Lymphoma
Conditions
Keywords
Anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody
Brief summary
Primary Objectives: Phase 1 -To characterize the safety and tolerability of isatuximab in combination with cemiplimab in participants with relapsed and refractory classic Hodgkin's lymphoma (cHL), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) or peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL), and to confirm the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D). Phase 2 * Cohort A1 (anti-programmed cell death protein 1/ligand 1 \[PD-1/PD-L1\] naïve cHL): To assess the complete remission (CR) rate of isatuximab in combination with cemiplimab. * Cohort A2 (cHL progressing from PD-1/PD-L1), B (DLBCL) and C (PTCL): To assess the objective response rate (ORR) of isatuximab in combination with cemiplimab. Secondary Objectives: * To evaluate the safety of the RP2D of the combination of isatuximab with cemiplimab. * To evaluate the safety of the combination of isatuximab with cemiplimab and radiotherapy in participants with cHL. * To evaluate the immunogenicity of isatuximab and cemiplimab when given in combination. * To characterize the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of isatuximab and cemiplimab when given in combination. * To assess overall efficacy of isatuximab in combination with cemiplimab and isatuximab in combination with cemiplimab and radiotherapy.
Detailed description
The total study duration per participant was up to 28 months, including an up to 28-day screening period, an up to 96-week treatment period, and a 90-day safety follow up period.
Interventions
Pharmaceutical form: solution for infusion Route of administration: intravenous
Pharmaceutical form: solution for infusion Route of administration: intravenous
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Participants greater than or equal to (\>=) 12 years of age inclusive, at the time of signing the informed consent. * Disease location amenable to tumor biopsy at Baseline. * Measurable disease. * For Cohort A1 (cHL anti-programmed cell death protein 1/ligand 1 \[PD-1/PD-L1\] inhibitor naïve): Histologically confirmed advanced cHL that had relapsed or progressed after at least 3 lines of systemic therapy that included autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (auto-HSCT) or auto-HSCT and brentuximab vedotin (BV). * For Cohort A2 (cHL anti-PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor progressor): Histologically confirmed advanced cHL which had relapsed or progressed after one previous anti-PD-1/PD-L1 containing regimen as the most recent prior therapy but no more than 4 lines of previous chemotherapy including the anti-PD-1/PD-L1 containing regimen and documentation of benefit during or after the anti-PD-1/PD-L1 containing regimen within 4 months prior to initiation of investigational medicinal product. * For Cohort B (diffuse large B-cell lymphoma \[DLBCL\]): Histologically confirmed advanced DLBCL that had relapsed or progressed after 2 lines of systemic therapy including auto-HSCT or 2 lines of systemic therapy for participants who were not eligible for auto-HSCT. * For Cohort C (peripheral T-cell lymphoma \[PTCL\]): Histologically confirmed advanced PTCL that had relapsed or progressed after either first-line chemotherapy and auto-HSCT as consolidation of first remission or first-line chemotherapy if participants were ineligible for auto-HSCT. * Body weight of greater than (\>) 45 kilograms for participants with age less than (\<)18 years.
Exclusion criteria
* Prior exposure to agent that blocks CD38. * For participants with cHL (PD-1/PD-L1 naïve), DLBCL or PTCL prior exposure to any agent (approved or investigational) that blocks the PD-1/PD-L1, PD-L2, CD137, cytotic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 or LAG-3. * Evidence of other immune related disease/conditions. * Had received a live-virus vaccination within 28 days of planned treatment start; seasonal flu vaccines that do not contain live virus are permitted. * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) \>=2. * Poor bone marrow reserve. * Poor organ function. The above information was not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a participant's potential participation in a clinical trial.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) | Cycle 1 (28 days) | DLTs: Adverse Events (AEs) occurring during 1st treatment cycle, unless due to disease progression or obviously unrelated cause which included: hematological abnormalities: Grade(G) 4 neutropenia(N) for 7 or more consecutive days, G3 to G4 N with fever (temperature greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 38.5 degree Celsius on more than 1 occasion) or microbiologically/radiographically documented infection, G3 to G4 thrombocytopenia with clinically significant bleeding requiring clinical intervention or non-hematological abnormalities: G 4 non-hematologic AE, G\>=2 uveitis, G3 non-hematological AE lasting greater than (\>)3 days, delay in initiation of Cycle 2 \>14 days due to treatment related laboratory abnormalities/AE. Any other AE that the study committee deemed to be dose-limiting, regardless of grade, was also considered as DLT. |
| Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), and Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) | From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum duration: up to 103 weeks) | An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug and did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. Serious adverse events (SAEs) were any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, was a medically important event. TEAEs were defined as AEs that developed, worsened or became serious during the TEAE period (defined as the time from the first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose of study treatment). |
| Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters | From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum duration: up to 103 weeks) | Hematological parameters assessed were anemia, white blood cell (WBC) decreased, platelet count decreased, lymphocyte count decreased, and neutrophil count decreased. Abnormality criteria was assessed as per the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0 NCI-CTCAE v 5.0), where Grade 1 = Mild; Grade 2 = Moderate; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Potentially Life Threatening. Grade refers to the severity of the AEs. |
| Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum duration: up to 103 weeks) | Electrolyte parameters assessed were hyponatremia, hypokalemia, hyperkalemia, hypocalcemia, hypercalcemia, hypoalbuminemia, hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia. Abnormal criteria was assessed as per the NCI-CTCAE v 5.0, where Grade 1 = Mild; Grade 2 = Moderate; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Potentially Life Threatening. Grade refers to the severity of the AEs. |
| Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Parameters | From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum duration: up to 103 weeks) | Abnormal renal parameters assessed were glomerular filtration rate (GFR) by class, creatinine increased and hyperuricemia. GFR by class was assessed in categories:\>=90 milliliter per minute per 1.73 meter square (mL/min/1.73m\^2) (Normal), \>=60 to \<90 mL/min/1.73m\^2 (Mild), \>=30 to \<60 mL/min/1.73m\^2 (Moderate), \>=15 to \<30 mL/min/1.73m\^2 (Severe), and \<15 mL/min/1.73m\^2 (End Stage Renal Disease). Abnormal criteria was assessed as per NCI-CTCAE v 5.0, where Grade 1 = Mild; Grade 2 = Moderate; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Potentially Life Threatening. Grade refers to the severity of the AEs. |
| Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function Parameters | From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum duration: up to 103 weeks) | Abnormal liver function parameters assessed were aspartate aminotransferase (AST) increased, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) increased, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) increased, blood bilirubin (BB) increased. Abnormal criteria was assessed as per NCI-CTCAE v 5.0, where Grade 1 = Mild; Grade 2 = Moderate; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Potentially Life Threatening. Grade refers to the severity of the AEs. |
| Cohort A1: Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) | From the date of randomization until disease progression or death or study cut-off date, whichever comes first (maximum duration: up to 103 weeks) | Percentage of participants who had a CR as a best overall response (BOR) using the Lugano response criteria (LRC) 2014 (based on PET-CT and CT responses). Per LRC, CR based on PET-CT response was defined as complete metabolic response (MR) in lymph nodes and extralymphatic sites with a score of 1, 2, or 3 with or without residual mass, on 5-point scale (5PS), where, 1= no uptake above background; 2 = uptake \<=mediastinum; 3 = uptake \> mediastinum but \<= liver; 4 = uptake moderately \> liver; 5 = uptake markedly higher than liver and/or new lesions; no new lesions and no evidence of fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-avid disease in bone marrow. CR based on CT-response was defined as target nodes/nodal masses of lymph nodes, extralymphatic sites regressed to \<=1.5 cm in longest dimension transverse diameter of lesion (LDi); absence of non-measured lesion; organ enlargement regressed to normal; no new lesions; normal bone marrow morphology; if indeterminate, immunohistochemistry negative. |
| Cohort A2, B and C: Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR) | From the date of randomization until disease progression, or death or study cut-off date, whichever comes first (maximum duration: up to 103 weeks) | Percentage of participants who had a CR or partial response (PR) as BOR using LRC, 2014. Per LRC, CR (PET-CT): complete MR in lymph nodes and extralymphatic sites with a score of 1, 2, or 3 with or without residual mass; no new lesions and no evidence of FDG-avid disease. CR (CT-response): target nodes/nodal masses of lymph nodes, extralymphatic sites regressed to \<=1.5cm LDi; absence of non-measured lesion; organ enlargement regressed to normal; no new lesions; normal bone marrow morphology. PR (PET-CT): partial MR in lymph nodes and extralymphatic sites; no new lesions and residual uptake higher than uptake. PR (Per CT): lymph nodes, extralymphatic sites\>=50% decrease in sum of product of perpendicular diameters (SPD), extranodal sites; if lesion is too small to measure on CT,assign5mm\*5mm as default; if no longer visible:0\*0mm; Node\>5mm\*5mm but smaller than normal, use actual measurement; absent/regressed non-measured lesions; no increase; spleen regressed by\>50% or no new lesions. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PK Parameter: Area Under the Plasma Concentration (AUClast) Versus Time Curve After the First Infusion of Isatuximab | At SOI (0 hour), before actual EOI (up to 3 hours), EOI+ 4 hours, 72 hours and 144 hours post-dose on Day 2 of Cycle 1 | AUClast was defined as area under the plasma concentration versus time curve calculated from time 0 to last quantifiable concentration, calculated for isatuximab. |
| PK Parameter: Last Concentration Observed Above the Lower Limit of Quantification (Clast) After the First Infusion of Isatuximab | At SOI (0 hour), before actual EOI (up to 3 hours), EOI+ 4 hours, 72 hours and 144 hours post-dose on Day 2 of Cycle 1 | Clast was defined as the last concentration of isatuximab observed above the lower limit of quantification. |
| PK Parameter: Time of Clast (Tlast) After the First Infusion of Isatuximab | At SOI (0 hour), before actual EOI (up to 3 hours), EOI+ 4 hours, 72 hours and 144 hours post-dose on Day 2 of Cycle 1 | Tlast was defined as the time of last concentration observed above the lower limit of quantification for isatuximab. |
| PK Parameter: Area Under the Concentration Versus Time Curve Over the Dosing Interval (AUC0-168 Hours) After the First Infusion of Isatuximab | At SOI (0 hour), before actual EOI (up to 3 hours), EOI+ 4 hours, 72 hours and 144 hours post-dose on Day 2 of Cycle 1 | AUC0-168 hours was defined as the area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from time 0 to 168 hours post dose calculated for isatuximab. Samples for this outcome measure were collected up to 144 hours post-dose. No sample was collected at 168 hours post-dose; and thus, the samples collected up to 144 hours post-dose were extrapolated to derive data for 168 hours post-dose. |
| PK Parameter: Area Under the Concentration Versus Time Curve Over the Dosing Interval (AUC0-144 Hours) After the First Infusion of Isatuximab | At SOI (0 hour), before actual EOI (up to 3 hours), EOI+ 4 hours, 72 hours and 144 hours post-dose on Day 2 of Cycle 1 | AUC0-144 hours was defined as the area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from time 0 to 144 hours post dose calculated for isatuximab. |
| PK Parameter: Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Isatuximab | Pre-infusion on Cycle1:Day 2, 8, 15, & 22, Cycle 2:Day 1 &15, Cycle 3:Day 1 &15, Cycle 4:Day 1 &15, Cycle 5 Day1,Cycle 6 Day1,Cycle 7 Day 1, Cycle 8 Day1, Cycle 9 Day1, Cycle 10 Day1, Cycle 11 Day1, Cycle14 Day1, Cycle 17 Day1, Cycle 20 Day1,Cycle 23 Day1 | Ctrough was the plasma concentration of isatuximab observed just before treatment administration during repeated dosing. |
| PK Parameter: Serum Concentration of Cemiplimab at End of Infusion (CEOI) | EOI (up to 30 minutes [min]) on Day 1 of Cycle 1 | Ceoi is the plasma concentration observed at the end of intravenous infusion of cemiplimab. |
| PK Parameter: Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) After the First Infusion of Cemiplimab | At SOI (0 hour), before actual EOI (up to 30 min), EOI+4 hours, 96 hours, 168 hours, and 336 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1 | Cmax was defined as the maximum concentration observed after the first administration. |
| Duration of Response (DOR) | From the date of first response until disease progression or death, or study cut-off date whichever occurred first (maximum duration: up to 103 weeks) | Time (months) between date of first response to first date that recurrent or radiologically disease progression (PD) was documented, or date of death,whichever was 1st. In absence of PD or death before cut-off date or date of initiation of further anticancer treatment, DOR was censored at date of last valid response not showing PD performed prior to initiation of further anticancer treatment or cut-off date, whichever was earlier. PD(PET-CT): metabolic disease with score 4/5 with inc. in intensity of uptake for target nodes/nodal mass & new FDG-avid foci consistent with lymphoma. PD(CT):any 1 of following: cross product of longest transverse diameter of lesion(LDi) & perpendicular diameter (PPD) progression of nodes/nodal mass, abnormal node/lesion with LDi \>1.5 cm, inc \>=50% from PPD nadir & inc in LDi/ shortest axis perpendicular to LDi(SDi) from nadir 0.5 cm, regrowth of resolved lesions, new splenomegaly,progression of non-measured lesion, new/recurrent involvement of bone marrow. |
| PK Parameter: Area Under the Serum Concentration (AUClast) Versus Time Curve After the First Infusion of Cemiplimab | At SOI (0 hour), before actual EOI (up to 30 min), EOI+4 hours, 96 hours, 168 hours, and 336 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1 | AUClast was defined as area under the serum concentration versus time curve calculated from time 0 to last quantifiable concentration calculated for cemiplimab. |
| PK Parameter: Last Concentration Observed Above the Lower Limit of Quantification (Clast) After the First Infusion of Cemiplimab | At SOI (0 hour), before actual EOI (up to 30 min), EOI+4 hours, 96 hours, 168 hours, and 336 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1 | Clast was defined as the last concentration of cemiplimab observed above the lower limit of quantification. |
| PK Parameter: Time of Clast (Tlast) After the First Infusion of Cemiplimab | At SOI (0 hour), before actual EOI (up to 30 min), EOI+4 hours, 96 hours, 168 hours, and 336 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1 | Tlast was defined as the time of last concentration observed above the lower limit of quantification for cemiplimab. |
| PK Parameter: Area Under the Serum Concentration Versus Time Curve Over the Dosing Interval (AUC0-336 Hours) After the First Infusion of Cemiplimab | At SOI (0 hour), before actual EOI (up to 30 min), EOI+4 hours, 96 hours, 168 hours, and 336 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1 | AUC0-336 hours was defined as the area under the serum concentration versus time curve from time 0 to 336 hours post dose for cemiplimab. |
| PK Parameter: Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Cemiplimab | Pre-infusion on Cycle 1:Day 1 & Day15,Cycle 2:Day 1 & Day 15,Cycle 3:Day 1 & Day 15,Cycle 4:Day 1 & Day15,Cycle 5 Day 1,Cycle 6 Day 1,Cycle7 Day1,Cycle 8 Day 1,Cycle 9 Day1,Cycle 10 Day1,Cycle11 Day1,Cycle14 Day 1,Cycle 17 Day1,Cycle20 Day 1,Cycle 23 Day1 | Ctrough was the serum concentration of cemiplimab observed just before treatment administration during repeated dosing. |
| Percent Change From Baseline in Tumor Burden | Up to 103 weeks | Tumor burden change was defined as the best percent-change from baseline in a sum of product of lesion diameters (longest for non-nodal lesion, short axis for nodal lesions) for all target lesions. |
| Cohort A1 and A2: Percentage of Participants With Objective Response | From the date of randomization until disease progression, or death or study cut-off date, whichever comes first (maximum duration: up to 103 weeks) | Percentage of participants who had a CR or PR as BOR using LRC, 2014 (based on PET-CT and CT responses). CR (per PET-CT): complete MR in lymph nodes and extra lymphatic sites with a score of 1, 2, or 3 with or without residual mass; no new lesions and no evidence of FDG-avid disease. CR (CT-response): target nodes/nodal masses of lymph nodes, extralymphatic sites regressed to \<=1.5cm LDi; absence of non-measured lesion; organ enlargement regressed to normal; no new lesions; normal bone marrow morphology. PR (per PET-CT): partial MR in lymph nodes and extral ymphatic sites; no new lesions and residual uptake higher than uptake. PR (per CT): lymph nodes, extralymphatic sites \>=50% decrease in SPD, extranodal sites; if lesion is too small to measure on CT, assign 5mm\*5mm as default; if no longer visible:0\*0mm; Node\>5mm\*5mm but smaller than normal, used actual measurement; absent/regressed non-measured lesions; no increase; spleen regressed by\>50% or no new lesions. |
| Cohort A1 and A2: Percentage of Participants With Complete Response | From the date of randomization until disease progression, or death or study cut-off date, whichever comes first (maximum duration: up to 103 weeks) | Percentage of participants who had a CR as a BOR using the LRC, 2014 (based on PET-CT and CT responses). Per LRC, CR based on PET-CT was defined as complete MR in lymph nodes and extralymphatic sites with a score of 1, 2, or 3 with or without residual mass, on 5PS, where, 1= no uptake above background; 2 = uptake \<=mediastinum; 3 = uptake \> mediastinum but \<= liver; 4 = uptake moderately \> liver; 5 = uptake markedly higher than liver and/or new lesions; no new lesions and no evidence of FDG-avid disease in bone marrow. CR based on CT-response was defined as target nodes/nodal masses of lymph nodes, extralymphatic sites regressed to \<=1.5 cm in longest dimension transverse diameter of lesion (LDi); absence of non-measured lesion; organ enlargement regressed to normal; no new lesions; normal bone marrow morphology; if indeterminate, immunohistochemistry negative. |
| PK Parameter: Time to Reach Cmax (Tmax) After the First Infusion of Cemiplimab | At SOI (0 hour), before actual EOI (up to 30 min), EOI+4 hours, 96 hours, 168 hours, and 336 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1 | Tmax was defined as the time to reach Cmax after the intravenous infusion of cemiplimab. |
| Percentage of Participants With Disease Control (DC) | From the date of first response until disease progression or death, or study cut-off date whichever occurred first (maximum duration: up to 103 weeks) | DC defined as percentage of participants who achieved CR, PR or stable disease (SD) as per LRC, 2014. CR (PET-CT): complete MR in lymph nodes and extralymphatic sites; no new lesions and no evidence of FDG-avid disease. CR (CT): target nodes/nodal masses of lymph nodes, extralymphatic sites regressed to \<=1.5cm LDi; absence of non-measured lesion; organ enlargement regressed to normal; no new lesions; normal bone marrow. PR (PET-CT): partial MR in lymph nodes and sites; no new lesions. PR (CT): lymph nodes, sites\>=50% decrease in SPD, sites; if lesion is too small to measure on CT, assign 5mm\*5mm; No longer visible:0\*0mm; Node\>5mm\*5mm, use actual measurement; absent/regressed non-measured lesions; no increase; spleen regressed by\>50% or no new lesions. SD (PET-CT):no metabolic response, target nodes score of 4/5 with no significant change & no new lesions; SD (CT): \<50% dec in SPD, no increase in progression for. 5PS:1: non-measured lesions, organ enlargement & no new lesions. |
| Progression Free Survival (PFS) | From the date of randomization until disease progression, or death or study cut-off date, whichever comes first (maximum duration: up to 103 weeks) | PFS: time (in months) from 1st study treatment administration to date of 1st documented radiographic progression or date of death from any cause, whichever occurs 1st. Per LRC, 2014 PD (per PET-CT): metabolic disease with score 4/5 with increase (inc) in intensity of uptake for individual target nodes/nodal mass & new FDG-avid foci consistent with lymphoma at interim/ end-of-treatment assessment for extra nodal lesions, new FDG-avid foci consistent with lymphoma rather; new/recurrent FDG-avid foci bone marrow. PD (per CT response): any 1 of following: cross product of longest transverse diameter of lesion (LDi) & perpendicular diameter (PPD) progression of nodes/nodal mass, abnormal node/lesion with LDi \>1.5 cm, inc \>=50% from PPD nadir & inc in LDi/ shortest axis perpendicular to LDi from nadir 0.5 cm for lesion \<= 2 cm, regrowth of resolved lesions, new splenomegaly,progression of preexisting non measured lesion, new/recurrent involvement of bone marrow. |
| Number of Participants With Treatment-Induced and Treatment Boosted Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) Against Isatuximab | From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum duration: up to 103 weeks) | ADA responses were categorized as treatment boosted ADA and treatment-induced ADA. Treatment boosted ADA was defined as pre-existing ADAs with a significant increase in the ADA titer during the study compared to the Baseline titer. Treatment-induced ADA was defined as ADA that developed at any time during the ADA on-study observation period in participants without pre-existing ADA. |
| Number of Participants With Treatment-Induced and Treatment Boosted Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) Against Cemiplimab | From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum duration: up to 103 weeks) | ADA responses were categorized as treatment boosted ADA and treatment-induced ADA. Treatment boosted ADA was defined as pre-existing ADAs with a significant increase in the ADA titer during the study compared to the Baseline titer. Treatment-induced ADA was defined as ADA that developed at any time during the ADA on-study observation period in participants without pre-existing ADA. |
| Pharmacokinetics (PK) Parameter: Plasma Concentration of Isatuximab at End of Infusion (CEOI) | End of infusion (EOI up to 3 hours) on Day 2 of Cycle 1 | Ceoi is the plasma concentration observed at the end of intravenous infusion of isatuximab. |
| PK Parameter: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) After the First Infusion of Isatuximab | At Start of infusion (SOI; 0 hour), before actual EOI (up to 3 hours), EOI+ 4 hours, 72 hours and 144 hours post-dose on Day 2 of Cycle 1 | Cmax was defined as the maximum plasma concentration observed after the first administration of drug. |
| PK Parameter: Time to Reach Cmax (Tmax) After the First Infusion of Isatuximab | At SOI (0 hour), before actual EOI (up to 3 hours), EOI+ 4 hours, 72 hours and 144 hours post-dose on Day 2 of Cycle 1 | Tmax was defined as the time to reach Cmax, after the intravenous infusion of isatuximab. |
Countries
France, Italy, Netherlands, Portugal, South Korea, Spain, Taiwan
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Study was conducted at 20 sites in 7 countries. A total of 58 participants were enrolled between 11 December 2018 and 27 August 2020 and received isatuximab in combination with cemiplimab. Study was planned to be conducted in 2 parts: Phase 1(safety run-in) and Phase 2 (efficacy/2-stage design).
Pre-assignment details
Efficacy results observed in Cohorts B & C didn't fulfill preplanned interim analysis criteria allowing the study to move to Phase(Ph) 2 Stage 2 in these cohorts. Efficacy results observed in Cohorts A1 & A2 fulfilled preplanned interim analysis criteria in Stage 1 to move to Ph 2 Stage 2 in these cohorts. However, study was stopped for all cohorts per sponsor's decision. Participant flow, Baseline,outcome measures & safety data were prespecified to be analyzed on combined Ph 1 & 2 populations.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab cHL, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor naïve participants received isatuximab 10 mg/kg, IV infusion QW in Cycle 1 and then Q2W from Cycle 2 to Cycle 6 (each cycle of 28 days), and then Q3W from Cycle 7 to Cycle 30 (each cycle of 21 days) along with cemiplimab 250 mg Q2W, IV infusion from Cycle 1 to 6 and then 350 mg Q3W from Cycle 7 to Cycle 30, with optional radiotherapy until unacceptable AEs or participant's decision to stop the treatment, or at least 96 weeks (at least 48 weeks from initial signal of CR, whichever was longer) of delivery of investigational medicinal product(s) without documented PD, or study cut-off date, whichever occurs first (maximum duration: up to 103 weeks). | 18 |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab cHL, anti-PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor progressor participants received isatuximab 10 mg/kg, IV infusion, QW in Cycle 1 and then Q2W from Cycle 2 to Cycle 6 (each cycle of 28 days) and Q3W from Cycle 7 to Cycle 30 (each cycle of 21 days) along with cemiplimab 250 mg Q2W, IV infusion from Cycle 1 to 6 and then 350 mg Q3W from Cycle 7 to Cycle 30, with optional radiotherapy until unacceptable AEs or participant's decision to stop the treatment, or at least 96 weeks (at least 48 weeks from initial signal of CR, whichever was longer) of delivery of investigational medicinal product(s) without documented PD, or study cut-off date, whichever occurs first (maximum duration: up to 103 weeks). | 12 |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab DLBCL, anti PD-1/PD-L1 naïve participants received isatuximab 10 mg/kg, IV infusion, QW in Cycle 1 and then Q2W from Cycle 2 to Cycle 6 (each cycle of 28 days) and Q3W from Cycle 7 to Cycle 30 (each cycle of 21 days) along with cemiplimab 250 mg Q2W, IV infusion from Cycle 1 to 6 and then 350 mg Q3W from Cycle 7 to Cycle 30, until unacceptable AEs or participant's decision to stop the treatment, or at least 96 weeks (at least 48 weeks from initial signal of CR, whichever was longer) of delivery of investigational medicinal product(s) without documented PD, or study cut-off date, whichever occurs first (maximum duration: up to 103 weeks). | 17 |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab PTCL, anti PD-1/PD-L1 naïve participants received isatuximab 10 mg/kg, IV infusion, QW in Cycle 1 and then Q2W from Cycle 2 to Cycle 6 (each cycle of 28 days) and Q3W from Cycle 7 to Cycle 30 (each cycle of 21 days) along with cemiplimab 250 mg Q2W, IV infusion from Cycle 1 to 6 and then 350 mg Q3W from Cycle 7 to Cycle 30, until unacceptable AEs or participant's decision to stop the treatment, or at least 96 weeks (at least 48 weeks from initial signal of CR, whichever was longer) of delivery of investigational medicinal product(s) without documented PD, or study cut-off date, whichever occurs first (maximum duration: up to 103 weeks). | 11 |
| Total | 58 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 | FG003 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| Overall Study | Other - Unspecified | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Progressive disease | 9 | 7 | 13 | 6 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Total | Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 44.8 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.1 | 52.0 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.8 | 65.5 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.8 | 60.8 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.2 | 38.0 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.5 |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 1 Participants | 8 Participants | 2 Participants | 4 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 5 Participants | 19 Participants | 2 Participants | 5 Participants | 7 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 12 Participants | 31 Participants | 7 Participants | 8 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 8 Participants | 22 Participants | 4 Participants | 5 Participants | 5 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 10 Participants | 36 Participants | 7 Participants | 12 Participants | 7 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 4 / 18 | 0 / 12 | 12 / 17 | 6 / 11 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 16 / 18 | 12 / 12 | 17 / 17 | 10 / 11 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 3 / 18 | 2 / 12 | 10 / 17 | 7 / 11 |
Outcome results
Cohort A1: Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR)
Percentage of participants who had a CR as a best overall response (BOR) using the Lugano response criteria (LRC) 2014 (based on PET-CT and CT responses). Per LRC, CR based on PET-CT response was defined as complete metabolic response (MR) in lymph nodes and extralymphatic sites with a score of 1, 2, or 3 with or without residual mass, on 5-point scale (5PS), where, 1= no uptake above background; 2 = uptake \<=mediastinum; 3 = uptake \> mediastinum but \<= liver; 4 = uptake moderately \> liver; 5 = uptake markedly higher than liver and/or new lesions; no new lesions and no evidence of fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-avid disease in bone marrow. CR based on CT-response was defined as target nodes/nodal masses of lymph nodes, extralymphatic sites regressed to \<=1.5 cm in longest dimension transverse diameter of lesion (LDi); absence of non-measured lesion; organ enlargement regressed to normal; no new lesions; normal bone marrow morphology; if indeterminate, immunohistochemistry negative.
Time frame: From the date of randomization until disease progression or death or study cut-off date, whichever comes first (maximum duration: up to 103 weeks)
Population: Analysis was performed on all treated population. Data for this outcome measure was not planned to be collected and analyzed for Cohort B and C as pre-specified in protocol.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Cohort A1: Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) | 27.8 percentage of participants |
Cohort A2, B and C: Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR)
Percentage of participants who had a CR or partial response (PR) as BOR using LRC, 2014. Per LRC, CR (PET-CT): complete MR in lymph nodes and extralymphatic sites with a score of 1, 2, or 3 with or without residual mass; no new lesions and no evidence of FDG-avid disease. CR (CT-response): target nodes/nodal masses of lymph nodes, extralymphatic sites regressed to \<=1.5cm LDi; absence of non-measured lesion; organ enlargement regressed to normal; no new lesions; normal bone marrow morphology. PR (PET-CT): partial MR in lymph nodes and extralymphatic sites; no new lesions and residual uptake higher than uptake. PR (Per CT): lymph nodes, extralymphatic sites\>=50% decrease in sum of product of perpendicular diameters (SPD), extranodal sites; if lesion is too small to measure on CT,assign5mm\*5mm as default; if no longer visible:0\*0mm; Node\>5mm\*5mm but smaller than normal, use actual measurement; absent/regressed non-measured lesions; no increase; spleen regressed by\>50% or no new lesions.
Time frame: From the date of randomization until disease progression, or death or study cut-off date, whichever comes first (maximum duration: up to 103 weeks)
Population: Analysis was performed on all treated population.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Cohort A2, B and C: Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR) | 33.3 percentage of participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Cohort A2, B and C: Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR) | 5.9 percentage of participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Cohort A2, B and C: Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR) | 9.1 percentage of participants |
Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)
DLTs: Adverse Events (AEs) occurring during 1st treatment cycle, unless due to disease progression or obviously unrelated cause which included: hematological abnormalities: Grade(G) 4 neutropenia(N) for 7 or more consecutive days, G3 to G4 N with fever (temperature greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 38.5 degree Celsius on more than 1 occasion) or microbiologically/radiographically documented infection, G3 to G4 thrombocytopenia with clinically significant bleeding requiring clinical intervention or non-hematological abnormalities: G 4 non-hematologic AE, G\>=2 uveitis, G3 non-hematological AE lasting greater than (\>)3 days, delay in initiation of Cycle 2 \>14 days due to treatment related laboratory abnormalities/AE. Any other AE that the study committee deemed to be dose-limiting, regardless of grade, was also considered as DLT.
Time frame: Cycle 1 (28 days)
Population: Analysis was performed on DLT evaluable population which included all participants who received the planned doses of isatuximab and cemiplimab during Cycle 1 and completed the DLT observation period after the first administration of the study drug. Here, 0 in the overall number of participants analyzed signifies that no participants were evaluable for DLTs in the Cohort A1 arm.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) | 0 Participants |
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes
Electrolyte parameters assessed were hyponatremia, hypokalemia, hyperkalemia, hypocalcemia, hypercalcemia, hypoalbuminemia, hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia. Abnormal criteria was assessed as per the NCI-CTCAE v 5.0, where Grade 1 = Mild; Grade 2 = Moderate; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Potentially Life Threatening. Grade refers to the severity of the AEs.
Time frame: From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum duration: up to 103 weeks)
Population: Analysis was performed on all treated population. Here number analyzed signifies the participants with available data for each specified parameter.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hypocalcemia: Grade 1 | 1 Participants |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hyperkalemia: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hyponatremia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hyperglycemia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hyperkalemia: Grade 2 | 1 Participants |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hyperkalemia: Grade 1 | 1 Participants |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hypokalemia: Grade 1 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hyperglycemia: Grade 3 | 2 Participants |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hypokalemia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hyperkalemia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hypokalemia: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hyperglycemia: Grade 2 | 2 Participants |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hypocalcemia: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hyperglycemia: Grade 1 | 2 Participants |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hypercalcemia: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hypoglycemia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hypoglycemia: Grade 1 | 5 Participants |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hypoglycemia: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hypoalbuminemia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hypoalbuminemia: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hypoglycemia: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hypokalemia: Grade 2 | 3 Participants |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hypercalcemia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hyponatremia: Grade 1 | 8 Participants |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hypoalbuminemia: Grade 2 | 4 Participants |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hypoalbuminemia: Grade 1 | 3 Participants |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hyponatremia: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hypercalcemia: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hypocalcemia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hypocalcemia: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hyponatremia: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hypercalcemia: Grade 1 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hypoalbuminemia: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hyponatremia: Grade 1 | 4 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hyperkalemia: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hypoglycemia: Grade 1 | 1 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hypoglycemia: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hypercalcemia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hyponatremia: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hyponatremia: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hyponatremia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hypokalemia: Grade 1 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hypokalemia: Grade 2 | 3 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hypokalemia: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hypokalemia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hyperkalemia: Grade 1 | 2 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hyperkalemia: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hyperkalemia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hypocalcemia: Grade 1 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hypocalcemia: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hypocalcemia: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hypocalcemia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hypoalbuminemia: Grade 1 | 2 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hypoalbuminemia: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hypoalbuminemia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hypoglycemia: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hypoglycemia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hyperglycemia: Grade 1 | 5 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hyperglycemia: Grade 2 | 2 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hyperglycemia: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hyperglycemia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hypercalcemia: Grade 1 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hypercalcemia: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hypercalcemia: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hypoalbuminemia: Grade 2 | 6 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hypoglycemia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hypocalcemia: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hypocalcemia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hypercalcemia: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hyperglycemia: Grade 1 | 1 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hyperglycemia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hypocalcemia: Grade 1 | 1 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hypercalcemia: Grade 1 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hyperglycemia: Grade 2 | 3 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hypoalbuminemia: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hypercalcemia: Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hypokalemia: Grade 2 | 3 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hypoglycemia: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hypokalemia: Grade 3 | 3 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hypoalbuminemia: Grade 1 | 5 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hypokalemia: Grade 1 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hypoalbuminemia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hypokalemia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hyponatremia: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hypocalcemia: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hyperglycemia: Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hyperkalemia: Grade 1 | 2 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hyperkalemia: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hyponatremia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hypoglycemia: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hypercalcemia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hyperkalemia: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hyperkalemia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hypoglycemia: Grade 1 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hyponatremia: Grade 3 | 2 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hyponatremia: Grade 1 | 6 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hyperkalemia: Grade 1 | 1 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hyponatremia: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hypocalcemia: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hyperglycemia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hypocalcemia: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hyperkalemia: Grade 2 | 1 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hypocalcemia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hyponatremia: Grade 1 | 5 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hypoalbuminemia: Grade 1 | 2 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hypercalcemia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hypoalbuminemia: Grade 2 | 5 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hypoglycemia: Grade 2 | 1 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hypoalbuminemia: Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hypercalcemia: Grade 1 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hypoalbuminemia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hypoglycemia: Grade 1 | 1 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hypoglycemia: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hypercalcemia: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hypoglycemia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hyperglycemia: Grade 1 | 6 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hypercalcemia: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hyperglycemia: Grade 2 | 2 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hypokalemia: Grade 2 | 5 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hyperkalemia: Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hypokalemia: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hypokalemia: Grade 1 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hypokalemia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hyponatremia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hypocalcemia: Grade 1 | 1 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hyponatremia: Grade 3 | 3 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hyperglycemia: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes | Hyperkalemia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters
Hematological parameters assessed were anemia, white blood cell (WBC) decreased, platelet count decreased, lymphocyte count decreased, and neutrophil count decreased. Abnormality criteria was assessed as per the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0 NCI-CTCAE v 5.0), where Grade 1 = Mild; Grade 2 = Moderate; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Potentially Life Threatening. Grade refers to the severity of the AEs.
Time frame: From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum duration: up to 103 weeks)
Population: Analysis was performed on all treated population.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters | Anemia: Grade 3 | 2 Participants |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters | White blood cell decreased: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters | Neutrophil count decreased: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters | White blood cell decreased: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters | Anemia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters | Neutrophil count decreased: Grade 2 | 3 Participants |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters | White blood cell decreased: Grade 1 | 10 Participants |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters | Neutrophil count decreased: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters | Lymphocyte count decreased: Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters | Lymphocyte count decreased: Grade 3 | 5 Participants |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters | Lymphocyte count decreased: Grade 2 | 3 Participants |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters | Lymphocyte count decreased: Grade 1 | 4 Participants |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters | Platelet count decreased: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters | Platelet count decreased: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters | Neutrophil count decreased: Grade 1 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters | Anemia: Grade 1 | 9 Participants |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters | White blood cell decreased: Grade 2 | 1 Participants |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters | Platelet count decreased: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters | Platelet count decreased: Grade 1 | 8 Participants |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters | Anemia: Grade 2 | 5 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters | Neutrophil count decreased: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters | White blood cell decreased: Grade 2 | 1 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters | White blood cell decreased: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters | Anemia: Grade 1 | 6 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters | Anemia: Grade 2 | 1 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters | Anemia: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters | Anemia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters | White blood cell decreased: Grade 1 | 2 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters | White blood cell decreased: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters | Platelet count decreased: Grade 1 | 3 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters | Platelet count decreased: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters | Platelet count decreased: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters | Platelet count decreased: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters | Lymphocyte count decreased: Grade 1 | 2 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters | Lymphocyte count decreased: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters | Lymphocyte count decreased: Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters | Lymphocyte count decreased: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters | Neutrophil count decreased: Grade 1 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters | Neutrophil count decreased: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters | Neutrophil count decreased: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters | Lymphocyte count decreased: Grade 3 | 6 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters | Platelet count decreased: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters | White blood cell decreased: Grade 2 | 2 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters | Lymphocyte count decreased: Grade 4 | 2 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters | Platelet count decreased: Grade 2 | 2 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters | Neutrophil count decreased: Grade 4 | 2 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters | Neutrophil count decreased: Grade 1 | 2 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters | Lymphocyte count decreased: Grade 1 | 2 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters | Anemia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters | Platelet count decreased: Grade 1 | 7 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters | White blood cell decreased: Grade 1 | 9 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters | Platelet count decreased: Grade 4 | 2 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters | Anemia: Grade 3 | 2 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters | White blood cell decreased: Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters | Neutrophil count decreased: Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters | Anemia: Grade 2 | 7 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters | Lymphocyte count decreased: Grade 2 | 4 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters | White blood cell decreased: Grade 4 | 2 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters | Anemia: Grade 1 | 7 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters | Neutrophil count decreased: Grade 2 | 2 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters | Anemia: Grade 1 | 6 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters | Platelet count decreased: Grade 1 | 3 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters | Platelet count decreased: Grade 2 | 1 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters | Lymphocyte count decreased: Grade 3 | 3 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters | Neutrophil count decreased: Grade 2 | 2 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters | Platelet count decreased: Grade 4 | 3 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters | Lymphocyte count decreased: Grade 1 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters | Lymphocyte count decreased: Grade 2 | 6 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters | Platelet count decreased: Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters | Neutrophil count decreased: Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters | Anemia: Grade 3 | 2 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters | Lymphocyte count decreased: Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters | Neutrophil count decreased: Grade 4 | 2 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters | Anemia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters | Neutrophil count decreased: Grade 1 | 2 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters | White blood cell decreased: Grade 1 | 3 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters | White blood cell decreased: Grade 3 | 2 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters | White blood cell decreased: Grade 2 | 4 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters | White blood cell decreased: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters | Anemia: Grade 2 | 3 Participants |
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function Parameters
Abnormal liver function parameters assessed were aspartate aminotransferase (AST) increased, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) increased, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) increased, blood bilirubin (BB) increased. Abnormal criteria was assessed as per NCI-CTCAE v 5.0, where Grade 1 = Mild; Grade 2 = Moderate; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Potentially Life Threatening. Grade refers to the severity of the AEs.
Time frame: From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum duration: up to 103 weeks)
Population: Analysis was performed on all treated population.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function Parameters | BB increased: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function Parameters | BB increased: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function Parameters | BB increased: Grade 1 | 1 Participants |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function Parameters | ALP increased: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function Parameters | ALT increased: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function Parameters | ALT increased: Grade 1 | 1 Participants |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function Parameters | ALP increased: Grade 1 | 3 Participants |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function Parameters | ALP increased: Grade 2 | 2 Participants |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function Parameters | ALT increased: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function Parameters | AST increased: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function Parameters | ALT increased: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function Parameters | AST increased: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function Parameters | AST increased: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function Parameters | AST increased: Grade 1 | 3 Participants |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function Parameters | BB increased: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function Parameters | ALP increased: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function Parameters | ALP increased: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function Parameters | ALT increased: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function Parameters | ALP increased: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function Parameters | ALP increased: Grade 1 | 5 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function Parameters | ALP increased: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function Parameters | BB increased: Grade 1 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function Parameters | BB increased: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function Parameters | BB increased: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function Parameters | BB increased: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function Parameters | AST increased: Grade 1 | 2 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function Parameters | AST increased: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function Parameters | AST increased: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function Parameters | AST increased: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function Parameters | ALT increased: Grade 1 | 7 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function Parameters | ALT increased: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function Parameters | ALT increased: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function Parameters | BB increased: Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function Parameters | ALT increased: Grade 1 | 6 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function Parameters | BB increased: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function Parameters | ALP increased: Grade 2 | 2 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function Parameters | AST increased: Grade 1 | 5 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function Parameters | ALT increased: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function Parameters | AST increased: Grade 2 | 1 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function Parameters | ALP increased: Grade 1 | 4 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function Parameters | AST increased: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function Parameters | BB increased: Grade 2 | 2 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function Parameters | ALT increased: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function Parameters | AST increased: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function Parameters | ALP increased: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function Parameters | BB increased: Grade 1 | 1 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function Parameters | ALP increased: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function Parameters | ALT increased: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function Parameters | AST increased: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function Parameters | BB increased: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function Parameters | ALP increased: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function Parameters | AST increased: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function Parameters | BB increased: Grade 2 | 1 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function Parameters | BB increased: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function Parameters | BB increased: Grade 1 | 2 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function Parameters | ALT increased: Grade 1 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function Parameters | ALT increased: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function Parameters | AST increased: Grade 1 | 3 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function Parameters | ALP increased: Grade 1 | 5 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function Parameters | ALT increased: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function Parameters | ALP increased: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function Parameters | AST increased: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function Parameters | ALP increased: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function Parameters | ALT increased: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Parameters
Abnormal renal parameters assessed were glomerular filtration rate (GFR) by class, creatinine increased and hyperuricemia. GFR by class was assessed in categories:\>=90 milliliter per minute per 1.73 meter square (mL/min/1.73m\^2) (Normal), \>=60 to \<90 mL/min/1.73m\^2 (Mild), \>=30 to \<60 mL/min/1.73m\^2 (Moderate), \>=15 to \<30 mL/min/1.73m\^2 (Severe), and \<15 mL/min/1.73m\^2 (End Stage Renal Disease). Abnormal criteria was assessed as per NCI-CTCAE v 5.0, where Grade 1 = Mild; Grade 2 = Moderate; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Potentially Life Threatening. Grade refers to the severity of the AEs.
Time frame: From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum duration: up to 103 weeks)
Population: Analysis was performed on all treated population.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Parameters | GFR: >=30 to <60 mL/min/1.73m^2 | 3 Participants |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Parameters | GFR: >=90 mL/min/1.73m^2 | 7 Participants |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Parameters | Hyperuricemia: Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Parameters | Creatinine increased: Grade 1 | 2 Participants |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Parameters | Creatinine increased: Garde 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Parameters | GFR: <15 mL/min/1.73m^2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Parameters | GFR: >=15 to <30 mL/min/1.73m^2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Parameters | Hyperuricemia: Grade 1 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Parameters | Creatinine increased: Grade 2 | 3 Participants |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Parameters | GFR: >=60 to <90 mL/min/1.73m^2 | 8 Participants |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Parameters | Hyperuricemia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Parameters | Hyperuricemia: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Parameters | Creatinine increased: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Parameters | Hyperuricemia: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Parameters | Creatinine increased: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Parameters | Hyperuricemia: Grade 1 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Parameters | Hyperuricemia: Grade 3 | 3 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Parameters | GFR: >=60 to <90 mL/min/1.73m^2 | 8 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Parameters | GFR: >=30 to <60 mL/min/1.73m^2 | 2 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Parameters | Creatinine increased: Garde 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Parameters | Hyperuricemia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Parameters | GFR: >=90 mL/min/1.73m^2 | 2 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Parameters | GFR: >=15 to <30 mL/min/1.73m^2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Parameters | GFR: <15 mL/min/1.73m^2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Parameters | Creatinine increased: Grade 1 | 3 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Parameters | Creatinine increased: Grade 2 | 1 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Parameters | Hyperuricemia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Parameters | Creatinine increased: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Parameters | Creatinine increased: Garde 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Parameters | Creatinine increased: Grade 2 | 3 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Parameters | Hyperuricemia: Grade 3 | 5 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Parameters | GFR: >=15 to <30 mL/min/1.73m^2 | 1 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Parameters | GFR: >=90 mL/min/1.73m^2 | 4 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Parameters | Hyperuricemia: Grade 1 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Parameters | GFR: <15 mL/min/1.73m^2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Parameters | GFR: >=60 to <90 mL/min/1.73m^2 | 8 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Parameters | Hyperuricemia: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Parameters | Creatinine increased: Grade 1 | 4 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Parameters | GFR: >=30 to <60 mL/min/1.73m^2 | 4 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Parameters | Creatinine increased: Garde 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Parameters | GFR: >=15 to <30 mL/min/1.73m^2 | 1 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Parameters | GFR: <15 mL/min/1.73m^2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Parameters | Hyperuricemia: Grade 1 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Parameters | Hyperuricemia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Parameters | Creatinine increased: Grade 1 | 1 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Parameters | GFR: >=60 to <90 mL/min/1.73m^2 | 7 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Parameters | GFR: >=30 to <60 mL/min/1.73m^2 | 2 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Parameters | Creatinine increased: Grade 2 | 4 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Parameters | Hyperuricemia: Grade 3 | 2 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Parameters | Hyperuricemia: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Parameters | GFR: >=90 mL/min/1.73m^2 | 1 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Parameters | Creatinine increased: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), and Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug and did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. Serious adverse events (SAEs) were any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, was a medically important event. TEAEs were defined as AEs that developed, worsened or became serious during the TEAE period (defined as the time from the first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose of study treatment).
Time frame: From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum duration: up to 103 weeks)
Population: Analysis was performed on all treated population which included all participants who signed the informed consent and received at least 1 dose of the study treatment, either isatuximab or cemiplimab.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), and Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) | TEAEs | 16 Participants |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), and Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) | TESAEs | 3 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), and Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) | TESAEs | 2 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), and Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) | TEAEs | 12 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), and Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) | TESAEs | 10 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), and Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) | TEAEs | 17 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), and Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) | TEAEs | 11 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), and Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) | TESAEs | 7 Participants |
Cohort A1 and A2: Percentage of Participants With Complete Response
Percentage of participants who had a CR as a BOR using the LRC, 2014 (based on PET-CT and CT responses). Per LRC, CR based on PET-CT was defined as complete MR in lymph nodes and extralymphatic sites with a score of 1, 2, or 3 with or without residual mass, on 5PS, where, 1= no uptake above background; 2 = uptake \<=mediastinum; 3 = uptake \> mediastinum but \<= liver; 4 = uptake moderately \> liver; 5 = uptake markedly higher than liver and/or new lesions; no new lesions and no evidence of FDG-avid disease in bone marrow. CR based on CT-response was defined as target nodes/nodal masses of lymph nodes, extralymphatic sites regressed to \<=1.5 cm in longest dimension transverse diameter of lesion (LDi); absence of non-measured lesion; organ enlargement regressed to normal; no new lesions; normal bone marrow morphology; if indeterminate, immunohistochemistry negative.
Time frame: From the date of randomization until disease progression, or death or study cut-off date, whichever comes first (maximum duration: up to 103 weeks)
Population: Analysis was performed on all treated population. Data for this outcome measure was not planned to be collected and analyzed for Cohort B and C as pre-specified.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Cohort A1 and A2: Percentage of Participants With Complete Response | 27.8 percentage of participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Cohort A1 and A2: Percentage of Participants With Complete Response | 16.7 percentage of participants |
Cohort A1 and A2: Percentage of Participants With Objective Response
Percentage of participants who had a CR or PR as BOR using LRC, 2014 (based on PET-CT and CT responses). CR (per PET-CT): complete MR in lymph nodes and extra lymphatic sites with a score of 1, 2, or 3 with or without residual mass; no new lesions and no evidence of FDG-avid disease. CR (CT-response): target nodes/nodal masses of lymph nodes, extralymphatic sites regressed to \<=1.5cm LDi; absence of non-measured lesion; organ enlargement regressed to normal; no new lesions; normal bone marrow morphology. PR (per PET-CT): partial MR in lymph nodes and extral ymphatic sites; no new lesions and residual uptake higher than uptake. PR (per CT): lymph nodes, extralymphatic sites \>=50% decrease in SPD, extranodal sites; if lesion is too small to measure on CT, assign 5mm\*5mm as default; if no longer visible:0\*0mm; Node\>5mm\*5mm but smaller than normal, used actual measurement; absent/regressed non-measured lesions; no increase; spleen regressed by\>50% or no new lesions.
Time frame: From the date of randomization until disease progression, or death or study cut-off date, whichever comes first (maximum duration: up to 103 weeks)
Population: Analysis was performed on all treated population. Data for cohort B and C are reported separately.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Cohort A1 and A2: Percentage of Participants With Objective Response | 55.6 percentage of participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Cohort A1 and A2: Percentage of Participants With Objective Response | 33.3 percentage of participants |
Duration of Response (DOR)
Time (months) between date of first response to first date that recurrent or radiologically disease progression (PD) was documented, or date of death,whichever was 1st. In absence of PD or death before cut-off date or date of initiation of further anticancer treatment, DOR was censored at date of last valid response not showing PD performed prior to initiation of further anticancer treatment or cut-off date, whichever was earlier. PD(PET-CT): metabolic disease with score 4/5 with inc. in intensity of uptake for target nodes/nodal mass & new FDG-avid foci consistent with lymphoma. PD(CT):any 1 of following: cross product of longest transverse diameter of lesion(LDi) & perpendicular diameter (PPD) progression of nodes/nodal mass, abnormal node/lesion with LDi \>1.5 cm, inc \>=50% from PPD nadir & inc in LDi/ shortest axis perpendicular to LDi(SDi) from nadir 0.5 cm, regrowth of resolved lesions, new splenomegaly,progression of non-measured lesion, new/recurrent involvement of bone marrow.
Time frame: From the date of first response until disease progression or death, or study cut-off date whichever occurred first (maximum duration: up to 103 weeks)
Population: Analysis was performed on participants who had a response. DOR was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method. Here, overall number of participants analyzed signifies the participants with available data for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Duration of Response (DOR) | 5.8 months | Standard Deviation 5.2 |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Duration of Response (DOR) | 7.3 months | Standard Deviation 4.8 |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Duration of Response (DOR) | 17.1 months | — |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Duration of Response (DOR) | 14.0 months | — |
Number of Participants With Treatment-Induced and Treatment Boosted Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) Against Cemiplimab
ADA responses were categorized as treatment boosted ADA and treatment-induced ADA. Treatment boosted ADA was defined as pre-existing ADAs with a significant increase in the ADA titer during the study compared to the Baseline titer. Treatment-induced ADA was defined as ADA that developed at any time during the ADA on-study observation period in participants without pre-existing ADA.
Time frame: From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum duration: up to 103 weeks)
Population: Analysis was performed on ADA evaluable population. Here, overall number of participants analyzed signifies the participants with available data for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Treatment-Induced and Treatment Boosted Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) Against Cemiplimab | Treatment-Induced ADA | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Treatment-Induced and Treatment Boosted Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) Against Cemiplimab | Treatment-Boosted ADA | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Treatment-Induced and Treatment Boosted Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) Against Cemiplimab | Treatment-Boosted ADA | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Treatment-Induced and Treatment Boosted Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) Against Cemiplimab | Treatment-Induced ADA | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Treatment-Induced and Treatment Boosted Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) Against Cemiplimab | Treatment-Induced ADA | 1 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Treatment-Induced and Treatment Boosted Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) Against Cemiplimab | Treatment-Boosted ADA | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Treatment-Induced and Treatment Boosted Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) Against Cemiplimab | Treatment-Induced ADA | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Treatment-Induced and Treatment Boosted Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) Against Cemiplimab | Treatment-Boosted ADA | 0 Participants |
Number of Participants With Treatment-Induced and Treatment Boosted Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) Against Isatuximab
ADA responses were categorized as treatment boosted ADA and treatment-induced ADA. Treatment boosted ADA was defined as pre-existing ADAs with a significant increase in the ADA titer during the study compared to the Baseline titer. Treatment-induced ADA was defined as ADA that developed at any time during the ADA on-study observation period in participants without pre-existing ADA.
Time frame: From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum duration: up to 103 weeks)
Population: Analysis was performed on Anti-drug antibody (ADA) evaluable population that included all participants who signed informed consent and received at least 1 dose of either isatuximab or cemiplimab, with at least 1 non-missing ADA result after the drug administration. Here, overall number of participants analyzed signifies the participants with available data for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Treatment-Induced and Treatment Boosted Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) Against Isatuximab | Treatment-Induced ADA | 1 Participants |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Treatment-Induced and Treatment Boosted Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) Against Isatuximab | Treatment-Boosted ADA | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Treatment-Induced and Treatment Boosted Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) Against Isatuximab | Treatment-Boosted ADA | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Treatment-Induced and Treatment Boosted Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) Against Isatuximab | Treatment-Induced ADA | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Treatment-Induced and Treatment Boosted Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) Against Isatuximab | Treatment-Induced ADA | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Treatment-Induced and Treatment Boosted Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) Against Isatuximab | Treatment-Boosted ADA | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Treatment-Induced and Treatment Boosted Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) Against Isatuximab | Treatment-Induced ADA | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Number of Participants With Treatment-Induced and Treatment Boosted Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) Against Isatuximab | Treatment-Boosted ADA | 0 Participants |
Percentage of Participants With Disease Control (DC)
DC defined as percentage of participants who achieved CR, PR or stable disease (SD) as per LRC, 2014. CR (PET-CT): complete MR in lymph nodes and extralymphatic sites; no new lesions and no evidence of FDG-avid disease. CR (CT): target nodes/nodal masses of lymph nodes, extralymphatic sites regressed to \<=1.5cm LDi; absence of non-measured lesion; organ enlargement regressed to normal; no new lesions; normal bone marrow. PR (PET-CT): partial MR in lymph nodes and sites; no new lesions. PR (CT): lymph nodes, sites\>=50% decrease in SPD, sites; if lesion is too small to measure on CT, assign 5mm\*5mm; No longer visible:0\*0mm; Node\>5mm\*5mm, use actual measurement; absent/regressed non-measured lesions; no increase; spleen regressed by\>50% or no new lesions. SD (PET-CT):no metabolic response, target nodes score of 4/5 with no significant change & no new lesions; SD (CT): \<50% dec in SPD, no increase in progression for. 5PS:1: non-measured lesions, organ enlargement & no new lesions.
Time frame: From the date of first response until disease progression or death, or study cut-off date whichever occurred first (maximum duration: up to 103 weeks)
Population: Analysis was performed on all treated population.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Percentage of Participants With Disease Control (DC) | 61.1 percentage of participants |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Percentage of Participants With Disease Control (DC) | 58.3 percentage of participants |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Percentage of Participants With Disease Control (DC) | 5.9 percentage of participants |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Percentage of Participants With Disease Control (DC) | 18.2 percentage of participants |
Percent Change From Baseline in Tumor Burden
Tumor burden change was defined as the best percent-change from baseline in a sum of product of lesion diameters (longest for non-nodal lesion, short axis for nodal lesions) for all target lesions.
Time frame: Up to 103 weeks
Population: Analysis was performed on all treated population. Here, overall number of participants analyzed signifies the participants with available data for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Percent Change From Baseline in Tumor Burden | -48.8 percent change | Standard Deviation 59 |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Percent Change From Baseline in Tumor Burden | -55.3 percent change | Standard Deviation 32.6 |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Percent Change From Baseline in Tumor Burden | 396.0 percent change | Standard Deviation 880.7 |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Percent Change From Baseline in Tumor Burden | -9.7 percent change | Standard Deviation 87.8 |
Pharmacokinetics (PK) Parameter: Plasma Concentration of Isatuximab at End of Infusion (CEOI)
Ceoi is the plasma concentration observed at the end of intravenous infusion of isatuximab.
Time frame: End of infusion (EOI up to 3 hours) on Day 2 of Cycle 1
Population: Analysis was performed on PK population (for isatuximab) which included participants who signed informed consent and received at least 1 dose of the drug with at least one reportable concentration after the study drug (isatuximab) administration. Here, overall number of participants analyzed signifies the participants with available data for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Pharmacokinetics (PK) Parameter: Plasma Concentration of Isatuximab at End of Infusion (CEOI) | 221 micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL) | Standard Deviation 47.2 |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Pharmacokinetics (PK) Parameter: Plasma Concentration of Isatuximab at End of Infusion (CEOI) | 263 micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL) | Standard Deviation 39.4 |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Pharmacokinetics (PK) Parameter: Plasma Concentration of Isatuximab at End of Infusion (CEOI) | 235 micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL) | Standard Deviation 39.3 |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Pharmacokinetics (PK) Parameter: Plasma Concentration of Isatuximab at End of Infusion (CEOI) | 181 micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL) | Standard Deviation 35.7 |
PK Parameter: Area Under the Concentration Versus Time Curve Over the Dosing Interval (AUC0-144 Hours) After the First Infusion of Isatuximab
AUC0-144 hours was defined as the area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from time 0 to 144 hours post dose calculated for isatuximab.
Time frame: At SOI (0 hour), before actual EOI (up to 3 hours), EOI+ 4 hours, 72 hours and 144 hours post-dose on Day 2 of Cycle 1
Population: Analysis was performed on PK population (for isatuximab). Here, overall number of participants analyzed signifies the participants with available data for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Area Under the Concentration Versus Time Curve Over the Dosing Interval (AUC0-144 Hours) After the First Infusion of Isatuximab | 20400 hours*mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 5170 |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Area Under the Concentration Versus Time Curve Over the Dosing Interval (AUC0-144 Hours) After the First Infusion of Isatuximab | 24300 hours*mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 3470 |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Area Under the Concentration Versus Time Curve Over the Dosing Interval (AUC0-144 Hours) After the First Infusion of Isatuximab | 21800 hours*mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 4550 |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Area Under the Concentration Versus Time Curve Over the Dosing Interval (AUC0-144 Hours) After the First Infusion of Isatuximab | 14000 hours*mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 4240 |
PK Parameter: Area Under the Concentration Versus Time Curve Over the Dosing Interval (AUC0-168 Hours) After the First Infusion of Isatuximab
AUC0-168 hours was defined as the area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from time 0 to 168 hours post dose calculated for isatuximab. Samples for this outcome measure were collected up to 144 hours post-dose. No sample was collected at 168 hours post-dose; and thus, the samples collected up to 144 hours post-dose were extrapolated to derive data for 168 hours post-dose.
Time frame: At SOI (0 hour), before actual EOI (up to 3 hours), EOI+ 4 hours, 72 hours and 144 hours post-dose on Day 2 of Cycle 1
Population: Analysis was performed on PK population (for isatuximab). Here, overall number of participants analyzed signifies the participants with available data for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Area Under the Concentration Versus Time Curve Over the Dosing Interval (AUC0-168 Hours) After the First Infusion of Isatuximab | 22500 hour*mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 5770 |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Area Under the Concentration Versus Time Curve Over the Dosing Interval (AUC0-168 Hours) After the First Infusion of Isatuximab | 26600 hour*mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 4030 |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Area Under the Concentration Versus Time Curve Over the Dosing Interval (AUC0-168 Hours) After the First Infusion of Isatuximab | 23700 hour*mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 4960 |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Area Under the Concentration Versus Time Curve Over the Dosing Interval (AUC0-168 Hours) After the First Infusion of Isatuximab | 15000 hour*mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 4680 |
PK Parameter: Area Under the Plasma Concentration (AUClast) Versus Time Curve After the First Infusion of Isatuximab
AUClast was defined as area under the plasma concentration versus time curve calculated from time 0 to last quantifiable concentration, calculated for isatuximab.
Time frame: At SOI (0 hour), before actual EOI (up to 3 hours), EOI+ 4 hours, 72 hours and 144 hours post-dose on Day 2 of Cycle 1
Population: Analysis was performed on PK population (for isatuximab). Here, overall number of participants analyzed signifies the participants with available data for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Area Under the Plasma Concentration (AUClast) Versus Time Curve After the First Infusion of Isatuximab | 20400 hours*mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 5190 |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Area Under the Plasma Concentration (AUClast) Versus Time Curve After the First Infusion of Isatuximab | 22700 hours*mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 6020 |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Area Under the Plasma Concentration (AUClast) Versus Time Curve After the First Infusion of Isatuximab | 21700 hours*mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 4610 |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Area Under the Plasma Concentration (AUClast) Versus Time Curve After the First Infusion of Isatuximab | 14400 hours*mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 4710 |
PK Parameter: Area Under the Serum Concentration (AUClast) Versus Time Curve After the First Infusion of Cemiplimab
AUClast was defined as area under the serum concentration versus time curve calculated from time 0 to last quantifiable concentration calculated for cemiplimab.
Time frame: At SOI (0 hour), before actual EOI (up to 30 min), EOI+4 hours, 96 hours, 168 hours, and 336 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1
Population: Analysis was performed on PK population (for Cemiplimab). Here, overall number of participants analyzed signifies the participants with available data for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Area Under the Serum Concentration (AUClast) Versus Time Curve After the First Infusion of Cemiplimab | 524 day*mg/mL | Standard Deviation 188 |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Area Under the Serum Concentration (AUClast) Versus Time Curve After the First Infusion of Cemiplimab | 648 day*mg/mL | Standard Deviation 112 |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Area Under the Serum Concentration (AUClast) Versus Time Curve After the First Infusion of Cemiplimab | 506 day*mg/mL | Standard Deviation 159 |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Area Under the Serum Concentration (AUClast) Versus Time Curve After the First Infusion of Cemiplimab | 466 day*mg/mL | Standard Deviation 147 |
PK Parameter: Area Under the Serum Concentration Versus Time Curve Over the Dosing Interval (AUC0-336 Hours) After the First Infusion of Cemiplimab
AUC0-336 hours was defined as the area under the serum concentration versus time curve from time 0 to 336 hours post dose for cemiplimab.
Time frame: At SOI (0 hour), before actual EOI (up to 30 min), EOI+4 hours, 96 hours, 168 hours, and 336 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1
Population: Analysis was performed on PK population (for Cemiplimab). Here, overall number of participants analyzed signifies the participants with available data for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Area Under the Serum Concentration Versus Time Curve Over the Dosing Interval (AUC0-336 Hours) After the First Infusion of Cemiplimab | 519 day*mg/mL | Standard Deviation 177 |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Area Under the Serum Concentration Versus Time Curve Over the Dosing Interval (AUC0-336 Hours) After the First Infusion of Cemiplimab | 645 day*mg/mL | Standard Deviation 113 |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Area Under the Serum Concentration Versus Time Curve Over the Dosing Interval (AUC0-336 Hours) After the First Infusion of Cemiplimab | 546 day*mg/mL | Standard Deviation 136 |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Area Under the Serum Concentration Versus Time Curve Over the Dosing Interval (AUC0-336 Hours) After the First Infusion of Cemiplimab | 466 day*mg/mL | Standard Deviation 130 |
PK Parameter: Last Concentration Observed Above the Lower Limit of Quantification (Clast) After the First Infusion of Cemiplimab
Clast was defined as the last concentration of cemiplimab observed above the lower limit of quantification.
Time frame: At SOI (0 hour), before actual EOI (up to 30 min), EOI+4 hours, 96 hours, 168 hours, and 336 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1
Population: Analysis was performed on PK population (for Cemiplimab). Here, overall number of participants analyzed signifies the participants with available data for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Last Concentration Observed Above the Lower Limit of Quantification (Clast) After the First Infusion of Cemiplimab | 23.4 mg/L | Standard Deviation 11.2 |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Last Concentration Observed Above the Lower Limit of Quantification (Clast) After the First Infusion of Cemiplimab | 30.3 mg/L | Standard Deviation 7.16 |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Last Concentration Observed Above the Lower Limit of Quantification (Clast) After the First Infusion of Cemiplimab | 27.0 mg/L | Standard Deviation 9.79 |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Last Concentration Observed Above the Lower Limit of Quantification (Clast) After the First Infusion of Cemiplimab | 14.3 mg/L | Standard Deviation 6.64 |
PK Parameter: Last Concentration Observed Above the Lower Limit of Quantification (Clast) After the First Infusion of Isatuximab
Clast was defined as the last concentration of isatuximab observed above the lower limit of quantification.
Time frame: At SOI (0 hour), before actual EOI (up to 3 hours), EOI+ 4 hours, 72 hours and 144 hours post-dose on Day 2 of Cycle 1
Population: Analysis was performed on PK population (for isatuximab). Here, overall number of participants analyzed signifies the participants with available data for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Last Concentration Observed Above the Lower Limit of Quantification (Clast) After the First Infusion of Isatuximab | 93.3 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 28.1 |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Last Concentration Observed Above the Lower Limit of Quantification (Clast) After the First Infusion of Isatuximab | 110 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 24.5 |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Last Concentration Observed Above the Lower Limit of Quantification (Clast) After the First Infusion of Isatuximab | 89.8 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 24.7 |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Last Concentration Observed Above the Lower Limit of Quantification (Clast) After the First Infusion of Isatuximab | 40.4 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 17.7 |
PK Parameter: Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) After the First Infusion of Cemiplimab
Cmax was defined as the maximum concentration observed after the first administration.
Time frame: At SOI (0 hour), before actual EOI (up to 30 min), EOI+4 hours, 96 hours, 168 hours, and 336 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1
Population: Analysis was performed on PK population (for Cemiplimab). Here, overall number of participants analyzed signifies the participants with available data for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) After the First Infusion of Cemiplimab | 70.9 mg/L | Standard Deviation 21.1 |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) After the First Infusion of Cemiplimab | 90.8 mg/L | Standard Deviation 19.4 |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) After the First Infusion of Cemiplimab | 79.0 mg/L | Standard Deviation 16.7 |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) After the First Infusion of Cemiplimab | 77.1 mg/L | Standard Deviation 20.7 |
PK Parameter: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) After the First Infusion of Isatuximab
Cmax was defined as the maximum plasma concentration observed after the first administration of drug.
Time frame: At Start of infusion (SOI; 0 hour), before actual EOI (up to 3 hours), EOI+ 4 hours, 72 hours and 144 hours post-dose on Day 2 of Cycle 1
Population: Analysis was performed on PK population (for isatuximab). Here, overall number of participants analyzed signifies the participants with available data for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) After the First Infusion of Isatuximab | 226 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 48.1 |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) After the First Infusion of Isatuximab | 265 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 38.8 |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) After the First Infusion of Isatuximab | 253 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 29.1 |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) After the First Infusion of Isatuximab | 181 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 35.7 |
PK Parameter: Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Isatuximab
Ctrough was the plasma concentration of isatuximab observed just before treatment administration during repeated dosing.
Time frame: Pre-infusion on Cycle1:Day 2, 8, 15, & 22, Cycle 2:Day 1 &15, Cycle 3:Day 1 &15, Cycle 4:Day 1 &15, Cycle 5 Day1,Cycle 6 Day1,Cycle 7 Day 1, Cycle 8 Day1, Cycle 9 Day1, Cycle 10 Day1, Cycle 11 Day1, Cycle14 Day1, Cycle 17 Day1, Cycle 20 Day1,Cycle 23 Day1
Population: Analysis was performed on PK population (for isatuximab). Here, '0' in the number analyzed field signifies that none of the participants were available for the specified timepoints.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Isatuximab | Cycle 5 Day 1 | 385 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 79.9 |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Isatuximab | Cycle 4 Day 15 | 363 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 122 |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Isatuximab | Cycle 2 Day 15 | 314 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 141 |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Isatuximab | Cycle 1 Day 8 | 93.1 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 28.1 |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Isatuximab | Cycle 4 Day 1 | 334 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 91.8 |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Isatuximab | Cycle 3 Day 15 | 325 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 85.1 |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Isatuximab | Cycle 3 Day 1 | 304 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 79.8 |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Isatuximab | Cycle 1 Day 2 | 0 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Isatuximab | Cycle 11 Day 1 | 318 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 147 |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Isatuximab | Cycle 10 Day 1 | 317 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 120 |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Isatuximab | Cycle 1 Day 15 | 159 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 47.7 |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Isatuximab | Cycle 9 Day 1 | 328 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 124 |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Isatuximab | Cycle 8 Day 1 | 352 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 94.9 |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Isatuximab | Cycle 1 Day 22 | 254 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 59.8 |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Isatuximab | Cycle 20 Day 1 | 117 mcg/mL | — |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Isatuximab | Cycle 7 Day 1 | 408 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 141 |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Isatuximab | Cycle 6 Day 1 | 379 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 105 |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Isatuximab | Cycle 2 Day 1 | 310 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 78.2 |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Isatuximab | Cycle 14 Day 1 | 357 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 119 |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Isatuximab | Cycle 23 Day 1 | 309 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 9.9 |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Isatuximab | Cycle 1 Day 15 | 191 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 41.4 |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Isatuximab | Cycle 1 Day 2 | 0 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Isatuximab | Cycle 1 Day 8 | 98.4 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 39.5 |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Isatuximab | Cycle 1 Day 22 | 262 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 45.2 |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Isatuximab | Cycle 2 Day 1 | 352 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 48.7 |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Isatuximab | Cycle 2 Day 15 | 390 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 256 |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Isatuximab | Cycle 3 Day 1 | 320 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 49.7 |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Isatuximab | Cycle 3 Day 15 | 336 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 42.3 |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Isatuximab | Cycle 4 Day 1 | 344 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 58.2 |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Isatuximab | Cycle 4 Day 15 | 376 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 65.2 |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Isatuximab | Cycle 5 Day 1 | 383 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 71 |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Isatuximab | Cycle 6 Day 1 | 361 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 97.8 |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Isatuximab | Cycle 7 Day 1 | 374 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 107 |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Isatuximab | Cycle 8 Day 1 | 356 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 57.7 |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Isatuximab | Cycle 9 Day 1 | 351 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 54.8 |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Isatuximab | Cycle 10 Day 1 | 347 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 51.8 |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Isatuximab | Cycle 11 Day 1 | 357 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 52 |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Isatuximab | Cycle 14 Day 1 | 333 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 28 |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Isatuximab | Cycle 17 Day 1 | 299 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 22.3 |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Isatuximab | Cycle 20 Day 1 | 328 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 14.4 |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Isatuximab | Cycle 4 Day 15 | 336 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 117 |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Isatuximab | Cycle 2 Day 1 | 316 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 110 |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Isatuximab | Cycle 1 Day 2 | 0 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Isatuximab | Cycle 5 Day 1 | 362 mcg/mL | — |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Isatuximab | Cycle 10 Day 1 | 383 mcg/mL | — |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Isatuximab | Cycle 6 Day 1 | 415 mcg/mL | — |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Isatuximab | Cycle 1 Day 22 | 259 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 57.9 |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Isatuximab | Cycle 1 Day 8 | 93.2 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 27.2 |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Isatuximab | Cycle 8 Day 1 | 360 mcg/mL | — |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Isatuximab | Cycle 1 Day 15 | 181 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 43.7 |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Isatuximab | Cycle 3 Day 1 | 327 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 92.4 |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Isatuximab | Cycle 3 Day 15 | 420 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 67.8 |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Isatuximab | Cycle 2 Day 15 | 291 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 108 |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Isatuximab | Cycle 4 Day 1 | 350 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 80.6 |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Isatuximab | Cycle 4 Day 15 | 158 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 16.9 |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Isatuximab | Cycle 4 Day 1 | 149 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 33.2 |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Isatuximab | Cycle 3 Day 1 | 122 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 58 |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Isatuximab | Cycle 2 Day 15 | 129 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 59.1 |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Isatuximab | Cycle 5 Day 1 | 157 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 11.5 |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Isatuximab | Cycle 1 Day 22 | 124 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 22.9 |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Isatuximab | Cycle 1 Day 2 | 0 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Isatuximab | Cycle 2 Day 1 | 132 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 64 |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Isatuximab | Cycle 6 Day 1 | 137 mcg/mL | — |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Isatuximab | Cycle 3 Day 15 | 176 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 8.19 |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Isatuximab | Cycle 1 Day 8 | 37.7 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 18 |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Isatuximab | Cycle 1 Day 15 | 115 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 89.4 |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Isatuximab | Cycle 7 Day 1 | 186 mcg/mL | — |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Isatuximab | Cycle 9 Day 1 | 83.5 mcg/mL | — |
PK Parameter: Serum Concentration of Cemiplimab at End of Infusion (CEOI)
Ceoi is the plasma concentration observed at the end of intravenous infusion of cemiplimab.
Time frame: EOI (up to 30 minutes [min]) on Day 1 of Cycle 1
Population: Analysis was performed on PK population (for Cemiplimab) which included all participants who signed informed consent and received at least 1 dose of the drug with at least one reportable concentration after the study drug (cemiplimab) administration. Here 'overall number of participants analyzed signifies the participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Serum Concentration of Cemiplimab at End of Infusion (CEOI) | 63.7 milligrams per milliliter (mg/mL) | Standard Deviation 24.2 |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Serum Concentration of Cemiplimab at End of Infusion (CEOI) | 78.8 milligrams per milliliter (mg/mL) | Standard Deviation 24.9 |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Serum Concentration of Cemiplimab at End of Infusion (CEOI) | 68.1 milligrams per milliliter (mg/mL) | Standard Deviation 26.3 |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Serum Concentration of Cemiplimab at End of Infusion (CEOI) | 66.2 milligrams per milliliter (mg/mL) | Standard Deviation 18.4 |
PK Parameter: Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Cemiplimab
Ctrough was the serum concentration of cemiplimab observed just before treatment administration during repeated dosing.
Time frame: Pre-infusion on Cycle 1:Day 1 & Day15,Cycle 2:Day 1 & Day 15,Cycle 3:Day 1 & Day 15,Cycle 4:Day 1 & Day15,Cycle 5 Day 1,Cycle 6 Day 1,Cycle7 Day1,Cycle 8 Day 1,Cycle 9 Day1,Cycle 10 Day1,Cycle11 Day1,Cycle14 Day 1,Cycle 17 Day1,Cycle20 Day 1,Cycle 23 Day1
Population: Analysis was performed on PK population (for Cemiplimab). Here, '0' in the number analyzed field signifies that none of the participants were available for the specified timepoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Cemiplimab | Cycle 17 Day 1 | 60.6 mg/mL | — |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Cemiplimab | Cycle 3 Day 15 | 95.1 mg/mL | Standard Deviation 35 |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Cemiplimab | Cycle 10 Day 1 | 112 mg/mL | Standard Deviation 65.8 |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Cemiplimab | Cycle 20 Day 1 | 62.6 mg/mL | — |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Cemiplimab | Cycle 2 Day 15 | 64.4 mg/mL | Standard Deviation 22.5 |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Cemiplimab | Cycle 4 Day 1 | 100 mg/mL | Standard Deviation 38.9 |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Cemiplimab | Cycle 8 Day 1 | 110 mg/mL | Standard Deviation 40.5 |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Cemiplimab | Cycle 1 Day 15 | 25.3 mg/mL | Standard Deviation 10.2 |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Cemiplimab | Cycle 14 Day 1 | 138 mg/mL | Standard Deviation 72.7 |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Cemiplimab | Cycle 4 Day 15 | 113 mg/mL | Standard Deviation 44.8 |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Cemiplimab | Cycle 7 Day 1 | 112 mg/mL | Standard Deviation 32.6 |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Cemiplimab | Cycle 2 Day 1 | 44.1 mg/mL | Standard Deviation 11.2 |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Cemiplimab | Cycle 3 Day 1 | 77.7 mg/mL | Standard Deviation 30.2 |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Cemiplimab | Cycle 5 Day 1 | 106 mg/mL | Standard Deviation 28.9 |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Cemiplimab | Cycle 1 Day 1 | 0.00800 mg/mL | Standard Deviation 0.033 |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Cemiplimab | Cycle 9 Day 1 | 107 mg/mL | Standard Deviation 36.2 |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Cemiplimab | Cycle 11 Day 1 | 120 mg/mL | Standard Deviation 60.2 |
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Cemiplimab | Cycle 6 Day 1 | 114 mg/mL | Standard Deviation 37.3 |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Cemiplimab | Cycle 2 Day 1 | 51.1 mg/mL | Standard Deviation 15.8 |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Cemiplimab | Cycle 1 Day 15 | 30.3 mg/mL | Standard Deviation 7.16 |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Cemiplimab | Cycle 10 Day 1 | 139 mg/mL | Standard Deviation 23.2 |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Cemiplimab | Cycle 7 Day 1 | 115 mg/mL | Standard Deviation 43 |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Cemiplimab | Cycle 8 Day 1 | 129 mg/mL | Standard Deviation 19.5 |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Cemiplimab | Cycle 23 Day 1 | 137 mg/mL | — |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Cemiplimab | Cycle 9 Day 1 | 122 mg/mL | Standard Deviation 27.9 |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Cemiplimab | Cycle 2 Day 15 | 61.0 mg/mL | Standard Deviation 10.8 |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Cemiplimab | Cycle 17 Day 1 | 131 mg/mL | Standard Deviation 18.8 |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Cemiplimab | Cycle 3 Day 1 | 73.7 mg/mL | Standard Deviation 11 |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Cemiplimab | Cycle 6 Day 1 | 94.8 mg/mL | Standard Deviation 29.8 |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Cemiplimab | Cycle 3 Day 15 | 86.6 mg/mL | Standard Deviation 19.5 |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Cemiplimab | Cycle 1 Day 1 | 0.980 mg/mL | Standard Deviation 2.19 |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Cemiplimab | Cycle 14 Day 1 | 127 mg/mL | Standard Deviation 17.1 |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Cemiplimab | Cycle 4 Day 1 | 84.4 mg/mL | Standard Deviation 20.3 |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Cemiplimab | Cycle 20 Day 1 | 137 mg/mL | Standard Deviation 26.7 |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Cemiplimab | Cycle 4 Day 15 | 88.2 mg/mL | Standard Deviation 30.5 |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Cemiplimab | Cycle 11 Day 1 | 133 mg/mL | Standard Deviation 14.5 |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Cemiplimab | Cycle 5 Day 1 | 92.7 mg/mL | Standard Deviation 21.8 |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Cemiplimab | Cycle 6 Day 1 | 113 mg/mL | — |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Cemiplimab | Cycle 1 Day 1 | 0 mg/mL | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Cemiplimab | Cycle 1 Day 15 | 24.2 mg/mL | Standard Deviation 9.91 |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Cemiplimab | Cycle 2 Day 1 | 49.6 mg/mL | Standard Deviation 16.3 |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Cemiplimab | Cycle 2 Day 15 | 48.9 mg/mL | Standard Deviation 9.16 |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Cemiplimab | Cycle 3 Day 1 | 62.8 mg/mL | Standard Deviation 13.6 |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Cemiplimab | Cycle 3 Day 15 | 72.3 mg/mL | Standard Deviation 3.8 |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Cemiplimab | Cycle 4 Day 1 | 76.8 mg/mL | Standard Deviation 4.31 |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Cemiplimab | Cycle 4 Day 15 | 91.6 mg/mL | Standard Deviation 10.3 |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Cemiplimab | Cycle 5 Day 1 | 91.6 mg/mL | — |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Cemiplimab | Cycle 8 Day 1 | 93.0 mg/mL | — |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Cemiplimab | Cycle 9 Day 1 | 122 mg/mL | — |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Cemiplimab | Cycle 10 Day 1 | 122 mg/mL | — |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Cemiplimab | Cycle 7 Day 1 | 100 mg/mL | — |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Cemiplimab | Cycle 6 Day 1 | 73.8 mg/mL | — |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Cemiplimab | Cycle 1 Day 1 | 0 mg/mL | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Cemiplimab | Cycle 5 Day 1 | 73.4 mg/mL | Standard Deviation 26.5 |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Cemiplimab | Cycle 4 Day 15 | 63.5 mg/mL | Standard Deviation 24.8 |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Cemiplimab | Cycle 4 Day 1 | 66.7 mg/mL | Standard Deviation 24.1 |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Cemiplimab | Cycle 3 Day 15 | 72.1 mg/mL | Standard Deviation 12.1 |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Cemiplimab | Cycle 3 Day 1 | 66.7 mg/mL | Standard Deviation 64.7 |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Cemiplimab | Cycle 2 Day 15 | 38.3 mg/mL | Standard Deviation 21.1 |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Cemiplimab | Cycle 2 Day 1 | 33.0 mg/mL | Standard Deviation 10.4 |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Cemiplimab | Cycle 1 Day 15 | 16.5 mg/mL | Standard Deviation 4.83 |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Cemiplimab | Cycle 9 Day 1 | 61.8 mg/mL | — |
PK Parameter: Time of Clast (Tlast) After the First Infusion of Cemiplimab
Tlast was defined as the time of last concentration observed above the lower limit of quantification for cemiplimab.
Time frame: At SOI (0 hour), before actual EOI (up to 30 min), EOI+4 hours, 96 hours, 168 hours, and 336 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1
Population: Analysis was performed on PK population (for Cemiplimab). Here, overall number of participants analyzed signifies the participants with available data for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Time of Clast (Tlast) After the First Infusion of Cemiplimab | 334 hours |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Time of Clast (Tlast) After the First Infusion of Cemiplimab | 333 hours |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Time of Clast (Tlast) After the First Infusion of Cemiplimab | 332 hours |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Time of Clast (Tlast) After the First Infusion of Cemiplimab | 335 hours |
PK Parameter: Time of Clast (Tlast) After the First Infusion of Isatuximab
Tlast was defined as the time of last concentration observed above the lower limit of quantification for isatuximab.
Time frame: At SOI (0 hour), before actual EOI (up to 3 hours), EOI+ 4 hours, 72 hours and 144 hours post-dose on Day 2 of Cycle 1
Population: Analysis was performed on PK population (for isatuximab). Here, overall number of participants analyzed signifies the participants with available data for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Time of Clast (Tlast) After the First Infusion of Isatuximab | 142 hours |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Time of Clast (Tlast) After the First Infusion of Isatuximab | 143 hours |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Time of Clast (Tlast) After the First Infusion of Isatuximab | 143 hours |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Time of Clast (Tlast) After the First Infusion of Isatuximab | 144 hours |
PK Parameter: Time to Reach Cmax (Tmax) After the First Infusion of Cemiplimab
Tmax was defined as the time to reach Cmax after the intravenous infusion of cemiplimab.
Time frame: At SOI (0 hour), before actual EOI (up to 30 min), EOI+4 hours, 96 hours, 168 hours, and 336 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1
Population: Analysis was performed on PK population (for Cemiplimab). Here, overall number of participants analyzed signifies the participants with available data for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Time to Reach Cmax (Tmax) After the First Infusion of Cemiplimab | 4.00 hours |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Time to Reach Cmax (Tmax) After the First Infusion of Cemiplimab | 4.50 hours |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Time to Reach Cmax (Tmax) After the First Infusion of Cemiplimab | 4.05 hours |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Time to Reach Cmax (Tmax) After the First Infusion of Cemiplimab | 2.34 hours |
PK Parameter: Time to Reach Cmax (Tmax) After the First Infusion of Isatuximab
Tmax was defined as the time to reach Cmax, after the intravenous infusion of isatuximab.
Time frame: At SOI (0 hour), before actual EOI (up to 3 hours), EOI+ 4 hours, 72 hours and 144 hours post-dose on Day 2 of Cycle 1
Population: Analysis was performed on PK population (for isatuximab). Here, overall number of participants analyzed signifies the participants with available data for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Time to Reach Cmax (Tmax) After the First Infusion of Isatuximab | 5.95 hours |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Time to Reach Cmax (Tmax) After the First Infusion of Isatuximab | 5.23 hours |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Time to Reach Cmax (Tmax) After the First Infusion of Isatuximab | 5.26 hours |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | PK Parameter: Time to Reach Cmax (Tmax) After the First Infusion of Isatuximab | 4.57 hours |
Progression Free Survival (PFS)
PFS: time (in months) from 1st study treatment administration to date of 1st documented radiographic progression or date of death from any cause, whichever occurs 1st. Per LRC, 2014 PD (per PET-CT): metabolic disease with score 4/5 with increase (inc) in intensity of uptake for individual target nodes/nodal mass & new FDG-avid foci consistent with lymphoma at interim/ end-of-treatment assessment for extra nodal lesions, new FDG-avid foci consistent with lymphoma rather; new/recurrent FDG-avid foci bone marrow. PD (per CT response): any 1 of following: cross product of longest transverse diameter of lesion (LDi) & perpendicular diameter (PPD) progression of nodes/nodal mass, abnormal node/lesion with LDi \>1.5 cm, inc \>=50% from PPD nadir & inc in LDi/ shortest axis perpendicular to LDi from nadir 0.5 cm for lesion \<= 2 cm, regrowth of resolved lesions, new splenomegaly,progression of preexisting non measured lesion, new/recurrent involvement of bone marrow.
Time frame: From the date of randomization until disease progression, or death or study cut-off date, whichever comes first (maximum duration: up to 103 weeks)
Population: Analysis was performed on all treated population. PFS was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort A1: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Progression Free Survival (PFS) | 5.09 months |
| Cohort A2: cHL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Progression Free Survival (PFS) | 6.21 months |
| Cohort B: DLBCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Progression Free Survival (PFS) | 2.37 months |
| Cohort C: PTCL: Isatuximab + Cemiplimab | Progression Free Survival (PFS) | 2.66 months |