Skip to content

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery for Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery for Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03772392
Enrollment
60
Registered
2018-12-11
Start date
2019-02-05
Completion date
2019-11-05
Last updated
2024-05-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Liver Diseases, Pancreas Disease

Brief summary

ERAS protocols have been utilized extensively in abdominal and non abdominal surgery over the past 20 years. These protocols incorporate evidence based, multi-disciplinary peri-operative care components. Compliance with these protocols is associated with reduced length of stay, reduced morbidity and reduced hospital costs. ERAS protocols within HPB units are les well established with less evidence supporting their use. Liver resection protocols are increasing in use, but ERAS post Whipples resection is less established. In the HPB unit at the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, the liver HPB protocol is in use but a recent audit identified that that the compliance rate is low with compliance rates as low as 30 per cent in some care domains.

Detailed description

1.1 Background Enhanced Recovery After Surgery(ERAS) protocols have been utilized extensively in abdominal and non abdominal surgery over the past 20 years. These protocols incorporate evidence based, multi-disciplinary peri-operative care components. Compliance with these protocols is associated with reduced length of stay, reduced morbidity and reduced hospital costs. ERAS protocols within hepatobiliary pancreatic (HPB) units are les well established with less evidence supporting their use. Liver resection protocols are increasing in use, but ERAS post Whipples resection is less established. 1.2 RATIONALE FOR STUDY In the HPB unit at the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, the liver HPB protocol is in use but a recent audit identified that that the compliance rate is low with compliance rates as low as 30 per cent in some care domains. 2\. OBJECTIVES To compare the compliance of ERAS protocol care components within an HPB unit before and after an education programme. 3\. STUDY POPULATION 3.1 NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS An attempt to observe 100 patients will be made over the study period. A preliminary audit of 27 patients has been performed. 4\. PARICIPANT SELECTION 4.1 IDENTIFYING PARTICIPANTS Those patients to be included will be identified from the theatre schedule as listed for HPB resectional surgery. Their compliance with the ERAS protocol will then be observed over the course of their stay. 4.2 CONSENT The ERAS protocol is part of the unit policy and so patients will not be undergoing any intervention that is not already part of normal practice and consent. Therefore further or additional consent will not be required. 5\. DATA COLLECTION Over a six month period the compliance to the ERAS protocol will be assessed in patients undergoing HPB resections. Compliance programme 1. Patients will be given an information leaflet describing their post-operative care pathway 2. Nursing and medical staff will receive education regarding the ERAS protocol and achievements 3. Auditing of the ERAS protocol adherence will subsequently be performed Outcome measures 1. Functional recovery 2. Morbidity 3. Compliance rate of the individual peri-operative care components 4. Drop out rate 5. Length of stay 6. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Chi squared analysis of dichotomised data will be performed. T test and Mann Whitney U tests will be performed to assess differences between the pre and post education programme results.

Interventions

PROCEDUREHPB resection

:Liver and Pancreas surgery - Compliance with ERAS protocol

Sponsors

NHS Lothian
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
University of Edinburgh
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

* All patients undergoing open HPB resectional surgery within the HPB unit at the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh

Exclusion criteria

* Laparoscopic surgery Non resectional surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time of functional recovery from surgery90 daysTime to achieve discharge criteria post-operatively

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Compliance90 daysAdherence rates to ERAS protocol and individual ERAS components
Length of Stay90 daysTime in hospital after surgery
Morbidity90 daysPost operative complications

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026