Skip to content

Heat Therapy for Fibromyalgia

Heat Therapy for Fibromyalgia: The Effect on Chronic Pain and Possible Mechanisms

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03768947
Enrollment
8
Registered
2018-12-07
Start date
2019-07-19
Completion date
2020-03-10
Last updated
2022-06-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fibromyalgia

Keywords

Chronic Pain

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to see if heat therapy intervention via hot water immersion (i.e., a hot tub) is an effective treatment for patients with Fibromyalgia.

Detailed description

Fibromyalgia (FM) is a complex and difficult-to-treat painful medical condition and is marked by chronic widespread musculoskeletal pain, decreased pain threshold, and comorbid symptomatology (e.g. fatigue, trouble thinking). Several factors appear to play a role in the pathophysiology of FM: abnormal pain processing, abnormal autonomic nervous and neuroendocrine system function, genetics, and environmental triggers. The prognosis for recovery in traditional medicine is generally poor and current pharmacological treatments for FM are often insufficient to control persistent symptoms. As such, complementary medicine and alternative lifestyle approaches are needed. Heat therapy, such as saunas and hot tubs, has been used historically for its presumed therapeutic benefits, and emerging research highlights the benefits of heat therapy on metabolic and cardiovascular disease risks. Finnish saunas, which result in total-body heating, have shown beneficial clinical effects for rheumatic patients and new studies are needed to determine if heat therapy could improve pain symptoms in patients with FM. The short-term goal of the investigators is to determine, in a pilot clinical study, that heat therapy intervention via hot water immersion is a safe and efficacious treatment for pain in patients with FM. The overall hypothesis is that heat therapy intervention will improve clinical pain severity and associated dysfunction in a cohort of FM patients and that the anti-inflammatory actions of heat shock proteins may mediate this improvement. The proposed interdisciplinary study will provide data regarding treatment efficacy and will explore potential molecular and physiologic processes that may underlie improvement in pain symptoms after heat therapy intervention for FM. Furthermore, these key pilot studies will provide important preliminary data for future studies.

Interventions

OTHERHeat therapy via hot water immersion

Participants will be asked to participate in a 4-week heat therapy intervention, which consists of \ 12-15 visits (45 min each) of immersion in to a hot tub.

Sponsors

University of Kansas Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Informed consent provided by the participant * Age 18 to 65 years * Diagnosis of FM according to American College of Rheumatology 2011 self-report criteria64 * Average BPI visual numerical pain score \> 4 * Stable doses of medications for at least 30 days prior to screening * Participant agrees to continue the same medication regimen for the study duration * FM patients with a sedentary lifestyle (exercise can alter heat shock protein levels)

Exclusion criteria

* Inability to provide informed consent * Age greater than 65 years * Previous history of hypotension * Pregnancy * Current clinically significant disease that would prevent safe heat therapy/hot water immersion (heart conditions such as myocardial infarction, angina, uncontrolled hypertension or kidney disease see below) * Reported previous bleeding problems * Anti-platelet medication (Plavix), Warfarin, and other anticoagulants (Eliquis, Pradaxa, and Xarelto) * Recent rectal, anal, vaginal or prostate surgery * Current litigation for fibromyalgia * Current disability proceedings * Active psychotic or suicidal symptoms * Current drug or alcohol abuse * Current regular exercise

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from Baseline Visual Numerical Pain Score (VNS) at 1 monthBaseline and 1 MonthMeasured by the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). The BPI scores are a numerical rating scale and range from 0 to 10. A score of 0 is equal to no pain and a score of 10 is equal to pain as bad as you can imagine.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from Baseline Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) at 1 monthBaseline to 1 MonthPROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) measures to be included are Depression, Anxiety, Physical Functioning, and Sleep Impairment. Each questionnaire usually has 4-16 response options ranging in value from one to five. The total raw score for a short form with all questions answered is the sum of the values of the response to each question. The total range of potential raw scores depends on the number of questions being asked, for example, a 6 item form would have a range from is 6 to 30. After the raw score is calculated, a T-score metric is used to convert the raw score to a T-score. On the T-score metric, a score of 50 is the mean of a relevant reference population and 10 is the standard deviation of that mean. For PROMIS measures, higher scores equals more of the concept being measured, this could be a desirable or undesirable outcome, depending on the concept being measured.
Change from Baseline Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ-R) at 1 monthBaseline and 1 MonthThe Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ-R) is a measure of symptom severity in fibromyalgia. There is a total of 21 questions and a range of scores from 0 to 210. The higher the score the more severe a person's symptoms.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST)-- Pressure pain sensitivity by Multimodal Automated Sensory TestingBaseline and 1 MonthPressure pain sensitivity is measured by the Multimodal Automated Sensory Testing (MAST) System (measured at the thumbnail). It yields a pressure pain threshold value measured in kg/cm2.
Blood Analyses of Change in Baseline Heat Shock Proteins at 1 monthBaseline and 1 MonthHeat shock proteins including Heat Shock Protein 72 (HSP72), Heat Shock Factor 25 (HSP25), and Heat Shock Factor 1 (HSF1) will be measured via Western blots and Elisa assays in serum at baseline (pre-intervention) and post-intervention (within 48 hours of completion of the one month heat therapy intervention). Each of these specific heat shock proteins is measured as a protein to total protein ratio. For example, HSP25 is measured as HSP25/total protein.
Blood Analyses of Change in Pro/Anti-inflammatory Markers at 1 monthBaseline and 1 MonthPro/Anti-Inflammatory markers (IL-1Ra, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-18, IFN-α, TNF-α) will be measured via Western blots and Elisa assays in serum at baseline (pre-intervention) and post-intervention (within 48 hours of completion of the protocol). All markers will be measured as concentrations (nanograms/milliliter (ng/mL))

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026