Noncommunicable Diseases, Surveys and Questionnaires
Conditions
Keywords
mobile phone surveys, interactive voice response, narration
Brief summary
This study evaluates the effect of two different narrative voices (one male and one female) and two different introductions (one with informational content and the other with additional motivational content) on interactive voice response (IVR) survey cooperation, response, refusal, and contact rates, as compared to a control group (male, informational), in Bangladesh and Uganda.
Detailed description
Using random digit dialing (RDD) sampling techniques, participants were randomized to one of four arms: 1) male narrator and informational survey introduction, 2) male narrator and motivational survey introduction, 3) female narrator and informational survey introduction, and 4) female narrator and motivational survey introduction,male motivational, female informational, female motivational) which were then followed by a noncommunicable disease risk factor survey. This mobile phone survey was sent as an interactive voice response (IVR). In IVR surveys, participants use their touch tone key pad to answer pre-recorded questions. (i.e. If you are male, press 1; if you are female, press 2). This study was conducted in both Bangladesh and Uganda.
Interventions
The survey was narrated by a female voice
The survey introduction was worded to include motivational content
The survey was narrated by a male voice
The survey introduction was worded to include informational content
Sponsors
Study design
Intervention model description
Participants were randomized to one of four narrator/introduction combinations: 1) male voice, informational content; 2) male voice, motivational content; 3) female voice, informational content; 4) female voice, motivational content.
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Access to a mobile phone * Greater or equal to 18 years of age * In Bangladesh, conversant in either English or Bangla language. In Uganda, conversant in either Luo, Luganda, Runyakitara or English languages.
Exclusion criteria
* Less than 18 years of age
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Cooperation rate #1 | Through study completion, an average of one month | As defined by American Association for Public Opinion Research, cooperation rate is defined as I/(I+P+R) where I is complete interviews, P is partial interviews, and R is refusals and breakoffs |
| Response Rate #4 | Through study completion, an average of one month | As defined by American Association for Public Opinion Research, response rate is defined as (I+P)/(I+P+R+eU) where I is complete interviews, P is partial interviews, R is refusals and breakoffs, and eU is the estimated eligible proportion of unknowns. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Refusal Rate #2 | Through study completion, an average of one month | As defined by American Association for Public Opinion Research, refusal rate is defined as (R)/(I+P+R+eU) where R is refusals and breakoffs, I is complete interviews, P is partial interviews, and eU is the estimated eligible proportion of unknowns |
| Contact Rate #2 | Through study completion, an average of one month | As defined by American Association for Public Opinion Research, contact rate is defined as (I+P+R)/(I+P+R+eU) where I is complete interviews, P is partial interviews, R is refusals and breakoffs, and eU is the estimated eligible proportion of unknowns |
Countries
Bangladesh, Uganda