Skip to content

A Study of Baricitinib in Participants From 2 Years to Less Than 18 Years Old With Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Withdrawal, Safety and Efficacy Study of Oral Baricitinib in Patients From 2 Years to Less Than 18 Years Old With Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03773978
Acronym
JUVE-BASIS
Enrollment
220
Registered
2018-12-12
Start date
2018-12-17
Completion date
2022-01-26
Last updated
2022-10-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

Keywords

Polyarticular JIA, Oligoarthritis, Juvenile psoriatic arthritis (JPsA), Enthesitis-related juvenile idiopathic arthritis (ERA)

Brief summary

The reason for this study is to see if the study drug baricitinib given orally is safe and effective in participants with JIA from 2 years to less than 18 years old.

Interventions

DRUGBaricitinib

Administered orally.

DRUGPlacebo

Administered orally.

Sponsors

Eli Lilly and Company
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
2 Years to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Participants must have had a diagnosis of active JIA (polyarticular, extended oligoarticular, or enthesitis-related juvenile idiopathic arthritis \[ERA\] including JPsA). * Participants must have had an inadequate response to at least one conventional or biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD).

Exclusion criteria

* Participants must not have systemic JIA, with or without active systemic features. * Participants must not have persistent oligoarticular arthritis. * Participants must not have been previously treated with a Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to Disease FlareWeek 12 to Week 44A disease flare is defined as a worsening of 30% or more in at least three of the six core Paediatric American College of Rheumatology (PedACR) criteria for juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (JIA) and an improvement of 30% or more in no more than one of the criteria. The six PedACR criteria are: 1) the number of active joints, 2) the number of joints with limited range of motion, 3) physician's global assessment of disease activity, 4) parent's global assessment of the participant's overall well-being, 5) physical function as measured by the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) and 6) acute-phase reactant (high-sensitivity C-reactive protein \[hsCRP\] and erythrocyte sedimentation rate \[ESR\]), the ESR measure is only used as an acute phase reactant in the core criteria.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR50 Responder IndexWeek 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40 and 44The PedACR50 response is defined as at least 50% improvement from baseline in 3 of any 6 variables in the core set, with no more than 1 of the remaining variables worsening by \> 30%. The 6 core response variables included in the PedACR criteria are: Number of active joints (defined as a joint that is swollen or in the absence of swelling has loss of passive motion accompanied by either pain on motion or joint tenderness) in 73 joints, Number of joints with limited range of motion in 69 joints, Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (21-circle VAS), Parent's Global Assessment of Patient's Overall Well-being, Physical function as assessed by the CHAQ and Acute-phase reactant (hsCRP and ESR). When PedACR response is analyzed as secondary endpoint, ESR measure is only used as acute-phase reactant in the core criteria.
Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR70 Responder IndexWeek 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40 and 44The PedACR70 response is defined as at least 70% improvement from baseline in 3 of any 6 variables in the core set, with no more than 1 of the remaining variables worsening by \> 30%. The 6 core response variables included in the PedACR criteria are: Number of active joints (defined as a joint that is swollen or in the absence of swelling has loss of passive motion accompanied by either pain on motion or joint tenderness) in 73 joints, Number of joints with limited range of motion in 69 joints, Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (21-circle VAS), Parent's Global Assessment of Patient's Overall Well-being, Physical function as assessed by the CHAQ and Acute-phase reactant (hsCRP and ESR). When PedACR response is analyzed as secondary endpoint, ESR measure is only used as acute-phase reactant in the core criteria.
Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR90 Responder IndexWeek 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40 and 44The PedACR90 response is defined as at least 90% improvement from baseline in 3 of any 6 variables in the core set, with no more than 1 of the remaining variables worsening by \> 30%. The 6 core response variables included in the PedACR criteria are: Number of active joints (defined as a joint that is swollen or in the absence of swelling has loss of passive motion accompanied by either pain on motion or joint tenderness) in 73 joints, Number of joints with limited range of motion in 69 joints, Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (21-circle VAS), Parent's Global Assessment of Patient's Overall Well-being, Physical function as assessed by the CHAQ and Acute-phase reactant (hsCRP and ESR). When PedACR response is analyzed as secondary endpoint, ESR measure is only used as acute-phase reactant in the core criteria.
Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR100 Responder IndexWeek 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40 and 44The PedACR100 response is defined as at least 100% improvement from baseline in 3 of any 6 variables in the core set, with no more than 1 of the remaining variables worsening by \> 30%. The 6 core response variables included in the PedACR criteria are: Number of active joints (defined as a joint that is swollen or in the absence of swelling has loss of passive motion accompanied by either pain on motion or joint tenderness) in 73 joints, Number of joints with limited range of motion in 69 joints, Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (21-circle VAS), Parent's Global Assessment of Patient's Overall Well-being, Physical function as assessed by the CHAQ and Acute-phase reactant (hsCRP and ESR). When PedACR response is analyzed as secondary endpoint, ESR measure is only used as acute-phase reactant in the core criteria.
Percentage of Participants With Inactive DiseaseWeek 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40 and 44Inactive disease is defined as the presence of all of the following: 1. No joints with active arthritis based on Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score (JADAS) - 27 score, 2. No fever, rash, serositis, splenomegaly, hepatomegaly, or generalized lymphadenopathy attributable to JIA as assessed by the investigator, 3. No active uveitis as assessed by the investigator, 4. Normal ESR or hsCRP (i.e., within normal limits in the local laboratory or, if elevated, not attributable to JIA), 5. Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity indicating no active disease (Score ranges are 0 to 100 and best possible score on scale is 0) and 6. Duration of morning stiffness ≤15 minutes.
Percentage of Participants With Minimal Disease ActivityWeek 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40 and 44Minimal disease activity is calculated based on the scores from the 1. Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity 2. Parent's Global Assessment of Well-Being and 3. the number of swollen joints. If the physician's global assessment of disease activity is ≤3.5 (score range: 0-100), the parent's global rating of patient's overall well-being is ≤2.5 (score range: 0-100), and the swollen joint count is ≤1 (score range: 0-73), then the participant reaches minimal disease activity. if not, minimal disease activity is not reached.
Percentage of Participants in RemissionWeek 28, 32, 36, 40 and 44Remission is defined as inactive disease for at least 24 consecutive weeks. Inactive disease is defined as the presence of all of the following: 1) No joints with active arthritis based on Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score (JADAS)-27 score, 2) No fever, rash, serositis, splenomegaly, hepatomegaly, or generalized lymphadenopathy attributable to JIA as assessed by the investigator, 3) No active uveitis as assessed by the investigator, 4) Normal ESR or hsCRP (i.e., within normal limits in the local laboratory or, if elevated, not attributable to JIA), 5) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity indicating no active disease (best possible score on scale \[0\]) and 6) Duration of morning stiffness ≤15 minutes.
Change From Baseline in Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score-27 (JADAS-27) ScoreBaseline, Week 44The JADAS-27 score is based on 4 components: 1) Physician's global assessment of disease activity on a 0-100 mm VAS, 2) Parent's global assessment of overall well-being on a 0-100 mm VAS, 3) normalized ESR and 4) number of joints (maximum of 27) with active arthritis (cervical spine, elbows, wrists, metacarpophalangeal joints \[from first to third\], proximal interphalangeal joints, hips, knees, and ankles). The scores for the each of the first 3 components range from 0 -10; the score for the final component ranges from 0-27. The overall JADAS-27 score is sum of the 4 components and it ranges from 0-57. A higher score indicates more disease activity. Least square (LS) mean was calculated using Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model which includes treatment, baseline, prior biologic JIA therapy, combined JIA category and predose exposure ESR category value as fixed factors.
Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR30 Responder IndexWeek 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40 and 44The PedACR30 response is defined as at least 30% improvement from baseline in 3 of any 6 variables in the core set, with no more than 1 of the remaining variables worsening by \>30%. The 6 core response variables included in the PedACR criteria are: Number of active joints (defined as a joint that is swollen or in the absence of swelling has loss of passive motion accompanied by either pain on motion or joint tenderness) in 73 joints, Number of joints with limited range of motion in 69 joints, Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (21-circle visual analogue scale \[VAS\]), Parent's Global Assessment of Patient's Overall Well-being, Physical function as assessed by the CHAQ and Acute-phase reactant (hsCRP and ESR). When PedACR response is analyzed as secondary endpoint, ESR measure is only used as acute-phase reactant in the core criteria.
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) ScoreBaseline, Week 44PASI is a combined assessment of lesion severity and affected area into a single score: 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease). Body is divided into 4 areas for scoring (head, arms, trunk and legs); each area is scored by itself and scores are combined for final PASI. For each area, percent of skin involved is estimated: 0 (0%) to 6 (90-100%), and severity is estimated by clinical signs, erythema, induration and desquamation; scale 0 (none) to 4 (maximum). Final PASI = sum of severity parameters for each area \* area score weight of section (head: 0.1, arms: 0.2 body: 0.3 legs: 0.4). LS mean was calculated using ANCOVA model which includes treatment, baseline, prior biologic JIA therapy, combined JIA category and predose exposure ESR category value as fixed factors.
Change From Baseline in Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) IndexBaseline, Week 44The SPARCC enthesitis is an index used to measure the severity of enthesitis (sites at which tendons and ligaments attach to bones). The SPARCC assesses 16 sites for enthesitis using a score of 0 for no activity or 1 for activity. Sites assessed include Medial epicondyle (left/right \[L/R\]), Lateral epicondyle (L/R), Supraspinatus insertion into greater tuberosity of humerus (L/R), Greater trochanter (L/R), Quadriceps insertion into superior border of patella (L/R), Patellar ligament insertion into inferior pole of patella or tibial tubercle (L/R), Achilles tendon insertion into calcaneum (L/R), and Plantar fascia insertion into calcaneum (L/R). The SPARCC is the sum of all site scores (range 0 to 16). Higher scores indicate more severe enthesitis. LS mean was calculated using ANCOVA model which includes treatment, baseline, prior biologic JIA therapy, combined JIA category and predose exposure ESR category value as fixed factors.
Change From Baseline in Juvenile Spondyloarthritis Disease Activity (JSpADA) IndexBaseline, Week 44The JSpADA index is used to evaluate the disease activity of juvenile spondyloarthritis. The JSpADA index scores will be determined by following 8 components: active joint count, active enthesitis count, pain over the past week, CRP level related to juvenile spondyloarthritis activity, morning stiffness greater than 15 minutes, clinical sacroiliitis, uveitis and back mobility. All items are transformed to values of 0, 0.5, or 1, and the total score ranges from 0 to 8, where higher scores indicate more disease activity. LS mean was calculated using ANCOVA model which includes treatment, baseline, prior biologic JIA therapy, combined JIA category and predose exposure ESR category value as fixed factors.
Pharmacokinetics (PK): Maximum Plasma Baricitinib Concentration at Steady-State (Cmax, ss)For Safety/PK period: Day 1, Day 4, Day 14 (pre dose) and Day 14 (post dose). For OLLI period: Day 1, Day 14, Day 28, Day 56 and 84 (pre dose)Maximum Plasma Baricitinib Concentration at Steady-State
PK: Area Under the Baricitinib Concentration-Time Curve During a Dosing Interval at Steady-State (AUCτ,ss)For Safety/PK period: Day 1, Day 4, Day 14 (pre dose) and Day 14 (post dose). For OLLI period: Day 1, Day 14, Day 28, Day 56 and 84 (pre dose)Area under the concentration-time curve of Baricitinib during a dosing interval at steady state.
Change From Baseline in Immunoglobulin LevelsBaseline, Week 12Change from baseline in Serum Immunoglobulin A, Serum Immunoglobulin G and Serum Immunoglobulin M levels at week 12 are presented.
Number of Participants With Change of Immunoglobulin G (IgG) TitersPre-Vaccination to 4 and 12 Weeks Post-VaccinationNumber of participants with change of IgG titers eligible for tetanus / diphtheria / acellular pertussis (tDaP) vaccine and pneumococcal conjugate are presented. Participants who were immunized with tDaP or pneumococcal conjugate vaccine had their IgG antibody titers to the antigens evaluated preimmunization and at 4 and 12 weeks postimmunization. A primary immune response was assessed in participants who had never received tDaP or pneumococcal conjugate vaccines previously and secondary/booster responses were assessed if the participants had previously received the vaccines. For pneumococcal conjugate vaccine, number of participants with \>= 2-fold increase from baseline in \>=6 pneumococcal serotypes at week 4 and 12 is presented. For tDaP vaccine, number of participants with \>= 4-fold increase from baseline in participants with baseline titer \>=0.1 IU/mL at week 4 and 12 is presented.
Number of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability AssessmentBaseline and week 12The questionnaire for product acceptability and palatability assessed the participants ability to swallow the tablet, experience relating to the taste, smell and ease of administering and taking the suspension. The questionnaire contained following Questions: Question 1) How did you (your child) like the taste of the medicine? Question 2) How did you (your child) like the smell of the medicine? Question 3) How easy was it for you (your child) to take the medicine today? Question 4) How easy was it for you to use the oral syringe to give your child the dose today? and Question 5) How easy was it for you (your child) to swallow the medicine today? Responses: Liked Very Much, Liked, Neither Liked nor Disliked, Disliked, Disliked Very Much, Very Easy, Easy, Neither Easy nor Hard, Difficult (or Hard) and Very Difficult (or Hard). The number of participants with these responses are presented. Data is presented as Question Number-Response-Time point.
Change From Baseline in Arthritis-Related Pain Severity as Measured by the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ItemBaseline, Week 44CHAQ assesses the health status and physical function of children with juvenile arthritis over the past week. The CHAQ consists of a Disability Index and a Discomfort Index. The disability index consisted of 30 items grouped into the following 8 domains: dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities. Each item is scored from 0 to 3 (0 = no difficulty; 1 = some difficulty; 2 = much difficulty and 3 = unable to do or not applicable). The scores of 8 domains were averaged to calculate the CHAQ-Disability Index total score. A higher score indicates worse physical function. The discomfort index consisted of Parent's Global Assessment of Well-Being and pain assessment due to illness. The intensity of pain is scored on a VAS scale ranging from 0-100 mm, with zero referring to no pain and 100 referring to very severe pain. A higher score indicates a worse outcome.

Countries

Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, China, Czechia, Denmark, France, Germany, India, Israel, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Poland, Russia, Spain, Turkey (Türkiye), United Kingdom

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Overall, 220 participants were enrolled: 29 started with the Pharmacokinetics (PK)/Safety period (2 weeks), and one participant was discontinued due to protocol deviation. 191 participants entered into the Open-label lead-in period (OLLI) period, and during week 2, 28 participants from the PK/Safety population entered into the OLLI period.

Pre-assignment details

Participants entered the PK/Safety period (0 to 2 weeks) in staggered enrollment of 4 age groups (12 to \<18, 9 to \<12, 6 to \<9, and 2 to \<6 years). Upon the confirmation of the safety comparability assessment, remaining participants were enrolled directly into the OLLI period (0 to 12 weeks) followed by a double-blind randomised withdrawal placebo-controlled period (DBW) period (12 to 44 weeks) in which participants were randomized to baricitinib or placebo.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Baricitinib
Baricitinib was administered QD (once daily) as a 4-mg for adolescent participants (12 to \<18 years of age) and children ≥9 years of age; and 2 mg for children \<9 years of age. Participants \<6 years of age received an oral suspension. Participants ≥6 to \<12 years old had the option of receiving an oral suspension. Participants \>12 years old were supplied tablets.
220
Total220

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
DBW PeriodAdverse Event22
DBW PeriodDue to epidemic or pandemic56
DBW PeriodFailure to Meet Continuation Criteria1640
DBW PeriodStudy team decision10
DBW PeriodWithdrawal by Subject21
PK/Safety and OLLI PeriodAdverse Event10
PK/Safety and OLLI PeriodDue to epidemic or pandemic60
PK/Safety and OLLI PeriodFailure to Meet Randomization Criteria390
PK/Safety and OLLI PeriodInvestigational product was not delivered to the site10
PK/Safety and OLLI PeriodLost to Follow-up10
PK/Safety and OLLI PeriodParticipant transitioned to JAHX10
PK/Safety and OLLI PeriodProtocol Violation40
PK/Safety and OLLI Periodunexplainable flare disease10
PK/Safety and OLLI PeriodWithdrawal by Subject30

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicBaricitinib
Age, Customized
Age
>=12 to <18 years
175 Participants
Age, Customized
Age
>=2 to <6 years
6 Participants
Age, Customized
Age
>=6 to <9 years
9 Participants
Age, Customized
Age
>=9 to <12 years
30 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
43 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
133 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
44 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
48 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
152 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Argentina
20 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Australia
1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Austria
2 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Belgium
7 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Brazil
2 Participants
Region of Enrollment
China
18 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Czechia
12 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Denmark
1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
France
10 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
26 Participants
Region of Enrollment
India
6 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Israel
15 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Italy
11 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Japan
25 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Mexico
21 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Poland
7 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Russia
8 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
14 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Turkey
3 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
11 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
152 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
68 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 2200 / 810 / 82
other
Total, other adverse events
48 / 22010 / 8126 / 82
serious
Total, serious adverse events
6 / 2203 / 814 / 82

Outcome results

Primary

Time to Disease Flare

A disease flare is defined as a worsening of 30% or more in at least three of the six core Paediatric American College of Rheumatology (PedACR) criteria for juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (JIA) and an improvement of 30% or more in no more than one of the criteria. The six PedACR criteria are: 1) the number of active joints, 2) the number of joints with limited range of motion, 3) physician's global assessment of disease activity, 4) parent's global assessment of the participant's overall well-being, 5) physical function as measured by the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) and 6) acute-phase reactant (high-sensitivity C-reactive protein \[hsCRP\] and erythrocyte sedimentation rate \[ESR\]), the ESR measure is only used as an acute phase reactant in the core criteria.

Time frame: Week 12 to Week 44

Population: DBW Population: All randomized participants from the DBW period who had data for time to disease flare at given time point.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
BaricitinibTime to Disease FlareNA Weeks
PlaceboTime to Disease Flare27.14 Weeks
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.128, 0.453]Log Rank
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Arthritis-Related Pain Severity as Measured by the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Item

CHAQ assesses the health status and physical function of children with juvenile arthritis over the past week. The CHAQ consists of a Disability Index and a Discomfort Index. The disability index consisted of 30 items grouped into the following 8 domains: dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities. Each item is scored from 0 to 3 (0 = no difficulty; 1 = some difficulty; 2 = much difficulty and 3 = unable to do or not applicable). The scores of 8 domains were averaged to calculate the CHAQ-Disability Index total score. A higher score indicates worse physical function. The discomfort index consisted of Parent's Global Assessment of Well-Being and pain assessment due to illness. The intensity of pain is scored on a VAS scale ranging from 0-100 mm, with zero referring to no pain and 100 referring to very severe pain. A higher score indicates a worse outcome.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 44

Population: DBW Population: All randomized participants from the DBW period who had data for at least one post-baseline CHAQ Pain VAS Item at given time point. LS mean was calculated using Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model which includes treatment, baseline, prior biologic JIA therapy, combined JIA category and predose exposure ESR category value as fixed factors.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
BaricitinibChange From Baseline in Arthritis-Related Pain Severity as Measured by the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Item-29.65 score on a scaleStandard Error 3.276
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Arthritis-Related Pain Severity as Measured by the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Item-16.68 score on a scaleStandard Error 3.202
p-value: 0.00395% CI: [-21.39, -4.55]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Immunoglobulin Levels

Change from baseline in Serum Immunoglobulin A, Serum Immunoglobulin G and Serum Immunoglobulin M levels at week 12 are presented.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: Safety/PK and OLLI population: All randomized participants from the Safety/PK and OLLI periods who had data for for at least one post-baseline immunoglobulin levels at given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BaricitinibChange From Baseline in Immunoglobulin LevelsSerum Immunoglobulin A-15.98 Milligrams per decilitre (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 39.501
BaricitinibChange From Baseline in Immunoglobulin LevelsSerum Immunoglobulin G-81.46 Milligrams per decilitre (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 209.549
BaricitinibChange From Baseline in Immunoglobulin LevelsSerum Immunoglobulin M-9.86 Milligrams per decilitre (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 26.68
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score-27 (JADAS-27) Score

The JADAS-27 score is based on 4 components: 1) Physician's global assessment of disease activity on a 0-100 mm VAS, 2) Parent's global assessment of overall well-being on a 0-100 mm VAS, 3) normalized ESR and 4) number of joints (maximum of 27) with active arthritis (cervical spine, elbows, wrists, metacarpophalangeal joints \[from first to third\], proximal interphalangeal joints, hips, knees, and ankles). The scores for the each of the first 3 components range from 0 -10; the score for the final component ranges from 0-27. The overall JADAS-27 score is sum of the 4 components and it ranges from 0-57. A higher score indicates more disease activity. Least square (LS) mean was calculated using Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model which includes treatment, baseline, prior biologic JIA therapy, combined JIA category and predose exposure ESR category value as fixed factors.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 44

Population: DBW Population: All randomized participants from the DBW period who had data for at least one post-baseline JADAS-27 score at given time point.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
BaricitinibChange From Baseline in Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score-27 (JADAS-27) Score-14.24 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.006
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score-27 (JADAS-27) Score-9.91 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.013
p-value: 0.00195% CI: [-6.95, -1.7]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Juvenile Spondyloarthritis Disease Activity (JSpADA) Index

The JSpADA index is used to evaluate the disease activity of juvenile spondyloarthritis. The JSpADA index scores will be determined by following 8 components: active joint count, active enthesitis count, pain over the past week, CRP level related to juvenile spondyloarthritis activity, morning stiffness greater than 15 minutes, clinical sacroiliitis, uveitis and back mobility. All items are transformed to values of 0, 0.5, or 1, and the total score ranges from 0 to 8, where higher scores indicate more disease activity. LS mean was calculated using ANCOVA model which includes treatment, baseline, prior biologic JIA therapy, combined JIA category and predose exposure ESR category value as fixed factors.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 44

Population: DBW Population: All randomized participants from the DBW period who had ERA or JPsA were included in this population.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
BaricitinibChange From Baseline in Juvenile Spondyloarthritis Disease Activity (JSpADA) Index-2.56 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.347
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Juvenile Spondyloarthritis Disease Activity (JSpADA) Index-1.47 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.296
p-value: 0.01995% CI: [-1.98, -0.19]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score

PASI is a combined assessment of lesion severity and affected area into a single score: 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease). Body is divided into 4 areas for scoring (head, arms, trunk and legs); each area is scored by itself and scores are combined for final PASI. For each area, percent of skin involved is estimated: 0 (0%) to 6 (90-100%), and severity is estimated by clinical signs, erythema, induration and desquamation; scale 0 (none) to 4 (maximum). Final PASI = sum of severity parameters for each area \* area score weight of section (head: 0.1, arms: 0.2 body: 0.3 legs: 0.4). LS mean was calculated using ANCOVA model which includes treatment, baseline, prior biologic JIA therapy, combined JIA category and predose exposure ESR category value as fixed factors.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 44

Population: DBW Population: All randomized participants from the DBW period who had at least one post-baseline juvenile psoriatic arthritis (JPsA) were included in this population.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
BaricitinibChange From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score-1.14 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.291
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score-0.79 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.354
p-value: 0.57495% CI: [-2.62, 1.91]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Index

The SPARCC enthesitis is an index used to measure the severity of enthesitis (sites at which tendons and ligaments attach to bones). The SPARCC assesses 16 sites for enthesitis using a score of 0 for no activity or 1 for activity. Sites assessed include Medial epicondyle (left/right \[L/R\]), Lateral epicondyle (L/R), Supraspinatus insertion into greater tuberosity of humerus (L/R), Greater trochanter (L/R), Quadriceps insertion into superior border of patella (L/R), Patellar ligament insertion into inferior pole of patella or tibial tubercle (L/R), Achilles tendon insertion into calcaneum (L/R), and Plantar fascia insertion into calcaneum (L/R). The SPARCC is the sum of all site scores (range 0 to 16). Higher scores indicate more severe enthesitis. LS mean was calculated using ANCOVA model which includes treatment, baseline, prior biologic JIA therapy, combined JIA category and predose exposure ESR category value as fixed factors.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 44

Population: DBW Population: All randomized participants from the DBW period who had enthesitis-related juvenile idiopathic arthritis (ERA) or JPsA were included in this population.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
BaricitinibChange From Baseline in Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Index-1.51 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.276
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Index-1.95 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.241
p-value: 0.20895% CI: [-0.26, 1.15]ANCOVA
Secondary

Number of Participants With Change of Immunoglobulin G (IgG) Titers

Number of participants with change of IgG titers eligible for tetanus / diphtheria / acellular pertussis (tDaP) vaccine and pneumococcal conjugate are presented. Participants who were immunized with tDaP or pneumococcal conjugate vaccine had their IgG antibody titers to the antigens evaluated preimmunization and at 4 and 12 weeks postimmunization. A primary immune response was assessed in participants who had never received tDaP or pneumococcal conjugate vaccines previously and secondary/booster responses were assessed if the participants had previously received the vaccines. For pneumococcal conjugate vaccine, number of participants with \>= 2-fold increase from baseline in \>=6 pneumococcal serotypes at week 4 and 12 is presented. For tDaP vaccine, number of participants with \>= 4-fold increase from baseline in participants with baseline titer \>=0.1 IU/mL at week 4 and 12 is presented.

Time frame: Pre-Vaccination to 4 and 12 Weeks Post-Vaccination

Population: Safety/PK and OLLI population: All randomized participants from the Safety/PK assessment and OLLI period who had data for IgG titers at given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
BaricitinibNumber of Participants With Change of Immunoglobulin G (IgG) TitersTetanus toxoid containing vaccine at week 42 participants
BaricitinibNumber of Participants With Change of Immunoglobulin G (IgG) TitersTetanus toxoid containing vaccine at week 122 participants
BaricitinibNumber of Participants With Change of Immunoglobulin G (IgG) TitersDiphtheria toxoid containing vaccine at week 42 participants
BaricitinibNumber of Participants With Change of Immunoglobulin G (IgG) TitersDiphtheria toxoid containing vaccine at week 121 participants
BaricitinibNumber of Participants With Change of Immunoglobulin G (IgG) TitersPertussis toxin containing vaccine at week 42 participants
BaricitinibNumber of Participants With Change of Immunoglobulin G (IgG) TitersPertussis toxin containing vaccine at week 122 participants
BaricitinibNumber of Participants With Change of Immunoglobulin G (IgG) Titerspneumococcal conjugate vaccine at week 43 participants
BaricitinibNumber of Participants With Change of Immunoglobulin G (IgG) Titerspneumococcal conjugate vaccine at week 122 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability Assessment

The questionnaire for product acceptability and palatability assessed the participants ability to swallow the tablet, experience relating to the taste, smell and ease of administering and taking the suspension. The questionnaire contained following Questions: Question 1) How did you (your child) like the taste of the medicine? Question 2) How did you (your child) like the smell of the medicine? Question 3) How easy was it for you (your child) to take the medicine today? Question 4) How easy was it for you to use the oral syringe to give your child the dose today? and Question 5) How easy was it for you (your child) to swallow the medicine today? Responses: Liked Very Much, Liked, Neither Liked nor Disliked, Disliked, Disliked Very Much, Very Easy, Easy, Neither Easy nor Hard, Difficult (or Hard) and Very Difficult (or Hard). The number of participants with these responses are presented. Data is presented as Question Number-Response-Time point.

Time frame: Baseline and week 12

Population: Safety/PK and OLLI population: All randomized participants from the Safety/PK assessment and OLLI period who had data for product acceptability and palatability at given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
BaricitinibNumber of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability AssessmentQuestion 1- Disliked Very Much: Baseline0 participants
BaricitinibNumber of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability AssessmentQuestion 2- Liked: Baseline7 participants
BaricitinibNumber of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability AssessmentQuestion 4- Very Easy: Week 128 participants
BaricitinibNumber of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability AssessmentQuestion 4- Neither Easy nor Hard: Baseline0 participants
BaricitinibNumber of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability AssessmentQuestion 4- Difficult (or Hard): Baseline0 participants
BaricitinibNumber of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability AssessmentQuestion 4- Very Difficult (or Hard): Week 120 participants
BaricitinibNumber of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability AssessmentQuestion 5- Very Difficult (or Hard): Baseline1 participants
BaricitinibNumber of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability AssessmentQuestion 5- Very Difficult (or Hard): Week 120 participants
BaricitinibNumber of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability AssessmentQuestion 1- Liked Very Much: Baseline2 participants
BaricitinibNumber of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability AssessmentQuestion 1- Liked Very Much: Week 126 participants
BaricitinibNumber of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability AssessmentQuestion 1- Liked: Baseline8 participants
BaricitinibNumber of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability AssessmentQuestion 1- Liked: Week 122 participants
BaricitinibNumber of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability AssessmentQuestion 1- Neither Liked nor Disliked: Baseline3 participants
BaricitinibNumber of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability AssessmentQuestion 1- Neither Liked nor Disliked: Week 121 participants
BaricitinibNumber of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability AssessmentQuestion 1- Disliked: Baseline0 participants
BaricitinibNumber of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability AssessmentQuestion 1- Disliked: Week 121 participants
BaricitinibNumber of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability AssessmentQuestion 1- Disliked Very Much: Week 120 participants
BaricitinibNumber of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability AssessmentQuestion 2- Liked Very Much: Baseline3 participants
BaricitinibNumber of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability AssessmentQuestion 2- Liked Very Much: Week 122 participants
BaricitinibNumber of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability AssessmentQuestion 2- Liked: Week 124 participants
BaricitinibNumber of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability AssessmentQuestion 2- Neither Liked nor Disliked: Baseline3 participants
BaricitinibNumber of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability AssessmentQuestion 2- Neither Liked nor Disliked: Week 122 participants
BaricitinibNumber of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability AssessmentQuestion 2- Disliked: Baseline0 participants
BaricitinibNumber of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability AssessmentQuestion 2- Disliked: Week 121 participants
BaricitinibNumber of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability AssessmentQuestion 2- Disliked Very Much: Baseline0 participants
BaricitinibNumber of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability AssessmentQuestion 2- Disliked Very Much: Week 121 participants
BaricitinibNumber of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability AssessmentQuestion 3- Very Easy: Baseline8 participants
BaricitinibNumber of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability AssessmentQuestion 3- Very Easy: Week 127 participants
BaricitinibNumber of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability AssessmentQuestion 3- Easy: Baseline3 participants
BaricitinibNumber of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability AssessmentQuestion 3- Easy: Week 122 participants
BaricitinibNumber of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability AssessmentQuestion 3- Neither Easy nor Hard: Baseline1 participants
BaricitinibNumber of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability AssessmentQuestion 3- Neither Easy nor Hard: Week 120 participants
BaricitinibNumber of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability AssessmentQuestion 3- Difficult (or Hard): Baseline0 participants
BaricitinibNumber of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability AssessmentQuestion 3- Difficult (or Hard): Week 121 participants
BaricitinibNumber of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability AssessmentQuestion 3- Very Difficult (or Hard): Baseline1 participants
BaricitinibNumber of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability AssessmentQuestion 3- Very Difficult (or Hard): Week 120 participants
BaricitinibNumber of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability AssessmentQuestion 4- Very Easy: Baseline5 participants
BaricitinibNumber of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability AssessmentQuestion 4- Easy: Baseline6 participants
BaricitinibNumber of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability AssessmentQuestion 4- Easy: Week 122 participants
BaricitinibNumber of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability AssessmentQuestion 4- Neither Easy nor Hard: Week 120 participants
BaricitinibNumber of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability AssessmentQuestion 4- Difficult (or Hard): Week 120 participants
BaricitinibNumber of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability AssessmentQuestion 4- Very Difficult (or Hard): Baseline0 participants
BaricitinibNumber of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability AssessmentQuestion 5- Very Easy: Baseline146 participants
BaricitinibNumber of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability AssessmentQuestion 5- Very Easy: Week 12120 participants
BaricitinibNumber of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability AssessmentQuestion 5- Easy: Baseline39 participants
BaricitinibNumber of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability AssessmentQuestion 5- Easy: Week 1234 participants
BaricitinibNumber of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability AssessmentQuestion 5- Neither Easy nor Hard: Baseline14 participants
BaricitinibNumber of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability AssessmentQuestion 5- Neither Easy nor Hard: Week 125 participants
BaricitinibNumber of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability AssessmentQuestion 5- Difficult (or Hard): Baseline3 participants
BaricitinibNumber of Participants With Product Acceptability and Palatability AssessmentQuestion 5- Difficult (or Hard): Week 120 participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR100 Responder Index

The PedACR100 response is defined as at least 100% improvement from baseline in 3 of any 6 variables in the core set, with no more than 1 of the remaining variables worsening by \> 30%. The 6 core response variables included in the PedACR criteria are: Number of active joints (defined as a joint that is swollen or in the absence of swelling has loss of passive motion accompanied by either pain on motion or joint tenderness) in 73 joints, Number of joints with limited range of motion in 69 joints, Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (21-circle VAS), Parent's Global Assessment of Patient's Overall Well-being, Physical function as assessed by the CHAQ and Acute-phase reactant (hsCRP and ESR). When PedACR response is analyzed as secondary endpoint, ESR measure is only used as acute-phase reactant in the core criteria.

Time frame: Week 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40 and 44

Population: DBW Population: All randomized participants from the DBW period who had data for PedACR100 at given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
BaricitinibPercentage of Participants Achieving PedACR100 Responder IndexAt week 3629.3 Percentage of participants
BaricitinibPercentage of Participants Achieving PedACR100 Responder IndexAt week 2826.8 Percentage of participants
BaricitinibPercentage of Participants Achieving PedACR100 Responder IndexAt week 2024.4 Percentage of participants
BaricitinibPercentage of Participants Achieving PedACR100 Responder IndexAt week 3228 Percentage of participants
BaricitinibPercentage of Participants Achieving PedACR100 Responder IndexAt week 4029.3 Percentage of participants
BaricitinibPercentage of Participants Achieving PedACR100 Responder IndexAt week 2418.3 Percentage of participants
BaricitinibPercentage of Participants Achieving PedACR100 Responder IndexAt week 4429.3 Percentage of participants
BaricitinibPercentage of Participants Achieving PedACR100 Responder IndexAt week 1614.6 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving PedACR100 Responder IndexAt week 4416 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving PedACR100 Responder IndexAt week 1617.3 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving PedACR100 Responder IndexAt week 2019.8 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving PedACR100 Responder IndexAt week 2416 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving PedACR100 Responder IndexAt week 2819.8 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving PedACR100 Responder IndexAt week 3221 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving PedACR100 Responder IndexAt week 3621 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving PedACR100 Responder IndexAt week 4017.3 Percentage of participants
Comparison: at week 16p-value: 0.6295% CI: [0.33, 1.92]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: at week 20p-value: 0.49295% CI: [0.61, 2.78]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: at week 24p-value: 0.71595% CI: [0.5, 2.75]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: at week 28p-value: 0.38495% CI: [0.66, 2.99]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: at week 32p-value: 0.31195% CI: [0.7, 3.1]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: at week 36p-value: 0.23195% CI: [0.75, 3.34]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: at week 40p-value: 0.12995% CI: [0.84, 3.95]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: at week 44p-value: 0.04395% CI: [1.02, 4.84]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR30 Responder Index

The PedACR30 response is defined as at least 30% improvement from baseline in 3 of any 6 variables in the core set, with no more than 1 of the remaining variables worsening by \>30%. The 6 core response variables included in the PedACR criteria are: Number of active joints (defined as a joint that is swollen or in the absence of swelling has loss of passive motion accompanied by either pain on motion or joint tenderness) in 73 joints, Number of joints with limited range of motion in 69 joints, Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (21-circle visual analogue scale \[VAS\]), Parent's Global Assessment of Patient's Overall Well-being, Physical function as assessed by the CHAQ and Acute-phase reactant (hsCRP and ESR). When PedACR response is analyzed as secondary endpoint, ESR measure is only used as acute-phase reactant in the core criteria.

Time frame: Week 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40 and 44

Population: DBW Population: All randomized participants from the DBW period who had data for PedACR30 at given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
BaricitinibPercentage of Participants Achieving PedACR30 Responder IndexAt week 1692.7 Percentage of participants
BaricitinibPercentage of Participants Achieving PedACR30 Responder IndexAt week 2087.8 Percentage of participants
BaricitinibPercentage of Participants Achieving PedACR30 Responder IndexAt week 2485.4 Percentage of participants
BaricitinibPercentage of Participants Achieving PedACR30 Responder IndexAt week 2878 Percentage of participants
BaricitinibPercentage of Participants Achieving PedACR30 Responder IndexAt week 3274.4 Percentage of participants
BaricitinibPercentage of Participants Achieving PedACR30 Responder IndexAt week 3672.0 Percentage of participants
BaricitinibPercentage of Participants Achieving PedACR30 Responder IndexAt week 4069.5 Percentage of participants
BaricitinibPercentage of Participants Achieving PedACR30 Responder IndexAt week 4467.1 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving PedACR30 Responder IndexAt week 4438.3 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving PedACR30 Responder IndexAt week 3249.4 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving PedACR30 Responder IndexAt week 1681.5 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving PedACR30 Responder IndexAt week 2064.2 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving PedACR30 Responder IndexAt week 4038.3 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving PedACR30 Responder IndexAt week 2455.6 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving PedACR30 Responder IndexAt week 3644.4 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving PedACR30 Responder IndexAt week 2851.9 Percentage of participants
Comparison: at week 16p-value: 0.05295% CI: [0.99, 7.46]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: at week 20p-value: 0.00295% CI: [1.6, 8.28]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: at week 24p-value: <0.00195% CI: [2, 9.41]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: at week 28p-value: 0.00195% CI: [1.62, 7.01]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: at week 32p-value: 0.00295% CI: [1.48, 6.07]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: at week 36p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.62, 6.52]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: at week 40p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.85, 7.41]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: at week 44p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.65, 6.5]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR50 Responder Index

The PedACR50 response is defined as at least 50% improvement from baseline in 3 of any 6 variables in the core set, with no more than 1 of the remaining variables worsening by \> 30%. The 6 core response variables included in the PedACR criteria are: Number of active joints (defined as a joint that is swollen or in the absence of swelling has loss of passive motion accompanied by either pain on motion or joint tenderness) in 73 joints, Number of joints with limited range of motion in 69 joints, Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (21-circle VAS), Parent's Global Assessment of Patient's Overall Well-being, Physical function as assessed by the CHAQ and Acute-phase reactant (hsCRP and ESR). When PedACR response is analyzed as secondary endpoint, ESR measure is only used as acute-phase reactant in the core criteria.

Time frame: Week 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40 and 44

Population: DBW Population: All randomized participants from the DBW period who had data for PedACR50 at given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
BaricitinibPercentage of Participants Achieving PedACR50 Responder IndexAt week 2481.7 Percentage of participants
BaricitinibPercentage of Participants Achieving PedACR50 Responder IndexAt week 2875.6 Percentage of participants
BaricitinibPercentage of Participants Achieving PedACR50 Responder IndexAt week 3272 Percentage of participants
BaricitinibPercentage of Participants Achieving PedACR50 Responder IndexAt week 3668.3 Percentage of participants
BaricitinibPercentage of Participants Achieving PedACR50 Responder IndexAt week 4068.3 Percentage of participants
BaricitinibPercentage of Participants Achieving PedACR50 Responder IndexAt week 4463.4 Percentage of participants
BaricitinibPercentage of Participants Achieving PedACR50 Responder IndexAt week 2081.7 Percentage of participants
BaricitinibPercentage of Participants Achieving PedACR50 Responder IndexAt week 1679.3 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving PedACR50 Responder IndexAt week 1675.3 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving PedACR50 Responder IndexAt week 3246.9 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving PedACR50 Responder IndexAt week 2449.4 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving PedACR50 Responder IndexAt week 4038.3 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving PedACR50 Responder IndexAt week 2850.6 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving PedACR50 Responder IndexAt week 2058 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving PedACR50 Responder IndexAt week 4437 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving PedACR50 Responder IndexAt week 3643.2 Percentage of participants
Comparison: at week 16p-value: 0.56895% CI: [0.59, 2.65]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: at week 20p-value: 0.00495% CI: [1.4, 6.09]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: at week 24p-value: <0.00195% CI: [2.1, 9.15]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: at week 28p-value: 0.00295% CI: [1.51, 6.32]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: at week 32p-value: 0.00395% CI: [1.47, 6.11]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: at week 36p-value: 0.00395% CI: [1.44, 5.6]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: at week 40p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.74, 6.97]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: at week 44p-value: 0.00295% CI: [1.46, 5.66]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR70 Responder Index

The PedACR70 response is defined as at least 70% improvement from baseline in 3 of any 6 variables in the core set, with no more than 1 of the remaining variables worsening by \> 30%. The 6 core response variables included in the PedACR criteria are: Number of active joints (defined as a joint that is swollen or in the absence of swelling has loss of passive motion accompanied by either pain on motion or joint tenderness) in 73 joints, Number of joints with limited range of motion in 69 joints, Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (21-circle VAS), Parent's Global Assessment of Patient's Overall Well-being, Physical function as assessed by the CHAQ and Acute-phase reactant (hsCRP and ESR). When PedACR response is analyzed as secondary endpoint, ESR measure is only used as acute-phase reactant in the core criteria.

Time frame: Week 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40 and 44

Population: DBW Population: All randomized participants from the DBW period who had data for PedACR70 at given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
BaricitinibPercentage of Participants Achieving PedACR70 Responder IndexAt week 1654.9 Percentage of participants
BaricitinibPercentage of Participants Achieving PedACR70 Responder IndexAt week 2867.1 Percentage of participants
BaricitinibPercentage of Participants Achieving PedACR70 Responder IndexAt week 3661 Percentage of participants
BaricitinibPercentage of Participants Achieving PedACR70 Responder IndexAt week 4057.3 Percentage of participants
BaricitinibPercentage of Participants Achieving PedACR70 Responder IndexAt week 4453.7 Percentage of participants
BaricitinibPercentage of Participants Achieving PedACR70 Responder IndexAt week 2068.3 Percentage of participants
BaricitinibPercentage of Participants Achieving PedACR70 Responder IndexAt week 2459.8 Percentage of participants
BaricitinibPercentage of Participants Achieving PedACR70 Responder IndexAt week 3257.3 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving PedACR70 Responder IndexAt week 2437.0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving PedACR70 Responder IndexAt week 1654.3 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving PedACR70 Responder IndexAt week 4435.8 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving PedACR70 Responder IndexAt week 2839.5 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving PedACR70 Responder IndexAt week 3235.8 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving PedACR70 Responder IndexAt week 2045.7 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving PedACR70 Responder IndexAt week 3635.8 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving PedACR70 Responder IndexAt week 4030.9 Percentage of participants
Comparison: at week 16p-value: 0.97295% CI: [0.52, 1.87]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: at week 20p-value: 0.00895% CI: [1.27, 4.81]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: at week 24p-value: 0.00595% CI: [1.33, 4.97]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: at week 28p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.57, 5.94]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: at week 32p-value: 0.00995% CI: [1.25, 4.71]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: at week 36p-value: 0.00395% CI: [1.43, 5.47]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: at week 40p-value: 0.00295% CI: [1.47, 5.83]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: at week 44p-value: 0.05295% CI: [0.99, 3.74]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving PedACR90 Responder Index

The PedACR90 response is defined as at least 90% improvement from baseline in 3 of any 6 variables in the core set, with no more than 1 of the remaining variables worsening by \> 30%. The 6 core response variables included in the PedACR criteria are: Number of active joints (defined as a joint that is swollen or in the absence of swelling has loss of passive motion accompanied by either pain on motion or joint tenderness) in 73 joints, Number of joints with limited range of motion in 69 joints, Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (21-circle VAS), Parent's Global Assessment of Patient's Overall Well-being, Physical function as assessed by the CHAQ and Acute-phase reactant (hsCRP and ESR). When PedACR response is analyzed as secondary endpoint, ESR measure is only used as acute-phase reactant in the core criteria.

Time frame: Week 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40 and 44

Population: DBW Population: All randomized participants from the DBW period who had data for PedACR90 at given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
BaricitinibPercentage of Participants Achieving PedACR90 Responder IndexAt week 1629.3 Percentage of participants
BaricitinibPercentage of Participants Achieving PedACR90 Responder IndexAt week 3243.9 Percentage of participants
BaricitinibPercentage of Participants Achieving PedACR90 Responder IndexAt week 3639 Percentage of participants
BaricitinibPercentage of Participants Achieving PedACR90 Responder IndexAt week 4442.7 Percentage of participants
BaricitinibPercentage of Participants Achieving PedACR90 Responder IndexAt week 2042.7 Percentage of participants
BaricitinibPercentage of Participants Achieving PedACR90 Responder IndexAt week 2437.8 Percentage of participants
BaricitinibPercentage of Participants Achieving PedACR90 Responder IndexAt week 2842.7 Percentage of participants
BaricitinibPercentage of Participants Achieving PedACR90 Responder IndexAt week 4040.2 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving PedACR90 Responder IndexAt week 4423.5 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving PedACR90 Responder IndexAt week 2825.9 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving PedACR90 Responder IndexAt week 2421 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving PedACR90 Responder IndexAt week 4023.5 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving PedACR90 Responder IndexAt week 3227.2 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving PedACR90 Responder IndexAt week 1623.5 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving PedACR90 Responder IndexAt week 3627.2 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving PedACR90 Responder IndexAt week 2024.7 Percentage of participants
Comparison: at week 16p-value: 0.40995% CI: [0.66, 2.75]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: at week 20p-value: 0.0395% CI: [1.07, 4.23]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: at week 24p-value: 0.02295% CI: [1.13, 4.92]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: at week 28p-value: 0.0495% CI: [1.03, 4.08]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: at week 32p-value: 0.03295% CI: [1.07, 4.24]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: at week 36p-value: 0.13295% CI: [0.85, 3.42]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: at week 40p-value: 0.0595% CI: [1, 4.1]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: at week 44p-value: 0.01995% CI: [1.15, 4.71]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Percentage of Participants in Remission

Remission is defined as inactive disease for at least 24 consecutive weeks. Inactive disease is defined as the presence of all of the following: 1) No joints with active arthritis based on Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score (JADAS)-27 score, 2) No fever, rash, serositis, splenomegaly, hepatomegaly, or generalized lymphadenopathy attributable to JIA as assessed by the investigator, 3) No active uveitis as assessed by the investigator, 4) Normal ESR or hsCRP (i.e., within normal limits in the local laboratory or, if elevated, not attributable to JIA), 5) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity indicating no active disease (best possible score on scale \[0\]) and 6) Duration of morning stiffness ≤15 minutes.

Time frame: Week 28, 32, 36, 40 and 44

Population: DBW Population: All randomized participants from the DBW period who had data for remission at given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
BaricitinibPercentage of Participants in RemissionAt week 280 Percentage of participants
BaricitinibPercentage of Participants in RemissionAt week 320 Percentage of participants
BaricitinibPercentage of Participants in RemissionAt week 443.7 Percentage of participants
BaricitinibPercentage of Participants in RemissionAt week 361.2 Percentage of participants
BaricitinibPercentage of Participants in RemissionAt week 402.4 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants in RemissionAt week 403.7 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants in RemissionAt week 364.9 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants in RemissionAt week 443.7 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants in RemissionAt week 280 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants in RemissionAt week 321.2 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Inactive Disease

Inactive disease is defined as the presence of all of the following: 1. No joints with active arthritis based on Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score (JADAS) - 27 score, 2. No fever, rash, serositis, splenomegaly, hepatomegaly, or generalized lymphadenopathy attributable to JIA as assessed by the investigator, 3. No active uveitis as assessed by the investigator, 4. Normal ESR or hsCRP (i.e., within normal limits in the local laboratory or, if elevated, not attributable to JIA), 5. Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity indicating no active disease (Score ranges are 0 to 100 and best possible score on scale is 0) and 6. Duration of morning stiffness ≤15 minutes.

Time frame: Week 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40 and 44

Population: DBW Population: All randomized participants from the DBW period who had data for inactive disease at given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
BaricitinibPercentage of Participants With Inactive DiseaseAt week 3222.0 Percentage of participants
BaricitinibPercentage of Participants With Inactive DiseaseAt week 2013.4 Percentage of participants
BaricitinibPercentage of Participants With Inactive DiseaseAt week 3623.2 Percentage of participants
BaricitinibPercentage of Participants With Inactive DiseaseAt week 2417.1 Percentage of participants
BaricitinibPercentage of Participants With Inactive DiseaseAt week 4020.7 Percentage of participants
BaricitinibPercentage of Participants With Inactive DiseaseAt week 2820.7 Percentage of participants
BaricitinibPercentage of Participants With Inactive DiseaseAt week 4423.2 Percentage of participants
BaricitinibPercentage of Participants With Inactive DiseaseAt week 1612.2 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Inactive DiseaseAt week 4413.6 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Inactive DiseaseAt week 2417.3 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Inactive DiseaseAt week 1611.1 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Inactive DiseaseAt week 2813.6 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Inactive DiseaseAt week 3213.6 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Inactive DiseaseAt week 3616.0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Inactive DiseaseAt week 4012.3 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Inactive DiseaseAt week 2017.3 Percentage of participants
Comparison: at week 16p-value: 0.85395% CI: [0.4, 2.98]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: at week 20p-value: 0.43295% CI: [0.29, 1.71]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: at week 24p-value: 0.9695% CI: [0.41, 2.31]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: at week 28p-value: 0.21595% CI: [0.73, 4.01]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: at week 32p-value: 0.17395% CI: [0.77, 4.22]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: at week 36p-value: 0.36795% CI: [0.64, 3.33]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: at week 40p-value: 0.16295% CI: [0.77, 4.67]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: at week 44p-value: 0.11395% CI: [0.85, 4.5]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Minimal Disease Activity

Minimal disease activity is calculated based on the scores from the 1. Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity 2. Parent's Global Assessment of Well-Being and 3. the number of swollen joints. If the physician's global assessment of disease activity is ≤3.5 (score range: 0-100), the parent's global rating of patient's overall well-being is ≤2.5 (score range: 0-100), and the swollen joint count is ≤1 (score range: 0-73), then the participant reaches minimal disease activity. if not, minimal disease activity is not reached.

Time frame: Week 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40 and 44

Population: DBW Population: All randomized participants from the DBW period who had data for minimum disease activity at given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
BaricitinibPercentage of Participants With Minimal Disease ActivityAt week 3243.9 Percentage of participants
BaricitinibPercentage of Participants With Minimal Disease ActivityAt week 4443.9 Percentage of participants
BaricitinibPercentage of Participants With Minimal Disease ActivityAt week 1636.6 Percentage of participants
BaricitinibPercentage of Participants With Minimal Disease ActivityAt week 2046.3 Percentage of participants
BaricitinibPercentage of Participants With Minimal Disease ActivityAt week 2443.9 Percentage of participants
BaricitinibPercentage of Participants With Minimal Disease ActivityAt week 2845.1 Percentage of participants
BaricitinibPercentage of Participants With Minimal Disease ActivityAt week 3640.2 Percentage of participants
BaricitinibPercentage of Participants With Minimal Disease ActivityAt week 4043.9 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Minimal Disease ActivityAt week 4427.2 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Minimal Disease ActivityAt week 3232.1 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Minimal Disease ActivityAt week 4032.1 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Minimal Disease ActivityAt week 2434.6 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Minimal Disease ActivityAt week 3633.3 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Minimal Disease ActivityAt week 1640.7 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Minimal Disease ActivityAt week 2833.3 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Minimal Disease ActivityAt week 2033.3 Percentage of participants
Comparison: at week 16p-value: 0.51195% CI: [0.42, 1.55]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: at week 20p-value: 0.14595% CI: [0.84, 3.2]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: at week 24p-value: 0.34995% CI: [0.7, 2.72]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: at week 28p-value: 0.16795% CI: [0.82, 3.25]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: at week 32p-value: 0.21295% CI: [0.78, 3.07]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: at week 36p-value: 0.57795% CI: [0.62, 2.39]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: at week 40p-value: 0.22595% CI: [0.78, 2.95]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: at week 44p-value: 0.05595% CI: [0.98, 3.9]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Pharmacokinetics (PK): Maximum Plasma Baricitinib Concentration at Steady-State (Cmax, ss)

Maximum Plasma Baricitinib Concentration at Steady-State

Time frame: For Safety/PK period: Day 1, Day 4, Day 14 (pre dose) and Day 14 (post dose). For OLLI period: Day 1, Day 14, Day 28, Day 56 and 84 (pre dose)

Population: Safety/PK and OLLI population: All randomized participants from the Safety/PK and OLLI periods who had data for Cmax, ss at given time point.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
BaricitinibPharmacokinetics (PK): Maximum Plasma Baricitinib Concentration at Steady-State (Cmax, ss)57.7 Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 28
PlaceboPharmacokinetics (PK): Maximum Plasma Baricitinib Concentration at Steady-State (Cmax, ss)79 Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 33
6 to <9 Years 2-mg QDPharmacokinetics (PK): Maximum Plasma Baricitinib Concentration at Steady-State (Cmax, ss)56.8 Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 22
2 to <6 Years 2-mg QDPharmacokinetics (PK): Maximum Plasma Baricitinib Concentration at Steady-State (Cmax, ss)87.4 Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 38
Secondary

PK: Area Under the Baricitinib Concentration-Time Curve During a Dosing Interval at Steady-State (AUCτ,ss)

Area under the concentration-time curve of Baricitinib during a dosing interval at steady state.

Time frame: For Safety/PK period: Day 1, Day 4, Day 14 (pre dose) and Day 14 (post dose). For OLLI period: Day 1, Day 14, Day 28, Day 56 and 84 (pre dose)

Population: Safety/PK and OLLI population: All randomized participants from the Safety/PK assessment and OLLI period who had data for AUCτ,ss at given time point.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
BaricitinibPK: Area Under the Baricitinib Concentration-Time Curve During a Dosing Interval at Steady-State (AUCτ,ss)386 hour*nanogram/millilitre (h*ng/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 45
PlaceboPK: Area Under the Baricitinib Concentration-Time Curve During a Dosing Interval at Steady-State (AUCτ,ss)500 hour*nanogram/millilitre (h*ng/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 57
6 to <9 Years 2-mg QDPK: Area Under the Baricitinib Concentration-Time Curve During a Dosing Interval at Steady-State (AUCτ,ss)254 hour*nanogram/millilitre (h*ng/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 27
2 to <6 Years 2-mg QDPK: Area Under the Baricitinib Concentration-Time Curve During a Dosing Interval at Steady-State (AUCτ,ss)410 hour*nanogram/millilitre (h*ng/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 57

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 21, 2026