Fever, Neutropenia
Conditions
Keywords
Pediatrics, Oncology, Outpatient therapy
Brief summary
It is possible to distinguish between pediatric oncology patients who are at high or low risk for serious infection during periods of fever and treatment related neutropenia based on clinical parameters. Patients with low risk can be safely treated as outpatients primarily using oral antibiotics. It is possible to improve methods of risk stratification through the addition of genomic and proteomic factors.
Detailed description
Outpatient management of patients considered to be at low risk for serious bacterial infection has been explored using risk stratification schema based on clinical parameters. First, patients will be stratified based on a clinical risk stratification schema. Patients stratified to the low risk group will be randomized between treatment using standard inpatient intravenous antibiotic therapy or outpatient antibiotic therapy using primarily an oral regimen. Second, an evaluation of proteins important to the innate immune system will be performed to provide a molecular characterization of episodes based on etiology. Third, single nucleotide polymorphisms in genes important for innate immunity will be evaluated to determine effect of each on infection risk during treatment induced neutropenia. Finally, we will develop a bank of both plasma and DNA specimens correlated with clinical outcomes for future use.
Interventions
DRUGLow Risk: Oupatient Management
Intravenous Levaquin initially, then oral dosing. Patient discharged to go home to finish medication cycle after initial 120 minutes observation. Patients will be evaluated daily in the clinic, and his or her temperature must be taken and recorded four times per day. Blood cultures will be drawn at clinic visits.
DRUGLow Risk: Inpatient Management
Broad spectrum intravenous antibiotics. Daily blood work will be drawn, and patients will be monitored for fever and neutropenia in hospital.
DRUGHigh Risk: Inpatient Management
Broad spectrum intravenous antibiotics. Daily blood work will be drawn, and patients will be monitored for fever and neutropenia in hospital.
Sponsors
University of Colorado, Denver
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Masking description
Because inpatient management and outpatient management use different treatment methods, blinding is not possible.
Intervention model description
Patients will be stratified as high risk, where they will receive inpatient management, or low risk, where they will then be randomize to receive inpatient or outpatient management.
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
0 Years to 21 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
1\. Any pediatric patient age \<21 years with an oncology diagnosis who is undergoing therapy and is expected to have treatment related neutropenia.
Exclusion criteria
1. Any patient who has previously undergone autologous or allogeneic bone marrow transplant will be excluded from study enrollment. If a patient is expected to undergo autologous or allogeneic bone marrow transplant as part of therapy at some point after enrollment in the study he/she will be removed from the study at the start of their bone marrow transplant. 2. Any patient with a documented allergy to Levofloxacin or any other fluoroquinolone will be excluded. 3. Patients with a known pregnancy will be excluded. 4. Any patient with an underlying chronic musculoskeletal condition (ie Juvenile rheumatoid arthritis, Systemic lupus erythematosis etc) which may make evaluation for joint toxicity related to quinolone treatment difficult.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Low Risk Treatment | Start of study to end of study, up to two years | The response to initial antibiotic management without modification with regards to resolution of the episode of fever and neutropenia, measured through blood cultures |
| Protein Evaluation | Start of study to end of study, up to two years | Comparison of the level of each protein at the initiation of each episode versus resolution to determine if there is a pattern of proteins that correlates with an infectious outcome, measured using ELISA techniques |
| Genomics Evaluation | Start of study to end of study, up to two years | A comparison of proven infections between patients with the wild-type and variant forms of each gene studied, taken through DNA specimens |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Benefit Analysis | Start of study to end of study, up to two years | A cost-benefit analysis between the arms, duration of fever per episode between the arms, and number of admissions or deaths. Medical cost will be obtained through billing records and indirect costs will be estimated through information obtained from the family. |
| Protein Evaluation | Start of study to end of study, up to two years | Determine trends of protein markers on days 3 and 5 of evaluation, using ELISA techniques. |
| Genomics Evaluation | Start of study to end of study, up to two years | A comparison of the number of episodes of fever and neutropenia per patient and the duration of fever per episode between the wild type and variant forms of each gene, taken through DNA specimens. |
Countries
United States
Outcome results
None listed