Skip to content

Nudging for Vaccination : Efficacity and Acceptability Among Medical Students

Nudging for Vaccination : Efficacity and Acceptability Among Medical Students

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03768596
Enrollment
200
Registered
2018-12-07
Start date
2018-11-07
Completion date
2018-12-20
Last updated
2019-01-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Influenza, Human, Vaccination; Sepsis

Keywords

Nudge, acceptability

Brief summary

Nudge is a set of methods aimed at helping people adopt a behavior by a gentle prompt, conscious or not. Classically, Nudges rely on heuristics and cognitive biases. These methods have been studied for years in social psychology and are receiving renewed attention since the awarding of the Nobel Prize in economics to Richard Thaler for his work on the application of Nudge to the economy. Health professionals are very inadequately vaccinated (25 to 45% of the population). Some studies have shown that a Nudge based on intent implementation can significantly increase vaccination coverage. However, few studies evaluate the acceptability of Nudge or its application to health professionals. The investigators sought to apply a Nudge based on availability heuristics to health professionals, in order to evaluate its effectiveness and terms of behavior adoption (influenza vaccination) and its acceptability. The investigator's hypothesis is that Nudging is both effective and acceptable and that people found nudging more acceptable if they have been exposed to a nudge.

Detailed description

The investigators asked residents in general medicine to pass a questionnaire including a Nudge. This Nudge was the influenza vaccine prescription form accompanied on the back of the telephone numbers of the occupational health centers of the hospitals where residents were on probation. The interns of the group Nudge saw at the end of their questionnaire the following statement: If you are not vaccinated against the flu so far, you can get the form stapled to this questionnaire, it will allow you to get the vaccine in pharmacy. On the back you will also find practical information about immunization services at your place of training. A group will receive an implemented Nudge questionnaire, a group will receive a questionnaire without Nudge and a control group will not be asked. (Phase 1) The 3 groups will receive a month later a questionnaire evaluating the effectiveness in terms of immunization coverage, and the acceptability of the Nudge, for oneself and for others. (Phase 2) The control group will only receive the Phase 2 questionnaire to control the Hawthorne effect. The difference between the 3 groups will consist exclusively in the exposure of the participants to: * A questionnaire on their attitude (opinion) towards vaccination; * The numbers of the occupational health vaccination centers of their places of training; * The flu vaccine prescription form, to be signed and stamped by a doctor (also already freely available on the internet)

Interventions

BEHAVIORALNudge

Influenza Vaccine Prescription Form accompanied on the back of telephone numbers of occupational health centers of different hospitals where interns are likely to be on probation.

OTHERvaccination form

a form about vaccination

Sponsors

Université de Nice Sophia Antipolis
CollaboratorOTHER
Adriaan Barbaroux
Lead SponsorINDIV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Masking description

In the first pat of the study, participants are unaware of the fact we are trying to nudge them. In the second part, they are explained and asked what they feel about nudging

Intervention model description

one group receives a form with the nudge, one group receives the same form without nudge and another group doesn't receive any form

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* medical students

Exclusion criteria

* none

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Efficiency: vaccination rate1 monthvaccination rate

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
acceptability: scaleOne monthlikert based acceptability form

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 16, 2026