Skip to content

Efficacy of Two Schemes of Self-monitoring Capillary Glucose in Gestational Diabetes

Efficacy of Two Schemes of Self-monitoring Capillary Glucose to Monitor Glycemic Control in Mexican Women With GDM

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03769701
Enrollment
110
Registered
2018-12-07
Start date
2018-12-07
Completion date
2022-07-30
Last updated
2021-12-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gestational Diabetes

Brief summary

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) affects 10 % of women who receive prenatal care at Instituto Nacional de Perinatología (Mexico, City). Currently, there is clear evidence on the utility of self- monitoring of capillary glucose (SMGC) to evaluate the efficacy of medical-nutrition therapy on glycemic control. However, the reports regarding the best pattern of SMGC in terms of frequency and number of determinations per day are limited. The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of two SMGC schemes for monitoring glycemic control in Mexican women with GDM.

Detailed description

Currently, the evidence from randomized clinical trials about the most appropriate scheme of SMGC for monitoring the glycemic control among women with GDM is limited. This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of two different schemes of SMGC in GDM Mexican population, it is an open-label randomized clinical trial including 2 groups: group 1 (SMGC 4 times/day) measured in fasting and 1 hour postprandial of breakfast, lunch and dinner; group 2 (SMGC 2 times/day), measured preprandial and 1 hour postprandial, of breakfast, lunch or dinner, alternating the meal each day, from GDM diagnosis until the resolution of pregnancy. Additionally, determinations of insulin, lipids and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) will be determinate at enrollment, and between the 30-32 and 36-38 of gestation week. The primary outcome: To compare the proportion of women who achieve glycemic control using SMGC 4 times/day versus SMGC 2 times/day. Secondary outcome: To compare the risk of new-born large for gestational age, gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, preterm birth, cesarean section, new-born weight, neonatal hypoglycemia, neonatal hyperbilirubinemia and entry to neonatal intensive care between groups. An analysis for intention of treatment will be made according to the recommendations of the CONSORT guidelines.

Interventions

PROCEDUREself-monitoring capillary glucose (SMCG)

To measure the capillary glucose with a glucometer according to the assigned group.

Sponsors

Instituto Nacional de Perinatologia Isidro Espinosa de los Reyes
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* GDM diagnosis, defined by 2 or more altered values during oral glucose tolerance test (75g-2h): Fasting ≥ 95 mg/dl, 1 hour ≥ 180 mg/dl and 2 hours ≥ 155 mg/dl. * Singleton pregnancy between 12-32 weeks of gestation at GDM diagnosis.

Exclusion criteria

1. Multiple pregnancy. 2. Pregestational diabetes. 3. Fasting glucose \> 126 mg/dl or random glucose \> 200 mg/dl before 12 weeks of gestation. 4. Active pathology: systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, congenital or acquired cardiopathy, uterine leiomyoma \> 10cm, renal insufficiency and chronic hypertension.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of women who achieve glycemic control.from GDM diagnosis to delivery.Proportion of women with more than 80% of capillary glucose determination into the following goals: preprandial; 70 to 95 mg/dl and 1 hour post-prandial ≤ 140 mg/dl.

Countries

Mexico

Contacts

Primary ContactEnrique Reyes-Muñoz, PhD
dr.enriquereyes@gmail.com+521 5555209900
Backup ContactLidia Arce-Sánchez, MD
li_arce@yahoo.com.mx+521 5555209900

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026