14 Weeks |
Change From Baseline in Arthritis-Related Pain Severity as Measured by the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Item
CHAQ assesses the health status and physical function of children with juvenile arthritis over the past week. The CHAQ consists of a Disability Index and a Discomfort Index. The disability index consisted of 30 items grouped into the following 8 domains: dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities. Each item is scored from 0 to 3 (0 = no difficulty; 1 = some difficulty; 2 = much difficulty and 3 = unable to do or not applicable). The scores of 8 domains were averaged to calculate the CHAQ-Disability Index total score. A higher score indicates worse physical function. The discomfort index consisted of Parent's Global Assessment of Well-Being and pain assessment due to illness. The intensity of pain is scored on a VAS scale ranging from 0-100 mm, with zero referring to no pain and 100 referring to very severe pain. A higher score indicates a worse outcome.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 44
Population: DBW Population: All randomized participants from the DBW period who had data for at least one post-baseline CHAQ Pain VAS Item at given time point. LS mean was calculated using Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model which includes treatment, baseline, prior biologic JIA therapy, combined JIA category and predose exposure ESR category value as fixed factors.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baricitinib | Change From Baseline in Arthritis-Related Pain Severity as Measured by the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Item | -29.65 score on a scale | Standard Error 3.276 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Arthritis-Related Pain Severity as Measured by the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Item | -16.68 score on a scale | Standard Error 3.202 |
Change From Baseline in Immunoglobulin Levels
Change from baseline in Serum Immunoglobulin A, Serum Immunoglobulin G and Serum Immunoglobulin M levels at week 12 are presented.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Population: Safety/PK and OLLI population: All randomized participants from the Safety/PK and OLLI periods who had data for for at least one post-baseline immunoglobulin levels at given time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baricitinib | Change From Baseline in Immunoglobulin Levels | Serum Immunoglobulin A | -15.98 Milligrams per decilitre (mg/dL) | Standard Deviation 39.501 |
| Baricitinib | Change From Baseline in Immunoglobulin Levels | Serum Immunoglobulin G | -81.46 Milligrams per decilitre (mg/dL) | Standard Deviation 209.549 |
| Baricitinib | Change From Baseline in Immunoglobulin Levels | Serum Immunoglobulin M | -9.86 Milligrams per decilitre (mg/dL) | Standard Deviation 26.68 |
Change From Baseline in Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score-27 (JADAS-27) Score
The JADAS-27 score is based on 4 components: 1) Physician's global assessment of disease activity on a 0-100 mm VAS, 2) Parent's global assessment of overall well-being on a 0-100 mm VAS, 3) normalized ESR and 4) number of joints (maximum of 27) with active arthritis (cervical spine, elbows, wrists, metacarpophalangeal joints \[from first to third\], proximal interphalangeal joints, hips, knees, and ankles). The scores for the each of the first 3 components range from 0 -10; the score for the final component ranges from 0-27. The overall JADAS-27 score is sum of the 4 components and it ranges from 0-57. A higher score indicates more disease activity. Least square (LS) mean was calculated using Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model which includes treatment, baseline, prior biologic JIA therapy, combined JIA category and predose exposure ESR category value as fixed factors.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 44
Population: DBW Population: All randomized participants from the DBW period who had data for at least one post-baseline JADAS-27 score at given time point.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baricitinib | Change From Baseline in Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score-27 (JADAS-27) Score | -14.24 score on a scale | Standard Error 1.006 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score-27 (JADAS-27) Score | -9.91 score on a scale | Standard Error 1.013 |
Change From Baseline in Juvenile Spondyloarthritis Disease Activity (JSpADA) Index
The JSpADA index is used to evaluate the disease activity of juvenile spondyloarthritis. The JSpADA index scores will be determined by following 8 components: active joint count, active enthesitis count, pain over the past week, CRP level related to juvenile spondyloarthritis activity, morning stiffness greater than 15 minutes, clinical sacroiliitis, uveitis and back mobility. All items are transformed to values of 0, 0.5, or 1, and the total score ranges from 0 to 8, where higher scores indicate more disease activity. LS mean was calculated using ANCOVA model which includes treatment, baseline, prior biologic JIA therapy, combined JIA category and predose exposure ESR category value as fixed factors.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 44
Population: DBW Population: All randomized participants from the DBW period who had ERA or JPsA were included in this population.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baricitinib | Change From Baseline in Juvenile Spondyloarthritis Disease Activity (JSpADA) Index | -2.56 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.347 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Juvenile Spondyloarthritis Disease Activity (JSpADA) Index | -1.47 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.296 |
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score
PASI is a combined assessment of lesion severity and affected area into a single score: 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease). Body is divided into 4 areas for scoring (head, arms, trunk and legs); each area is scored by itself and scores are combined for final PASI. For each area, percent of skin involved is estimated: 0 (0%) to 6 (90-100%), and severity is estimated by clinical signs, erythema, induration and desquamation; scale 0 (none) to 4 (maximum). Final PASI = sum of severity parameters for each area \* area score weight of section (head: 0.1, arms: 0.2 body: 0.3 legs: 0.4). LS mean was calculated using ANCOVA model which includes treatment, baseline, prior biologic JIA therapy, combined JIA category and predose exposure ESR category value as fixed factors.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 44
Population: DBW Population: All randomized participants from the DBW period who had at least one post-baseline juvenile psoriatic arthritis (JPsA) were included in this population.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baricitinib | Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score | -1.14 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.291 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score | -0.79 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.354 |
Change From Baseline in Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Index
The SPARCC enthesitis is an index used to measure the severity of enthesitis (sites at which tendons and ligaments attach to bones). The SPARCC assesses 16 sites for enthesitis using a score of 0 for no activity or 1 for activity. Sites assessed include Medial epicondyle (left/right \[L/R\]), Lateral epicondyle (L/R), Supraspinatus insertion into greater tuberosity of humerus (L/R), Greater trochanter (L/R), Quadriceps insertion into superior border of patella (L/R), Patellar ligament insertion into inferior pole of patella or tibial tubercle (L/R), Achilles tendon insertion into calcaneum (L/R), and Plantar fascia insertion into calcaneum (L/R). The SPARCC is the sum of all site scores (range 0 to 16). Higher scores indicate more severe enthesitis. LS mean was calculated using ANCOVA model which includes treatment, baseline, prior biologic JIA therapy, combined JIA category and predose exposure ESR category value as fixed factors.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 44
Population: DBW Population: All randomized participants from the DBW period who had enthesitis-related juvenile idiopathic arthritis (ERA) or JPsA were included in this population.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baricitinib | Change From Baseline in Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Index | -1.51 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.276 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Index | -1.95 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.241 |
Number of Participants With Change of Immunoglobulin G (IgG) Titers
Number of participants with change of IgG titers eligible for tetanus / diphtheria / acellular pertussis (tDaP) vaccine and pneumococcal conjugate are presented. Participants who were immunized with tDaP or pneumococcal conjugate vaccine had their IgG antibody titers to the antigens evaluated preimmunization and at 4 and 12 weeks postimmunization. A primary immune response was assessed in participants who had never received tDaP or pneumococcal conjugate vaccines previously and secondary/booster responses were assessed if the participants had previously received the vaccines. For pneumococcal conjugate vaccine, number of participants with \>= 2-fold increase from baseline in \>=6 pneumococcal serotypes at week 4 and 12 is presented. For tDaP vaccine, number of participants with \>= 4-fold increase from baseline in participants with baseline titer \>=0.1 IU/mL at week 4 and 12 is presented.
Time frame: Pre-Vaccination to 4 and 12 Weeks Post-Vaccination
Population: Safety/PK and OLLI population: All randomized participants from the Safety/PK assessment and OLLI period who had data for IgG titers at given time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baricitinib | Number of Participants With Change of Immunoglobulin G (IgG) Titers | Tetanus toxoid containing vaccine at week 4 | 2 participants |
| Baricitinib | Number of Participants With Change of Immunoglobulin G (IgG) Titers | Tetanus toxoid containing vaccine at week 12 | 2 participants |
| Baricitinib | Number of Participants With Change of Immunoglobulin G (IgG) Titers | Diphtheria toxoid containing vaccine at week 4 | 2 participants |
| Baricitinib | Number of Participants With Change of Immunoglobulin G (IgG) Titers | Diphtheria toxoid containing vaccine at week 12 | 1 participants |
| Baricitinib | Number of Participants With Change of Immunoglobulin G (IgG) Titers | Pertussis toxin containing vaccine at week 4 | 2 participants |
| Baricitinib | Number of Participants With Change of Immunoglobulin G (IgG) Titers | Pertussis toxin containing vaccine at week 12 | 2 participants |
| Baricitinib | Number of Participants With Change of Immunoglobulin G (IgG) Titers | pneumococcal conjugate vaccine at week 4 | 3 participants |
| Baricitinib | Number of Participants With Change of Immunoglobulin G (IgG) Titers | pneumococcal conjugate vaccine at week 12 | 2 participants |
Number of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability Assessment
The questionnaire for product acceptability and palatability assessed the participants ability to swallow the tablet, experience relating to the taste, smell and ease of administering and taking the suspension. The questionnaire contained following Questions: Question 1) How did you (your child) like the taste of the medicine? Question 2) How did you (your child) like the smell of the medicine? Question 3) How easy was it for you (your child) to take the medicine today? Question 4) How easy was it for you to use the oral syringe to give your child the dose today? and Question 5) How easy was it for you (your child) to swallow the medicine today? Responses: Liked Very Much, Liked, Neither Liked nor Disliked, Disliked, Disliked Very Much, Very Easy, Easy, Neither Easy nor Hard, Difficult (or Hard) and Very Difficult (or Hard). The number of participants with these responses are presented. Data is presented as Question Number-Response-Time point.
Time frame: Baseline and week 12
Population: Safety/PK and OLLI population: All randomized participants from the Safety/PK assessment and OLLI period who had data for product acceptability and palatability at given time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baricitinib | Number of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability Assessment | Question 1- Disliked Very Much: Baseline | 0 participants |
| Baricitinib | Number of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability Assessment | Question 2- Liked: Baseline | 7 participants |
| Baricitinib | Number of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability Assessment | Question 4- Very Easy: Week 12 | 8 participants |
| Baricitinib | Number of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability Assessment | Question 4- Neither Easy nor Hard: Baseline | 0 participants |
| Baricitinib | Number of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability Assessment | Question 4- Difficult (or Hard): Baseline | 0 participants |
| Baricitinib | Number of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability Assessment | Question 4- Very Difficult (or Hard): Week 12 | 0 participants |
| Baricitinib | Number of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability Assessment | Question 5- Very Difficult (or Hard): Baseline | 1 participants |
| Baricitinib | Number of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability Assessment | Question 5- Very Difficult (or Hard): Week 12 | 0 participants |
| Baricitinib | Number of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability Assessment | Question 1- Liked Very Much: Baseline | 2 participants |
| Baricitinib | Number of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability Assessment | Question 1- Liked Very Much: Week 12 | 6 participants |
| Baricitinib | Number of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability Assessment | Question 1- Liked: Baseline | 8 participants |
| Baricitinib | Number of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability Assessment | Question 1- Liked: Week 12 | 2 participants |
| Baricitinib | Number of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability Assessment | Question 1- Neither Liked nor Disliked: Baseline | 3 participants |
| Baricitinib | Number of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability Assessment | Question 1- Neither Liked nor Disliked: Week 12 | 1 participants |
| Baricitinib | Number of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability Assessment | Question 1- Disliked: Baseline | 0 participants |
| Baricitinib | Number of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability Assessment | Question 1- Disliked: Week 12 | 1 participants |
| Baricitinib | Number of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability Assessment | Question 1- Disliked Very Much: Week 12 | 0 participants |
| Baricitinib | Number of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability Assessment | Question 2- Liked Very Much: Baseline | 3 participants |
| Baricitinib | Number of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability Assessment | Question 2- Liked Very Much: Week 12 | 2 participants |
| Baricitinib | Number of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability Assessment | Question 2- Liked: Week 12 | 4 participants |
| Baricitinib | Number of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability Assessment | Question 2- Neither Liked nor Disliked: Baseline | 3 participants |
| Baricitinib | Number of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability Assessment | Question 2- Neither Liked nor Disliked: Week 12 | 2 participants |
| Baricitinib | Number of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability Assessment | Question 2- Disliked: Baseline | 0 participants |
| Baricitinib | Number of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability Assessment | Question 2- Disliked: Week 12 | 1 participants |
| Baricitinib | Number of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability Assessment | Question 2- Disliked Very Much: Baseline | 0 participants |
| Baricitinib | Number of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability Assessment | Question 2- Disliked Very Much: Week 12 | 1 participants |
| Baricitinib | Number of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability Assessment | Question 3- Very Easy: Baseline | 8 participants |
| Baricitinib | Number of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability Assessment | Question 3- Very Easy: Week 12 | 7 participants |
| Baricitinib | Number of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability Assessment | Question 3- Easy: Baseline | 3 participants |
| Baricitinib | Number of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability Assessment | Question 3- Easy: Week 12 | 2 participants |
| Baricitinib | Number of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability Assessment | Question 3- Neither Easy nor Hard: Baseline | 1 participants |
| Baricitinib | Number of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability Assessment | Question 3- Neither Easy nor Hard: Week 12 | 0 participants |
| Baricitinib | Number of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability Assessment | Question 3- Difficult (or Hard): Baseline | 0 participants |
| Baricitinib | Number of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability Assessment | Question 3- Difficult (or Hard): Week 12 | 1 participants |
| Baricitinib | Number of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability Assessment | Question 3- Very Difficult (or Hard): Baseline | 1 participants |
| Baricitinib | Number of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability Assessment | Question 3- Very Difficult (or Hard): Week 12 | 0 participants |
| Baricitinib | Number of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability Assessment | Question 4- Very Easy: Baseline | 5 participants |
| Baricitinib | Number of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability Assessment | Question 4- Easy: Baseline | 6 participants |
| Baricitinib | Number of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability Assessment | Question 4- Easy: Week 12 | 2 participants |
| Baricitinib | Number of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability Assessment | Question 4- Neither Easy nor Hard: Week 12 | 0 participants |
| Baricitinib | Number of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability Assessment | Question 4- Difficult (or Hard): Week 12 | 0 participants |
| Baricitinib | Number of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability Assessment | Question 4- Very Difficult (or Hard): Baseline | 0 participants |
| Baricitinib | Number of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability Assessment | Question 5- Very Easy: Baseline | 146 participants |
| Baricitinib | Number of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability Assessment | Question 5- Very Easy: Week 12 | 120 participants |
| Baricitinib | Number of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability Assessment | Question 5- Easy: Baseline | 39 participants |
| Baricitinib | Number of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability Assessment | Question 5- Easy: Week 12 | 34 participants |
| Baricitinib | Number of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability Assessment | Question 5- Neither Easy nor Hard: Baseline | 14 participants |
| Baricitinib | Number of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability Assessment | Question 5- Neither Easy nor Hard: Week 12 | 5 participants |
| Baricitinib | Number of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability Assessment | Question 5- Difficult (or Hard): Baseline | 3 participants |
| Baricitinib | Number of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability Assessment | Question 5- Difficult (or Hard): Week 12 | 0 participants |
Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR100 Responder Index
The PedACR100 response is defined as at least 100% improvement from baseline in 3 of any 6 variables in the core set, with no more than 1 of the remaining variables worsening by \> 30%. The 6 core response variables included in the PedACR criteria are: Number of active joints (defined as a joint that is swollen or in the absence of swelling has loss of passive motion accompanied by either pain on motion or joint tenderness) in 73 joints, Number of joints with limited range of motion in 69 joints, Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (21-circle VAS), Parent's Global Assessment of Patient's Overall Well-being, Physical function as assessed by the CHAQ and Acute-phase reactant (hsCRP and ESR). When PedACR response is analyzed as secondary endpoint, ESR measure is only used as acute-phase reactant in the core criteria.
Time frame: Week 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40 and 44
Population: DBW Population: All randomized participants from the DBW period who had data for PedACR100 at given time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baricitinib | Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR100 Responder Index | At week 36 | 29.3 Percentage of participants |
| Baricitinib | Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR100 Responder Index | At week 28 | 26.8 Percentage of participants |
| Baricitinib | Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR100 Responder Index | At week 20 | 24.4 Percentage of participants |
| Baricitinib | Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR100 Responder Index | At week 32 | 28 Percentage of participants |
| Baricitinib | Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR100 Responder Index | At week 40 | 29.3 Percentage of participants |
| Baricitinib | Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR100 Responder Index | At week 24 | 18.3 Percentage of participants |
| Baricitinib | Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR100 Responder Index | At week 44 | 29.3 Percentage of participants |
| Baricitinib | Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR100 Responder Index | At week 16 | 14.6 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR100 Responder Index | At week 44 | 16 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR100 Responder Index | At week 16 | 17.3 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR100 Responder Index | At week 20 | 19.8 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR100 Responder Index | At week 24 | 16 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR100 Responder Index | At week 28 | 19.8 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR100 Responder Index | At week 32 | 21 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR100 Responder Index | At week 36 | 21 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR100 Responder Index | At week 40 | 17.3 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR30 Responder Index
The PedACR30 response is defined as at least 30% improvement from baseline in 3 of any 6 variables in the core set, with no more than 1 of the remaining variables worsening by \>30%. The 6 core response variables included in the PedACR criteria are: Number of active joints (defined as a joint that is swollen or in the absence of swelling has loss of passive motion accompanied by either pain on motion or joint tenderness) in 73 joints, Number of joints with limited range of motion in 69 joints, Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (21-circle visual analogue scale \[VAS\]), Parent's Global Assessment of Patient's Overall Well-being, Physical function as assessed by the CHAQ and Acute-phase reactant (hsCRP and ESR). When PedACR response is analyzed as secondary endpoint, ESR measure is only used as acute-phase reactant in the core criteria.
Time frame: Week 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40 and 44
Population: DBW Population: All randomized participants from the DBW period who had data for PedACR30 at given time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baricitinib | Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR30 Responder Index | At week 16 | 92.7 Percentage of participants |
| Baricitinib | Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR30 Responder Index | At week 20 | 87.8 Percentage of participants |
| Baricitinib | Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR30 Responder Index | At week 24 | 85.4 Percentage of participants |
| Baricitinib | Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR30 Responder Index | At week 28 | 78 Percentage of participants |
| Baricitinib | Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR30 Responder Index | At week 32 | 74.4 Percentage of participants |
| Baricitinib | Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR30 Responder Index | At week 36 | 72.0 Percentage of participants |
| Baricitinib | Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR30 Responder Index | At week 40 | 69.5 Percentage of participants |
| Baricitinib | Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR30 Responder Index | At week 44 | 67.1 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR30 Responder Index | At week 44 | 38.3 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR30 Responder Index | At week 32 | 49.4 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR30 Responder Index | At week 16 | 81.5 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR30 Responder Index | At week 20 | 64.2 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR30 Responder Index | At week 40 | 38.3 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR30 Responder Index | At week 24 | 55.6 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR30 Responder Index | At week 36 | 44.4 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR30 Responder Index | At week 28 | 51.9 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR50 Responder Index
The PedACR50 response is defined as at least 50% improvement from baseline in 3 of any 6 variables in the core set, with no more than 1 of the remaining variables worsening by \> 30%. The 6 core response variables included in the PedACR criteria are: Number of active joints (defined as a joint that is swollen or in the absence of swelling has loss of passive motion accompanied by either pain on motion or joint tenderness) in 73 joints, Number of joints with limited range of motion in 69 joints, Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (21-circle VAS), Parent's Global Assessment of Patient's Overall Well-being, Physical function as assessed by the CHAQ and Acute-phase reactant (hsCRP and ESR). When PedACR response is analyzed as secondary endpoint, ESR measure is only used as acute-phase reactant in the core criteria.
Time frame: Week 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40 and 44
Population: DBW Population: All randomized participants from the DBW period who had data for PedACR50 at given time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baricitinib | Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR50 Responder Index | At week 24 | 81.7 Percentage of participants |
| Baricitinib | Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR50 Responder Index | At week 28 | 75.6 Percentage of participants |
| Baricitinib | Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR50 Responder Index | At week 32 | 72 Percentage of participants |
| Baricitinib | Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR50 Responder Index | At week 36 | 68.3 Percentage of participants |
| Baricitinib | Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR50 Responder Index | At week 40 | 68.3 Percentage of participants |
| Baricitinib | Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR50 Responder Index | At week 44 | 63.4 Percentage of participants |
| Baricitinib | Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR50 Responder Index | At week 20 | 81.7 Percentage of participants |
| Baricitinib | Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR50 Responder Index | At week 16 | 79.3 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR50 Responder Index | At week 16 | 75.3 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR50 Responder Index | At week 32 | 46.9 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR50 Responder Index | At week 24 | 49.4 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR50 Responder Index | At week 40 | 38.3 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR50 Responder Index | At week 28 | 50.6 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR50 Responder Index | At week 20 | 58 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR50 Responder Index | At week 44 | 37 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR50 Responder Index | At week 36 | 43.2 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR70 Responder Index
The PedACR70 response is defined as at least 70% improvement from baseline in 3 of any 6 variables in the core set, with no more than 1 of the remaining variables worsening by \> 30%. The 6 core response variables included in the PedACR criteria are: Number of active joints (defined as a joint that is swollen or in the absence of swelling has loss of passive motion accompanied by either pain on motion or joint tenderness) in 73 joints, Number of joints with limited range of motion in 69 joints, Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (21-circle VAS), Parent's Global Assessment of Patient's Overall Well-being, Physical function as assessed by the CHAQ and Acute-phase reactant (hsCRP and ESR). When PedACR response is analyzed as secondary endpoint, ESR measure is only used as acute-phase reactant in the core criteria.
Time frame: Week 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40 and 44
Population: DBW Population: All randomized participants from the DBW period who had data for PedACR70 at given time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baricitinib | Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR70 Responder Index | At week 16 | 54.9 Percentage of participants |
| Baricitinib | Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR70 Responder Index | At week 28 | 67.1 Percentage of participants |
| Baricitinib | Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR70 Responder Index | At week 36 | 61 Percentage of participants |
| Baricitinib | Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR70 Responder Index | At week 40 | 57.3 Percentage of participants |
| Baricitinib | Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR70 Responder Index | At week 44 | 53.7 Percentage of participants |
| Baricitinib | Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR70 Responder Index | At week 20 | 68.3 Percentage of participants |
| Baricitinib | Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR70 Responder Index | At week 24 | 59.8 Percentage of participants |
| Baricitinib | Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR70 Responder Index | At week 32 | 57.3 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR70 Responder Index | At week 24 | 37.0 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR70 Responder Index | At week 16 | 54.3 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR70 Responder Index | At week 44 | 35.8 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR70 Responder Index | At week 28 | 39.5 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR70 Responder Index | At week 32 | 35.8 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR70 Responder Index | At week 20 | 45.7 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR70 Responder Index | At week 36 | 35.8 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR70 Responder Index | At week 40 | 30.9 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR90 Responder Index
The PedACR90 response is defined as at least 90% improvement from baseline in 3 of any 6 variables in the core set, with no more than 1 of the remaining variables worsening by \> 30%. The 6 core response variables included in the PedACR criteria are: Number of active joints (defined as a joint that is swollen or in the absence of swelling has loss of passive motion accompanied by either pain on motion or joint tenderness) in 73 joints, Number of joints with limited range of motion in 69 joints, Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (21-circle VAS), Parent's Global Assessment of Patient's Overall Well-being, Physical function as assessed by the CHAQ and Acute-phase reactant (hsCRP and ESR). When PedACR response is analyzed as secondary endpoint, ESR measure is only used as acute-phase reactant in the core criteria.
Time frame: Week 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40 and 44
Population: DBW Population: All randomized participants from the DBW period who had data for PedACR90 at given time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baricitinib | Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR90 Responder Index | At week 16 | 29.3 Percentage of participants |
| Baricitinib | Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR90 Responder Index | At week 32 | 43.9 Percentage of participants |
| Baricitinib | Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR90 Responder Index | At week 36 | 39 Percentage of participants |
| Baricitinib | Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR90 Responder Index | At week 44 | 42.7 Percentage of participants |
| Baricitinib | Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR90 Responder Index | At week 20 | 42.7 Percentage of participants |
| Baricitinib | Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR90 Responder Index | At week 24 | 37.8 Percentage of participants |
| Baricitinib | Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR90 Responder Index | At week 28 | 42.7 Percentage of participants |
| Baricitinib | Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR90 Responder Index | At week 40 | 40.2 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR90 Responder Index | At week 44 | 23.5 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR90 Responder Index | At week 28 | 25.9 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR90 Responder Index | At week 24 | 21 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR90 Responder Index | At week 40 | 23.5 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR90 Responder Index | At week 32 | 27.2 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR90 Responder Index | At week 16 | 23.5 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR90 Responder Index | At week 36 | 27.2 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR90 Responder Index | At week 20 | 24.7 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants in Remission
Remission is defined as inactive disease for at least 24 consecutive weeks. Inactive disease is defined as the presence of all of the following: 1) No joints with active arthritis based on Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score (JADAS)-27 score, 2) No fever, rash, serositis, splenomegaly, hepatomegaly, or generalized lymphadenopathy attributable to JIA as assessed by the investigator, 3) No active uveitis as assessed by the investigator, 4) Normal ESR or hsCRP (i.e., within normal limits in the local laboratory or, if elevated, not attributable to JIA), 5) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity indicating no active disease (best possible score on scale \[0\]) and 6) Duration of morning stiffness ≤15 minutes.
Time frame: Week 28, 32, 36, 40 and 44
Population: DBW Population: All randomized participants from the DBW period who had data for remission at given time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baricitinib | Percentage of Participants in Remission | At week 28 | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Baricitinib | Percentage of Participants in Remission | At week 32 | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Baricitinib | Percentage of Participants in Remission | At week 44 | 3.7 Percentage of participants |
| Baricitinib | Percentage of Participants in Remission | At week 36 | 1.2 Percentage of participants |
| Baricitinib | Percentage of Participants in Remission | At week 40 | 2.4 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants in Remission | At week 40 | 3.7 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants in Remission | At week 36 | 4.9 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants in Remission | At week 44 | 3.7 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants in Remission | At week 28 | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants in Remission | At week 32 | 1.2 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Inactive Disease
Inactive disease is defined as the presence of all of the following: 1. No joints with active arthritis based on Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score (JADAS) - 27 score, 2. No fever, rash, serositis, splenomegaly, hepatomegaly, or generalized lymphadenopathy attributable to JIA as assessed by the investigator, 3. No active uveitis as assessed by the investigator, 4. Normal ESR or hsCRP (i.e., within normal limits in the local laboratory or, if elevated, not attributable to JIA), 5. Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity indicating no active disease (Score ranges are 0 to 100 and best possible score on scale is 0) and 6. Duration of morning stiffness ≤15 minutes.
Time frame: Week 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40 and 44
Population: DBW Population: All randomized participants from the DBW period who had data for inactive disease at given time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baricitinib | Percentage of Participants With Inactive Disease | At week 32 | 22.0 Percentage of participants |
| Baricitinib | Percentage of Participants With Inactive Disease | At week 20 | 13.4 Percentage of participants |
| Baricitinib | Percentage of Participants With Inactive Disease | At week 36 | 23.2 Percentage of participants |
| Baricitinib | Percentage of Participants With Inactive Disease | At week 24 | 17.1 Percentage of participants |
| Baricitinib | Percentage of Participants With Inactive Disease | At week 40 | 20.7 Percentage of participants |
| Baricitinib | Percentage of Participants With Inactive Disease | At week 28 | 20.7 Percentage of participants |
| Baricitinib | Percentage of Participants With Inactive Disease | At week 44 | 23.2 Percentage of participants |
| Baricitinib | Percentage of Participants With Inactive Disease | At week 16 | 12.2 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Inactive Disease | At week 44 | 13.6 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Inactive Disease | At week 24 | 17.3 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Inactive Disease | At week 16 | 11.1 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Inactive Disease | At week 28 | 13.6 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Inactive Disease | At week 32 | 13.6 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Inactive Disease | At week 36 | 16.0 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Inactive Disease | At week 40 | 12.3 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Inactive Disease | At week 20 | 17.3 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Minimal Disease Activity
Minimal disease activity is calculated based on the scores from the 1. Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity 2. Parent's Global Assessment of Well-Being and 3. the number of swollen joints. If the physician's global assessment of disease activity is ≤3.5 (score range: 0-100), the parent's global rating of patient's overall well-being is ≤2.5 (score range: 0-100), and the swollen joint count is ≤1 (score range: 0-73), then the participant reaches minimal disease activity. if not, minimal disease activity is not reached.
Time frame: Week 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40 and 44
Population: DBW Population: All randomized participants from the DBW period who had data for minimum disease activity at given time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baricitinib | Percentage of Participants With Minimal Disease Activity | At week 32 | 43.9 Percentage of participants |
| Baricitinib | Percentage of Participants With Minimal Disease Activity | At week 44 | 43.9 Percentage of participants |
| Baricitinib | Percentage of Participants With Minimal Disease Activity | At week 16 | 36.6 Percentage of participants |
| Baricitinib | Percentage of Participants With Minimal Disease Activity | At week 20 | 46.3 Percentage of participants |
| Baricitinib | Percentage of Participants With Minimal Disease Activity | At week 24 | 43.9 Percentage of participants |
| Baricitinib | Percentage of Participants With Minimal Disease Activity | At week 28 | 45.1 Percentage of participants |
| Baricitinib | Percentage of Participants With Minimal Disease Activity | At week 36 | 40.2 Percentage of participants |
| Baricitinib | Percentage of Participants With Minimal Disease Activity | At week 40 | 43.9 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Minimal Disease Activity | At week 44 | 27.2 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Minimal Disease Activity | At week 32 | 32.1 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Minimal Disease Activity | At week 40 | 32.1 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Minimal Disease Activity | At week 24 | 34.6 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Minimal Disease Activity | At week 36 | 33.3 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Minimal Disease Activity | At week 16 | 40.7 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Minimal Disease Activity | At week 28 | 33.3 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Minimal Disease Activity | At week 20 | 33.3 Percentage of participants |
Pharmacokinetics (PK): Maximum Plasma Baricitinib Concentration at Steady-State (Cmax, ss)
Maximum Plasma Baricitinib Concentration at Steady-State
Time frame: For Safety/PK period: Day 1, Day 4, Day 14 (pre dose) and Day 14 (post dose). For OLLI period: Day 1, Day 14, Day 28, Day 56 and 84 (pre dose)
Population: Safety/PK and OLLI population: All randomized participants from the Safety/PK and OLLI periods who had data for Cmax, ss at given time point.
| Arm | Measure | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baricitinib | Pharmacokinetics (PK): Maximum Plasma Baricitinib Concentration at Steady-State (Cmax, ss) | 57.7 Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 28 |
| Placebo | Pharmacokinetics (PK): Maximum Plasma Baricitinib Concentration at Steady-State (Cmax, ss) | 79 Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 33 |
| 6 to <9 Years 2-mg QD | Pharmacokinetics (PK): Maximum Plasma Baricitinib Concentration at Steady-State (Cmax, ss) | 56.8 Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 22 |
| 2 to <6 Years 2-mg QD | Pharmacokinetics (PK): Maximum Plasma Baricitinib Concentration at Steady-State (Cmax, ss) | 87.4 Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 38 |
PK: Area Under the Baricitinib Concentration-Time Curve During a Dosing Interval at Steady-State (AUCτ,ss)
Area under the concentration-time curve of Baricitinib during a dosing interval at steady state.
Time frame: For Safety/PK period: Day 1, Day 4, Day 14 (pre dose) and Day 14 (post dose). For OLLI period: Day 1, Day 14, Day 28, Day 56 and 84 (pre dose)
Population: Safety/PK and OLLI population: All randomized participants from the Safety/PK assessment and OLLI period who had data for AUCτ,ss at given time point.
| Arm | Measure | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baricitinib | PK: Area Under the Baricitinib Concentration-Time Curve During a Dosing Interval at Steady-State (AUCτ,ss) | 386 hour*nanogram/millilitre (h*ng/mL) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 45 |
| Placebo | PK: Area Under the Baricitinib Concentration-Time Curve During a Dosing Interval at Steady-State (AUCτ,ss) | 500 hour*nanogram/millilitre (h*ng/mL) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 57 |
| 6 to <9 Years 2-mg QD | PK: Area Under the Baricitinib Concentration-Time Curve During a Dosing Interval at Steady-State (AUCτ,ss) | 254 hour*nanogram/millilitre (h*ng/mL) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 27 |
| 2 to <6 Years 2-mg QD | PK: Area Under the Baricitinib Concentration-Time Curve During a Dosing Interval at Steady-State (AUCτ,ss) | 410 hour*nanogram/millilitre (h*ng/mL) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 57 |